[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 157208] "Find and Replace" dialog's error notifications should be more noticeable, not an unformatted label in the middle
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157208 --- Comment #8 from Heiko Tietze --- (In reply to Jeff Fortin Tam from comment #5) > I would like to suggest we unmark this here as a duplicate and reopen it... Both topics belong together and we use to keep the older. The global system notification, while looking great, is way too prominent and not similarly appealing/available on all platforms. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 157208] "Find and Replace" dialog's error notifications should be more noticeable, not an unformatted label in the middle
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157208 --- Comment #8 from Heiko Tietze --- (In reply to Jeff Fortin Tam from comment #5) > I would like to suggest we unmark this here as a duplicate and reopen it... Both topics belong together and we use to keep the older. The global system notification, while looking great, is way too prominent and not similarly appealing/available on all platforms. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 156227] Get Rid of the Red Background Color in Find Box
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156227 --- Comment #15 from Heiko Tietze --- (In reply to larrybradley from comment #14) > How do I withdraw this request? By setting the status to resolved/wontfix or invalid. But take a look at the duplicate how badly it works in other configurations. Even small changes improve usability, and your suggestion was accepted. Maybe you want to hack it yourself? It's not too difficult... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
Minutes from the UX/design meeting 2023-Sep-13
Present: John, Eyal, Heiko Comments: Dieter, Stephane, Mike Tickets/Topics * Separate Default Page Size from Language Locale + https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149478 + add an option to set the default page size (John, Eyal) + Consider placing the option elsewhere than Languages Settings | Language, as that is not intuitive & difficult to discover (Eyal) + templates are pretty easy to do and users should learn this (Dieter) => do it * UX review needed for Options - Writer - Compatibility dialog + https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157006 + hide single GUI option (John, Heiko) + reorganize the other, ie. OpenOffice 1.1 together + perhaps combining all those options makes it easier (John) + rename, ie. use verbs at the beginning + shorten text if possible, ie. "Tolerate..." without " for compatibility..." (needs to be considered individually) + Perhaps consider having a drop-down list box for setting the selection to correspond to specific apps: OOo 1.1, some version(s) of MS Word etc. (Eyal) + Planning to comment on specifics in more detail on the bug page (Eyal) => easyhack * Tabs in Ruler not showing correctly + https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157081 + Windows show no automatic tab stop at all (only manual) + change design of default tab stop indicator and (John) + use left/right pointing angle for LTR/RTL (Stephane) => do it * Inconsistent table row selection + https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=155670 + nothing "surprising" in the selection, LibreOffice is doing well (Heiko) + LO behavior on is surprising, frustrates expectations and inconsistent (e.g. third-line-level vs first-line-level) (Eyal) + unclear use case /issue (John) + compatibility might be relevant (John) + don't think we need to make the same mistakes (Heiko) + Disagree, issue is very clear (Eyal) + Will try to make a video to better clarify the frustration (Eyal) => prolly NAB * Incentivize users to use the latest version via the UI + https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153153 + prompt would be intrusive, static text in About dialog okay (Mike) + Windows has the (auto-)updater informing about new versions, Linux distributions prefer own update procedures, no need for more "incentives" (Heiko) + About dialog is not an incentive per se (Eyal) + rather invest in better update mechanism and "intrusive prompt" when new major updates are available (Eyal) + show an infobar on major version "Version is no longer supported" along with buttons "Update", "Show again", Don't bother again" (Eyal, John) => comment OpenPGP_0xA68C0CA5EEA5F466.asc Description: OpenPGP public key OpenPGP_signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[Libreoffice-qa] Minutes from the UX/design meeting 2023-Sep-13
Present: John, Eyal, Heiko Comments: Dieter, Stephane, Mike Tickets/Topics * Separate Default Page Size from Language Locale + https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149478 + add an option to set the default page size (John, Eyal) + Consider placing the option elsewhere than Languages Settings | Language, as that is not intuitive & difficult to discover (Eyal) + templates are pretty easy to do and users should learn this (Dieter) => do it * UX review needed for Options - Writer - Compatibility dialog + https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157006 + hide single GUI option (John, Heiko) + reorganize the other, ie. OpenOffice 1.1 together + perhaps combining all those options makes it easier (John) + rename, ie. use verbs at the beginning + shorten text if possible, ie. "Tolerate..." without " for compatibility..." (needs to be considered individually) + Perhaps consider having a drop-down list box for setting the selection to correspond to specific apps: OOo 1.1, some version(s) of MS Word etc. (Eyal) + Planning to comment on specifics in more detail on the bug page (Eyal) => easyhack * Tabs in Ruler not showing correctly + https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157081 + Windows show no automatic tab stop at all (only manual) + change design of default tab stop indicator and (John) + use left/right pointing angle for LTR/RTL (Stephane) => do it * Inconsistent table row selection + https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=155670 + nothing "surprising" in the selection, LibreOffice is doing well (Heiko) + LO behavior on is surprising, frustrates expectations and inconsistent (e.g. third-line-level vs first-line-level) (Eyal) + unclear use case /issue (John) + compatibility might be relevant (John) + don't think we need to make the same mistakes (Heiko) + Disagree, issue is very clear (Eyal) + Will try to make a video to better clarify the frustration (Eyal) => prolly NAB * Incentivize users to use the latest version via the UI + https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153153 + prompt would be intrusive, static text in About dialog okay (Mike) + Windows has the (auto-)updater informing about new versions, Linux distributions prefer own update procedures, no need for more "incentives" (Heiko) + About dialog is not an incentive per se (Eyal) + rather invest in better update mechanism and "intrusive prompt" when new major updates are available (Eyal) + show an infobar on major version "Version is no longer supported" along with buttons "Update", "Show again", Don't bother again" (Eyal, John) => comment OpenPGP_0xA68C0CA5EEA5F466.asc Description: OpenPGP public key OpenPGP_signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 153131] Copy causes Calc to Freeze on Windows 11
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153131 --- Comment #41 from Mike Kaganski --- (In reply to Barry L. Kramer from Bug 156290 comment #0) > Running Calc from the Windows shortcut: > > ... > > The following is my > workaround for getting Calc to run without crashing: from a CMD prompt: > > C:>"C:\Program Files\LibreOffice\program\scalc.exe" And which shortcut is meant exactly? The direct one for Calc (also running scalc.exe)? Or the generic running soffice.exe? Does a new shortcut created for the executable(s) manually show the same problem? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 155214] Rename “Modify” button to "Assign"
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=155214 t.aswath changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|libreoffice-b...@lists.free |aswaths...@gmail.com |desktop.org | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 157026] Align commands should appear in the Table tab of the Notebookbar when a table is selected
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157026 Stéphane Guillou (stragu) changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard| QA:needsComment| -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 155214] Rename “Modify” button to "Assign"
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=155214 t.aswath changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #5 from t.aswath --- let me do this as my first EasyHack -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 156995] Selecting a group of many curves is extremely slow in Linux
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156995 --- Comment #14 from Peter Bleszynski --- Thanks for looking at this. I have not looked at the daily build yet. However, I noticed a difference in "drag view" behavior across Windows and Linux. Is it intentional that Linux, unlike Win_x86-64, has no limits on the number of curve points when drawing drag previews? Are these limits set differently based on operating system? Are they dependent on hardware or settings? In Windows, a rectangular bounding box is drawn instead of a "real" drag view when dragging a group of Bézier curves having more than a total of 500 points. The limit appears to be 200 points for a selection of curves (as opposed to a selected group of curves). In Linux, there appears to be no upper limit to the number of points and LO tries to generate a "real" drag view regardless of the complexity of the group object. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 127105] Threaded comments (replies) support in OOXML (.XLSX) spreadsheets
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127105 Jeff Fortin Tam changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda ||tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11 ||9229 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 119229] Provide compatibility with comment replies in MS Word
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=119229 Jeff Fortin Tam changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nekoh...@gmail.com See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda ||tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12 ||7105 --- Comment #8 from Jeff Fortin Tam --- For the record, this is just for the LibreOffice "Writer" component; for those landing here and interested in the spreadsheets (OOXML ".xlsx" format) counterpart to this, it is at bug #127105. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 127105] Threaded comments (replies) support in OOXML (.XLSX) spreadsheets
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127105 Jeff Fortin Tam changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nekoh...@gmail.com Summary|Threaded comments support |Threaded comments (replies) |(OOXML) in XLSX |support in OOXML (.XLSX) ||spreadsheets --- Comment #4 from Jeff Fortin Tam --- Retitling for clarity & searchability. According to my observations, any such xlsx file opened by LibreOffice, when re-saved to xlsx format, will destroy those comments' metadata (essentially converting them to notes objects) even if you don't touch those comments specifically, not only if "modifying the comment" like the comment says. Curiosity question: beyond OOXML and the need for a UI for this in LibreOffice Calc, does OpenDocument support threaded comments with replies and usernames etc. in the .ods spreadsheet format? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 157026] Align commands should appear in the Table tab of the Notebookbar when a table is selected
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157026 QA Administrators changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard|| QA:needsComment -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 157023] The size of sections (with tables in it) suddenly increases to bottom page after inserting a row, creating large empty area
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157023 QA Administrators changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard|| QA:needsComment -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 157020] Offline help opens always the same page (overview/home page)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157020 QA Administrators changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard|| QA:needsComment -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 156999] Writer splitting words or changing them
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156999 QA Administrators changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard|| QA:needsComment -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 157000] sessions -- working sessions (groups of documents you're working on) #2
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157000 QA Administrators changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard|| QA:needsComment -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 156993] Snap guides are not visible
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156993 QA Administrators changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard|| QA:needsComment -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 129062] [META] Skia library bugs
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=129062 Bug 129062 depends on bug 152468, which changed state. Bug 152468 Summary: scroll in writer (text with pictures, tables, ...) --> memory overflow crash --> skia off --> writer is running https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=152468 What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED Resolution|--- |INSUFFICIENTDATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 153615] Multiple aspects of LO crash upon opening existing files
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153615 --- Comment #3 from QA Administrators --- Dear Kinsey, Please read this message in its entirety before proceeding. Your bug report is being closed as INSUFFICIENTDATA due to inactivity and a lack of information which is needed in order to accurately reproduce and confirm the problem. We encourage you to retest your bug against the latest release. If the issue is still present in the latest stable release, we need the following information (please ignore any that you've already provided): a) Provide details of your system including your operating system and the latest version of LibreOffice that you have confirmed the bug to be present b) Provide easy to reproduce steps – the simpler the better c) Provide any test case(s) which will help us confirm the problem d) Provide screenshots of the problem if you think it might help e) Read all comments and provide any requested information Once all of this is done, please set the bug back to UNCONFIRMED and we will attempt to reproduce the issue. Please do not: a) respond via email b) update the version field in the bug or any of the other details on the top section of our bug tracker Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-NeedInfo-FollowUp -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 152468] scroll in writer (text with pictures, tables, ...) --> memory overflow crash --> skia off --> writer is running
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=152468 --- Comment #13 from QA Administrators --- Dear Uwe, Please read this message in its entirety before proceeding. Your bug report is being closed as INSUFFICIENTDATA due to inactivity and a lack of information which is needed in order to accurately reproduce and confirm the problem. We encourage you to retest your bug against the latest release. If the issue is still present in the latest stable release, we need the following information (please ignore any that you've already provided): a) Provide details of your system including your operating system and the latest version of LibreOffice that you have confirmed the bug to be present b) Provide easy to reproduce steps – the simpler the better c) Provide any test case(s) which will help us confirm the problem d) Provide screenshots of the problem if you think it might help e) Read all comments and provide any requested information Once all of this is done, please set the bug back to UNCONFIRMED and we will attempt to reproduce the issue. Please do not: a) respond via email b) update the version field in the bug or any of the other details on the top section of our bug tracker Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-NeedInfo-FollowUp -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 122652] [META] Memory problems in LibreOffice
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=122652 Bug 122652 depends on bug 152468, which changed state. Bug 152468 Summary: scroll in writer (text with pictures, tables, ...) --> memory overflow crash --> skia off --> writer is running https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=152468 What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED Resolution|--- |INSUFFICIENTDATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 152468] scroll in writer (text with pictures, tables, ...) --> memory overflow crash --> skia off --> writer is running
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=152468 QA Administrators changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INSUFFICIENTDATA Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 154240] Relative Formula Calculations do not work correctly with Autofilters that reorder applied
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=154240 --- Comment #5 from QA Administrators --- Dear jgraham11, This bug has been in NEEDINFO status with no change for at least 6 months. Please provide the requested information as soon as possible and mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED. Due to regular bug tracker maintenance, if the bug is still in NEEDINFO status with no change in 30 days the QA team will close the bug as INSUFFICIENTDATA due to lack of needed information. For more information about our NEEDINFO policy please read the wiki located here: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/Fields/Status/NEEDINFO If you have already provided the requested information, please mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED so that the QA team knows that the bug is ready to be confirmed. Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-NeedInfo-Ping -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 153318] Cannot save or open files on gvfs mounted smb share
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153318 --- Comment #5 from QA Administrators --- Dear nico.winkelstraeter, This bug has been in NEEDINFO status with no change for at least 6 months. Please provide the requested information as soon as possible and mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED. Due to regular bug tracker maintenance, if the bug is still in NEEDINFO status with no change in 30 days the QA team will close the bug as INSUFFICIENTDATA due to lack of needed information. For more information about our NEEDINFO policy please read the wiki located here: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/Fields/Status/NEEDINFO If you have already provided the requested information, please mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED so that the QA team knows that the bug is ready to be confirmed. Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-NeedInfo-Ping -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 152999] UI: Document background color in settings overrides cell background colors in Calc
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=152999 --- Comment #7 from QA Administrators --- Dear Jens, This bug has been in NEEDINFO status with no change for at least 6 months. Please provide the requested information as soon as possible and mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED. Due to regular bug tracker maintenance, if the bug is still in NEEDINFO status with no change in 30 days the QA team will close the bug as INSUFFICIENTDATA due to lack of needed information. For more information about our NEEDINFO policy please read the wiki located here: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/Fields/Status/NEEDINFO If you have already provided the requested information, please mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED so that the QA team knows that the bug is ready to be confirmed. Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-NeedInfo-Ping -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 152966] pdf export to fillable pdf changes tab order through fields
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=152966 --- Comment #14 from QA Administrators --- Dear Mike Sapsard, This bug has been in NEEDINFO status with no change for at least 6 months. Please provide the requested information as soon as possible and mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED. Due to regular bug tracker maintenance, if the bug is still in NEEDINFO status with no change in 30 days the QA team will close the bug as INSUFFICIENTDATA due to lack of needed information. For more information about our NEEDINFO policy please read the wiki located here: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/Fields/Status/NEEDINFO If you have already provided the requested information, please mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED so that the QA team knows that the bug is ready to be confirmed. Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-NeedInfo-Ping -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 152739] Round ROUND_HALF_UP is OK in Python, but NO in Basic when call the same Python def.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=152739 --- Comment #3 from QA Administrators --- Dear edil, This bug has been in NEEDINFO status with no change for at least 6 months. Please provide the requested information as soon as possible and mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED. Due to regular bug tracker maintenance, if the bug is still in NEEDINFO status with no change in 30 days the QA team will close the bug as INSUFFICIENTDATA due to lack of needed information. For more information about our NEEDINFO policy please read the wiki located here: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/Fields/Status/NEEDINFO If you have already provided the requested information, please mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED so that the QA team knows that the bug is ready to be confirmed. Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-NeedInfo-Ping -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 152715] I was hovering over a grouped set of objects, when a faulty tool tip appeared
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=152715 --- Comment #2 from QA Administrators --- Dear matthijs.volker.bo...@gmail.com, This bug has been in NEEDINFO status with no change for at least 6 months. Please provide the requested information as soon as possible and mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED. Due to regular bug tracker maintenance, if the bug is still in NEEDINFO status with no change in 30 days the QA team will close the bug as INSUFFICIENTDATA due to lack of needed information. For more information about our NEEDINFO policy please read the wiki located here: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/Fields/Status/NEEDINFO If you have already provided the requested information, please mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED so that the QA team knows that the bug is ready to be confirmed. Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-NeedInfo-Ping -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 147481] Writer Mail Merge does not use CR/LF as paragraph separator
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=147481 --- Comment #6 from QA Administrators --- Dear titanemdg, This bug has been in NEEDINFO status with no change for at least 6 months. Please provide the requested information as soon as possible and mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED. Due to regular bug tracker maintenance, if the bug is still in NEEDINFO status with no change in 30 days the QA team will close the bug as INSUFFICIENTDATA due to lack of needed information. For more information about our NEEDINFO policy please read the wiki located here: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/Fields/Status/NEEDINFO If you have already provided the requested information, please mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED so that the QA team knows that the bug is ready to be confirmed. Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-NeedInfo-Ping -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 152699] infinitely spread window on libre office calc when apply base filter - by clicking filtermenu
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=152699 --- Comment #3 from QA Administrators --- Dear Roman, This bug has been in NEEDINFO status with no change for at least 6 months. Please provide the requested information as soon as possible and mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED. Due to regular bug tracker maintenance, if the bug is still in NEEDINFO status with no change in 30 days the QA team will close the bug as INSUFFICIENTDATA due to lack of needed information. For more information about our NEEDINFO policy please read the wiki located here: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/Fields/Status/NEEDINFO If you have already provided the requested information, please mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED so that the QA team knows that the bug is ready to be confirmed. Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-NeedInfo-Ping -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 150092] FILESAVE XLSX Very slow saving time for spreadsheet with large number of columns
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=150092 --- Comment #16 from QA Administrators --- Dear Owen Savill, This bug has been in NEEDINFO status with no change for at least 6 months. Please provide the requested information as soon as possible and mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED. Due to regular bug tracker maintenance, if the bug is still in NEEDINFO status with no change in 30 days the QA team will close the bug as INSUFFICIENTDATA due to lack of needed information. For more information about our NEEDINFO policy please read the wiki located here: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/Fields/Status/NEEDINFO If you have already provided the requested information, please mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED so that the QA team knows that the bug is ready to be confirmed. Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-NeedInfo-Ping -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 141535] VIEWING: base crashes when viewing a form
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=141535 --- Comment #8 from QA Administrators --- Dear userxyz, This bug has been in NEEDINFO status with no change for at least 6 months. Please provide the requested information as soon as possible and mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED. Due to regular bug tracker maintenance, if the bug is still in NEEDINFO status with no change in 30 days the QA team will close the bug as INSUFFICIENTDATA due to lack of needed information. For more information about our NEEDINFO policy please read the wiki located here: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/Fields/Status/NEEDINFO If you have already provided the requested information, please mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED so that the QA team knows that the bug is ready to be confirmed. Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-NeedInfo-Ping -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 108009] Can't save new file to WebDAV server via Save Remote
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108009 --- Comment #12 from QA Administrators --- Dear Vitaliy Lotorev, This bug has been in NEEDINFO status with no change for at least 6 months. Please provide the requested information as soon as possible and mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED. Due to regular bug tracker maintenance, if the bug is still in NEEDINFO status with no change in 30 days the QA team will close the bug as INSUFFICIENTDATA due to lack of needed information. For more information about our NEEDINFO policy please read the wiki located here: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/Fields/Status/NEEDINFO If you have already provided the requested information, please mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED so that the QA team knows that the bug is ready to be confirmed. Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-NeedInfo-Ping -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 82319] use modern OpenGL for OpenGL canvas
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82319 --- Comment #16 from QA Administrators --- Dear Markus Mohrhard, To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo'; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: https://web.libera.chat/?settings=#libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 143186] pivotcaches - BASIC runtime error 423
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=143186 --- Comment #10 from QA Administrators --- Dear johnks, To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo'; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: https://web.libera.chat/?settings=#libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 144269] Mouse hover border is disabled if an element is focused
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=144269 --- Comment #6 from QA Administrators --- Dear medmedin2014, To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo'; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: https://web.libera.chat/?settings=#libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 125328] Printing to PDF - PPTX becomes very large size (Export to PDF is OK)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125328 --- Comment #25 from QA Administrators --- Dear lfcramos, To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo'; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: https://web.libera.chat/?settings=#libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 111737] Not possible to create / add a new Master Slide with pressing Enter in slides/pages pane
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111737 --- Comment #9 from QA Administrators --- Dear Telesto, To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo'; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: https://web.libera.chat/?settings=#libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 157219] Cells cannot be merged after unsharing
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157219 --- Comment #2 from 1009323...@qq.com --- (In reply to m.a.riosv from comment #1) > 示例文件似乎受到保护，而不是共享。 我就设置了共享，再取消共享，表格就这样了，你可以试试看，能不能自己操作复现此bug。如果是受到保护，那么在哪里可以取消保护呢 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 157226] PIVOTTABLE and Data > Sort function:some suggested tweaks.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157226 m.a.riosv changed: What|Removed |Added CC||miguelangelrv@libreoffice.o ||rg Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEEDINFO --- Comment #1 from m.a.riosv --- There are sort option in the header of the pivot table fields, and also in the properties of the fields can be set up to sort. Doesn't serve for your purpose? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 157219] Cells cannot be merged after unsharing
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157219 m.a.riosv changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEEDINFO Ever confirmed|0 |1 CC||miguelangelrv@libreoffice.o ||rg --- Comment #1 from m.a.riosv --- Sample file seems protected, not shared. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 157217] Ordered List changes from what created to a bracket blue on opening a file
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157217 m.a.riosv changed: What|Removed |Added CC||miguelangelrv@libreoffice.o ||rg --- Comment #1 from m.a.riosv --- Please ask your question at https://ask.libreoffice.org/c/english/5? Where you can find knowledgeable people, willing to help. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: drawinglayer/source include/drawinglayer
drawinglayer/source/primitive2d/softedgeprimitive2d.cxx |7 ++-
drawinglayer/source/tools/converters.cxx|4 ++--
include/drawinglayer/converters.hxx |8
3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
New commits:
commit 4942aa1533af25cf102da7516bd5e521c553aa07
Author: Patrick Luby
AuthorDate: Wed Sep 13 18:52:29 2023 -0400
Commit: Patrick Luby
CommitDate: Thu Sep 14 01:52:22 2023 +0200
tdf#156808 force an alpha mask to be created even if it has no alpha
We need an alpha mask, even if it is totally opaque, so that
drawinglayer::primitive2d::ProcessAndBlurAlphaMask() can be called.
Otherwise, blurring of edges will fail in cases like running in a
slideshow or exporting to PDF.
Change-Id: If03b32a8a22ed960f1475710a9831cab33799b60
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/156903
Tested-by: Jenkins
Reviewed-by: Patrick Luby
diff --git a/drawinglayer/source/primitive2d/softedgeprimitive2d.cxx
b/drawinglayer/source/primitive2d/softedgeprimitive2d.cxx
index 89e1fd545fcb..bfd8ebf71656 100644
--- a/drawinglayer/source/primitive2d/softedgeprimitive2d.cxx
+++ b/drawinglayer/source/primitive2d/softedgeprimitive2d.cxx
@@ -166,9 +166,14 @@ void SoftEdgePrimitive2D::create2DDecomposition(
const sal_uInt32
nDiscreteClippedHeight(ceil(aDiscreteClippedSize.getY()));
const geometry::ViewInformation2D aViewInformation2D;
const sal_uInt32 nMaximumQuadraticPixels(25);
+// tdf#156808 force an alpha mask to be created even if it has no alpha
+// We need an alpha mask, even if it is totally opaque, so that
+// drawinglayer::primitive2d::ProcessAndBlurAlphaMask() can be called.
+// Otherwise, blurring of edges will fail in cases like running in a
+// slideshow or exporting to PDF.
const BitmapEx aBitmapEx(::drawinglayer::convertToBitmapEx(
std::move(xEmbedSeq), aViewInformation2D, nDiscreteClippedWidth,
nDiscreteClippedHeight,
-nMaximumQuadraticPixels));
+nMaximumQuadraticPixels, true));
if (aBitmapEx.IsEmpty())
break;
diff --git a/drawinglayer/source/tools/converters.cxx
b/drawinglayer/source/tools/converters.cxx
index 80ae15a3b6a9..9283f7db779f 100644
--- a/drawinglayer/source/tools/converters.cxx
+++ b/drawinglayer/source/tools/converters.cxx
@@ -156,7 +156,7 @@ AlphaMask
createAlphaMask(drawinglayer::primitive2d::Primitive2DContainer&& rSeq
BitmapEx convertToBitmapEx(drawinglayer::primitive2d::Primitive2DContainer&&
rSeq,
const geometry::ViewInformation2D&
rViewInformation2D,
sal_uInt32 nDiscreteWidth, sal_uInt32
nDiscreteHeight,
- sal_uInt32 nMaxSquarePixels)
+ sal_uInt32 nMaxSquarePixels, bool
bForceAlphaMaskCreation)
{
drawinglayer::primitive2d::Primitive2DContainer aSequence(std::move(rSeq));
@@ -261,7 +261,7 @@ BitmapEx
convertToBitmapEx(drawinglayer::primitive2d::Primitive2DContainer&& rSe
}
#endif
-if (aAlpha.hasAlpha())
+if (bForceAlphaMaskCreation || aAlpha.hasAlpha())
{
// Need to correct content using known alpha to get to background-free
// RGBA result, usable e.g. in PNG export(s) or convert-to-bitmap.
diff --git a/include/drawinglayer/converters.hxx
b/include/drawinglayer/converters.hxx
index 0b4a5649874e..d090b1e0a921 100644
--- a/include/drawinglayer/converters.hxx
+++ b/include/drawinglayer/converters.hxx
@@ -38,10 +38,10 @@ AlphaMask DRAWINGLAYER_DLLPUBLIC createAlphaMask(
// Helper for convertPrimitive2DContainerToBitmapEx below, but can be also used
// directly
-BitmapEx DRAWINGLAYER_DLLPUBLIC
-convertToBitmapEx(drawinglayer::primitive2d::Primitive2DContainer&& rSeq,
- const geometry::ViewInformation2D& rViewInformation2D,
sal_uInt32 nDiscreteWidth,
- sal_uInt32 nDiscreteHeight, sal_uInt32 nMaxSquarePixels);
+BitmapEx DRAWINGLAYER_DLLPUBLIC convertToBitmapEx(
+drawinglayer::primitive2d::Primitive2DContainer&& rSeq,
+const geometry::ViewInformation2D& rViewInformation2D, sal_uInt32
nDiscreteWidth,
+sal_uInt32 nDiscreteHeight, sal_uInt32 nMaxSquarePixels, bool
bForceAlphaMaskCreation = false);
// helper to convert any Primitive2DSequence to a good quality BitmapEx,
// using default parameters
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 157231] New: webp 0-day CVE-2023-4863 affect LO?
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157231 Bug ID: 157231 Summary: webp 0-day CVE-2023-4863 affect LO? Product: LibreOffice Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Draw Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org Reporter: mjbr...@acm.org CVE-2023-4863 is a 0-day for webp (libwebp) that everybody is panic patching. LO accepts webp. If it uses Google's libwebp or something descended from it, it may be affected. I am not a coder, so it would do no good for me to look at the source. Please check. See https://arstechnica.com/security/2023/09/with-0-days-hitting-chrome-ios-and-dozens-more-this-month-is-no-software-safe/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 154525] [sample] Calc is extremely slow (3+ minutes) to open Lenovo's Accessories "Options Compatibility Matrix" spreadsheet
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=154525 --- Comment #14 from m.a.riosv --- 24 seconds for me with Version: 24.2.0.0.alpha0+ (X86_64) / LibreOffice Community Build ID: 92d0fa8c3a7998e51c8f27409ed8c44f34c42c8e CPU threads: 16; OS: Windows 10.0 Build 22621; UI render: Skia/Vulkan; VCL: win Locale: es-ES (es_ES); UI: en-US Calc: CL threaded Jumbo Should be a bit better in a liberated release. Please, @Caolán, can you set up the bug as fixed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 156901] FILEOPEN PPTX: text not shown (properly) in presentation mode (only)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156901 Gerald Pfeifer changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||156902 Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156902 [Bug 156902] FILEOPEN PPTX: graphics not shown (edit mode and presentation mode) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 156902] FILEOPEN PPTX: graphics not shown (edit mode and presentation mode)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156902 Gerald Pfeifer changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||156901 --- Comment #6 from Gerald Pfeifer --- (In reply to Gabor Kelemen (allotropia) from comment #3) > Seems like the cow is a grouping of two shapes, and the grouping has glow > effect set on it. This is not supported in Impress. Not showing glow effect for a grouping of shapes is one thing. Completely not showing the two shapes at *all* is quite massive, though. Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156901 [Bug 156901] FILEOPEN PPTX: text not shown (properly) in presentation mode (only) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 156718] FILEOPEN PPTX: alternating colored lines in table / style don't render properly
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156718 Gerald Pfeifer changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|FILEOPEN PPTX: alternating |FILEOPEN PPTX: alternating |colored lines in table /|colored lines in table / |style not render properly |style don't render properly -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 107237] [META] Notebookbar Tabbed
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107237 Stéphane Guillou (stragu) changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||157026 Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157026 [Bug 157026] Align commands should appear in the Table tab of the Notebookbar when a table is selected -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 157026] Align commands should appear in the Table tab of the Notebookbar when a table is selected
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157026 Stéphane Guillou (stragu) changed: What|Removed |Added CC||stephane.guillou@libreoffic ||e.org Ever confirmed|0 |1 Severity|normal |enhancement Component|Impress |UI Blocks||107237, 100155 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW --- Comment #1 from Stéphane Guillou (stragu) --- I see that the Draw, Image, Media and Object tabs all have those 6 buttons, so I can't see why we shouldn't have them in the Table tab too. What's more: when a table is selected, the sidebar doesn't even have those commands. All others objects I tested (formula, chart, text box, image, fontwork, shape) have the alignment options in the sidebar. So you could argue that tables are the ones who need that command in the tabbed interface _the most_. (Workaround is to switch to the Layout tab, or use the context menu, or reveal the menubar > Format > Align Objects.) Version: 24.2.0.0.alpha0+ (X86_64) / LibreOffice Community Build ID: 43df1237a091e2b0f4495d5a7e959f7beaab025d CPU threads: 8; OS: Linux 5.15; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3 Locale: en-AU (en_AU.UTF-8); UI: en-US Calc: threaded Same in Writer. Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100155 [Bug 100155] [META] Improve object selection and alignment https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107237 [Bug 107237] [META] Notebookbar Tabbed -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 100155] [META] Improve object selection and alignment
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100155 Stéphane Guillou (stragu) changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||157026 Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157026 [Bug 157026] Align commands should appear in the Table tab of the Notebookbar when a table is selected -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 156227] Get Rid of the Red Background Color in Find Box
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156227 --- Comment #14 from larrybradley --- How do I withdraw this request? LO is so far superior to Word that it's really not worth everyone's time and trouble for this rather cosmetic issue. My apologies for submitting it to begin with. I'll try to do better and not fret over relatively minor inconveniences. Thanks to all who bring us LO. You do great work. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 157208] "Find and Replace" dialog's error notifications should be more noticeable, not an unformatted label in the middle
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157208 --- Comment #7 from larrybradley --- Jeff, my bad. I can see now that the solid red background is intermittent, and sometimes the only thing that is red is the outline of the Search box. At any rate, I'm just going to learn to live with it. LO is so far superior to Word in all other regards that it's not worth quibbling over a cosmetic annoyance. Sorry for wasting everyone's time. I'll try to do better. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 157208] "Find and Replace" dialog's error notifications should be more noticeable, not an unformatted label in the middle
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157208 --- Comment #7 from larrybradley --- Jeff, my bad. I can see now that the solid red background is intermittent, and sometimes the only thing that is red is the outline of the Search box. At any rate, I'm just going to learn to live with it. LO is so far superior to Word in all other regards that it's not worth quibbling over a cosmetic annoyance. Sorry for wasting everyone's time. I'll try to do better. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 157221] "Use Background" area fill does not work if slide background uses "None"
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157221 Regina Henschel changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rb.hensc...@t-online.de --- Comment #2 from Regina Henschel --- I think, that is not a problem with the feature "use background" but with the background setting of the master slide. The master slide has set "None" and so "use background" uses "None", which means it becomes transparent. PowerPoint does not allow setting "None" as fill for a master slide. So the import should set the background of the master page to the background color from the associated theme. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 47848] VIEWING: Spell & grammar check should highlight text just checking in the body of the document
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47848 Stéphane Guillou (stragu) changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda ||tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15 ||7227 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 157227] "Search Results" dialog (from find & replace in "All sheets") should use markup to make the matching part of the strings easier to spot
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157227 Stéphane Guillou (stragu) changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda ||tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47 ||848 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW CC||libreoffice-ux-advise@lists ||.freedesktop.org, ||stephane.guillou@libreoffic ||e.org --- Comment #2 from Stéphane Guillou (stragu) --- I agree that this would be a welcome tweak to the Search Results dialog, especially for cells with long strings. Just copying UX/Design team to hear their opinion. Tested in: Version: 24.2.0.0.alpha0+ (X86_64) / LibreOffice Community Build ID: 43df1237a091e2b0f4495d5a7e959f7beaab025d CPU threads: 8; OS: Linux 5.15; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3 Locale: en-AU (en_AU.UTF-8); UI: en-US Calc: threaded -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 157227] "Search Results" dialog (from find & replace in "All sheets") should use markup to make the matching part of the strings easier to spot
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157227 Stéphane Guillou (stragu) changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda ||tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47 ||848 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW CC||libreoffice-ux-advise@lists ||.freedesktop.org, ||stephane.guillou@libreoffic ||e.org --- Comment #2 from Stéphane Guillou (stragu) --- I agree that this would be a welcome tweak to the Search Results dialog, especially for cells with long strings. Just copying UX/Design team to hear their opinion. Tested in: Version: 24.2.0.0.alpha0+ (X86_64) / LibreOffice Community Build ID: 43df1237a091e2b0f4495d5a7e959f7beaab025d CPU threads: 8; OS: Linux 5.15; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3 Locale: en-AU (en_AU.UTF-8); UI: en-US Calc: threaded -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 47848] VIEWING: Spell & grammar check should highlight text just checking in the body of the document
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47848 Stéphane Guillou (stragu) changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda ||tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14 ||9535 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149535] Add highlighting (background color) to options for marking misspelled words in the spelling checker
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149535 Stéphane Guillou (stragu) changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda ||tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47 ||848 URL||https://ask.libreoffice.org ||/t/change-wavy-line-to-text ||-highlight-during-spell-gra ||mmar-check/78483/3 Version|unspecified |Inherited From OOo -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 153131] Copy causes Calc to Freeze on Windows 11
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153131 --- Comment #40 from Barry L. Kramer --- My system still has this problem. I am a computer engineer by trade and I will try to use these tools to get you the information you need. I am not familiar with them right now so I will need a while to review the documentation to learn exactly how to do this. In the meantime I can confirm that there are no compatibility mode settings applied to the shortcut on my windows system. To reiterate, running calc from the shortcut will demonstrate the hang problem, but running scalc at the command line does not. So I will try to compare the two situations. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: Branch 'libreoffice-7-6' - cui/uiconfig
cui/uiconfig/ui/areatabpage.ui |3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) New commits: commit 4f94245ef7ac0b49729c14454f02a28c70b6ac44 Author: Gabor Kelemen AuthorDate: Sun Sep 10 20:46:31 2023 +0200 Commit: Gabor Kelemen CommitDate: Wed Sep 13 23:48:18 2023 +0200 tdf#157101 Make Area dialog narrower by turning off the homogeneous setting of the top button bar Change-Id: I1e2e4f4db04c4a061c4e699a32b51997495880a9 Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/156804 Tested-by: Jenkins Reviewed-by: Adolfo Jayme Barrientos (cherry picked from commit 7a02d8fffcdcd4d17b52e5bc3e1fa2b5be56a94d) Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/156743 Reviewed-by: Gabor Kelemen diff --git a/cui/uiconfig/ui/areatabpage.ui b/cui/uiconfig/ui/areatabpage.ui index 4555c0df0207..157a7d0ce968 100644 --- a/cui/uiconfig/ui/areatabpage.ui +++ b/cui/uiconfig/ui/areatabpage.ui @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ - + @@ -25,7 +25,6 @@ 3 True 12 -True False
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 126008] TABLES STYLES: Inserting or removing a row/column changes entire table's formatting (see comment 5)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126008 Stéphane Guillou (stragu) changed: What|Removed |Added CC||Sebastiano.Baratella@GMail. ||com --- Comment #86 from Stéphane Guillou (stragu) --- *** Bug 157229 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 157229] Table font changes and no way to undo
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157229 Stéphane Guillou (stragu) changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE CC||stephane.guillou@libreoffic ||e.org --- Comment #1 from Stéphane Guillou (stragu) --- Thank you for the report! This long-standing issue is already tracked in bug 126008, so I am marking as a duplicate. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 126008 *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 157187] DOCX export: lost tracked column deletion or insertion interoperability
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157187 László Németh changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Assignee|nem...@numbertext.org |libreoffice-b...@lists.free ||desktop.org CC||nem...@numbertext.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 143002] [META] Tracked Changes of tables
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=143002 Bug 143002 depends on bug 157187, which changed state. Bug 157187 Summary: DOCX export: lost tracked column deletion or insertion interoperability https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157187 What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: sw/qa sw/source
sw/qa/extras/ooxmlexport/ooxmlexport12.cxx |4
sw/source/core/table/swtable.cxx |2 +-
sw/source/filter/ww8/docxattributeoutput.cxx | 14 --
sw/source/filter/ww8/docxattributeoutput.hxx |4
4 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
New commits:
commit d23ba9e6103bba27b57c59505641cc64db63ec98
Author: László Németh
AuthorDate: Wed Sep 13 10:42:45 2023 +0200
Commit: László Németh
CommitDate: Wed Sep 13 23:37:02 2023 +0200
tdf#157187 sw tracked table column: fix DOCX export
DOCX export of tracked table column changes
could result dummy content boxes and missing
tracked table column changes in MSO, i.e. lost
interoperability. As a workaround, skip
exporting content boxes within tracked table cells.
Note: bad 0x01 characters and incomplete w:sdt export in table
cells since commit b5c616d10bff3213840d4893d13b4493de71fa56
"tdf#104823: support for sdt plain text fields".
See also commit 4697d2bda1b37f9cf8b301f5bf044c2390f56333
"tdf#157011 sw tracked table column: fix DOCX import of empty cell".
Change-Id: I32f77c7532a9cc6bf5d88a626ac3c62a5c02a34a
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/156895
Tested-by: László Németh
Reviewed-by: László Németh
diff --git a/sw/qa/extras/ooxmlexport/ooxmlexport12.cxx
b/sw/qa/extras/ooxmlexport/ooxmlexport12.cxx
index e5a585f01d68..243bfffb23c2 100644
--- a/sw/qa/extras/ooxmlexport/ooxmlexport12.cxx
+++ b/sw/qa/extras/ooxmlexport/ooxmlexport12.cxx
@@ -1335,6 +1335,10 @@ DECLARE_OOXMLEXPORT_TEST(testTdf157011,
"tdf157011_ins_del_empty_cols.docx")
// This was 4 (missing tracked table cell deletions)
assertXPath(pXmlDoc, "//w:del", 6);
+
+// tdf#157187 This was false (dummy w:tc/w:p/w:sdt/w:sdtContent
content box)
+assertXPath(pXmlDoc, "//w:tc/w:p/w:del", 6);
+assertXPath(pXmlDoc, "//w:tc/w:p/w:ins", 3);
}
}
diff --git a/sw/source/core/table/swtable.cxx b/sw/source/core/table/swtable.cxx
index ca360e324081..3d53ef518903 100644
--- a/sw/source/core/table/swtable.cxx
+++ b/sw/source/core/table/swtable.cxx
@@ -2267,7 +2267,7 @@ bool SwTableBox::IsEmpty( bool bWithRemainingNestedTable
) const
// tdf#157011 OOXML w:std cell content is imported with terminating
0x01 characters,
// i.e. an empty box can contain double 0x01: handle it to avoid
losing change tracking
-// FIXME regression since LibreOffice 7.3?
+// FIXME regression since commit
b5c616d10bff3213840d4893d13b4493de71fa56
if ( pCNd && pCNd->Len() == 2 && pCNd->GetTextNode() )
{
const OUString = pCNd->GetTextNode()->GetText();
diff --git a/sw/source/filter/ww8/docxattributeoutput.cxx
b/sw/source/filter/ww8/docxattributeoutput.cxx
index 4b51f52c6796..6d67081e932f 100644
--- a/sw/source/filter/ww8/docxattributeoutput.cxx
+++ b/sw/source/filter/ww8/docxattributeoutput.cxx
@@ -2013,7 +2013,10 @@ void DocxAttributeOutput::EndRun(const SwTextNode*
pNode, sal_Int32 nPos, sal_In
{
auto pTextContentControl =
static_txtattr_cast(pAttr);
m_pContentControl =
pTextContentControl->GetContentControl().GetContentControl();
-WriteContentControlStart();
+if (!m_tableReference.m_bTableCellChanged)
+{
+WriteContentControlStart();
+}
}
}
@@ -2039,7 +2042,7 @@ void DocxAttributeOutput::EndRun(const SwTextNode* pNode,
sal_Int32 nPos, sal_In
{
sal_Int32 nEnd = nPos + nLen;
SwTextAttr* pAttr = pNode->GetTextAttrAt(nPos,
RES_TXTATR_CONTENTCONTROL, ::sw::GetTextAttrMode::Default);
-if (pAttr && *pAttr->GetEnd() == nEnd)
+if (pAttr && *pAttr->GetEnd() == nEnd &&
!m_tableReference.m_bTableCellChanged)
{
WriteContentControlEnd();
}
@@ -4725,6 +4728,12 @@ void DocxAttributeOutput::StartTableCell(
ww8::WW8TableNodeInfoInner::Pointer_t
InitTableHelper( pTableTextNodeInfoInner );
+// check tracked table column deletion or insertion
+const SwTableBox* pTabBox = pTableTextNodeInfoInner->getTableBox();
+SwRedlineTable::size_type nChange = pTabBox->GetRedline();
+if (nChange != SwRedlineTable::npos)
+m_tableReference.m_bTableCellChanged = true;
+
m_pSerializer->startElementNS(XML_w, XML_tc);
// Write the cell properties here
@@ -4745,6 +4754,7 @@ void DocxAttributeOutput::EndTableCell(sal_uInt32 nCell)
m_tableReference.m_bTableCellOpen = false;
m_tableReference.m_bTableCellParaSdtOpen = false;
+m_tableReference.m_bTableCellChanged = false;
}
void DocxAttributeOutput::StartStyles()
diff --git a/sw/source/filter/ww8/docxattributeoutput.hxx
b/sw/source/filter/ww8/docxattributeoutput.hxx
index e8b255bdc990..88fbeeaf740f 100644
--- a/sw/source/filter/ww8/docxattributeoutput.hxx
+++ b/sw/source/filter/ww8/docxattributeoutput.hxx
@@
7.6.0 Build fails in Cygwin - weird path
Hi,
I'm having a weird path bug upon compilation:
D:/lo/src/core/external/skia/source/SkMemory_malloc.cxx(6,10): fatal error:
cannot open file 'C:/gnu/JDK-11~1.2/include\include/core/SkTypes.h': The
file cannot be accessed by the system.
#include "include/core/SkTypes.h"
^
C:/gnu/JDK-11~1.2/include is correct, and include/core/SkTypes.h exists,
although in another include path. Please help me figure out why would they
get joined and ruin the compilation.
For reference, down here is the full execution line from "make -d" which
gives me the same error, but works if I remove the JDK paths.
S=D:/lo/src/core && B=D:/lo/bld && I=$B/instdir && W=$B/workdir && mkdir
-p $W/CxxObject/external/skia/source/
$W/Dep/CxxObject/external/skia/source/ && unset INCLUDE && export
SHOWINCLUDES_PREFIX="Note: including file:" && CCACHE_PCH_EXTSUM=1
CCACHE_SLOPPINESS=pch_defines,time_macros VSLANG=1033
/cygdrive/c/PROGRA~2/MICROS~2/2019/COMMUN~1/VC/Tools/Llvm/bin/clang-cl.exe
-m64 -DBOOST_ERROR_CODE_HEADER_ONLY
-DBOOST_OPTIONAL_USE_OLD_DEFINITION_OF_NONE -DBOOST_SYSTEM_NO_DEPRECATED
-DCPPU_ENV=mscx -DOSL_DEBUG_LEVEL=1 -DSAL_LOG_INFO -DSAL_LOG_WARN -DWIN32
-DWNT -DX86_64 -D_CRT_NONSTDC_NO_DEPRECATE -D_CRT_NON_CONFORMING_SWPRINTFS
-D_CRT_SECURE_NO_DEPRECATE -D_DLL -D_MT -D_REENTRANT
-D_SCL_SECURE_NO_WARNINGS
-D_SILENCE_CXX17_CODECVT_HEADER_DEPRECATION_WARNING
-D_SILENCE_CXX17_OLD_ALLOCATOR_MEMBERS_DEPRECATION_WARNING
-D_SILENCE_CXX17_RESULT_OF_DEPRECATION_WARNING
-D_SILENCE_CXX23_DENORM_DEPRECATION_WARNING -D_WIN32_WINNT=0x0601 -D_DLL
-DSKIA_IMPLEMENTATION=1 -DSKIA_DLL
-DSK_USER_CONFIG_HEADER="<$B/config_host/config_skia.h>"
-DSK_CPU_SSE_LEVEL=SK_CPU_SSE_LEVEL_SSE2 -DUNICODE -D_UNICODE -DZLIB_CONST
-DZLIB_CONST -utf-8 -std:c++17 -permissive- -Zc:__cplusplus,preprocessor
-Gd -GR -Gs -GS -Gy -MD -nologo -wd4127 -wd4201 -wd4244 -wd4250 -wd4251
-wd4267 -wd4275 -wd4505 -wd4611 -wd4706 -bigobj -Wv:18 -FS -Zi -Oy-
-FIsrc/utils/win/SkDWriteNTDDI_VERSION.h -DLIBO_INTERNAL_ONLY -showIncludes
-w -O2 -EHs -DNOMINMAX -D_AMD64_=1 -Zc:inline -I$W/UnpackedTarball/zlib
-I$W/UnpackedTarball/libpng -I$W/UnpackedTarball/libjpeg-turbo
-I$W/UnpackedTarball/zlib -I$S/include
-IC:/PROGRA~2/WI3CF2~1/10/Include/10.0.20348.0/ucrt
-IC:/PROGRA~2/WI3CF2~1/10/include
-IC:/PROGRA~2/MICROS~2/2019/COMMUN~1/VC/Tools/MSVC/1429~1.301/Include
-IC:/PROGRA~2/WI3CF2~1/10/Include/10.0.20348.0/um
-IC:/PROGRA~2/WI3CF2~1/10/Include/10.0.20348.0/shared
-IC:/gnu/JDK-11~1.2/include/win32 -IC:/gnu/JDK-11~1.2/include
-I$B/config_host -I$W/UnpackedTarball/skia
-I$W/UnpackedTarball/skia/modules/skcms/
-I$W/UnpackedTarball/skia/third_party/vulkanmemoryallocator/
-I$W/UnpackedTarball/skia/include/third_party/vulkan/
-I$S/external/skia/inc/ -Fd$W/LinkTarget/Library/skialo.dll.objects.pdb -c
$S/external/skia/source/skia_opts.cxx
-Fo$W/CxxObject/external/skia/source/skia_opts.o |
D:/lo/src/core/solenv/gbuild/platform/filter-showIncludes.awk
-vdepfile=D:/lo/bld/workdir/Dep/CxxObject/external/skia/source/skia_opts.d
-vobjectfile=D:/lo/bld/workdir/CxxObject/external/skia/source/skia_opts.o
-vsourcefile=D:/lo/src/core/external/skia/source/skia_opts.cxx; exit
${PIPESTATUS[0]}
Thank you
Re: testListLabelPDFExport segfaulting
On Wed, 13 Sep 2023 22:02:49 +0200 Noel Grandin wrote: > A debug build (--enable-debug) would possibly give a more useful backtrace. bisecting shows https://git.libreoffice.org/core/+/ea0f9776ed8e7e9809853d292923b86756274564 is the first bad commit the better backtrace is here ... [New Thread 0x7fffcb38e7a0 (LWP 2839768)] [Thread 0x7fffcb38e7a0 (LWP 2839768) exited] warn:legacy.osl:2838662:2838662:oox/source/helper/storagebase.cxx:67: StorageBase::StorageBase - missing base input stream Test::testDateFormFieldCharacterFormatting finished in: 5248ms [_RUN_] testListLabelPDFExport::TestBody private:factory/swriter: Thread 1 "cppunittester" received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0x7fffd7c16188 in testListLabelPDFExport::TestBody (this=0x10e6d640) at /home/sharkcz/projects/libreoffice/sw/qa/extras/globalfilter/globalfilter.cxx:1290 1290CPPUNIT_ASSERT_EQUAL(1, pPdfDocument->getPageCount()); (gdb) where #0 0x7fffd7c16188 in testListLabelPDFExport::TestBody() (this=0x10e6d640) at /home/sharkcz/projects/libreoffice/sw/qa/extras/globalfilter/globalfilter.cxx:1290 #1 0x7fffd7c9b4a8 in std::__invoke_impl(std::__invoke_memfun_deref, void (testListLabelPDFExport::*&)(), testListLabelPDFExport*&) (__f=@0x10e6dba0: (void (testListLabelPDFExport::*)(testListLabelPDFExport * const)) 0x7fffd7c155d8 , __t=@0x10e6dbb0: 0x10e6d640) at /usr/include/c++/13/bits/invoke.h:74 ... but I think I see the problem, pPdfDocument is NULL, which is returned by parsePDFExport(), because we don't build with pdfium, I suppose. I can prepare a patch to run the test section only when non-NULL. Dan
Re: New tests: GTK3 platform accessibility
On 2023-09-12 10:49, Colomban Wendling wrote:
All that is a bit confusing to me, but let me try ton understand:
- On a system using dbus-broker, when logged in under GNOME, test fails?
- On *the same system*, but logging-in through SSH works!??
Yes, that's what I've observed in a Fedora 38 VM.
That's worrying, as it suggests the running environment has too much
influence on the test run, which is not good.
However, IIUC you suggest it might be a dbus/dbus-borken conflict
somehow?
That's what it looked like to me during first analysis.
What might be happening is that at-spi-bus-launcher detects a systemd
environment that makes it think running dbus-broker should work, but
something about the systemd/D-Bus environment in the virtual X session
provided by xfvb-run and dbus-launch doesn't match what's expected/required.
See also this comment in the at-spi-bus-launcher source code [1]:
/* This detects whether we are running under systemd. We only try to
* use dbus-broker if we are running under systemd because D-Bus
* service activation won't work otherwise.
*/
The following sample program, based on the at-spi-bus-launcher-code,
could explain why the SSH case works: The "systemd, use dbus-broker"
case is triggered for me on Debian testing in a KDE Plasma X11 session
(and probably the same way for a Fedora 38 GNOME session), but not in an
SSH session ("no systemd, don't use dbus-broker").
---
// build: g++ -o test test.cxx -lsystemd
#include
#include
#include
int main()
{
// s.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/at-spi2-core/-/blob/e7310f8a57cf9d9744f68059fad451cb3acd116a/bus/at-spi-bus-launcher.c#L453-460
char* unit;
if (sd_pid_get_user_unit (getpid (), ) >= 0)
std::cout << "systemd, use dbus-broker" << std::endl;
else
std::cout << "no systemd, don't use dbus-broker" << std::endl;
}
---
What if we try `dbus-broker-launch` (assuming it's compatible)
instead of `dbus-launch` if the former is available?
Would that help?
As Stephan mentioned already, it's not compatible as a drop-in-replacement.
Maybe this more complicated way mentioned in the Github discussion I
mentioned earlier could work:
Question [2]:
"What is the recommended way to run a nested dbus session, if not by
using dbus-run-session? I mostly use it to run debug instances of GNOME
Shell, as well as the for the CI pipeline when running inside Docker."
Answer (next comment):
"We don't have a recommended way to do that. If that functionality is
needed, it should be straightforward to achieve by just invoking your
private instance of `dbus-broker-launch`. Socket-activation for the
listener-socket is mandatory, though. So I would imagine creating
`dbus-broker@.socket` and `dbus-broker@.service` as systemd template
units, which take a path as template-argument where to place the socket.
It should then be as simple as `systemctl start
dbus-broker@foobar.service` to get it up and running.
If, however, you intend to integrate it into a test-suite, I would
rather expect the test-suite to create the listener manually and pass it
through `execve(2)` to `dbus-broker-launch`."
I don't have any system to test this with yet, and it might take some
time before I can have a F38 VM up and running with a LO build setup,
but I'll try and see to this soon if it's a concern.
I'm on vacation this week, but could give this another try in my Fedora
VM sometime afterwards. Or, if you're also attending LibreOffice
conference next week in person, we could also take a look at it together
then for example.
[1]
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/at-spi2-core/-/blob/e7310f8a57cf9d9744f68059fad451cb3acd116a/bus/at-spi-bus-launcher.c#L453-460
[2] https://github.com/bus1/dbus-broker/issues/145#issuecomment-437874214
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 157230] In Tabbed NotebookBar toolbar mode, the "Open" menubutton's items are redundant with the "Recent Documents" menubutton and "Open Remote" button
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157230 Jeff Fortin Tam changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||107237 Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107237 [Bug 107237] [META] Notebookbar Tabbed -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 107237] [META] Notebookbar Tabbed
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107237 Jeff Fortin Tam changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||157230 Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157230 [Bug 157230] In Tabbed NotebookBar toolbar mode, the "Open" menubutton's items are redundant with the "Recent Documents" menubutton and "Open Remote" button -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 157230] New: In Tabbed NotebookBar toolbar mode, the "Open" menubutton's items are redundant with the "Recent Documents" menubutton and "Open Remote" button
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157230 Bug ID: 157230 Summary: In Tabbed NotebookBar toolbar mode, the "Open" menubutton's items are redundant with the "Recent Documents" menubutton and "Open Remote" button Product: LibreOffice Version: 7.6.0.3 release Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor Priority: medium Component: UI Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org Reporter: nekoh...@gmail.com Created attachment 189562 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=189562=edit Comparative screenshot As shown in the attached screenshot, in the tabbed notebookbar toolbar mode (but not really in other toolbar layouts), the "Open" button has a menubutton (▼) that only contains contents that duplicate the "Recent Documents menubutton and the "Open Remote" button, both of which are present in the same group within the toolbar. It would be good to show one or the others, but not both at the same time? Tested with version: 7.6.0.3 (X86_64) / LibreOffice Community Build ID: 69edd8b8ebc41d00b4de3915dc82f8f0fc3b6265 CPU threads: 8; OS: Linux 6.4; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3 Locale: fr-CA (en_CA.UTF-8); UI: en-US Flatpak Calc: threaded -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 155670] Inconsistent table row selection
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=155670 --- Comment #7 from Eyal Rozenberg --- Created attachment 189561 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=189561=edit Narrated screencast demostrating the inconsistent selection behavior If the issue description is not entirely clear to you, please watch this narrated screencast for a demonstration (recorded on Linux, with Writer 7.6.0.3 gtk3 VCL) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 155670] Inconsistent table row selection
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=155670 --- Comment #7 from Eyal Rozenberg --- Created attachment 189561 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=189561=edit Narrated screencast demostrating the inconsistent selection behavior If the issue description is not entirely clear to you, please watch this narrated screencast for a demonstration (recorded on Linux, with Writer 7.6.0.3 gtk3 VCL) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 157006] UX review needed for Options - Writer - Compatibility dialog
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157006 --- Comment #8 from Eyal Rozenberg --- (In reply to sdc.blanco from comment #0) > * better sequencing of options? I would consider placing all options together and dropping the "like OOo 1.1" text in favor of the drop-down list box I attached an example of. >"Reorganize" is not a good word for the label. > Better label might be "Form dropdown menu like Microsoft". That option's phrasing is poor: 1. It describes a prolonged action rather than a setting (and it's probably a setting - have one kind of "organization" or another kind of "organization") 2. The term "organization" is not clear enough. Is this about the order of items on the menu? 3. "form menu" - is it a menu that's on forms? Some menu on the settings dialog, which is itself somewhat like a form? Is it the menu entitled "Form" on the main menu bar? and again - don't mention what the compatibility target is, that can be expressed using the drop-down listbox. > * general review of option labels for possible improvements/corrections > (e.g., bug 141676) I generally don't like many of them :-) * Instead of saying "Position objects like in OpenOffice 1.1", "Word-compatible trailing blanks" - we should try and say _how_ OOo positioned objects, _what_'s special about Word trailing blanks. * No commentary in parenthesis please, e.g. "(no longer protects X. You should do Y)" * We should not say "for compatibility" in the label for compatibility options. Of course its for compatibility. > * is the scroll box really needed? (i.e., general design/layout of dialog > can probably be simplified) That's certainly not a fun design. Perhaps consider two-line options? With the checkbox on the first line? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 157006] UX review needed for Options - Writer - Compatibility dialog
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157006 --- Comment #8 from Eyal Rozenberg --- (In reply to sdc.blanco from comment #0) > * better sequencing of options? I would consider placing all options together and dropping the "like OOo 1.1" text in favor of the drop-down list box I attached an example of. >"Reorganize" is not a good word for the label. > Better label might be "Form dropdown menu like Microsoft". That option's phrasing is poor: 1. It describes a prolonged action rather than a setting (and it's probably a setting - have one kind of "organization" or another kind of "organization") 2. The term "organization" is not clear enough. Is this about the order of items on the menu? 3. "form menu" - is it a menu that's on forms? Some menu on the settings dialog, which is itself somewhat like a form? Is it the menu entitled "Form" on the main menu bar? and again - don't mention what the compatibility target is, that can be expressed using the drop-down listbox. > * general review of option labels for possible improvements/corrections > (e.g., bug 141676) I generally don't like many of them :-) * Instead of saying "Position objects like in OpenOffice 1.1", "Word-compatible trailing blanks" - we should try and say _how_ OOo positioned objects, _what_'s special about Word trailing blanks. * No commentary in parenthesis please, e.g. "(no longer protects X. You should do Y)" * We should not say "for compatibility" in the label for compatibility options. Of course its for compatibility. > * is the scroll box really needed? (i.e., general design/layout of dialog > can probably be simplified) That's certainly not a fun design. Perhaps consider two-line options? With the checkbox on the first line? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
Re: testListLabelPDFExport segfaulting
A debug build (--enable-debug) would possibly give a more useful backtrace.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 157006] UX review needed for Options - Writer - Compatibility dialog
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157006 --- Comment #7 from Eyal Rozenberg --- Created attachment 189559 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=189559=edit MS Word 2004 Mac compatibility dialog Note the drop-down list box with the choice of app + version to collectively set compatibility options for. We could perhaps have that. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 157006] UX review needed for Options - Writer - Compatibility dialog
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157006 --- Comment #7 from Eyal Rozenberg --- Created attachment 189559 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=189559=edit MS Word 2004 Mac compatibility dialog Note the drop-down list box with the choice of app + version to collectively set compatibility options for. We could perhaps have that. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 157229] Table font changes and no way to undo
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157229 Sebastiano changed: What|Removed |Added URL||https://u.pcloud.link/publi ||nk/show?code=kZVNpGVZAQvdCb ||MrC5R2degLHhmv643DcvR7 Hardware|All |x86-64 (AMD64) OS|All |Windows (All) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 157228] "Find and Replace" search dialog's widgets are not consistently aligned on the sides/margins of the dialog
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157228 --- Comment #2 from Jeff Fortin Tam --- I could sort-of understand the "Help" and "Close" buttons being an exception case if they are meant to be "outside of all the contents" (though in that case they might also benefit from bigger vertical spacing from the contents, such as 12px or 24px), but the rest would be expected to be aligned. I also don't really see why there should be a Close button at the bottom when there is a window manager close button (in addition to the "Esc" keyboard shortcut), but I guess I can live with its presence. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 157229] New: Table font changes and no way to undo
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157229 Bug ID: 157229 Summary: Table font changes and no way to undo Product: LibreOffice Version: 7.6.0.3 release Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Writer Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org Reporter: sebastiano.barate...@gmail.com Created attachment 189558 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=189558=edit document to check the problem - Open the attached document - go to the firstline - mouse right click - select 'insert' - select 'rows below' only on e row is inserted (should be better 'row below') and the font changes. if you do Ctrl-Z (undo) the new line is removed, but no way do undo the font change -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 157228] "Find and Replace" search dialog's widgets are not consistently aligned on the sides/margins of the dialog
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157228 --- Comment #1 from Jeff Fortin Tam --- Created attachment 189557 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=189557=edit Annotated screenshot -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 113136] [META] Find & Replace Dialog
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113136 Jeff Fortin Tam changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||157228 Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157228 [Bug 157228] "Find and Replace" search dialog's widgets are not consistently aligned on the sides/margins of the dialog -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 157228] "Find and Replace" search dialog's widgets are not consistently aligned on the sides/margins of the dialog
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157228 Jeff Fortin Tam changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||113136 Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113136 [Bug 113136] [META] Find & Replace Dialog -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 157228] New: "Find and Replace" search dialog's widgets are not consistently aligned on the sides/margins of the dialog
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157228 Bug ID: 157228 Summary: "Find and Replace" search dialog's widgets are not consistently aligned on the sides/margins of the dialog Product: LibreOffice Version: 7.6.0.3 release Hardware: All OS: Linux (All) Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: trivial Priority: medium Component: UI Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org Reporter: nekoh...@gmail.com Description: Please see the attached annotated screenshot from the GTK3 version, in which I have overlaid orange vertical guidelines that reveal how the widgets currently don't align. Particularly, these widgets: - THe "Replace All" button - The "Sounds…" button - The "Search in:" combobox - The "Help" button - The "Close" button Steps to Reproduce: 1. Ctrl+H 2. Expand "Other options" Actual Results: See screenshot Expected Results: Ideally, everything that goes to the dialog's left/right margins should be vertically aligned. Reproducible: Always User Profile Reset: No Additional Info: Version: 7.6.0.3 (X86_64) / LibreOffice Community Build ID: 69edd8b8ebc41d00b4de3915dc82f8f0fc3b6265 CPU threads: 8; OS: Linux 6.4; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3 Locale: fr-CA (en_CA.UTF-8); UI: en-US Flatpak Calc: threaded -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 149478] Allow setting default page size separately from the choice of (language) locale
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149478 --- Comment #3 from Eyal Rozenberg --- (In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #2) > If the default page size should be made optional the best place seems to be > next to T > O > Writer > Settings where the measurement units are located But isn't the Default Page Style setting common to (almost) all modules? Writer, Calc, Impress/Draw, and Base with its generated reports? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149478] Allow setting default page size separately from the choice of (language) locale
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149478 --- Comment #3 from Eyal Rozenberg --- (In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #2) > If the default page size should be made optional the best place seems to be > next to T > O > Writer > Settings where the measurement units are located But isn't the Default Page Style setting common to (almost) all modules? Writer, Calc, Impress/Draw, and Base with its generated reports? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149478] Allow setting default page size separately from the choice of (language) locale
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149478 Eyal Rozenberg changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Separate Default Page Size |Allow setting default page |from Language Locale|size separately from the ||choice of (language) locale -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 149478] Allow setting default page size separately from the choice of (language) locale
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149478 Eyal Rozenberg changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Separate Default Page Size |Allow setting default page |from Language Locale|size separately from the ||choice of (language) locale -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 157227] "Search Results" dialog (from find & replace in "All sheets") should use markup to make the matching part of the strings easier to spot
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157227 Jeff Fortin Tam changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|"Search Results" dialog |"Search Results" dialog |(from find & replace in |(from find & replace in |"All sheets") |"All sheets") should use ||markup to make the matching ||part of the strings easier ||to spot -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 157227] "Search Results" dialog (from find & replace in "All sheets")
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157227 --- Comment #1 from Jeff Fortin Tam --- Created attachment 189556 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=189556=edit Screenshot showing how the "needle" term is not clearly identified among the search results items' strings -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 113136] [META] Find & Replace Dialog
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113136 Jeff Fortin Tam changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||157227 Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157227 [Bug 157227] "Search Results" dialog (from find & replace in "All sheets") -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 157227] "Search Results" dialog (from find & replace in "All sheets")
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157227 Jeff Fortin Tam changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||113136 Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113136 [Bug 113136] [META] Find & Replace Dialog -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 157227] New: "Search Results" dialog (from find & replace in "All sheets")
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157227 Bug ID: 157227 Summary: "Search Results" dialog (from find & replace in "All sheets") Product: LibreOffice Version: Inherited From OOo Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: medium Component: Calc Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org Reporter: nekoh...@gmail.com Description: In a long list of search results, matching parts of strings should be easier to spot. Steps to Reproduce: 1. Ctrl+H in Calc 2. Check "All sheets" 3. Run a "Find all" (or "Replace all") query Actual Results: All row items in the "Search results" dialog are shown in plain text, with no visual indication of where the matches happen in the strings Expected Results: Either use bold text (ideally) or highlighting (suboptimal, because we shouldn't depend only on color) to mark up the matching portions of the strings, so that it's easy to see what part of each row has been matching. Reproducible: Always User Profile Reset: No Additional Info: Tested on version: 7.6.0.3 (X86_64) / LibreOffice Community Build ID: 69edd8b8ebc41d00b4de3915dc82f8f0fc3b6265 CPU threads: 8; OS: Linux 6.4; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3 Locale: fr-CA (en_CA.UTF-8); UI: en-US Flatpak Calc: threaded -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 157224] Downloaded 7.6.0 and it won't boot. Not even in Safe Mode.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157224 Julien Nabet changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED OS|All |Windows (All) --- Comment #3 from Julien Nabet --- Ok let's put this one to WFM then. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 157209] Keyboard shortcuts with CTRL (copy/cut/paste/undo/redo...) not working in Linux Hebrew keyboard layout
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157209 --- Comment #5 from Amiad --- The bug still happen. I tried other locale but the bug happen too. LC_ALL=en_US.utf-8 lowriter -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
