how do you remove the media player off the LiberoOffice.
i was just messing with it and now it will not come off.
can you help please
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Apologies for posting to the developers' list but I just wanted to express a
big thank you to the creator(s) of the wonderful Linux Libertine G and Linux
Biolinum G!
These fonts, with their many ligatures and other special characters and
combinations, bring some of the delight back that the typese
I submitted the patch to the bug-make mailing list
Norbert
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 6:00 PM, Cor Nouws wrote:
>> Indeed - by freezing earlier we could potentially make things worse
>> ;-)
>
> Warning: you're going to loose me completely in the next paragraph.
>
>> because QA will not have started at all, and thus there will apparently
>> be no bugs
Hi Michael,
Michael Meeks wrote (24-06-11 10:52)
On Fri, 2011-06-24 at 01:09 +0200, Cor Nouws wrote:
Apologies for that - but it was about what I expected. (Have to try to
focus on making a living during the day-hours ;-) )
Sure, sure ...
+ extend the feature-freeze period
Jan Holesovsky wrote (24-06-11 11:52)
If we do an additional build, let's disable the online update - there is
something rotten around XPath that makes LibreOffice looking like always
up-to-date, even though it should report a new version.
Ah, that at least explains why we had so much trouble w
Hi Lubos,
Lubos Lunak píše v Pá 24. 06. 2011 v 16:40 +0200:
> could somebody who understands tarball fetching review the attached patch? I
> did make clean, pulled, configured with --with-systems-libs and during make I
> get:
>
> dmake: Error: --
> `./unxlngx6.pro/misc/4bb835ea2225c8f5f6c2b
Le 24/06/2011 14:19, Caolán McNamara a écrit :
On Thu, 2011-06-23 at 19:57 +0100, serv serva wrote:
Your theory was right, I commented out all that concerns _GLIBCXX_DEBUG in :
- sal/inc/unxgcc.mk
- sal/gbuild/platform/unxgcc.mk
Then remove sal/unxlng* and build again.
Everything is ok.
Excell
Hi,
The problem was fixed by my provider.
Regards,
László
2011/6/24 Németh László :
> Hi,
>
> I'm very sorry the problem, it was not intended. (In fact, I paid also
> the next month for the domain, but my hosting provider/registrator
> forgot to renewal the domain or inform me about the expirati
Hi,
I'm very sorry the problem, it was not intended. (In fact, I paid also
the next month for the domain, but my hosting provider/registrator
forgot to renewal the domain or inform me about the expiration. I
hope, it will be fixed soon, especially because I plan to release a
new version with a lot
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 7:13 AM, drew wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-06-23 at 15:36 -0400, drew wrote:
>> Just a quick note.
>>
>> Have sent off the formal request to the OHLF organizers..will keep folks
>> posted as specifics firm up.
>>
>
> Hi,
>
> Quick note.
>
> Exchanged a few emails with one of the o
Hi *,
Running 340rc2 / 333rc1 from command line, I sometimes get error
reports. If I get it well, it is when I have placed images in a Writer doc.
Example 1:
cono@cono-tm-new:~$ LibO341rc2/libreoffice3.4/program/soffice
(soffice:1979): Gdk-WARNING **: XID collision, trouble ahead
[...]
(soffic
On Fri, 2011-06-24 at 16:08 +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> Hmm, yeah, the passive uno registration stuff as it stood didn't really
> help a lot here does it. That just removed the need to dlopen libs at
> registration time to find out what's in it, component_getFactory was
> still the required en
I'm doing a windows build, fetching
881af2b7dca9b8259abbca00bbbc004d-LinLibertineG-20110101.zip
failed, looks like domain www.numbertext.org is expired.
Christian.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedeskto
On Wed, 2011-06-22 at 05:03 -0600, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
> Thanks. If these work fine on Linux (i.e. X11), they can't be awfully
> broken on other windowing systems either, I hope. Pushed to master.
I run into a crash on startup in that part. I quickly fixed it, but it
might be better if you check
Hi Luke,
thanks for your patch!
On Fri, 2011-06-24 at 17:38 +1200, Luke Symes wrote:
> Hi there,
>
>
> This is a one-line patch to impress to make the animation list scroll
> down to show a newly added animation. Previously we didn't scroll the
> list at all.
I think better way of doing it mig
On Fri, 2011-06-24 at 15:16 +0100, Michael Meeks wrote:
> Hey - let me explain some more; (I had hoped Matus would be at the TSC
> to explain but ...), anyhow, for the wider benefit:
>
> * having fixed symbol names like component_doFoo means we cannot
> easily chop and change a
Hello Petr, *
Thanks again and again!
Best Regards,
--
Korrawit Pruegsanusak
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Hello,
could somebody who understands tarball fetching review the attached patch? I
did make clean, pulled, configured with --with-systems-libs and during make I
get:
dmake: Error: --
`./unxlngx6.pro/misc/4bb835ea2225c8f5f6c2b2e63d25993c-libvisio-0.0.1.unpack'
not found, and can't be made
Hi Luke,
Luke Symes píše v Pá 24. 06. 2011 v 17:27 +1200:
> I'm interested in working on gui stuff, especially the custom
> animation workflow. I'm going to look at the reason for the slowdown
> with changing animation properties; something to do with the "presets
> list" taking ages to generate
Caolán McNamara píše v Pá 24. 06. 2011 v 14:00 +0100:
> On Wed, 2011-06-22 at 15:27 +0200, Petr Mladek wrote:
> > + writing output into valgrind.log instead of stdout; it should be
> > easier for users
>
> Hmm, checking this here it appears that each subprocess spawned off
> overwrites/
Hi Anurag
On 22/06/11 15:51, Anurag Jain wrote:
Hi Noel,
Resending the patch again along with the source files here.
as mentioned on Wed on iRC I pushed the patch to the feature branch. I
had hoped to see the latest changes you made to correct the control size
problem that I identified that wa
On Fri, 2011-06-24 at 10:45 +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-06-24 at 11:36 +0200, Matúš Kukan wrote:
> > Any thoughts welcomed.
>
> I'm a little confused as to what the goal/purpose of all the stoc
> hackery and library merging is all about.
Hey - let me explain some more; (
On Thu, 2011-06-23 at 15:36 -0400, drew wrote:
> Just a quick note.
>
> Have sent off the formal request to the OHLF organizers..will keep folks
> posted as specifics firm up.
>
Hi,
Quick note.
Exchanged a few emails with one of the other organizers of the show.
No final yes - but looks good.
Hi Caolan,
Caolán McNamara píše v Pá 24. 06. 2011 v 14:34 +0100:
> i.e. crash in layout of a specific .doc
> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38623
>
> fix:
> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/writer/commit/?id=fd768eb1d726e63a9c9cad0b245d1603eba6b5d9
>
> in master. Need extra
Hi Matus,
On Wed, 2011-06-22 at 09:57 +0200, Matúš Kukan wrote:
> I'm sending some patches to allow prefixes for components and also
> I've done prefixing for some components. It hope it will work also for
> others. I've done make from clean. But when I tried to add prefix
> for comphelper's compo
Le 24/06/11 15:34, Caolán McNamara a écrit :
Hi Caolàn,
> i.e. crash in layout of a specific .doc
> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38623
>
> fix:
> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/writer/commit/?id=fd768eb1d726e63a9c9cad0b245d1603eba6b5d9
Quicker than you can say "jackrabb
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673
Bug 35673 depends on bug 38623, which changed state.
Bug 38623 Summary: CRASH, FILEOPEN - opening MS word processor document causes
crash
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38623
What|Old Value |New Va
i.e. crash in layout of a specific .doc
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38623
fix:
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/writer/commit/?id=fd768eb1d726e63a9c9cad0b245d1603eba6b5d9
in master. Need extra acks for 3-4, or additional ones for
3-4-whatever-we-are-now
C.
__
> Reading more carefully, it seems the #undef block at the bottom of a
> recent svn's valgrind.h doesn't match the similar undef at the top - is
> that intended ? [seems to miss eg. the s390 piece].
oh, our snafu. will fix.
> Caolan - what do you think of doing:
> [...]
> +if (
On Wed, 2011-06-22 at 15:27 +0200, Petr Mladek wrote:
> + writing output into valgrind.log instead of stdout; it should be
> easier for users
Hmm, checking this here it appears that each subprocess spawned off
overwrites/mangles the valgrind.log, see man valgrind. So --log-file as
it st
On Thu, 2011-06-23 at 18:46 +0200, Andras Timar wrote:
> Sorry, this breaks the string freeze in 3-3, 3-4 and 3-4-1. Translators
> expect that strings don't change in stable brances. I would say, it is
> easier for everyone, if we change strings in master only.
Seems nuts to me that its better to
On Wed, 2011-06-22 at 15:27 +0200, Petr Mladek wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Kendy suggested to add --backtrace, --strace, and --valgring to the
> soffice wrapper. It will make it easier for users to provide the debug
> info.
>
> I have realized it in master, see
> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/libs
On Thu, 2011-06-23 at 19:57 +0100, serv serva wrote:
> Your theory was right, I commented out all that concerns _GLIBCXX_DEBUG in :
> - sal/inc/unxgcc.mk
> - sal/gbuild/platform/unxgcc.mk
>
> Then remove sal/unxlng* and build again.
> Everything is ok.
Excellent, so...
We don't want anyone else
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673
Alex Thurgood changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||38623
--- Comment #157 from Alex Thurgoo
Le 24/06/11 12:23, Cor Nouws a écrit :
Hi Cor, all,
> I thought we had the rationale of one issue for 3.4.x (#35673) most
> annoying bugs, where the candidates for fixing in one of the next ...
> bug-fix releases are gathered ...
You're right of course, but I just wanted to check that another
Hi,
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38590 has been accepted as
a blocker. It has been fixed this morning and we created the
libreoffice-3.4.1.3 tag for 3.4.1-rc3 release.
The corresponding official builds will be available in the beginning of
the following week. If no blocker is foun
On Fri, 2011-06-24 at 11:30 +0100, Michael Meeks wrote:
>
> -if (getenv("G_SLICE") != NULL)
> +if (RUNNING_ON_VALGRIND)
> +{
> +putenv ("G_SLICE=1");
> +fprintf(stderr, "LibreOffice: running under valgrind detected.\n");
> +alloc_mode = AMode_SYSTEM;
> +}
>
On Thu, 2011-06-23 at 17:03 -0700, plino wrote:
> Cor Nouws wrote:
> >
> > Plus - especially with the unfortunate experience from 3.4.0, and to do
> > something good for users, testers, marketing etc - IMO it is better that
> > in the end we have three weeks extra, than that we lack three days.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673
Bug 35673 depends on bug 38590, which changed state.
Bug 38590 Summary: Possible fd-leak with speadsheet containing Chart objects
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38590
What|Old Value |New Value
-
Hi Julian,
On Thu, 2011-06-23 at 11:59 +0200, Julian Seward wrote:
> Oh, I think I missed answering the simple question here. Thusly:
Ah indeed :-) and I missed that in the headers.
> #include "valgrind.h"
>
> bool running_under_valgrind (void)
> {
> return (RUNNING_ON_VALGR
Hi Alexander, *,
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 6:59 AM, Alexander Thurgood
wrote:
>
> http://neowiki.neooffice.org/index.php/Lion_Upgrade_Issues
Oh, and what they actually write, but not say so clearly is: "We
dropped support for Mac OSX 10.4"
We surely don't want that, so the deprecated stuff is to
Hi Alexander, *,
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 6:59 AM, Alexander Thurgood
wrote:
>
> http://neowiki.neooffice.org/index.php/Lion_Upgrade_Issues
Those don't look like blockers to me, but if
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38290
is a general problem with 10.7, then we got a problem.
Not
Hi Alex,
Alexander Thurgood wrote (24-06-11 11:54)
I might have missed it, but do we have a bug ID for blockers for the
3.4.1 release ? Only asking because of this crasher, which is a
regression over 3.3.2 :
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38623
I thought we had the rationale of
On Thu, 2011-06-23 at 19:27 +0100, Michael Meeks wrote:
> + remove old non-cairo cases (Caolan)
> + bin monochrome & paletised display support with prejudice (Caolan)
Now that I look at it properly the non-cairo code path was vertical
text, not monochrome X :-), oops. Will have a poke
Petr Mladek píše v Pá 24. 06. 2011 v 11:59 +0200:
> Jan Holesovsky píše v Pá 24. 06. 2011 v 11:52 +0200:
> > Hi,
> >
> > If we do an additional build, let's disable the online update - there is
> > something rotten around XPath that makes LibreOffice looking like always
> > up-to-date, even though
Jan Holesovsky píše v Pá 24. 06. 2011 v 11:52 +0200:
> Hi,
>
> If we do an additional build, let's disable the online update - there is
> something rotten around XPath that makes LibreOffice looking like always
> up-to-date, even though it should report a new version.
>
> Patch attached - please
Hi Alexander, *,
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 11:54 AM, Alexander Thurgood
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I might have missed it, but do we have a bug ID for blockers for the
> 3.4.1 release ? Only asking because of this crasher, which is a
> regression over 3.3.2 :
>
> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=
On Fri, 2011-06-24 at 11:54 +0200, Alexander Thurgood wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I might have missed it, but do we have a bug ID for blockers for the
> 3.4.1 release ? Only asking because of this crasher, which is a
> regression over 3.3.2 :
>
> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38623
Its a cra
Hi,
I might have missed it, but do we have a bug ID for blockers for the
3.4.1 release ? Only asking because of this crasher, which is a
regression over 3.3.2 :
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38623
Alex
___
LibreOffice mailing list
Libr
Hi,
If we do an additional build, let's disable the online update - there is
something rotten around XPath that makes LibreOffice looking like always
up-to-date, even though it should report a new version.
Patch attached - please have a look & push to -3-4, and -3-4-1, if
possible.
Regards,
Kend
On Fri, 2011-06-24 at 11:36 +0200, Matúš Kukan wrote:
> Any thoughts welcomed.
I'm a little confused as to what the goal/purpose of all the stoc
hackery and library merging is all about. Presumably the smallest
libraries e.g. bootstrap.uno.so and stocservices.uno.so and things like
that are good m
Hi Petr,
Sorry about the confusion I created on a previous summary thread in my
brainstorming attempt to get development summaries into the wiki.
I know it was bad because it even seemed to infect your response a little.
This should be clearer.
Here is an example of a wrapper (wiki-dev-sum
Hi all,
I tried to merge svxcore into svx library and it seems to be working.
I'm sending diff for it, so you can tell me if that's alright (and the
right way to do it).
I also had to adjust dependencies of other libraries but that's not
worth sending.
I'd like first to merge libraries in modules
Hi Cor,
On Fri, 2011-06-24 at 01:09 +0200, Cor Nouws wrote:
> Apologies for that - but it was about what I expected. (Have to try to
> focus on making a living during the day-hours ;-) )
Sure, sure ...
> > + extend the feature-freeze period for 3.5 ?
> > + Norbert: may n
On Fri, 2011-06-24 at 01:11 +0200, Cor Nouws wrote:
> > * Posting TSC minutes on the blog ...
> > + Norbert: wording is very terse, not enough context, not suitable
> > for mass public consumption.
> > + Suggestion: needs to be expanded, and made more comprehensible,
> > someon
Desire to impress and please your lover tonight?
http://singlehottiesonline.com/success.html
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Le 24/06/11 10:17, Michael Meeks a écrit :
Hi Michael,
> So the API deprecation issues are not so urgent, I hope Apple stays
> backwards compatible here - so the first two items hopefully are not a
> major issue for this release.
Hopefully :-))
>
Yep - wrt. the other two issues:
Hi Alex,
On Fri, 2011-06-24 at 06:59 +0200, Alexander Thurgood wrote:
> I know this is likely to irk folks a little here
Ah not at all ;-) its nice to hear of up-coming problems before they
arrive.
> http://neowiki.neooffice.org/index.php/Lion_Upgrade_Issues
So the API deprecati
Michael @ OP - awesome set of notes!
Cor @
> I only can point to my favourite page:
> http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Installing_in_parallel
Even though I have two build configs (3.4 and master), OOo3.2 and the 3.4
release installed, I have been frustrated in doing full triage/testing and
o
Cor Nouws wrote (24-06-11 09:21)
I know no evidence that Windows (users) is (are) not taken seriously.
I think it will help if people try more serious to improve on where we
are, also with QA/testing, rather then complain.
Hmm, while slicing an excellent mango (hmm ;-) , my thoughts drifted to
Hi Korrawit,
My take is:
-- you (and others) cannot reproduce fdo#37584 (redlined text disappears)
in 3-3 or 3-3-3 because my patch referenced in your original post [OP] is
not in the 3-3 branches.
-- you and others cannot reproduce 'leading quote as word' in your 3-3
build because the patch
plino wrote (24-06-11 09:03)
Cor Nouws wrote:
Well, I don't see any betas coming for the 3.4.x branch, so whether is
has been added or not, does not make sense.
Unless TDF is going to adopt the absurd Chrome (and now Firefox) version
model, the next version should be 3.5.0 indeed.
Hmm - apa
Cor Nouws wrote:
>
> Well, I don't see any betas coming for the 3.4.x branch, so whether is
> has been added or not, does not make sense.
>
Unless TDF is going to adopt the absurd Chrome (and now Firefox) version
model, the next version should be 3.5.0 indeed. I guess we (Windows users)
will h
64 matches
Mail list logo
