Asking here Tor and Fridrich if they are ok with the possibility of
breaking the windows build
Well, it has already been broken for several weeks, I doubt it would make the
situation much worse.
--tml
___
LibreOffice mailing list
Hi all,
this reminder is for both the students and the mentors: please apply now
on Google Melange.
http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/org/show/google/gsoc2011/libreoffice
* Students applications can be filed from March 28th (yesterday) to
April 8th (less than 2 weeks).
* Mentors need to apply
Hi Xisco,
On Mon, 2011-03-28 at 11:16 +0200, Xisco Faulí wrote:
I was wondering if this task is suitable for the GSoC and if there is
anyone who's willing to be a mentor of it.
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Easy_Hacks#Wizards:_Java_to_Python.3F_conversion
I could help on the Java side,
Hi Andreas,
On Mon, 2011-03-28 at 20:39 +0200, Andreas Mantke wrote:
the development of LibreOffice and its features are growing every day
and week ;-)
Exciting isn't it :-)
In my opinion it would be a good idea to have a special build (nightly
build or something similar) with a
Hi Lubos
On 25/03/11 18:52, Lubos Lunak wrote:
printf( %p %p %s %p %p %s %p %p %s\n, ptr, dynamic_cast void*( ptr ),
typeid( *ptr ).name(), pFieldmark, dynamic_cast void*( pFieldmark ),
typeid( *pFieldmark ).name(), pCheckboxFm, dynamic_cast void*(
pCheckboxFm ), typeid( *pCheckboxFm
Thank you for your attention.
I'm working on a university project, where the goal is to develop solutions
for advanced calculations. eg. (integrals, derivatives, polynomials ... etc)
a range of funçções. But as I said do not believe it useful to go into
details of the source code. I can not
Hi Michael, Fridrich, *,
Am Dienstag, 29. März 2011, 10:55:53 schrieb Michael Meeks:
Hi Andreas,
On Mon, 2011-03-28 at 20:39 +0200, Andreas Mantke wrote:
the development of LibreOffice and its features are growing every day
and week ;-)
Exciting isn't it :-)
yeah :-)
In my
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673
Bug 35673 depends on bug 35602, which changed state.
Bug 35602 Summary: .docx no comments saved
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35602
What|Old Value |New Value
(2011/03/29 14:18), Cedric Bosdonnat wrote:
* Mentors need to apply now too in order to be able to participate in
the applications selection process after that period.
I have applied as a mentor.
id = vuhung
___
LibreOffice mailing list
Andreas Mantke wrote (29-03-11 17:40)
This is happening already but only for Mac and Linux.
http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/
It would be usefull, if the daily build could be installed in parallel to the
last
stable version. That makes it easier for testing and
Am 29.03.11 15:15, schrieb Jan Holesovsky:
Hi Peter,
On 2011-03-29 at 11:37 +0200, Jan Holesovsky wrote:
How wrong I was ;-) - the best is expose the Inflater / Deflater classes
as you did, so I pushed your stuff as it was.
:-)
Only did a small follow-up hack, and that was moving them to
Hi Lubos,
On Tue, 29 Mar 2011 15:11:44 +0200
Lubos Lunak l.lu...@suse.cz wrote:
Why not? I generally just need a number and int fits that perfectly.
I really don't care how many bits it has as long as it works and
don't need to wonder if I should use sal_Int32, sal_UInt16, sal_Int64
or
Hi,
pushed the framework part. Again a lot of files changed their place so
it was quite a lot of work to apply the patch. Additionally I removed
lots of dates, comments above removed commented methods, {} not needed
anymore after the if () has gone and changed
if ( bState = sal_True) to if
Hi all,
subsequenttests runs headless now by default and seem to be very stable
that way. These tests are very good to parallelize. On my machine I see:
subsequenttests
[ __.oO SCK ] loaded modules: chart2 comphelper configmgr dbaccess
editeng forms framework linguistic ooo padmin qadevOOo sal
Hi Joe,
Joe Hillenbrand wrote:
Hi all,
I am trying to build libo from git source for the first time, so that I
can apply to GSoC.
I am able to make just fine, but when I try to make dev-install it
fails (please see the errors at the end of the email).
Please pardon my ignorance,
-Joe
Hi there,
On Tue, 2011-03-29 at 14:05 -0300, saito wrote:
Here is a list of files that are not supposed to have executable bit
set on Unix/Linux.
Great; so I cleaned it up a bit more - the unxlngi6.pro files are build
intermediates that are not in git; I removed .bat and .btm files
On Tue, 2011-03-29 at 22:51 +0200, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
Hi Nuno,
First - great work :-) and good to have you helping out here Nuno.
Second - this is a page of incredible importance to developers, and as
such - any changes to it need to be discussed and decided on the
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 10:22:43PM +0200, Bjoern Michaelsen
bjoern.michael...@canonical.com wrote:
subsequenttests runs headless now by default and seem to be very stable
that way. These tests are very good to parallelize. On my machine I see:
Hi,
I'm sure this is a newbie question, but what
Joe Hillenbrand wrote:
So you think build1.log is the missing file?
Not the log file but the other part. Last weekend I did a clean build
and forgot to run that step, the full process is at [1], and got the
same error when I tried to do the make dev-install. I got pointed to
[1] when I
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 4:04 PM, Michael Meeks michael.me...@novell.com wrote:
I'd also like to hear from some of our new developers that liked that
page - again, on the dev list.
The easy hack page has hugely grown since I started. I guess that is a
good thing, but in my opinion it's
Very impressed with the programme (or should I say 'program' ), but, as
a newcomer to Linux, I found the installation procedure a pain in the butt.
Brian
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
Hi Miklos,
lengthy answer to your innocent question ahead -- brace for impact.
On Tue, 29 Mar 2011 23:18:20 +0200
Miklos Vajna vmik...@frugalware.org wrote:
I'm sure this is a newbie question, but what is the relation between
unit tests, smoketest and subsequenttests?
There is a whole lot
Hello there,
After ./g pull -r and doing make clean make build failed for dbaccess
and starmath modules. I referred the wiki and did a prtial build for
dbacess which came out clean. But still I've got build issue with starmath
module related to some JUnit test.
please have a look here
On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 05:21 +0530, Anurag Jain wrote:
Hello there,
After ./g pull -r and doing make clean make build failed for
dbaccess and starmath modules. I referred the wiki and did a prtial
build for dbacess which came out clean. But still I've got build issue
with starmath module
On 03/29/2011 12:18 AM, Cedric Bosdonnat wrote:
Hi all,
this reminder is for both the students and the mentors: please apply now
on Google Melange.
http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/org/show/google/gsoc2011/libreoffice
* Students applications can be filed from March 28th (yesterday) to
April
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 6:51 PM, Bjoern Michaelsen
bjoern.michael...@canonical.com wrote:
Maybe we should use those even in sal/types.h by now?
sure, modulo a bit of work to teach windows about standards... as C99
is way to recent of a standard for MS to have implemented it... Poor
things,
26 matches
Mail list logo
