[solved] no JDK found

I found the root cause of my problems. It sat in front of the keyboard! LODE was not set up correctly. The documentation was not read carefully An autogen option (jdk-home) was wrong. The path had an  "/" at the end sh*t happens

Re: no JDK found

On 14.1.2024 12.16, jh276 wrote: Am 14.01.24 um 10:28 schrieb drei97: Why then no autogen.input is created, I don't know Am 14.01.24 um 08:20 schrieb Ilmari Lauhakangas: On 13.1.2024 19.24, y27p6e3vu...@web.de wrote: If you had used the LODE method, an autogen.input file would have been

Re: no JDK found

autogen.sh is now running even with none existing autogen.input. Am 14.01.24 um 10:28 schrieb drei97: I had used LODE. the important part is:  "The Easiest way to perform the following is to use LODE, which automates all that is necessary, beyond installing Visual Studio and Java"  ;-)

Re: no JDK found

I had used LODE. the important part is:  "The Easiest way to perform the following is to use LODE, which automates all that is necessary, beyond installing Visual Studio and Java"  ;-) Why then no autogen.input is created, I don't know Am 14.01.24 um 08:20 schrieb Ilmari Lauhakangas: On

Re: no JDK found

It is really hard to get all which is necessary and quite easy to miss important information. The information about the VS option is some line behind the step to run autogen.sh. I got stuck with JDK and did not proceed in reading the docs further. Thanks for pointing out. Am 14.01.24 um

Re: no JDK found

On 13.1.2024 19.24, y27p6e3vu...@web.de wrote: Hi, I am trying to compile LO for the first time on windows and do follow the official guide https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/BuildingOnWindows Nevertheless I am runnning into several issues while configuring the build. Running

Re: no JDK found

On 1/13/2024 11:24 PM, y27p6e3vu...@web.de wrote: it is not finding C++ build tools (Win 10 SDK), even if Visual Studio is available. I have to use the option "--with-visual-studio=2022" Yes, it is expected and normal. We keep the baseline at VS 2019 level [1] (IIUC, this is what the official

no JDK found

Hi,   I am trying to compile LO for the first time on windows and do follow the official guide   https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/BuildingOnWindows   Nevertheless I am runnning into several issues while configuring the build.   Running autogen.sh gives errors,   it is not

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 101956] FILEOPEN: No JRE or JDK found in macOS 10.9 and lower, 10.10 and up need full JDK

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101956 Alex Thurgood changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 101956] FILEOPEN: No JRE or JDK found in macOS 10.9 and lower, 10.10 and up need full JDK

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101956 Serge changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|NEW Resolution|WORKSFORME

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 101956] FILEOPEN: No JRE or JDK found in macOS 10.9 and lower, 10.10 and up need full JDK

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101956 Alex Thurgood changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 101956] FILEOPEN: No JRE or JDK found in macOS 10.9 and lower, 10.10 and up need full JDK

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101956 --- Comment #45 from Madison Wilson --- Awesome! Such a great help. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 101956] FILEOPEN: No JRE or JDK found in macOS 10.9 and lower, 10.10 and up need full JDK

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101956 Stephan Bergmann changed: What|Removed |Added Hardware|Other |x86-64 (AMD64)

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 101956] FILEOPEN: No JRE or JDK found in macOS 10.9 and lower, 10.10 and up need full JDK

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101956 Jos changed: What|Removed |Added OS|Mac OS X (All) |Windows (All) Severity|critical

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 101956] FILEOPEN: No JRE or JDK found in macOS 10.9 and lower, 10.10 and up need full JDK

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101956 --- Comment #42 from Joana --- I confirm this on OS X Ver. 10.11.6. Joana -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 101956] FILEOPEN: No JRE or JDK found in macOS 10.9 and lower, 10.10 and up need full JDK

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101956 --- Comment #41 from Kobayashi Senta --- was this fixed? Java runtime sometimes buggy in mac. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 101956] FILEOPEN: No JRE or JDK found in macOS 10.9 and lower, 10.10 and up need full JDK

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101956 --- Comment #40 from eisa01 --- Yes, it seems like the original issue was either fixed by Oracle or is moot now that 10.10 is required. Comment #11 says it was actually WFM at that point The issue in comment #31 seems to be a new issue

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 101956] FILEOPEN: No JRE or JDK found in macOS 10.9 and lower, 10.10 and up need full JDK

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101956 --- Comment #39 from xander ford --- The following are the system requirements for installing the JDK and the JRE on macOS: Any Intel-based computer running macOS. Administrator privileges. You cannot install Java for a single user.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 101956] FILEOPEN: No JRE or JDK found in macOS 10.9 and lower, 10.10 and up need full JDK

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101956 steve -_- changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|FILEOPEN: No JRE or JDK |FILEOPEN: No JRE or JDK

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 101956] FILEOPEN: No JRE or JDK found in OSX 10.9 and lower, 10.10 and up need full JDK

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101956 --- Comment #38 from steve -_- --- This is one confusing bug. Can someone with deeper understanding update the title? Title sounds like the issue is limited to 10.9. Is that the case? Comment 43 mentions this being a problem on macOS

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 101956] FILEOPEN: No JRE or JDK found in OSX 10.9 and lower, 10.10 and up need full JDK

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101956 Michael Meeks changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vmik...@collabora.com ---

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 101956] FILEOPEN: No JRE or JDK found in OSX 10.9 and lower, 10.10 and up need full JDK

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101956 --- Comment #36 from Julien Nabet --- Any update here? Are we stuck? Should it be discussed on ESC? Indeed, with notarization related bugs, it's the only bug which is high/critical for MacOS. -- You are receiving this mail because: You

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 101956] FILEOPEN: No JRE or JDK found in OSX 10.9 and lower, 10.10 and up need full JDK

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101956 --- Comment #35 from jhonmaccu...@gmail.com --- There are way too many bugs on this page too, but you can just not find it. https://www.office-help-setup.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 101956] FILEOPEN: No JRE or JDK found in OSX 10.9 and lower, 10.10 and up need full JDK

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101956 Alex Thurgood changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 101956] FILEOPEN: No JRE or JDK found in OSX 10.9 and lower, 10.10 and up need full JDK

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101956 Xisco Faulí changed: What|Removed |Added CC||xiscofa...@libreoffice.org

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 101956] FILEOPEN: No JRE or JDK found in OSX 10.9 and lower, 10.10 and up need full JDK

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101956 --- Comment #33 from Alex Jacob --- Play PUBG Online online and discover the true meaning of battleground! Download PUBG Online on PC and Mac for free. Same PUBG gameplay on a larger screen. http://pubgfree.io/ -- You are receiving

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 101956] FILEOPEN: No JRE or JDK found in OSX 10.9 and lower, 10.10 and up need full JDK

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101956 --- Comment #32 from Alex Thurgood --- Note that this is not mysql dependent, that was just used as an example. I get the same issue when trying to load tables from an embedded hsqldb, or when starting the database wizards that rely on

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 101956] FILEOPEN: No JRE or JDK found in OSX 10.9 and lower, 10.10 and up need full JDK

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101956 --- Comment #31 from Alex Thurgood --- In current production release versions (6152 and 6203), the annoying problem of Java detection (or lack thereof) has come back, albeit in a slightly different form, with OpenJDK11. Currently using

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 101956] FILEOPEN: No JRE or JDK found in OSX 10.9 and lower, 10.10 and up need full JDK

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101956 --- Comment #30 from Gerry Webbs --- if you ever need a good syllable counter, then just check this tool https://howmanysyllables.github.io/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 101956] FILEOPEN: No JRE or JDK found in OSX 10.9 and lower, 10.10 and up need full JDK

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101956 --- Comment #29 from Alex Thurgood --- (In reply to Tor Lillqvist from comment #28) > back-ends should work, though, I assume. (But no idea if it works with the > SQLite thing that comes with macOS.) Yes and No : there is currently no

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 101956] FILEOPEN: No JRE or JDK found in OSX 10.9 and lower, 10.10 and up need full JDK

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101956 --- Comment #28 from Tor Lillqvist --- David, that is correct yes, as far as I see. (I am not really a Base expert, or even user.) Connecting to an external database using one of the included back-ends should work, though, I

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 101956] FILEOPEN: No JRE or JDK found in OSX 10.9 and lower, 10.10 and up need full JDK

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101956 --- Comment #27 from David --- Thanks, @Michael, @Tor -- am I right in thinking that Base is effectively non-functional in LibO Vanilla, then? Or at least not functional "out of the box"? I'll methodically attempt to

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 101956] FILEOPEN: No JRE or JDK found in OSX 10.9 and lower, 10.10 and up need full JDK

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101956 --- Comment #26 from Tor Lillqvist --- Note that we don't currently include the Firebird database back-end in LibreOffice Vanilla, though. This is because of a problem in the Firebird source code that makes it crash when

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 101956] FILEOPEN: No JRE or JDK found in OSX 10.9 and lower, 10.10 and up need full JDK

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101956 --- Comment #24 from Michael Meeks --- Hi David - the long term plan for de-java-isation of Base pivots around the new Firebird backend and migration of legacy HSQLDB databases there; if base doesn't work on

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 101956] FILEOPEN: No JRE or JDK found in OSX 10.9 and lower, 10.10 and up need full JDK

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101956 --- Comment #24 from Michael Meeks --- Hi David - the long term plan for de-java-isation of Base pivots around the new Firebird backend and migration of legacy HSQLDB databases there; if base doesn't work on

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 101956] FILEOPEN: No JRE or JDK found in OSX 10.9 and lower, 10.10 and up need full JDK

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101956 --- Comment #23 from David --- I mean "LibreOffice Vanilla" -- thanks for reply! That clarifies a lot. And means I need to pursue a different line ... like how to persuade Base in LibO Vanilla to work, or whether I

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 101956] FILEOPEN: No JRE or JDK found in OSX 10.9 and lower, 10.10 and up need full JDK

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101956 --- Comment #22 from Tor Lillqvist --- David, when you say "Collabora release", what do you you mean exactly? Do you mean "LibreOffice Vanilla" or "Collabora Office" from the Mac App Store? Those products are built without

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 101956] FILEOPEN: No JRE or JDK found in OSX 10.9 and lower, 10.10 and up need full JDK

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101956 --- Comment #21 from David --- I don't know if this should be registered as a new bug, but given the number of duplicates here, I'll report my experience and if it needs its own space, so be it. I'm using Version:

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 101956] FILEOPEN: No JRE or JDK found in OSX 10.9 and lower, 10.10 and up need full JDK

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101956 --- Comment #20 from David --- Created attachment 141582 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=141582=edit Options screenshot -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 101956] FILEOPEN: No JRE or JDK found in OSX 10.9 and lower, 10.10 and up need full JDK

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101956 --- Comment #19 from Alex Thurgood --- *** Bug 112551 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 101956] FILEOPEN: No JRE or JDK found in OSX 10.9 and lower, 10.10 and up need full JDK

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101956 Aron Budea changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 101956] FILEOPEN: No JRE or JDK found in OSX 10.9 and lower, 10.10 and up need full JDK

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101956 V Stuart Foote changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 101956] FILEOPEN: No JRE or JDK found in OSX 10.9 and lower, 10.10 and up need full JDK

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101956 Alex Thurgood changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 101956] FILEOPEN: No JRE or JDK found in OSX 10.9 and lower, 10.10 and up need full JDK

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101956 --- Comment #15 from V Stuart Foote --- Changed the title because with bug 94716 closed, folks on 10.10-10.12 with issues of needing the JDK were being duped here. Though, I'm still not convinced that issue of

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 101956] FILEOPEN: No JRE or JDK found in OSX 10.9 and lower, 10.10 and up need full JDK

"FILEOPEN: No JRE or JDK found in OSX 10.9 and lower" to "FILEOPEN: No JRE or JDK found in OSX 10.9 and lower, 10.10 and up need full JDK" for no apparent reason. Lets keep this bug focused on the claim that LO no longer detected JDKs on old OS X after <https://cgit.freedesktop

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 101956] FILEOPEN: No JRE or JDK found in OSX 10.9 and lower, 10.10 and up need full JDK

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101956 --- Comment #13 from Stephan Bergmann --- (In reply to Alex Thurgood from comment #11) > (In reply to Stephan Bergmann from comment #10) > In bug 94716, comments 14 and 20 confirmed this. bug 94716 comment 14 indeed

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 101956] FILEOPEN: No JRE or JDK found in OSX 10.9 and lower, 10.10 and up need full JDK

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101956 --- Comment #12 from Alex Thurgood --- (In reply to Alex Thurgood from comment #11) > (In reply to Stephan Bergmann from comment #10) > > > > From comment 26, a second confirmation that the JDK is detected on

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 101956] FILEOPEN: No JRE or JDK found in OSX 10.9 and lower, 10.10 and up need full JDK

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101956 --- Comment #11 from Alex Thurgood --- (In reply to Stephan Bergmann from comment #10) Hi Stephan, > I'm not sure whether that answers my question. I do understand that, since > some version of LO (5.1, as you

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 101956] FILEOPEN: No JRE or JDK found in OSX 10.9 and lower, 10.10 and up need full JDK

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101956 --- Comment #9 from V Stuart Foote --- (In reply to Stephan Bergmann from comment #8) > I'm a bit confused by the history of this bug and bug 94716 it got cloned > from. > > Can anybody actually confirm that on

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 101956] FILEOPEN: No JRE or JDK found in OSX 10.9 and lower, 10.10 and up need full JDK

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101956 --- Comment #8 from Stephan Bergmann --- (In reply to Alex Thurgood from comment #0) > Bug 94716 has been fixed. However, the fix for that bug caused LibreOffice > to no longer be able to detect either a JRE (Apples

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 101956] FILEOPEN: No JRE or JDK found in OSX 10.9 and lower, 10.10 and up need full JDK

or JDK |FILEOPEN: No JRE or JDK |found in OSX 10.9 and lower |found in OSX 10.9 and ||lower, 10.10 and up need ||full JDK -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for t

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 101956] FILEOPEN: No JRE or JDK found in OSX 10.9 and lower

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101956 Alex Thurgood changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 101956] FILEOPEN: No JRE or JDK found in OSX 10.9 and lower

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101956 Yousuf Philips (jay) changed: What|Removed |Added See Also|

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 101956] FILEOPEN: No JRE or JDK found in OSX 10.9 and lower

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101956 Yousuf Philips (jay) changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on|94716 |

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 101956] FILEOPEN: No JRE or JDK found in OSX 10.9 and lower

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101956 Yousuf Philips (jay) changed: What|Removed |Added See Also|

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 101956] FILEOPEN: No JRE or JDK found in OSX 10.9 and lower

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101956 --- Comment #6 from John Toliver --- (In reply to Alex Thurgood from comment #5) > (In reply to John Toliver from comment #4) > > @John : installing a complete JDK works around the problem for current > versions

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 101956] FILEOPEN: No JRE or JDK found in OSX 10.9 and lower

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101956 --- Comment #5 from Alex Thurgood --- (In reply to John Toliver from comment #4) @John : installing a complete JDK works around the problem for current versions of LibreOffice on OSX 10.10, 10.11 and 10.12. I

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 101956] FILEOPEN: No JRE or JDK found in OSX 10.9 and lower

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101956 --- Comment #4 from John Toliver --- (In reply to V Stuart Foote from comment #2) > LibreOffice builds through 5.0.6.3 will run with JRE 1.8 < 99 and an Apple > Java for OS X (2015-001) JRE 1.6 > > post bug 94716

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 101956] FILEOPEN: No JRE or JDK found in OSX 10.9 and lower

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101956 V Stuart Foote changed: What|Removed |Added See Also|

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 101956] FILEOPEN: No JRE or JDK found in OSX 10.9 and lower

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101956 --- Comment #2 from V Stuart Foote --- LibreOffice builds through 5.0.6.3 will run with JRE 1.8 < 99 and an Apple Java for OS X (2015-001) JRE 1.6 post bug 94716 NeoOffice provided patch to work with JDK 1.8 will

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 101956] FILEOPEN: No JRE or JDK found in OSX 10.9 and lower

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101956 --- Comment #1 from John Toliver --- Question for inital poster: While this bug is being triaged and investigated, is it known what the last know working version of Libreoffice that does see the JRE? I confirm

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 101956] FILEOPEN: No JRE or JDK found in OSX 10.9 and lower

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101956 Alex Thurgood changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 101956] New: FILEOPEN: No JRE or JDK found in OSX 10.9 and lower

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101956 Bug ID: 101956 Summary: FILEOPEN: No JRE or JDK found in OSX 10.9 and lower Product: LibreOffice Version: unspecified Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64) URL: http://bugs.java.com