___
Libreoffice-commits mailing list
libreoffice-comm...@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-commits
___
Libreoffice-commits mailing list
libreoffice-comm...@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-commits
___
Libreoffice-commits mailing list
libreoffice-comm...@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-commits
___
Libreoffice-commits mailing list
libreoffice-comm...@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-commits
___
Libreoffice-commits mailing list
libreoffice-comm...@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-commits
___
Libreoffice-commits mailing list
libreoffice-comm...@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-commits
Might get better results emailing the user list - more people on that
list and this seems like a user (can I do this) question.
Best,
Joel
On 09/22/2014 08:59 AM, Dan Lewis wrote:
Can MySQL be accessed on an Apple computer using a native
connector? If so, what is the URL for where it is
Hey Owen -
I'd assume since there were no objections in nearly a week just go ahead
and do it :) Worst case we can revert the changes if someone gets really
upset ;)
Best,
Joel
On 09/07/2014 05:22 AM, Owen Genat wrote:
I have just made an update to the wiki Development/Java page:
Hi All,
Am 10.09.2014 um 02:55 schrieb Terrence Enger:
I have noticed that Urmas has been abruptly closing bug reports that are
in languages other than English.
What an arrogant behavior :-(
I do wish he'd do it more tactfully - I close them also but I leave a
comment and direct them to
Hey Algot,
Question about the second step.
2.What was the earliest version of LibreOffice that showed this bug?
If there is only to be a checklist for this question, it is important
to offer the option I have not done the steps which caused the bug
until this version. and/or This is the
On 09/10/2014 04:32 PM, Jay Philips wrote:
Hey Joel,
Yes i think a step by step process is a nice user friendly way to go.
When Calligra Words crashed on me, their step by step bug report was fun
to go through.
About your doc, here are some thoughts.
1) I'm assuming that many users
Hi All,
Just wanted to raise awareness of this one. If anyone has some time to
poke it. Regression with nearly 50 comments on it and I get pinged daily
with dupes or more people saying that it's still an issue in a comment.
Thanks
Best,
Joel
___
Thought I'd pass this along as it meant something to me at least :)
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=83264
Best,
Joel
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
:
Bug report 82150. As promised I attached an ODB file with the
problem. It's part of the Base guide.
Dan
Original message
From: Joel Madero
Date:08/04/2014 3:41 PM (GMT-05:00)
To: Dan Lewis ,libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Base 4.3.0.4 has
Thanks for confirming. It's best to post comments on the bug itself. If
you have the time to bibisect the bug that would be great.
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/HowToBibisect
Best,
Joel
On 08/16/2014 07:32 PM, piotrjurkiewicz wrote:
Hi,
I experience the same problem. That is very
Hey there,
Jay, *,
Not sure that codifying a bunch of approved QA exchanges is in the best
interest of moving the QA process along--especially if we have to dig them out of a WiKi.
It would not do much to improve the QA flow, nor improve the readability of issues over
their life span.
Hey there,
Jay, *,
Not sure that codifying a bunch of approved QA exchanges is in the best
interest of moving the QA process along--especially if we have to dig them out of a WiKi.
It would not do much to improve the QA flow, nor improve the readability of issues over
their life span.
Hi All -
If you have some spare cycles please check out new easy hack below:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82632
Summary: Add bibisectRequest to regressions - we have some new people
doing bibisects (thanks so much!) and I'd love to get the regressions
tagged so they can
Well - I lied, let's stick to procedures, but I've taken first action:
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/Policies_and_Procedures
Best,
Joel
On 08/08/2014 07:21 AM, David Tardon wrote:
Hi,
could we block this user's bugzilla account? He is apparently a troll
and all attempts to
Hi Eric,
I suggest you email the user mailing list instead - many more eyes than
the QA list :)
Best,
Joel
On 08/03/2014 04:26 AM, Eric P wrote:
Hi
I am trying to post a question on one of the libreoffice forums but I
am running a linux distro that has a lot of java security so I cannot
pinging the dev list (and particularly
the rtf expert(s) and ask them if it will help at all. We have quite a few
meta bugs that are literally never looked at. How would this be better than
just putting filter:rtf on all of them? Would it do something extra?
Best,
Joel
--
*Joel Madero*
LibreOffice QA
Hey Alxander,
On 08/04/14 05:00, Aleksandr P wrote:
Hello.
Some weeks ago there was a discussion about whiteboard, but
information in wiki is incomplete. For example, I can not find
information about such statuses as filter:doc or filter:rtf. Also I
see both “filter:rtf” and “rtf_filter” for
Sure thing - just link us to the bug report and make sure there are
repro steps on the bug report. Thanks!
Best,
Joel
On 08/04/14 12:32, Dan Lewis wrote:
The same embedded database with subforms within subforms will open
and work properly using 4.2.6.2. I am using Debian x86_64 version.
as WORKSFORME please tell the user to set the bug to
UNCONFIRMED if they can still reproduce (and not just say reopen the bug
if you can still confirm - as they then put the bug in REOPENED status
which is again...not correct).
I know it's a bit confusing but it is what it is.
Best,
Joel
--
*Joel
. I
know a bit of a pain, but no more of a pain than me having to dig
through REOPENED bugs to figure out which ones are really REOPENED and
which ones I have to move back to UNCONFIRMED :-D
Best,
Joel
--
*Joel Madero*
LibreOffice QA Volunteer
jmadero@gmail.com
I suggest everyone ignore this
On 07/30/2014 10:38 AM, Urmas wrote:
Interesting things happen in LO QA community.
Instead of reading 4.3 release notes, as an adequate person would, Jay
Philips in comment 15 starts being rude (and authoritative) to me, which I
—knowing about the dreck open
-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
--
*Joel Madero*
LibreOffice QA Volunteer
jmadero@gmail.com
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa
Hi All,
Anyone with Windows Mobile installed?
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50090list_id=450303
Best,
joel
--
*Joel Madero*
LibreOffice QA Volunteer
jmadero@gmail.com
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address
Hi Gerry,
If you're running Linux do you mind trying to bibisect the issue. I can
walk you through the steps or you can read them here:
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/HowToBibisect
It helps a lot to get us closer to a solution.
Best,
Joel
Best,
Joel
On 07/27/2014 09:17 AM, Gerry T.
Well aware of this one. Thanks for pointing it out.
Best,
Joel
On 07/23/2014 06:04 PM, Tommy wrote:
Hi, I think we cannot ship 4.3.0 out with this bug unfixed.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=81511
are the developers aware of this? are we gonna delay the 4.3.0 release
adding
Yeah bug count is currently sitting at 742 which is the lowest it has
been in for over 2 years. With a push this week I think we can drop it
to 700 :) Maybe the 500 goal wasn't so outlandish after all
Best,
Joel
On 07/22/2014 08:12 AM, Tommy wrote:
On Mon, 21 Jul 2014 20:06:01 +0200, Tommy
Hi Aleksandr,
What Bjoern said but keep in mind sometimes users aren't happy with
this. If a user is requesting a backport to a currently supported
version, it's up to QA to decide if it's worth the hassle of finding out
the commit that fixed it, poking the developer, and then getting them to
Hi All,
QA is doing a bug squashing session (confirming/closing bugs) in 90
minutes. Feel free to jump in if you have a spare 10 minutes.
http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=libreoffice-qa
We've seen some great progress this past week or so and we're on the
border of being the lowest
I have closed this bug twice as NOTABUG but the user does not agree so
requesting second opinion:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=81627
Thanks
Best,
Joel
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address:
Hi All,
I know we've discussed this already a few times - both within ESC and
within the QA call but I wanted to get a better sense of what is needed
to move forward with getting it fixed. FWIW I've closed 3 bugs this at
least tangentially related to the subject.
So - from what I understand the
Closing in on 800 now :) Monday morningish my time (PST) we're going to
be on the IRC channel doing a blitz to try to get it down another 100 or
so. Feel free to join (everyone :) ). Would be great if we're down below
750 by the end of Monday.
Best,
Joel
On 07/18/2014 08:44 AM, Tommy wrote:
Hi All,
I know we've discussed this already a few times - both within ESC and
within the QA call but I wanted to get a better sense of what is needed
to move forward with getting it fixed. FWIW I've closed 3 bugs this at
least tangentially related to the subject.
So - from what I understand the
Hi all,
At the QA meeting today we discussed the importance of consistency in
the tags that we use in the Whiteboard on our bug reports. We decided
that to make things simple for both old and new contributors, it would
be best for QA to use 'wimpyCaps' for all of our tags.
.
Hi all,
At the QA meeting today we discussed the importance of consistency in
the tags that we use in the Whiteboard on our bug reports. We decided
that to make things simple for both old and new contributors, it would
be best for QA to use 'wimpyCaps' for all of our tags.
.
I also replied to this off list. We are consistent and that's good ;)
Ultimately, we're not going to change our workflow. It's up to a user to
report with clear steps and a simple test document - else it's just a
waste of our time. Glad we all think alike :-D
Best,
Joel
On 07/14/2014 05:38 PM,
Hi All,
Including dev list on this because I know developers are using the
whiteboard status' to do queries so I wanted to give you all the chance
to voice opinions.
Currently we are not consistent with whiteboard status' and I'd like to
update these so that we are. There are two blaring
Hey Jay,
On 07/12/2014 04:49 PM, Jay Philips wrote:
Hi All,
Hope everyone is well. Well i've been adding the whiteboard keyword
'interoperability' to bug reports that relate to files that are not the
native odf format, like html, wpd, rtf, doc, docx, etc. Is this correct
or should it only be
Hi All,
Including dev list on this because I know developers are using the
whiteboard status' to do queries so I wanted to give you all the chance
to voice opinions.
Currently we are not consistent with whiteboard status' and I'd like to
update these so that we are. There are two blaring
Hi All,
Jay asked about this new status to parallel the NeedAdvice which is a
call for developers to get involved. I went ahead and said +1 so it's
added to the whiteboard wiki:
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/Fields/Whiteboard/Advanced
So my advice is for experienced QA members
I believe we agreed to give it 6 months from EOL to give time for
transition. I could be wrong though ;)
Best,
Joel
On 07/09/2014 01:43 PM, Tommy wrote:
as all of you should know, 4.1.x reached end of life few months ago
I thinks it's time to remove all 4.1.x RC versions from bugzilla
On 07/01/2014 06:27 AM, Sophie wrote:
Hi Joel, Robinson,
In order to prepare the communication on the 4.3.0 release, is there
some areas that are not stable enough, or where some bugs remain
problematics and should be known by the marketing team?
Monitoring the MAB didn't give me this
Hi All,
On 06/30/2014 01:49 PM, Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote:
Hi,
Le 30/06/2014 02:13, m.a.riosv a écrit :
Hi,
maybe could be of interest comments #4 and #6 of Kohei in bug
MOD shows not existing small remainder with calculated Dividend
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50299#c4
Don't forget to join to keep up to date with US based events!
https://plus.google.com/communities/111758039218283143648
Best,
Joel
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings:
NeedInfo or NeedDevEval?
Best,
Joel
On 06/25/2014 10:10 AM, Robinson Tryon wrote:
Hi guys,
What NeedInfo bugs[1] do you hate (or love) the most?
I'll bring up a handful of bugs during the ESC call tomorrow, so let
me know which ones are most deserving of developer eyeballs.
Thanks,
--R
Hi All,
We have about 15-25 people in the room, would be great if we saw some
more over the weekend. To join just click the link below:
http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=libreoffice-qa
Best,
Joel
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail
Hi All,
Our NeedAdvice list is growing a bit. These are bugs that QA just hasn't
been able to confirm for one reason or another. Some have comments that
have pointers to what some QA members think might be going on, others
can't be confirmed but there are debug logs from the original reporter.
Hi All,
Top posting because we still need a time to meet to do the below things.
@Norbert - not sure how much of your time will be needed but I think
we'll at least need you around for the beginning part before we are able
to move forward with stress testing and what not. It's looking like our
Please report it to the bug tracker.
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/
Thanks.
Best,
Joel
On 06/17/2014 05:46 AM, Илья Найдов wrote:
Create new text field
Enter some text in it to make it several lines
Make some letters in this text subscript
Result: Uneven line spacing in the paragraph...
Hey Marina,
Hi all,
I tested the bugs 80139 and 80140.
In the report they are related to Impress but I can confirm the same behavior
in Draw. How can I correctly set the component field? The bugs are related to
the spellchecker and maybe Linguistic is the right component. Calc and Draw
On 06/17/2014 02:46 AM, Michael Stahl wrote:
On 16/06/14 23:39, Joel Madero wrote:
*Status* *Question*
complextest Is this useful? If so – when should we use it?
unoapitest We have “uno” is that sufficient?
these two are very similar, maybe we could combine them as junittest?
Hm
On 06/17/2014 02:46 AM, Michael Stahl wrote:
On 16/06/14 23:39, Joel Madero wrote:
*Status* *Question*
complextest Is this useful? If so – when should we use it?
unoapitest We have “uno” is that sufficient?
these two are very similar, maybe we could combine them as junittest?
Hm
Hi All!
Well after our incredible showing with Beta 1 we're going a second round
of bug hunting against 4.3 Release Candidate 1 to try to catch any
lingering nasty regressions before release. Literally anyone can help
and we encourage everyone to jump into the QA chat and see what it's all
about.
Hi All,
I've put quite a bit of time updating the wiki site after pulling FDO
and viewing all of the whiteboard status' have been used. It isn't
complete (needs organized and cleaned a bit more) but it's located
here:https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/Fields/Whiteboard/Advanced
Hi All!
Well after our incredible showing with Beta 1 we're going a second round
of bug hunting against 4.3 Release Candidate 1 to try to catch any
lingering nasty regressions before release. Literally anyone can help
and we encourage everyone to jump into the QA chat and see what it's all
about.
Hi All,
I am still cleaning this whiteboard status page and have found quite a
few that I have no clue how they ever made it on the list and a few that
I have suggestions to change. The first is described below:
We have just a few extensions that somehow got special treatment to have
whiteboard
Hi All,
I've put quite a bit of time updating the wiki site after pulling FDO
and viewing all of the whiteboard status' have been used. It isn't
complete (needs organized and cleaned a bit more) but it's located
here:https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/Fields/Whiteboard/Advanced
Hi!
Having saved queries against crash/dataloss/perf etc. items gives bugs on
your radar without the need of checking Major/Critical, Summary or comments.
It is easier to be alarmed and IMHO such Whiteboard items could be used
more.
Then my follow up question to dataloss is what do we want
Hi All,
There are currently 71 bugs that have something about crashing in the
title. If we could tackle these it would be great. For useful links see:
Organized by OS:
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/BugTriage#Table_By_Platform_.28OS.29
Organized by Component:
I made a second table for a suggested triage order that orders by
component instead of platform.
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/BugTriage#Table_By_Component
Couple notes:
Unconfirmed:
Blockers: 0
Crasher: 70
PossibleRegression: 32
Keyword Regression: 10
Critical: 2
Major: 69
Total:
Hi All,
We're looking for a couple developers to be at our US hackfest at the
end of July. Anyone going to be around? Specifically on the east coast?
Best,
Joel
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
Hi All,
I'm a bit tired of having to cd into a bibisect folder and do all the
initial commands so I've created a launcher/script to do the first stuff
but hitting a big of a snag. Script below:
#!/bin/sh
cd /home/joel/Downloads/bibisect-43all
sleep 5
git checkout .
sleep 10
git bisect start
Hey Xisco,
Hello all,
does it make sense to include another status for the regression issues
where the problematic commit has been identified ? I'm asking it
because yesterday I spent some time on this task and I could chase
down two regressions, one of them made by a Collabora developer (
On 06/05/2014 05:36 AM, Joren DC wrote:
Hi,
Jay Philips schreef op 5/06/2014 4:45:
I think it might be a good idea to include the following whiteboard
keywords -
HasDebug or HasBacktrace HasStrace - When the bug reporter or
commenter has included the backtrace or strace output, so devs
Crap I see ;) Thanks - we can talk about consistency between keyword and
whiteboard once we actually get our own instance of bugzilla :)
Best,
Joel
On 06/05/2014 08:29 AM, Joren DC wrote:
Joel Madero schreef op 5/06/2014 17:26:
Ah I didn't see that. We should change it to camel case
On 06/05/2014 05:36 AM, Joren DC wrote:
Hi,
Jay Philips schreef op 5/06/2014 4:45:
I think it might be a good idea to include the following whiteboard
keywords -
HasDebug or HasBacktrace HasStrace - When the bug reporter or
commenter has included the backtrace or strace output, so devs
Hi Brian,
Sorry for the long delay - not sure if someone else already responded.
Chrome is giving a false positive - it's a bug on there side. You can
force the download (or download using a different browser) and
everything will work fine.
Best,
Joel
P.S. Thanks so much for the donation - is
Hi All,
We have a new easy hack available for people wanting to get more
involved - very simple task, instructions on the bug report. Thanks in
advance!
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=79650
All the best,
Joel
___
List Name:
On 05/22/2014 08:24 AM, Robinson Tryon wrote:
Hi all,
I'd like to thank Norbert for all of his hard work on the Bugzilla
migration process. Many of us have been rather busy over the last few
weeks, so it would be great if we could touch base again and
determine what todo items are left
On 06/04/2014 07:45 PM, Jay Philips wrote:
Hi All,
I think it might be a good idea to include the following whiteboard
keywords -
HasDebug or HasBacktrace HasStrace - When the bug reporter or
commenter has included the backtrace or strace output, so devs can
easily see this list
I like
Tommy - I moved that one - leaving the pleasure of closing 4.1 mab to you :)
Best,
Joel
P.S. Thanks for your incredible work
On 06/04/2014 10:04 PM, Andras Timar wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 6:34 AM, Tommy ba...@quipo.it wrote:
hi QA guys,
I've created a new mab4.4 page at
Hi All,
I've created a table that has a suggested triage order. Note that this
is only a suggested order (you're free to triage in whatever order you
prefer). The table has useful links and some comments :)
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/BugTriage#Suggested_Triage_Order
The point of the
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56847
We've had an extensive discussion on the QA channel about the above MAB
and we're looking for guidance.
Our findings are quite inconsistent - we're testing on multiple
platforms and some are seeing as a regression (comment 61), but I tested
on
Hi All,
Can someone with MS2013 confirm this (not confirmable in 2007 or 2010).
Thanks!
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=79292list_id=428177
Best,
Joel
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address:
Hi All,
Can someone take a look at this one:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=79194
Looks pretty nasty - if confirmed IMHO should be on mab4.3 list.
Thanks!
Joel
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address:
Hi All!
Day one of our 4.3 bug hunting session was /*incredible*/. Some of the
high notes were that our QA channel had 35 people in it when I woke up
this morning (crazy!) and quite a few regressions have been discovered
and bibisected which is exactly what we're trying to do.
We saw about 10-15
Hi All,
Don't forget this weekend is our 4.3 bug hunting session! We really need
as many people as possible testing 4.3 now so that developers can fix
nasty regressions before release (which isn't too far away!).
Please join us in the /_*chat*_/:
Hey Sophie!
On 05/22/2014 08:17 AM, Sophie wrote:
Hi all,
Could someone add 4.3.0 beta 1 to BZ, thanks :)
Done :)
Best,
Joel
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings:
On May 22, 2014 9:09 AM, Bjoern Michaelsen
bjoern.michael...@canonical.com wrote:
Hi Pedro, Joel,
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 09:02:09AM -0700, Pedro wrote:
jmadero wrote
To download /_*latest daily build*_/ of 4.3 please go here:
http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/master/
...
Hi All,
We have moved our regular calls to every other week on Wednesday's at
1730 UTC.
So next call:
Wednesday, June 4th
Time: 1730
As always we'll send out at least one reminder prior to the call and we
encourage users and all contributors to join. The call is both by phone
and video through
Hi All,
I was unable to reproduce this but we now have a couple users who are
reporting that saving to .docx results in a loss of all data in comments
(quite serious). Can someone try to reproduce:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=75694
If you can reproduce it would be really nice
This is all fantastic Jay.
A couple questions:
(1) Are you searching for duplicates before reporting? Some of these
(I'd hope many?) have already been reported.
(2) For sample test documents - if you can create the most simple test
case it makes life much much happier for our developers. If you
Hi All,
As discussed last call, I am unavailable next Monday but will be
available the following Monday. The other option is to move our call to
Wed. next week. If we want to do Wed. a little earlier (maybe 2-3 hours
earlier), we can do that.
Please let me know what you prefer ASAP so we can
This kind of a suggestion should be on the redmine site not on QA
mailing list. The email thread that I started was specific about
suggestions that we discussed during the call. Apologies for the confusion.
Best,
Joel
On 05/07/2014 08:44 AM, Harald Köster wrote:
Hi all,
at the moment on the
I have added PreBibisect to version field on FDO - if you try to
bibisect a version and the regression shows up in the earliest commit in
bibisect please set it to PreBibisect.
Then if anyone is interested in going through these and testing them
against the first release of LibreOffice that would
On future reports will you try to include your computer specs (most
importantly your OS) :)
Best,
Joel
On 05/05/2014 01:03 AM, Jay Philips wrote:
Hi Joel,
Its been done. :)
Jay Philips
On 05/05/2014 02:48 AM, Joel Madero wrote:
Ah - okay new plan. CC me on every regression and put
Hi All,
Per our discussion, here is a single thread where I think we should
discuss suggestions to make the website clearer and then one of us (I'll
volunteer if no one else does...) can go to redmine to offer the
suggestion. This way we aren't offering contradictory suggestions.
So the first
Hi All,
I've gone ahead and hidden most 3.6 pre release versions on FDO (kept
3.6.0.beta0 because this is the equivalent of before bibisect).
Two questions:
1. Can I do the same for 4.0 or should I wait longer ?
2. Thoughts on adding a new version called PreBibisect and we can
replace the
Hi All,
I've gone ahead and hidden most 3.6 pre release versions on FDO (kept
3.6.0.beta0 because this is the equivalent of before bibisect).
Two questions:
1. Can I do the same for 4.0 or should I wait longer ?
2. Thoughts on adding a new version called PreBibisect and we can
replace the
to do what I can. The wiki is
pretty solid but sometimes I hit snags that require finagling.
Best,
Joel
On 05/04/2014 02:52 AM, Jay Philips wrote:
Hi,
No i haven't bibisected before, but can give it a try.
Jay Philips
On 05/04/2014 06:51 AM, Joel Madero wrote:
have you bibisected before
, Florian Reisinger wrote:
Hi Joel,
We are still lacking 4.3 alpha1+ version :) Could you please add it :)
[and hide alpha+ master]
Am 04.05.2014 18:45, schrieb Joel Madero:
Hi All,
I've gone ahead and hidden most 3.6 pre release versions on FDO (kept
3.6.0.beta0 because this is the equivalent
Ah - okay new plan. CC me on every regression and put bibisectrequest
in whiteboard. I'll do the bibisecting :)
Best,
Joel
On 05/04/2014 02:02 PM, Jay Philips wrote:
Hi Joel,
I think i hit my first snag as i dont run 64-bit linux. :(
Jay Philips
On 05/04/2014 08:48 PM, Joel Madero wrote
Hey Pedro,
I haven't seen this. With Windows XP reaching EOL according to Microsoft
I wonder what the plan is . . . I'll try to verify this and then try to
go from there.
Best,
Joel
On 05/04/2014 03:42 PM, Pedro wrote:
Hi all
I can't do anything with LO 4.3 alpha under Windows XP Pro
Can you link me to the download? I just installed the latest
master/daily and it works fine.
Best,
Joel
On 05/04/2014 04:41 PM, V Stuart Foote wrote:
Here is a stack trace for a crashing writer session on XP sp3...
soffice.bin
=-=-=
ntdll.dll!KiFastSystemCallRet
Thanks - I swear I looked there twice and didn't see it :-/ Oh well,
I'll follow up with a couple tests once Windows is done updating.
Haven't been in XP for over a year ;)
Best,
Joel
On 05/04/2014 05:49 PM, V Stuart Foote wrote:
Joel,
4.3.0 Alpha1 on the Pre-release page
Hey Jay,
Are you running Windows or Linux? I'd like to get some bibisects of
these if possible (the ones where you say it's a regression)
Best,
Joel
On 05/02/2014 10:14 PM, Jay Philips wrote:
Hi All,
I just wanted to share with you all the results of my latest extended
.docx test and
201 - 300 of 999 matches
Mail list logo
