On Thursday 18 of August 2011, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
Hi Lubos,
On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 12:09:19 +0200
Lubos Lunak l.lu...@suse.cz wrote:
No, starmath doesn't need to call back to writer. The problem is
that this is still needlessly complicated. How about the attached
patch?
While it
On Thursday 18 of August 2011, Lubos Lunak wrote:
Is that true in practice? Sw and writerfilter have a hard depedency on
Correction: Writerfilter does not. It doesn't change anything though.
filter already. I only added few more dependencies to starmath that sw
already has as a dependency
Hello Olivier,
the header/footer information are stored in a ScPageHFItem, which is a
SfxPoolItem.
Then for printing the following function might be interesting:
http://opengrok.libreoffice.org/xref/core/sc/source/ui/view/printfun.cxx#1757and
the whole class ScPrintFunc. I think setting a
Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
So without much ado the simplified layout that I myself find sane
(and hopefully you will like it too):
d.tdf.o - domain
|
\ - PACKAGENAME (if the hosted packages are more than libreoffice)
|
\ - latest (symlink to latest version folder)
On Thursday 18 of August 2011, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
Lubos Lunak wrote:
However, I can't help noticing that the template layout is ... er, not
suitable for easy use:
How about attached patch? Does that address your points?
It does, but does it really need to be so chatty to repeat the
Marc-André Laverdière wrote:
Is there any way we could have our own api website too? And possibly
improve the documentation?
Could we do that under a nice license like CC-non commercial?
Well, only if we write the content under that license. :)
(FWIW, the OOo DevGuide is PDL-licensed, the
Hi,
I think Kohei has covered most of the questions below but..
On 17/08/11 19:49, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
Hi,
[...]
So I don't know when to close a bug. When it is fixed in master?
yes, and normally the committer does that, is it a rule? I don't know,
it's just what I and at least I know
On Thu, 2011-08-18 at 01:57 -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
Guards are used and badly abused in the code, especially with the
infamous SolarMutex...
anything that would make that code slower or fatter than it already is
(with virtual functions and all), especially for corner-case
On Wed, 2011-08-17 at 23:08 +0200, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
Hi Dmitry - yes, the two different methods are surely confusing. As
for the wrong value, that very much depends on the mental model of
rectangles you're using. In a discrete geometry world (aka pixel),
the GetWidth() is correct. In a
Noel Power wrote (18-08-11 11:16)
For example, bug #40079; it is fixed in master, so I closed it. But
now it shows up as not blocking LibreOffice 3.4 most annoying bugs
anymore (it is striked out),
when we want a bug to be fixed in the 3.4 release then we need to get
the patch into the
Hi Cor,
On Wed, 2011-08-17 at 22:49 +0200, Cor Nouws wrote:
Shouldn't it be backported in this case? ...
That is a separate decision. And if the choice is no, there still is the
problem: bug fixed in master, and is tricked out in most annoying for
3.4.x ..
Ah - but if it is not
On 18/08/11 10:39, Cor Nouws wrote:
Noel Power wrote (18-08-11 11:16)
For example, bug #40079; it is fixed in master, so I closed it. But
now it shows up as not blocking LibreOffice 3.4 most annoying bugs
anymore (it is striked out),
when we want a bug to be fixed in the 3.4 release then we
Michael Meeks wrote (18-08-11 11:49)
On Wed, 2011-08-17 at 22:49 +0200, Cor Nouws wrote:
Shouldn't it be backported in this case? ...
That is a separate decision. And if the choice is no, there still is the
problem: bug fixed in master, and is tricked out in most annoying for
3.4.x ..
Jan Holesovsky wrote:
I have just pushed the ccache for MSVC to dev-tools:
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/contrib/dev-tools/tree/ccache-msvc
Neat! For consistency, copied the ccache.exe binary over to
http://dev-www.libreoffice.org/extern/ccache.exe
where we seem to collect
Hi Lionel, all,
On Wed, 17 Aug 2011 20:49:43 +0200
Lionel Elie Mamane lio...@mamane.lu
wrote:
Hi,
I don't see any way in bugzilla to say things like:
bug present / not present in master / libreoffice-3.4, ...
bug fixed / not fixed in master / libreoffice-3.4, ...
There is only *one*
On Thursday 18 of August 2011, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
Hi all,
On Thu, 18 Aug 2011 10:21:54 +0200
Lubos Lunak l.lu...@suse.cz wrote:
It does, but does it really need to be so chatty to repeat the
obvious facts that each contributor's copyright relates only to
portions created by that
Noel Power wrote (18-08-11 11:54)
Well I wasn't really trying to answer that question but more give the
developer-centric detail about getting a patch into the dev/release
branches. But... it f the bug has been fixed, it is fixed right, it has
to be marked as such, and in this case approval is
On Wed, 2011-08-10 at 09:59 -0600, Tom Tromey wrote:
I tried building LibreOffice with svn trunk gcc
It dies in soltools with:
..
The appended patch fixes this problem by adding 'this-' qualifiers.
Thanks ! - pushed this (I hope it was still relevant).
All the best,
On Thu, 18 Aug 2011 11:39:01 +0200
Cor Nouws oo...@nouenoff.nl wrote:
This explanation still does not cover the case where a bug ís fixed
in master, but not in the release A branch, where it is listed as
annoying. Having is stricken out, cause of the fix in master,
erroneously gives the
Hi Lubos,
On Thu, 2011-08-18 at 12:02 +0200, Lubos Lunak wrote:
And do we have somebody like that? Who can decide if it is ok to change the
template to this version?
Yes - and yes it's fine.
Just an idea: IIRC we have a git hook
that warns about commiting files with merge
On Thu, 2011-08-18 at 12:09 +0200, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
The solution to that is simple: Before adding a bug to the most
annoying for 3.4 bug is has to have a 3.4 target. If it has not, I
should not be added there.
This thread starts to look like noise. Is there a concrete instance
Bjoern Michaelsen wrote (18-08-11 12:09)
On Thu, 18 Aug 2011 11:39:01 +0200
Cor Nouwsoo...@nouenoff.nl wrote:
This explanation still does not cover the case where a bug ís fixed
in master, but not in the release A branch, where it is listed as
annoying. Having is stricken out, cause of the
Hi Terence,
On Tue, 2011-08-16 at 11:50 -0400, Terrence Enger wrote:
Resolution: I hereby resolve that I shall ask about my next
rebuild problem *before* I confuse things beyond
description.
Heh - unfortunately, incremental building can be fraught with problems
- mostly around
Hi Cor,
On Wed, 2011-08-10 at 15:44 +0200, Cor Nouws wrote:
A. If I find an issue, is it OK if I mail this list or just ping on IRC?
Just to prevent adding bugs that are already noticed (not in bugzilla)
and maybe even fixed in master after I udated?
Personally, I think regression
Hi
I am Investigating this and 3 issues jumps immediately
1) size of the VM (if using VirtualBox) for download: a few to dozens of
Gigabytes
2) Windows License: EULA, Compilers and SDKs
3) your favorite flavour of Linux
Sad, because 2) is quite hard to setup and most desired.
Olivier
Em
html
head
meta http-equiv=Content-Language content=en-us
meta http-equiv=Content-Type content=text/html; charset=windows-1252
titleNew Page 1/title
style
!--
p.MsoNormal
{mso-style-parent:;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;
Perhaps it would be a good idea to add some comments to that code so that
analysis is preserving for future generations
of code archeologists :-)
Seriously, I often do this because it saves me time later when I look at some
code and think why is it doing _that__???
Michael Meeks wrote:
On
Hi Lionel
On 17/08/11 19:02, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 09:48:04AM +0100, Noel Power wrote:
On 16/08/11 17:32, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
I did now. Reproduced there, but someone (you?) pushed my patch so
*now* one cannot reproduce it anymore. I also took the liberty of
Hi Radek,
What was our EMF+ story in the end ? did this stay disabled or did it
get resurrected for Win32 and elsewhere ? :-)
Thanks,
Michael.
Forwarded Message
From: Jesús Corrius je...@softcatala.org
To: michael.me...@novell.com
Cc: Tor
Michael Meeks wrote:
On Thu, 2011-08-18 at 12:02 +0200, Lubos Lunak wrote:
And do we have somebody like that? Who can decide if it is ok to change
the
template to this version?
Yes - and yes it's fine.
Good then, tweaked Lubos' proposal with the conflict markers
pushed.
On Thu, 2011-08-18 at 13:04 +0100, Michael Meeks wrote:
Hi Radek,
What was our EMF+ story in the end ? did this stay disabled or did it
get resurrected for Win32 and elsewhere ? :-)
It is still disabled on win32, should work on unx AFAIK.
Cheers
Radek
Thanks,
On 17/08/11 19:02, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
Which leads me to another bug: If I remove the librarie's only dialog
and save, I restart LO, I reopen the file again, the dialog is
back.
probably worth opening another bug for that then, anyway, lets look
at one thing at a time ( otherwise I will
Hi Caolán,
On Thu, 18 Aug 2011 09:27:21 +0100, Caolán McNamara caol...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, 2011-07-14 at 00:41 +0200, Xisco Faulí wrote:
Hello,
I took a look to the problem related to the Adress Data Souce Wizard
( it's not loaded on master ) and it's not caused by the changes i've
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 03:35:25PM -0400, Terrence Enger
ten...@iseries-guru.com wrote:
On Wed, 2011-08-17 at 19:38 +0200, Matúš Kukan wrote:
[snip]
So, can I just rename ItemHolder2 in svtools to ItemHolder3 ?
I have a vague memory from the times of OpenOffice.org of a
numeric suffix
2011/8/18 Eike Rathke o...@erack.de:
Hi Matúš,
On Monday, 2011-08-15 13:50:44 +0200, Matúš Kukan wrote:
I'm trying to build bigger libraries
What would be the benefit of that in this specific case?
I don't want to merge these two but also others always loaded
libraries in application
and
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 12:27:14PM +0200, Gioele Barabucci gio...@svario.it
wrote:
I was wondering why the git tags are named `3.3.4.2` for 3.3.4-rc2
instead of the more natural `3.3.4-rc2` or the more common `v3.3.4-rc2`.
I am used to see 3.3.4.2 as the second bugfix release for 3.3.4, or,
Hi,
Previous week starts here:
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~vmiklos/lo-gsoc/tree/README#n1283
In short, it was about:
- added paragraph vertical alignment support to dmapper (improves rtf
and docx import)
- implemented support for the PAGEREF field in dmapper
- implemented footnote/endnote
On 08/18/2011 01:19 AM, Markus Mohrhard wrote:
I think we have someting in this direction already in calc. You should
have a closer look at ScPrintFunc, especially at ScPrintfunc::PrintPage.
Thank you, Markus. I will try to poke into ScPrintFunc :D
Best Regards,
Ta Tung
* Present:
+ Norbert, David, Rainer, Bjoern, Kendy, Kohei,
Caolan, Petr, Cedric, Lubos, Michael, Mitch
+ Completed Action Items:
+ get SmartArt interop. feature into master (Thorsten)
+ easy hacks - completion / fixing (Bjoern)
+ looks pretty: eg.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673
Bug 35673 depends on bug 34184, which changed state.
Bug 34184 Summary: [Task]: Make E-mail MAILMERGE usable
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34184
What|Old Value |New Value
Hi,
make ran without problems (after one stop in tail_build)
make dev-install gives error
...
-env:arg-env=LD_LIBRARY_PATH${LD_LIBRARY_PATH+=$LD_LIBRARY_PATH}
-env:arg-testarg.smoketest.doc=/home/cono/src/git/libo_core/solver/350/unxlngi6.pro/bin/smoketestdoc.sxw
--protector \
Cor Nouws wrote (18-08-11 18:06)
ERROR: error 65280 occurred while making
/home/cono/src/git/libo_core/smoketestoo_native
etc etc )
hint?
Hmm, earlier in the output it reads
***
Successful packaging process!
On 18 August 2011 19:25, Cor Nouws oo...@nouenoff.nl wrote:
Cor Nouws wrote (18-08-11 18:06)
ERROR: error 65280 occurred while making
/home/cono/src/git/libo_core/smoketestoo_native
etc etc )
hint?
Hmm, earlier in the output it reads
Matúš Kukan wrote (18-08-11 19:29)
ou, this is my fault, I will look at it.
Thanks for looking at it.
Thanks for letting know.
Look forward to your solution :-)
--
- Cor
- http://nl.libreoffice.org
___
LibreOffice mailing list
On 18/08/2011 16:15, Miklos Vajna wrote:
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 12:27:14PM +0200, Gioele Barabuccigio...@svario.it
wrote:
I was wondering why the git tags are named `3.3.4.2` for 3.3.4-rc2
instead of the more natural `3.3.4-rc2` or the more common `v3.3.4-rc2`.
I am used to see 3.3.4.2 as
On Thu, 2011-08-18 at 11:22 +0100, Michael Meeks wrote:
Hi Terence,
On Tue, 2011-08-16 at 11:50 -0400, Terrence Enger wrote:
Resolution: I hereby resolve that I shall ask about my next
rebuild problem *before* I confuse things beyond
description.
Heh - unfortunately, incremental
Hi Micheal,
could you have a look at:
http://opengrok.libreoffice.org/xref/core/unotools/source/i18n/calendarwrapper.cxx#59
?
Is it possible that the else part is ever executed ?
Because there is getComponentInstance which calls
loadSharedLibComponentFactory and does not pass prefix information.
On Thu, 2011-08-18 at 12:00 +0200, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
Jan Holesovsky wrote:
I have just pushed the ccache for MSVC to dev-tools:
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/contrib/dev-tools/tree/ccache-msvc
Neat! For consistency, copied the ccache.exe binary over to
Hi Terrence,
On Thu, 2011-08-18 at 14:27 -0400, Terrence Enger wrote:
I just wish I could stop thinking about ways to
attack the problem. ... I thought of another way
even as I was writing the previous sentence.
:-)
One SEGV has happened only with an earlier build. I do have
a
On Thu, 2011-08-18 at 19:37 +0200, Gioele Barabucci wrote:
On 18/08/2011 16:15, Miklos Vajna wrote:
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 12:27:14PM +0200, Gioele
Barabuccigio...@svario.it wrote:
Is this behaviour a leftover of the SVN workflow? Could it be changed?
Why is it worth changing ?
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 2:40 PM, Michael Meeks michael.me...@novell.com wrote:
On Thu, 2011-08-18 at 19:37 +0200, Gioele Barabucci wrote:
On 18/08/2011 16:15, Miklos Vajna wrote:
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 12:27:14PM +0200, Gioele
Barabuccigio...@svario.it wrote:
Is this behaviour a
Hi
I am trying to build under windows 7 64Bits. I have installed Microsoft
Windows SDK, but autogen is not able to find it no matter the trials I made.
So can someone tell me what is the exact path to pass to
--with-windows-sdk-home?
The SDK is in 2 places:
C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft SDKs
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 10:34 PM, Olivier Hallot
olivier.hal...@documentfoundation.org wrote:
Hi
I am trying to build under windows 7 64Bits. I have installed Microsoft
Windows SDK, but autogen is not able to find it no matter the trials I made.
So can someone tell me what is the exact path
Hi Terry,
On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 11:50:20 -0400
Terrence Enger ten...@iseries-guru.com wrote:
I do have another something goes wrong that I have not
mentioned here because I cannot say exactly how to make it
go wrong. Is there a way that I can make LibreOffice log
my actions--keystrokes, mouse
Kohei Yoshida wrote:
Hmm... Is this binary right? I can actually read the content of this
exe file and it looks like an html file. ;-)
*blush* - better now? ;)
Cheers,
-- Thorsten
pgpMDrg6miEdu.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
LibreOffice
Hi Michael, Terrence,
On Thu, 18 Aug 2011 11:22:10 +0100
Michael Meeks michael.me...@novell.com
wrote:
Heh - unfortunately, incremental building can be fraught with
problems
- mostly around dependencies; quite possibly we should have a 'make
dep-clean' rule (or somesuch) that discards
Hi Matúš,
On Thursday, 2011-08-18 20:49:23 +0200, Matúš Kukan wrote:
http://opengrok.libreoffice.org/xref/core/unotools/source/i18n/calendarwrapper.cxx#59
?
Is it possible that the else part is ever executed ?
There are various paths how it _could_ be reached, however I'm not sure
if in
Hi Michael,
On Thu, 18 Aug 2011 20:40:13 +0100
Michael Meeks michael.me...@novell.com
wrote:
It looks like yet-another bikeshed to me :-)
Indeed.
I'd be more concerned that git tag -l on the 'core' repo has dozens
of tags for the same version: artwork_libreoffice-3.4.0.2
On Thu, 2011-08-18 at 23:29 +0200, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
Kohei Yoshida wrote:
Hmm... Is this binary right? I can actually read the content of this
exe file and it looks like an html file. ;-)
*blush* - better now? ;)
Yup. A lot better. Now it looks more like an executable. :-)
Hi all,
here is another thing I forgot to talk about on the ESC meeting (likely
a good thing as we took too long already). I have my patches in a flat
git format-patch export:
Hi Michael
On 16-08-2011 17:50, Michael Meeks wrote:
Hi Henrik,
On Mon, 2011-08-15 at 23:40 +0100, Henrik Jensen wrote:
Feel free to commit to the dev-tools repo directly, improving the
jenkins setup even more would be awesome!
I appreciate the trust Bjoern :-), but I don't have an
Makes it easier to move the jenkins install directory without the need to change
paths in 'start-lo-jenkins.sh'
This script could now be placed as a file in the contrib/devtools/ubuntu-jenkins
dir alternative to being generated by setup-ubuntu-jenkins.sh as it currently
is.
I'm not sure what's
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673
--- Comment #188 from Rainer Bielefeld libreoff...@bielefeldundbuss.de
2011-08-18 21:34:03 PDT ---
Following Most Annoying Bugs still are without assignee, can developers
please check?
1. Bug 37620 - Data in reports created by Report Wizard do
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 5:40 PM, Bjoern Michaelsen
bjoern.michael...@canonical.com wrote:
Hi Michael,
On Thu, 18 Aug 2011 20:40:13 +0100
Michael Meeks michael.me...@novell.com
wrote:
It looks like yet-another bikeshed to me :-)
Indeed.
I'd be more concerned that git tag -l on the
64 matches
Mail list logo
