Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Automatically select an option page if a user clicks on a category

Hi August, August Sodora wrote (16-12-11 06:27) Stefan Knorr notified me of the following whiteboard item from the design team [1], and I have created the following patch that should implement the desired behavior. [...] [1] http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Whiteboards/KillOptions#Filler_Page

Re: [Libreoffice] Tell me Easy Hack 42782 "remove a dog ! " is a joke !

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 15/12/11 08:26, Khaled Hosny wrote: > certain culture is superior to others, and if we can remove a > possibly offending item to certain people, what harm can be caused > by that? This is the only time I'll comment on this thread, don't worry. Is

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] Automatically select an option page if a user clicks on a category

Hey all, Stefan Knorr notified me of the following whiteboard item from the design team [1], and I have created the following patch that should implement the desired behavior. I haven't done any of the cleanup for this because I'd like to dig a little deeper but there are definitely src and hrc en

[Libreoffice] [Patch] Remove OOoImprovement

Hello, I realized there were still a few things left over from the testtool removal so I created the attached patch. There seem to be some logging-related things left in comphelper and officecfg that are used all over the place but I'm not 100% sure about them yet. Would somebody mind reviewing/pu

Re: [Libreoffice] [RFC] COMPRESSMODE_FULL

Matteo Casalin wrote: > set: > /binfilter/binfilter/bf_svtools/source/filter.vcl/filter/svt_filter.cxx > /core/svtools/source/filter/filter.cxx > Both can go. > check: > /core/tools/source/generic/gen.cxx > /core/tools/source/generic/color.cxx > /core/tools/source/generic/poly.cxx > Heh. Hard

Re: [Libreoffice] minutes of tech. steering call ...

Christian Lohmaier wrote: > A proposal for such common URL has been > hub.libreoffice.org/?optional=parameters&like=version&and=distribution > Yep, recall that - wanna work on this, you seem to have spent quite some thought on it already? Cheers, -- Thorsten pgpWkkRW3kXQG.pgp Description: PGP

Re: [Libreoffice] minutes of tech. steering call ...

Hi Thorsten, *, On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 9:30 PM, Thorsten Behrens wrote: > Michael Meeks wrote: >> >>       + bugzilla submission assistant - lots of work currently >>               + pending integration of link in the help menu for 3.5 >> AA:           + get a permanant re-direction link for bug

[Libreoffice] [RFC] COMPRESSMODE_FULL

Hi everybody, some days ago I stumbled upon vcl Rectangle SvStream >> and << operators (gen.cxx). Their implementation handles the case that the stream is compressed as COMPRESSMODE_FULL (and can surely be improved). For better understanding I opengrok'ed this COMPRESSMODE_FULL and it turns

Re: [Libreoffice] libicudata ICU data info

Hi Mike, On Wednesday, 2011-12-14 07:48:49 -0800, Mike Whiteley wrote: > The current libicudata is about 15MB, but it doesn't need > to be that large. We can probably get it down to 5MB > or less. I took a bit of time on this. > > 1) The configuration files needed to modify what is actually > i

[Libreoffice] [Bug 37361] LibreOffice 3.5 most annoying bugs

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37361 Cor Nouws changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||43869 --- Comment #55 from Cor Nouws 2011-1

[Libreoffice] [Bug 37361] LibreOffice 3.5 most annoying bugs

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37361 Cor Nouws changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||43480 --- Comment #54 from Cor Nouws 2011-1

[Libreoffice] [Bug 37361] LibreOffice 3.5 most annoying bugs

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37361 Cor Nouws changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||43532 --- Comment #53 from Cor Nouws 2011-1

[Libreoffice] [Bug 37361] LibreOffice 3.5 most annoying bugs

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37361 Cor Nouws changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||43824 --- Comment #52 from Cor Nouws 2011-1

[Libreoffice] [Bug 37361] LibreOffice 3.5 most annoying bugs

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37361 Cor Nouws changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||43458 --- Comment #51 from Cor Nouws 2011-1

[Libreoffice] [Bug 35673] LibreOffice 3.4 most annoying bugs

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673 Cor Nouws changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||43867 --- Comment #238 from Cor Nouws 2011-

[Libreoffice] [Bug 37361] LibreOffice 3.5 most annoying bugs

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37361 Cor Nouws changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||43867 --- Comment #50 from Cor Nouws 2011-1

Re: [Libreoffice] gbuild'ified salhelper

On 15/12/11 12:24, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > > > converts salhelper to gbuild directly on master (rather than on > feature/gbuild branch, should help us find out faster if it breaks on > some plat

Re: [Libreoffice] What do we want from extensions module?

Hi Peter, I think your e-mail did not make it to the list, so re-sending without patch. > On Wed, 14 Dec 2011, Michael Stahl wrote: > >> On 14/12/11 12:34, Mat?? Kukan wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > I'm going to have a look at converting extensions to gbuild. >> >> i have dug out my incomplete patches

[Libreoffice] [Bug 37361] LibreOffice 3.5 most annoying bugs

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37361 --- Comment #49 from Regina Henschel 2011-12-15 13:15:22 PST --- Nominate Bug 43837 - Impress crashes on custom animation of presentation objects Please try it out, it is not confirmed yet. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/u

Re: [Libreoffice] minutes of tech. steering call ...

Michael Meeks wrote: > + cleanup old test build server directories (Thorsten) > This is done - there were beta0 builds from the Linux/Windows Release config still around, but since beta0 was not so nice anyway ... ;) > + 3.4.5 - tag delayed by two days > + builds already

[Libreoffice] [Bug 37361] LibreOffice 3.5 most annoying bugs

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37361 Bug 37361 depends on bug 43831, which changed state. Bug 43831 Summary: Advanced FILTER incompatible with 3.4.4 documents https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43831 What|Old Value |New Value -

Re: [Libreoffice] minutes of tech. steering call ...

On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 1:46 PM, Christian Lohmaier wrote: > Hi *, > > On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 6:40 PM, Michael Meeks wrote: >> QA awesome git bibi fun (Bjoern) >> [...] >>        + Norbert to investigate it working on Mac, will it bloat up >>                + have to copy images, not DMGs > > DM

Re: [Libreoffice] minutes of tech. steering call ...

Hi *, On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 6:40 PM, Michael Meeks wrote: > QA awesome git bibi fun (Bjoern) > [...] >        + Norbert to investigate it working on Mac, will it bloat up >                + have to copy images, not DMGs DMGs are the images (disk images, similar to a iso, i.e. an in-file filesy

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] Fix for fdo43460 Part X getLength() to isEmpty()

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Please find attached a partial fix for Easy Hack FDO43460 Part X Module cppu cppuhelper cpputools - -- Olivier Hallot Founder, Board of Directors Member - The Document Foundation LibreOffice translation leader for Brazilian Portuguese +55-21-8822-881

[Libreoffice] License statement: Gustavo Buzzatti Pacheco

All my contributions to LibreOffice are licensed under the MPL/LGPLv3+ dual license. Gustavo Buzzatti Pacheco. ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: [Libreoffice] Candidate patch for integration?

Hi Muthu, On Thu, 2011-12-15 at 17:03 +0530, Muthu Subramanian K wrote: > I had written this patch quite some time back: > https://issues.apache.org/ooo/attachment.cgi?id=68593&action=diff > Related to > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33602 > I assumed this was in go-oo.org and also

Re: [Libreoffice] postgresql bits in minutes of tech. steering call

On Thu, 2011-12-15 at 19:11 +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote: > On this, someone said on the talk "we use only libc" (and I implicitly > understood: in the binaries we distribute). You have to be quite careful with claims from Fridrich, they are often exaggerated for comic effect :-)

Re: [Libreoffice] unit-test dependencies (Re: Tests on release build)

Hi there, On Thu, 2011-12-15 at 18:01 +0100, Michael Stahl wrote: > well that of course would be the case if the dependencies in the test > makefile were complete. which they apparently are not. which is in no > way obvious. which is my point. Hah :-) so - one thing that I wondered abo

[Libreoffice] [Bug 37361] LibreOffice 3.5 most annoying bugs

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37361 Rainer Bielefeld changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||43862 --- Comment #48 from Rainer Bie

[Libreoffice] postgresql bits in minutes of tech. steering call

On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 05:40:27PM +, Michael Meeks wrote: > * postgresql bits > AA: + checking pg baseline on windows (Fridrich) I had understood this as: "Check Kerberos/GSSAPI on our GNU/Linux baseline, to see if we can use it as a system library". So nothing on Windows. On this, someon

[Libreoffice] minutes of tech. steering call ...

* Present: + Rainer, Michael Stahl, Christian, Norbert, Cor Nouws, Bjoern, Lionel, Stephan, Eike, Kendy, Caolan, Cedric, Petr, Lubos * Completed Action Items + create 'lightproof' git repo on freedesktop for Laszlo (Michael) + review pending labels patch

Re: [Libreoffice] Tell me Easy Hack 42782 "remove a dog ! " is a joke !

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Em 15-12-2011 13:22, Pedro escreveu: (snip useless references) > > In any case the picture is not particularly helpful or useful. The problem > is: what do you replace it with? > A big question mark ?, a traffic danger sign (yellow triangle w

Re: [Libreoffice] unit-test dependencies (Re: Tests on release build)

On 15/12/11 17:37, Michael Meeks wrote: > On Thu, 2011-12-15 at 13:18 +, Caolán McNamara wrote: >> On Thu, 2011-12-15 at 13:56 +0100, Michael Stahl wrote: >>> we wouldn't have this problem if these were subsequenttests >> >> but then no one would run them :-), I still feel its far better to try

Re: [Libreoffice] Mozldap switch

On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 02:19:50PM +0100, Tomáš Chvátal wrote: > Dne 15. prosince 2011 14:13 Lionel Elie Mamane napsal(a): >> On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 10:40:25AM +0100, Tomáš Chvátal wrog    te: >>> I tried to implement simple mozldap system switch to update from the >>> older-than-sun bundled fir

[Libreoffice] [Bug 37361] LibreOffice 3.5 most annoying bugs

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37361 Bug 37361 depends on bug 43707, which changed state. Bug 43707 Summary: FILEOPEN PDF brings up (ASCII) filter selector instead of opening document https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43707 What|Old Value

Re: [Libreoffice] unit-test dependencies (Re: Tests on release build)

On Thu, 2011-12-15 at 13:18 +, Caolán McNamara wrote: > On Thu, 2011-12-15 at 13:56 +0100, Michael Stahl wrote: > > we wouldn't have this problem if these were subsequenttests > > but then no one would run them :-), I still feel its far better to try > and track down and fix the dependency or

Re: [Libreoffice] Make gbuild output [build CXX] filename also with the .cxx extension

On Wednesday 14 of December 2011, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: > Hi Lubos, > > On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 04:45:29PM +0100, Lubos Lunak wrote: > > I find it mildly annoying that gbuild outputs "[ build CXX ] > > starmath/source/types", without the .cxx extension, i.e. a non-existent > > file. Especially

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Use -gdwarf-4 by default if possible (was Re: Even more debugging info)

On Thursday 08 of December 2011, Lubos Lunak wrote: > On Wednesday 07 of December 2011, Michael Meeks wrote: > > On Thu, 2011-12-01 at 17:35 +0100, Lubos Lunak wrote: > > > > So -gdwarf-4 looks like a sensible default to me. Even if not, I'm > > > > going to use it (quick hack: modify your LO make

Re: [Libreoffice] Tell me Easy Hack 42782 "remove a dog ! " is a joke !

In the same way, we should remove all the drawing tools too because someone could use a personal photo and change it to make the person ridiculous... We should also add some autocorrect to prevent the writing of rude words... The pb is not the tool, it's what you do with it (think about all these

Re: [Libreoffice] Hi ! We are new on libo!

Hi Michael & Fernand ! The preview feature isn't in the scope of what we would like to do for the moment, but if we've got the occasion, we'll have a look at it. Thank you for the hint about FTP connections, we'll see what we can do to deal with this issue. We looked at this project on Elveos, bu

Re: [Libreoffice] assertion in SwIndexReg::~SwIndexReg

On Thu, 2011-12-15 at 08:56 +0100, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > On 12/15/2011 12:59 AM, Terrence Enger wrote: > > [snip] > > > > How on earh can soffice.bin know that I did anything in > > gnome-terminal? > > Due to the clipboard being a resource shared across all applications. Calm down, Terry.

Re: [Libreoffice] Tell me Easy Hack 42782 "remove a dog ! " is a joke !

It is quite easy to get the dog image displayed and it shows up in the Picture dialog replacing the missing image... That can be offending in any culture, especially if the image replaced is of a person and the image replacing it is an offense for your culture (imagine your picture replaced by a

Re: [Libreoffice] Simpler logging using a string format function

On Thursday 15 of December 2011, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > On 12/15/2011 02:57 PM, Lubos Lunak wrote: > > The "bar"<< "baz", which, at first glance, is nonsense. Code is not > > only written, it is also read, and many more times. > > Still don't get what you mean. You mean, "bar" << "baz" shoul

Re: [Libreoffice] please pick those two build-related commits for libreoffice-3.5 (XCode 2.5 build breaker & download → use same branch for the clones)

Hi *, was told that there is no sign-off needed yet for the branch, so pushed myself :-) ciao Christian ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: [Libreoffice] Simpler logging using a string format function

On 12/15/2011 02:57 PM, Lubos Lunak wrote: On Thursday 15 of December 2011, Stephan Bergmann wrote: On 12/13/2011 07:56 PM, Lubos Lunak wrote: But it might the moment you realize you're trading away things like SAL_INFO( "foo", 1<< 2 ) or SAL_INFO( "foo", "bar"<< "baz" ). Trading a

[Libreoffice] please pick those two build-related commits for libreoffice-3.5 (XCode 2.5 build breaker & download → use same branch for the clones)

Hi *, please pick http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=9a845f988e6b5ec50ddda123cf761d8541c005fa (change to download, so that when using linked git repos, git-new-workdir will checkout the same branch as the core repo) and http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=

Re: [Libreoffice] Simpler logging using a string format function

On Thursday 15 of December 2011, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > On 12/13/2011 07:56 PM, Lubos Lunak wrote: > > But it might the moment you realize you're trading away things like > > > > SAL_INFO( "foo", 1<< 2 ) or SAL_INFO( "foo", "bar"<< "baz" ). > > Trading away the former, having to parenthesi

Re: [Libreoffice] Tell me Easy Hack 42782 "remove a dog ! " is a joke !

Hi all > I don't know if it's a French ideal, it's just the fact that an image of dog > should'nt possibly offend anyone. as a newbye, with ideals too, and most important I'm french, i would highly prefer that we speak about cats ! a highly cultural matter concerning Lovecraft lovers please guys

Re: [Libreoffice] postresql-sdbc bits out of minutes of tech. steering call

On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 10:32:26AM +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote: > On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 09:46:37AM +0100, Fridrich Strba wrote: >> On 12/12/11 08:14, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote: >>> This also means that by our "we have to build everything we ship" >>> rule, we have to internalise, according to

Re: [Libreoffice] Tell me Easy Hack 42782 "remove a dog ! " is a joke !

On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 05:05:34AM -0800, julien2412 wrote: > I don't know if it's a French ideal, it's just the fact that an image of dog > should'nt possibly offend anyone. True, if you consider only one culture, the fact is that the world is vastly different and what can't "possibly offend anyo

Re: [Libreoffice] Mozldap switch

Dne 15. prosince 2011 14:13 Lionel Elie Mamane napsal(a): > On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 10:40:25AM +0100, Tomáš Chvátal wrog    te: > >> I tried to implement simple mozldap system switch to update from the >> older-than-sun bundled firefox [1]. > > You seem to remove support for OpenLDAP; any reason f

Re: [Libreoffice] unit-test dependencies (Re: Tests on release build)

On Thu, 2011-12-15 at 13:56 +0100, Michael Stahl wrote: > we wouldn't have this problem if these were subsequenttests but then no one would run them :-), I still feel its far better to try and track down and fix the dependency or parallel test problem, whatever it is, then move things into a subse

[Libreoffice] [ANN] LibreOffice 3.4.5 RC1 test builds available

Hi *, for 3.4.5 RC1, we're now uploading builds to a public (but non-mirrored - so don't spread news too widely!) place, as soon as they're available. Grab them here: http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/pre-releases-3-4/ If you've a bit of time, please give them a try & report *critical* bugs not

Re: [Libreoffice] Mozldap switch

On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 10:40:25AM +0100, Tomáš Chvátal wrogte: > I tried to implement simple mozldap system switch to update from the > older-than-sun bundled firefox [1]. You seem to remove support for OpenLDAP; any reason for that? -- Lionel __

Re: [Libreoffice] Tell me Easy Hack 42782 "remove a dog ! " is a joke !

Hi again, I answered to Mike and Khaled personally, i should have cc the forum too. Just to sum up what I told them : first : it's not a personal attack against anyone, all of you guys do a great job and brought me friendly help when i needed. Then : of course the vast majority of muslims, like c

Re: [Libreoffice] unit-test dependencies (Re: Tests on release build)

On 12/15/2011 01:56 PM, Michael Stahl wrote: we wouldn't have this problem if these were subsequenttests; it would even be possible to run them when rebuilding a single module with something like "make build&& make subsequenttests" (perhaps "make check" in a module should do that?), just not on

[Libreoffice] unit-test dependencies (Re: Tests on release build)

On 15/12/11 11:34, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > On 12/15/2011 10:58 AM, Tomáš Chvátal wrote: >> So unless you can look at one of those traces and tell me that the >> build should be stopped because "it is obvious error in the code (not >> in the test, the app code) that needs to be fixed" I would want

Re: [Libreoffice] symbol visibility, windows, 3-5

On Thu, 2011-12-15 at 12:43 +, Caolán McNamara wrote: > Looking at fdo#43422 and now looking at fdo#43707 I see that for some > reason we are not exporting component_getFactory symbols under windows > from some dmake-built uno libs. > > Anyone know when these last worked ? Alright, tracked do

Re: [Libreoffice] gbuild conversion module status

On 15 December 2011 13:11, Michael Stahl wrote: > http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Build_System/Module_status > > people who have already converted modules in feature branches, please > add that info to the page! > done thanks, Matus ___

Re: [Libreoffice] Tests on release build

2011/12/15 Bjoern Michaelsen : > > It is (unless I broke it with the last major gbuild -- it should be easy to > fix > then). That said, I really have a bad feeling about letting end users compile > distro builds without running these tests -- the last thing we need is > additional bugzilla worklo

Re: [Libreoffice] Tell me Easy Hack 42782 "remove a dog ! " is a joke !

On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 11:58:52AM +, Michael Meeks wrote: > > On Thu, 2011-12-15 at 13:14 +0200, Khaled Hosny wrote: > > I'm really offended by > ... > > This is a software project, if you have some political, > > cultural or religious agenda, please take it somewhere else. > > I'm sor

[Libreoffice] symbol visibility, windows, 3-5

Looking at fdo#43422 and now looking at fdo#43707 I see that for some reason we are not exporting component_getFactory symbols under windows from some dmake-built uno libs. Anyone know when these last worked ? C. ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffic

Re: [Libreoffice] Tell me Easy Hack 42782 "remove a dog ! " is a joke !

Hi Julien, if you find the current explanation why the dog should go unconvincing, let's look at it from a different angle: how does it fare as a preview image? I'd say: okay-ish, but it's not great, a more conventional image would definitely work better. So, even if the bug was started for the wr

Re: [Libreoffice] Tell me Easy Hack 42782 "remove a dog ! " is a joke !

Hi, On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 11:58:52AM +, Michael Meeks wrote: > I'm well aware that many people will not like many of the things that I > stand for, and be offended by some of my opinions :-) personally I'd > like to hope that I can still air them from time to time, and people > will pu

[Libreoffice] gbuild conversion module status

hi all, if you consider converting a module to gbuild, please first take a look at this brand new Wiki page, and add your name to the "remarks" column, so we don't end up with 3 people doing the same thing: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Build_System/Module_status people who have

Re: [Libreoffice] Tests on release build

On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 12:49:41PM +0100, Tomáš Chvátal wrote: > > IIUC, "make build" will omit the checks (and "make unitcheck" will execute > > them). (for gbuildified modules, build.pl modules will still run tests) > > > > Stephan > > That would be awesome to see implemented. It is (unless I

Re: [Libreoffice] Tell me Easy Hack 42782 "remove a dog ! " is a joke !

On Thu, 2011-12-15 at 13:14 +0200, Khaled Hosny wrote: > I'm really offended by ... > This is a software project, if you have some political, > cultural or religious agenda, please take it somewhere else. I'm sorry you're offended Khaled; this is (I suspect) a consequence of our growth -

[Libreoffice] [Bug 37361] LibreOffice 3.5 most annoying bugs

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37361 Bug 37361 depends on bug 43422, which changed state. Bug 43422 Summary: Spell check: Crash "Runtime Error" with AutoSpellcheck https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43422 What|Old Value |New Value

Re: [Libreoffice] Tests on release build

2011/12/15 Stephan Bergmann : > On 12/15/2011 10:58 AM, Tomáš Chvátal wrote: >> >> So unless you can look at one of those traces and tell me that the >> build should be stopped because "it is obvious error in the code (not >> in the test, the app code) that needs to be fixed" I would want you > > >

[Libreoffice] gbuild'ified salhelper

converts salhelper to gbuild directly on master (rather than on feature/gbuild branch, should help us find out faster if it breaks on some platform). Technically its the earliest feature/gbuild-ch

[Libreoffice] dog jokes ...

Hi Julien, On Wed, 2011-12-14 at 23:03 -0800, julien2412 wrote: > This morning I'm still angry about this tracker. It is an easy hack :-) it is a somewhat light-hearted one designed to attract and amuse volunteers - so yes it is partly a joke - but it's not designed to make you angry. Its

Re: [Libreoffice] split links, word import issue?

[ forwarded to qa-list ] Tomas Hlavaty wrote (15-12-11 12:06) Hi all, I created a document xx.odt with a link. Then I saved the link as [...] Anybody seen this issue? -- - Cor - http://nl.libreoffice.org ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@

Re: [Libreoffice] Tell me Easy Hack 42782 "remove a dog ! " is a joke !

Hi Julien, On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 11:03:15PM -0800, julien2412 wrote: > Hello, > > This morning I'm still angry about this tracker. I read it yesterday and > spoke my mind on IRC dev channel. I was glad I wasn't alone to think this > easyhack is nonsense. > I put a quick comment on this tracker

[Libreoffice] split links, word import issue?

Hi all, I created a document xx.odt with a link. Then I saved the link as xx.doc. Then opened xx.doc and found that the single original link was split into several links, each link for one word or space from the original link label (see xx3.odt). It looks like the algorithm for word import shou

[Libreoffice] Candidate patch for integration?

Hi, I had written this patch quite some time back: https://issues.apache.org/ooo/attachment.cgi?id=68593&action=diff Related to https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33602 I assumed this was in go-oo.org and also made it to libreoffice, but I guess I was wrong. If the code is fine, shall I

Re: [Libreoffice] Tests on release build

On 12/15/2011 10:58 AM, Tomáš Chvátal wrote: So unless you can look at one of those traces and tell me that the build should be stopped because "it is obvious error in the code (not in the test, the app code) that needs to be fixed" I would want you Hard to tell without a backtrace. guys to r

Re: [Libreoffice] SDK installation problem was: libreoffice-3.4.99.1 tag created (3.5.0-beta1)

Andreas Radke píše v St 14. 12. 2011 v 22:48 +0100: > build is done in a clean chroot each time. shouldn't be a problem. the > beta0 built fine here. > the only difference to beta0 is the changed internal libvisio src bump. > tried autoconf/autoreconf and make -j1 install without luck :( It is re

[Libreoffice] Tests on release build

Hello guys, as again there is new series of lo it means more tests were added to the list of those that are run during the make phase (where normal software do only build). For developers it helps to identify issues quickly because your build crashes if you try to compile your changes but for user

Re: [Libreoffice] [ANNOUNCE] libreoffice-3.4.99.1 tag created (3.5.0-beta1)

2011/12/14 Andreas Radke : > > any suggestions welcome. > > the only difference to beta0 is the changed internal libvisio src bump. > tried autoconf/autoreconf and make -j1 install without luck :( > > -Andy It is not failure during build, but during install, so configure and make can have any para

Re: [Libreoffice] Simpler logging using a string format function

On 12/13/2011 10:21 PM, Michael Meeks wrote: On Mon, 2011-12-12 at 22:59 +0100, Stephan Bergmann wrote: To be honest, I don't think the stated benefits (a different syntax) are worth a switch. Well; the syntax that makes translation possible is a nice thing; but Again, translation i

Re: [Libreoffice] Simpler logging using a string format function

On 12/13/2011 07:56 PM, Lubos Lunak wrote: On Monday 12 of December 2011, Stephan Bergmann wrote: Shrug. Neither<< nor something printf-like is particularly sexy, IMO. And trading<< for +, when it requires you to wrap non-string arguments in rtl::OUString::valueOf, doesn't look too excitin