Re: [Libreoffice] RFC Operation Spamzilla

Bjoern Michaelsen schrieb: here is an urgent request for comments. We still have ~2400 bugs in state NEW Hi Bjoern, of course I see the problem, but I have absolutely no problem with that fact, because I use a query basing on my experience. You find it here:

Re: [Libreoffice] [REVIEW-3-4-5] Reverted - Fix overly zealous check in Zip package consistency

And +1 from me. --tml ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

[Libreoffice] 让你的产品满地飞！相当于20个业务员的营销能力！（AD）libreoffice@lists.freedesktop.org

　 libreoffice@lists.freedesktop.org 电话接不停，一定有可能！ 精准9邮1件7推6广，相当于20个业务员。 5wJwEwB.4830l630O1n020V09.5ccofmM （网址不能复制，只能人工输入到浏览器地址栏哦） QQ:8131H4M312c5Q8O9j8892 20111222183941 ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedeskt

Re: [Libreoffice] gbuild circular dependencies

On 23 December 2011 00:42, Peter Foley wrote: > > Hi, > > While converting connectivity to gbuild I seem to have created some > circular dependencies. > > make[1]: Circular > /home/peter/libreoffice/workdir/unxlngx6.pro/ExternalHeaders/Library/libsdbc2lo.so > <- > /home/peter/libreoffice/workdi

Re: [Libreoffice] gbuild circular dependencies

On Thu, 22 Dec 2011, Peter Foley wrote: > > Hi, > > While converting connectivity to gbuild I seem to have created some > circular dependencies. > > make[1]: Circular > /home/peter/libreoffice/workdir/unxlngx6.pro/ExternalHeaders/Library/libsdbc2lo.so > <- > /home/peter/libreoffice/workdir/u

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Remove SC_DLLPUBLIC to fix build on msvc 2008

On 22 December 2011 15:53, Korrawit Pruegsanusak wrote: > [ build MOD ] hwpfilter > R=/cygdrive/d && S=$R/libo && O=$S/solver/wntmsci12.pro && > W=$S/workdir/wntmsci12.pro &&  mkdir -p $W/Module/ && touch > $W/Module/hwpfilter > D:/libo/solenv/gbuild/StaticLibrary.mk:49: *** gb_Deliver_deliver: >

Re: [Libreoffice] [REVIEW-3-4-5] Reverted - Fix overly zealous check in Zip package consistency

On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 12:40:28AM +0100, Michael Stahl wrote: > > Sigh, we had branched off 3-4-5 meanwhile, which needs 3 reviews - > > Michael, Petr, would you want to approve the revert? > if it really needs that, +1 from me +1 from me ___ LibreOffice

[Libreoffice] gbuild circular dependencies

Hi, While converting connectivity to gbuild I seem to have created some circular dependencies. make[1]: Circular /home/peter/libreoffice/workdir/unxlngx6.pro/ExternalHeaders/Library/libsdbc2lo.so <- /home/peter/libreoffice/workdir/unxlngx6.pro/Headers/Library/libdbtoolslo.so dependency dropp

Re: [Libreoffice] [REVIEW-3-4-5] Reverted - Fix overly zealous check in Zip package consistency

On 23/12/11 00:29, Thorsten Behrens wrote: >>> Michael Meeks wrote: can't we just revert the original fix there ? >>> >> Reverted with Stephan's review in -3-4. >> > Sigh, we had branched off 3-4-5 meanwhile, which needs 3 reviews - > Michael, Petr, would you want to approve the revert?

Re: [Libreoffice] [REVIEW-3-4-5] Reverted - Fix overly zealous check in Zip package consistency

> > Michael Meeks wrote: > > > can't we just revert the original fix there ? > > > > > > Reverted with Stephan's review in -3-4. > Sigh, we had branched off 3-4-5 meanwhile, which needs 3 reviews - Michael, Petr, would you want to approve the revert? Thanks, -- Thorsten pgpNmCCgWUuIa.pgp Descr

[Libreoffice] [Bug 35673] LibreOffice 3.4 most annoying bugs

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673 Bug 35673 depends on bug 39799, which changed state. Bug 39799 Summary: CRASH when insert SVG image while EDITING https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39799 What|Old Value |New Value -

Re: [Libreoffice] RFC Operation Spamzilla

Niko Rönkkö wrote: > Shouldn't it be 3.5.0 Beta 2 and not Beta 1? > Yep, though in theory, Beta2 could be a disaster & we don't publish it (not likely). Plan was I think to wait for feedback on the pre-release builds & then adapt the messaging ... Cheers, -- Thorsten pgpzDsIG5aG6Z.pgp Descript

Re: [Libreoffice] RFC Operation Spamzilla

Hi Niko, Niko Rönkkö wrote (23-12-11 00:03) Details on how to test the 3.5.0 beta1 can be found at: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/BugHunting_Session_3.5.0.-1 Shouldn't it be 3.5.0 Beta 2 and not Beta 1? Both are fine. I guess the beta 2 will be available when we have the bug-hunting

Re: [Libreoffice] RFC Operation Spamzilla

Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: > So here is my proposal: I want to batch change all those old unconfirmed bugs > (without the now obsolete CONFIRMED in whiteboard status) to state NEEDINFO. > Sounds very worthwhile. Go for it! :) Cheers, -- Thorsten pgpJDdVD4dPvs.pgp Description: PGP signature __

[Libreoffice] [REVIEW] invalid ODF fdo#37390 fdo#44073 fdo#44082

proposing the following commits for 3.4.5, as they prevent LO from writing invalid ODF: http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=c1e1ef80e8428514499b061e00801a6a6298d0b0 http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=59a5c37d0df9b5612552c4b749191385ca0adc80 with the fix

[Libreoffice] [Bug 37361] LibreOffice 3.5 most annoying bugs

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37361 Bug 37361 depends on bug 43837, which changed state. Bug 43837 Summary: SLIDESHOW CRASH on custom animation of particular objects https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43837 What|Old Value |New Value -

Re: [Libreoffice] RFC Operation Spamzilla

On 22.12.2011 22.33, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: [This is an automated message.] This bug was filed before the changes to Bugzilla on 2011-10-16. Thus it started right out as NEW without ever being explicitly confirmed. The bug is changed to state NEEDINFO for this reason. To move this bug from NEED

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Remove options "Show preview of fonts" and "Show font history"

Hi Pedro, Pedro wrote (22-12-11 21:53) I'm not a Dev or UX, but what is the point of removing Options? If the Option is already there and it works correctly, why remove it? Why limit the user's choice? Well, my oldest joke with OpenOffice.org is, that people always complain about the huge a

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED] [PATCH] [RFC] COMPRESSMODE_FULL

Hi Thorsten, just and after-thought: some of the cleaned-up I/Os regard variables of type "long" (Pair, Rectangle...). I was afraid this could be platform dependent, but it seems that SvStream casts them to int "if(SAL_TYPES_SIZEOFLONG != 4)". The question then becomes: do that data really

Re: [Libreoffice] RFC Operation Spamzilla

On Thu, 22 Dec 2011 21:33:44 +0100, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: Thus, if nobody vetos this, I would do that tommorrow in ~500 bug batches. Objections? Vetos? Comments? Best, Bjoern A dirty job but somebody has to do it... go ahead!!! :-) ___ L

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Remove options "Show preview of fonts" and "Show font history"

I'm not a Dev or UX, but what is the point of removing Options? If the Option is already there and it works correctly, why remove it? Why limit the user's choice? -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/PATCH-Remove-options-Show-preview-of-fonts-and-Show-font-histo

[Libreoffice] RFC Operation Spamzilla

Hi all, here is an urgent request for comments. We still have ~2400 bugs in state NEW from the pre-Bugzilla 4.0 days. Back then we had no initial state UNCONFIRMED, so unfortunately they started with NEW. This is changed now for new bugs, but the old ones are still in state NEW because we did not

[Libreoffice] [Broken patch] Frame dialogue, try to draw the preview at its original size

Hi, I was the person who removed the dog preview from Writer's Picture dialogue. In it's place there is now a nice alpine landscape (that I nabbed from the Writer icon, but whatever). Sadly, it's stretched larger than its original size which leads to pixelation. This is a condition I wanted to rem

Re: [Libreoffice] Index table: character style 'Index link' instead of 'Internet link'

Hi Alexander, > When character style is 'Internet Link', all items are underline. In my > humble opinion, it doesn't look nice. > > Is this a mistake or a conscious decision of developers? There's a discussion on ux-advise about this, see: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-ux-advi

Re: [Libreoffice] calc: Re: com.sun.star.container.XNameContainer.removeByName() fails v3.5b0+ (linux)

Michael Stahl píše v Po 19. 12. 2011 v 19:26 +0100: > > What are the git tags for v3.4.4, v3.5b0 and v3.5b1? > > i guess 3.4.4 is this: libreoffice-3.4.4.2 I have create the tags libreoffice-3.4.x-final based on the last release candidates for the give release. It should make it easier to get fin

Re: [Libreoffice] calc: Re: com.sun.star.container.XNameContainer.removeByName() fails v3.5b0+ (linux)

Jan Holesovsky píše v Út 20. 12. 2011 v 16:26 +0100: > Hi Tomas, > > On 2011-12-20 at 13:23 +0100, Tomas Hlavaty wrote: > > > > i guess 3.4.4 is this: libreoffice-3.4.4.2 > > > beta0: libreoffice-3.5.0.0 > > > beta1: libreoffice-3.4.99.1 > > > > > > yes, really :) > > > > Is that somewhere doc

[Libreoffice] [ANN] LibreOffice 3.5.0 beta2 available

Hi *, for the upcoming new version 3.5.0, we continue with a beta2 build that is now feature-complete. For further milestones on the way towards 3.5.0, please refer to our release plan timings here: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan#3.5_release Builds are now being uploaded to a pu

Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED][PATCH] c1db721 ScChangeActionTable conversion: Yet another correction.

Hi Marcel, On Thursday, 2011-12-22 18:52:02 +0100, Marcel Metz wrote: > after testing the change tracking feature in calc I've found yet > another bug in the UI. The attached patch fixes the bug in > question. Muchas gracias ... pushed to master http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commi

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] c1db721 ScChangeActionTable conversion: Yet another correction.

Hello Eike, after testing the change tracking feature in calc I've found yet another bug in the UI. The attached patch fixes the bug in question. regards Marcel --- sc/source/ui/miscdlgs/acredlin.cxx |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/sc/source/ui/miscdlg

Re: [Libreoffice] bug in post-commit hook

I've had about a 100 so far today On Thursday, 22 December 2011, Michael Stahl wrote: > On 22/12/11 16:12, Noel Grandin wrote: >> there is something wrong with the post-commit hook - I'm getting repeats >> of the message below every few seconds. > > are you sure? i guess there should be ~20 of th

Re: [Libreoffice] bug in post-commit hook

On 22/12/11 16:12, Noel Grandin wrote: > there is something wrong with the post-commit hook - I'm getting repeats > of the message below every few seconds. are you sure? i guess there should be ~20 of them, one for each bootstrap based repo ___ LibreOff

[Libreoffice] bug in post-commit hook

there is something wrong with the post-commit hook - I'm getting repeats of the message below every few seconds. Original Message Subject:[Libreoffice-commits] Changes to 'refs/tags/libreoffice-3.4.3-final' Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2011 07:06:53 -0800 (PST) From: pmla...@

Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Remove SC_DLLPUBLIC to fix build on msvc 2008

Hello Matúš, all, On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 00:00, Matúš Kukan wrote: > On 21 December 2011 17:52, Korrawit Pruegsanusak > wrote: >> Anyway, I don't have enough knowledge for why this works, but after >> reverting, it passed through this point. (but still failed somewhere >> else) > > Where ? Is i

[Libreoffice] [PUSHED][PATCH] Fix for fdo43460 Part XV getLength() to isEmpty()

On Wed, 2011-12-21 at 20:01 -0200, Olivier Hallot wrote: > Please find attached a partial fix for Easy Hack FDO43460 Pushed now, thanks for these. C. ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/li

[Libreoffice] [REVIEW 3-4-5] untranslated menu items

Hi all, commit 7248aaed7aca6c241683f6d83bb6caa00c447b0d reverts earlier commit, that caused some menu items to be left untranslated. If you are wondering why it is so, read my comment (I hope it is understandable) in commit a6511b9d9a3f13835510a9caffc837829b206d14 :-) How to reproduce: 1. start w

Re: [Libreoffice] [BUG] Hide system pkg-config, to avoid finding stray freetype.

Tor Lillqvist wrote: > What we should do, IMHO, is to check in our own configure.in if there > is a pkg-config in PATH on a system where one is not expected to be > present (only Mac OS X, I guess?), and in that case emit a warning. > > But wait, we already do that! > Have to agree with Tor here,

Re: [Libreoffice] [MacOS] Horizontal cursor positioning in justified text

Hi James, *, On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 8:56 AM, James C wrote: > [Caret movement in justified text on Mac] > Questions: >  - is anybody currently working on this?  (If so, they should > continue, and I should work on something else.) This is specific to the Mac, where ATSUI is used for the text re

Re: [Libreoffice] [BUG] Hide system pkg-config, to avoid finding stray freetype.

Yes, we can't protect against an arbitrarily broken system. I'm not a good systems administrator. I don't know how to do "please consider hiding it" without breaking something else. I think pango is faulty; it needs to depend on how cairo was configured, but it is testing how the system is confi

Re: [Libreoffice] [BUG] Hide system pkg-config, to avoid finding stray freetype.

> This is a protection-from-contaminated-system But in general, a system can be contaminamed in arbitrary ways. Should/can we really protect against arbitrary, unknown, ways in which a system might have been changed by "helpful" 3rd-party software or misguided sysadmins/users to not correspond to

Re: [Libreoffice] [ANNOUNCE] libreoffice-3.4.99.1 tag created (3.5.0-beta1)

Bjoern Michaelsen píše v St 21. 12. 2011 v 21:31 +0100: > On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 06:34:26PM +0100, Petr Mladek wrote: > > Note that I used the correct version 3.4.99.1 for this beta. We use > > (3.3.99.X also for 3.4 betas). I am sorry that I used 3.5.0.0 for > > beta0. The 3.5.0.x version are res

[Libreoffice] [PATCH] Hide system pkg-config, to avoid finding stray freetype.

Sorry; re-doing the manual process with the right label :-) On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 11:52 PM, James C wrote: > Hi All, > > This is a protection-from-contaminated-system patch, anticipated in > the tail of this bug: > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43917 > > Depending on what happens

[Libreoffice] [BUG] Hide system pkg-config, to avoid finding stray freetype.

Hi All, This is a protection-from-contaminated-system patch, anticipated in the tail of this bug: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43917 Depending on what happens to my git send-emal attempt, another copy may appear later. Regards, James. On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 11:06 PM, Caolán McN

[Libreoffice] [Bug 35673] LibreOffice 3.4 most annoying bugs

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35673 Petr Mladek changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||41089 --- Comment #241 from Petr Mladek 2

Re: [Libreoffice] [REVIEW] fdo#40482 sw: view options changed by printing

On Wed, 2011-12-21 at 17:11 +0100, Michael Stahl wrote: > i'd like to have the fix for $SUBJECT in 3.4.5, it is a regression > introduced in 3.4.2 or 3.4.3, am too lazy to check which. > > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=89d2733e16ae6233deea6bef3193bd45c89b854c Bah :-(. We

Re: [Libreoffice] [MacOS] Starting dev-install is hairy

On Thu, 2011-12-22 at 20:33 +1300, James C wrote: > I submitted a patch with git send-email. I presume that it > is awaiting moderation. hmm, maybe not, probably worth extracting it with git format-patch and try sending it as a manual attachment. Even if it is in moderation, might be a while over

Re: [Libreoffice] .: 2 commits - vcl/inc vcl/source writerfilter/inc writerfilter/source

On Thu, 2011-12-22 at 08:51 +, Michael Meeks wrote: > On Thu, 2011-12-22 at 01:50 +0100, Miklos Vajna wrote: > > removed are methods necessary for the XML dump writerfilter > > creates when built using dbglevel=2. > > I wonder if Caolan could build with dbglevel=2 with callcatcher so the

[Libreoffice] License statement

Hi, I here by confirm that my contributions to LibreOffice are available under the terms of the LGPL3+ and/or MPL1.1+. -- Regards Jonas Finnemann Jensen. ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman

Re: [Libreoffice] .: 2 commits - vcl/inc vcl/source writerfilter/inc writerfilter/source

On Thu, 2011-12-22 at 01:50 +0100, Miklos Vajna wrote: > removed are methods necessary for the XML dump writerfilter > creates when built using dbglevel=2. I wonder if Caolan could build with dbglevel=2 with callcatcher so the unused methods don't end up in the list ? Anyhow - th

Re: [Libreoffice] [MacOS] Horizontal cursor positioning in justified text

Hi James, On Thu, 2011-12-22 at 20:56 +1300, James C wrote: > Justified text changes the kerning (space between letters) of words on > a line. The cursor positioning in writer seems to assume, falsely, > that all of the adjustment happens in the spaces between words. So > the cursor ends up in t

Re: [Libreoffice] [MacOS] Horizontal cursor positioning in justified text

Sorry, I don't know the code related to the problem you describe; just some other comments here. > The cursor positioning in writer Just a nitpick: You mean "caret", not "cursor". (The cursor is the thing that you move around with your pointing device, the caret is the "text insertion cursor". Bu