On Wed, 2011-07-13 at 21:32 +0100, Noel Power wrote:
> +1 and applied to 3.4 ( and master ) branch(s)
And a last time - and pushed for 3.4.2.
Thanks,
Michael.
--
michael.me...@novell.com <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
Hi Kohei,
On Fri, 2011-07-15 at 09:48 +0100, Noel Power wrote:
> looks fine to me +1, one more needed for 3.4.2
Ditto here; much preferred to creating that new temporary DPObject :-)
I've merged to libreoffice-3-4-2. I closed the bug too ;-)
Thanks,
Michael.
--
Hi Kohei,
On Mon, 2011-07-18 at 16:57 -0400, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
> Just to tone down this statistics a bit. The vast majority of changes
> are in fact code relocations with no changes e.g. the change in
> rectangle_set is purely moving code from one file to another.
:-) Any chance of a
Hi Imacat,
This really belongs on the design list; please reply only to there,
unless you have a patch or are seriously considering doing the work;
as/when you are committed there - then:
libreoffice-ux-adv...@lists.freedesktop.org
is a better forum. My personal take is t
Hi Mike,
On Mon, 2011-07-18 at 16:07 -0700, Mike Eberdt wrote:
> seriously yet. And as I understand it, a transition is underway to GNU
> make, so I guess I've been a bit reluctant to put a lot of time into
> learning the old build system.
Yes - there is some horrible sterilisation of
Hi there,
On Sun, 2011-07-17 at 18:50 +0200, Maciej Rumianowski wrote:
> > Hmm, well I've now added a sylk import unit test to sc, i.e.
> > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/calc/commit/?id=8ac49ef8ab4f065d7b729dcb15505c602c77
> >
>
> Thanks, but as Nigel pointed out it's hard to unit
On Tue, 2011-07-19 at 03:06 -0600, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
> > 2 more reviews needed for the current 3.4.2
> +1
And pushed to libreoffice-3-4-2; thanks - and lovely to see the unit
test there to prevent regression :-)
ATB,
Michael.
--
michael.me...@novell.com <>
On Mon, 2011-07-18 at 16:57 -0400, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
> Just to tone down this statistics a bit. The vast majority of changes
> are in fact code relocations with no changes
So - I've pushed it to -3-4-2 - after doing my best at reviewing the
changes; but I'm really unhappy with this.
On Tue, 2011-07-12 at 11:18 +0200, Petr Mladek wrote:
> Yes, it will be in 3.4.2. I am going to make sure that all patches are
> in, do test build, tag, and branch.
So this got into 3.4.2 - for the record.
Thanks,
Michael.
--
michael.me...@novell.com <><, Pse
Hi guys,
On Mon, 2011-07-18 at 16:58 +0200, Petr Mladek wrote:
> the below patches should fix two more problems reported by Andy. I would
> like to get them into libreoffice-3-4-2 branch.
I've pushed them to libreoffice-3-4; and I attach them here, two more
ack's needed, I understand Andr
Hi Tor,
On Tue, 2011-07-19 at 08:45 -0600, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
> This seems to fix fdo#34805. If I understand correctly, the autosave
> files are always written in ODF formats, but the recovery code still
> tried to load them using the filter for the original document.
:-)
> It should o
Hi Andreas,
On Tue, 2011-07-19 at 20:29 +0200, Andreas Mantke wrote:
> I used the same machine in the past for building with openSUSE 11.3-x64. In
> the
> meantime I updated to 11.4 using zypper -dup. Thus you could see it as a
> fresh
> install.
I assume you re-ran autogen.sh from a
Hi Kohei,
On Tue, 2011-07-19 at 09:37 -0400, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
> Because I'd like mdds to be product-neutral, general purpose library.
Okay; but of course this makes it much harder for people from
LibreOffice (so far its only user) to contribute to it - wrt. git commit
accounts and so
On Wed, 2011-07-20 at 11:10 +0200, Andras Timar wrote:
> Can someone please review and cherry pick this to libreoffice-3-4. It
> fixes #i117857#.
Pushed; thanks :-)
Michael.
--
michael.me...@novell.com <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
__
Hi Swagat,
On Wed, 2011-07-20 at 15:14 +0530, swagat sharma wrote:
> I am working on fixing the custom properties in libre office, which
> are not preserved in MS format.
Sounds good - can you be more precise as to exactly which properties
you're talking about though ? :-)
> I need littl
Hi Tugay,
On Wed, 2011-07-20 at 19:18 +, TUGAY İLBAY wrote:
> I would like to join the LibreOffice development community, but i have
> a problem.
And we'd love to have you :-)
> I tried to build LibreOffice as shown on
> http://www.libreoffice.org/get-involved/developers/. But when i
On Thu, 2011-07-21 at 10:00 +0200, Fridrich Strba wrote:
> I need several reviews to get these two fixes to the 3-4-2 branch.
Ack'd both fixes - much cleaner than this (::std::max)(a,b) type
ugliness IMHO :-) I'd also love to drop the mdds patch that added those.
Thanks,
Hi there,
On Thu, 2011-07-21 at 15:10 +0700, speedyboiz wrote:
> I want to ask, to find ms office there is a search form that displays
> the character associated with that in the search.
It is certainly possible for you to add the feature. However, this is a
developers list, we are not in
Hi there,
On Thu, 2011-07-21 at 09:15 +0530, swagat sharma wrote:
> Thanks for your valuable time. I'll explain the problem in more
> details.
Great - that is most helpful :-)
> I create a new Document (.odt file). I add some custom properties, Say
> a text and a number, by going into Fi
Hi Andreas,
On Wed, 2011-07-20 at 21:59 +0200, Andreas Mantke wrote:
> a complete clean building in a new / clean shell with a fresh autogen.sh with
> the
> options above didn't help, but now I get another error inside vcl (vcl
> seemed to be
> an nightmare to me):
Goodness - lets ho
On Wed, 2011-07-20 at 19:29 +0200, Markus Mohrhard wrote:
> after a quick test it seems that excel allows values up to 1E10. I'm
> open for suggestions but 1E5 is definitely much too low. We should
> choose a value between 1E10 and 1E14 if we really want to add an upper
> limit.
Matching
Hi there,
I was wondering why:
sc/source/ui/vba/vbaapplication.cxx
and
sc/source/ui/vba/vbafiledialog.cxx
had this complicated duplication of this big ugly block:
sal_Bool bUseXFilePicker2 = false;
uno::Reference< lang::XServiceInfo > xSer
Hi Eike,
On Thu, 2011-07-21 at 14:00 +0200, Eike Rathke wrote:
> Building master on Debian Squeeze x86_64 unxlngx6.pro --with-num-cpus=2
> --with-max-jobs=3 reported breakages in modules editeng and framework,
Oooh - interesting; and annoying - thanks for the report !
> unfortunately the
Present:
+ Norbert, Mitch, David, Kendy, Andras, Michael,
Caolan, Rainer, Bjoern, Fridrich, Petr
* Completed Action Items
+ implementing vertical text with Cairo (Caolan)
+ manual / wiki page for using nightlies (Rainer)
+ windows snapshot builds are reall
Hi Markus,
On Thu, 2011-07-21 at 19:54 +0200, Markus Mohrhard wrote:
> We have a bug report that asks for a larger upper limit and I think as
> long as Excel has one and there is no technical reason to deny this we
> should increase it. I think at least the 1E10 that Excel allows is
> something we
On Thu, 2011-07-21 at 21:49 +0200, Francois Tigeot wrote:
> Why does LO tinker with window managers in the first place ?
It wants to get its way with them :-) so - eg. we do a lot of explicit
window manager interactions that we should not really be doing -
stacking our floating windows, f
Michael.
>From 7f823d91d55900ee7d5bedbc145b280942fe0b69 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Michael Meeks
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 10:58:00 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] don't let our fprintf on a broken pipe pollute errno's ECHILD
with EPIPE
---
dmake/unix/runargv.c | 10 ++
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 dele
Hi Joe,
On Thu, 2011-07-21 at 20:21 -0700, Joseph Powers wrote:
> Just doing a little research and wanted to report my findings:
Wow - what a nice write-up; we have similar problems on Linux deciding
what versions of what underlying infrastructure to support and/or when
to axe it.
On Fri, 2011-07-22 at 03:56 +0200, Fridrich Strba wrote:
> I actually dare to contend that the mdds fix is much cleaner and more
> robust for following reasons:
Heh ;-) I think it is pretty clear that including windows.h is a
shortcut for rapid insanity. I'd strongly prefer to write reada
On Fri, 2011-07-22 at 03:07 +0700, thamht wrote:
> I'm trying to build libreoffice right after './g pull -r' to get the
> latest source code, however, there are some errors as the following:
Did your ./g pull -r fully succeed ? If you have a './g diff' that is
non-empty, modules you have
Hi Tugay,
It seems that you need to learn the reply-to-all thing, usually that
takes only one or two tries :-) the advantage of requiring that is that
old-timers / competent people soon learn it, and we're much more
welcoming to new faces.
> > PS: @Michael, I want to contribute developing
Hi Olivier,
On Fri, 2011-07-22 at 14:47 -0300, Olivier Hallot wrote:
> I am behind a firewall and cannot use git directly. I downloaded 3.3.3
> tarballs from the site.
Great :-) encouraging indeed.
> Are there instructions specific to build from the source donwloaded as
> tarballs?
Hi Bjoern,
First - this is great work :-) thanks for pulling this all together.
On Sat, 2011-07-23 at 04:10 +0200, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
> I have reverted the gbuildization of gnumake4 in writerfilter and kept
> "our" gbuildization.
Great :-) always good to prefer our changes
On Mon, 2011-07-25 at 11:03 -0300, Genix Info wrote:
> Vote for this bug: Bug 705279 - Fix the LibreOffice
This is not a list for discussing bugs, but for discussing patches, and
their development.
I would also suggest you expand your description of the bug, which
AFIACS is that
Hi there,
On Mon, 2011-07-25 at 10:40 -0400, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/calc/commit/?id=e5d0ab65f918a3a90d1b7fa4fdf7ee5c2ee89535
>
> cherry-picked to the -3-4 branch.
Looks fine to me, I've pushed it to libreoffice-3-4. I'd love to have
this approved f
On Fri, 2011-07-22 at 21:38 +0200, Eike Rathke wrote:
> On Friday, 2011-07-22 14:47:45 -0300, Olivier Hallot wrote:
> > I am behind a firewall and cannot use git directly.
Ah - so, there should be an http port for our git archives, notice the
http URL linked at:
http://www.libreo
Hi Knut,
On Mon, 2011-07-25 at 17:25 +0200, Knut Olav Bøhmer wrote:
> 1. Where can I find the main-loop in LibreOffice
Ah - that at one level easy - attach a debugger, and watch the
backtrace for a bit ;-) the main main-loop lives inside vcl/ and handles
95% of the application code - livi
On Mon, 2011-07-25 at 18:19 +0200, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
> Any chance for two more reviews for 3-4-2 here? Bug affects a bunch
> of 3rd party extensions out there...
Yep - it's good for -3-4-2 with me.
Michael.
--
michael.me...@novell.com <><, Pseudo Engineer, itine
On Mon, 2011-07-25 at 18:23 +0200, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
> please, we'd need two reviews for -3-4-2 for Caolan's nice fix for
> the https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39517 regression -
> patch is here:
You have mine :-)
Michael.
--
michael.me...@novell.com
Hi Noel,
On Mon, 2011-07-25 at 17:27 +0100, Noel Power wrote:
> I have *no* idea, even though I committed this code it is not ours ( it
> was a contribution of new api ), you would think the Application object
> would use the FileDialog object
Quite :-) but that doesn't follow the comp
Hi Thomas,
On Mon, 2011-07-25 at 19:42 +0200, Thomas Arnhold wrote:
> An additional comment: Problem without this fix is, that you won't be
> able to compile Libreoffice (3.4) on a plattform with newest kernel. I
> think this means it's a blocker.
Hey ho - we've already tagged rc3 of 3.
Hi Swagat,
On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 11:45 +0530, swagat sharma wrote:
> Thank you for the support.
> Now I am getting build errors. I have downloaded the all the tarballs
> of libreoffice 3.3.2.2.
Oh - goodness; 3.3.2.2 is a horribly old code-base; also building from
tar-balls is really not
Hi Christian,
On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 13:18 +0200, Christian Lohmaier wrote:
> But obviously not enough. The bug that made MS-Office flag LO-produced
> files as corrupt for example is one of those bugs that prevent use in
Sure sure - the real hope is that (once we are clean with it - still
Hi Swagat,
On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 15:45 +0530, swagat sharma wrote:
> Also when i hit git using http,
Hah - this is my fault; try:
git clone http://anongit.freedesktop.org/git/libreoffice/bootstrap.git libo
I'll update the website;
> Has it to do something with the server or pr
Hi Andras,
On Thu, 2011-07-21 at 12:38 +0200, Andras Timar wrote:
> 2 or 3 weeks ago we agreed on the tech. steering call that we allow
> bugfixes which break the string freeze, providing that translators have
> enough time to catch up before release. So I suggest the following
> patches to be che
On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 15:17 +0200, Andras Timar wrote:
> I'd like to add the bugfix for
> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32895
> Somebody some day marked it as critical.
:-) So - I'm not a huge fan of the code. What does:
+ for( int i = 0; i < nCount; ++i )
+ {
+ if( rStrin
Hi Caolan,
On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 15:46 +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> a) On a vanilla/universal build we build static .as under Linux from
> openssl-0.9.8, i.e. libssl.a and libcrypto.o.
Oooh - nice catch :-)
> b) liboox links against these .a's. The resulting .so by default exports
>
On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 10:37 -0400, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
> Just to spell out my intention more clearly, if nobody disagrees that
> this minor quirk will not cause any issues (after all, right now, the
> whole functionality is not working) within the next few days, I will
> push Markus' patch with
Hi Sam,
On Wed, 2011-07-27 at 16:12 +0700, Samphan Raruenrom wrote:
> Last year I've done a comparison of memory usage on Windows between
> OpenOffice.org Calc 3.1 and MS Excel 2003/2007 for spreadsheets with
> simple formula of various size. I found that Calc take a lot more
> memory than Excel 2
Thanks for that; those parallel build pieces can be hard to catch when
they're missing.
Nice catch :-)
Michael.
--
michael.me...@novell.com <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOf
On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 23:44 -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
> the goal is also to get rid of BOOL, but again being careful with uno
> interaction: if uno -> sal_Bool otherwise bool
> (this is particularly tricky when touching the prototype of a virtual
> function... as all of the derived virtual of
On Wed, 2011-07-27 at 09:18 +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> > Or perhaps I mis-understood ;-) is it easy to inject those flags ?
>
> Not particularly easy, but ended up doing that anyway.
Great - and I hope it works :-)
> I was sort of hoping for a fire-once solution which could be
Hi Knut,
On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 23:20 +0200, Knut Olav Bøhmer wrote:
> >Sadly I don't know. I imagine you need to avoid the splash binary -
> > and
> > run soffice.bin. I would be tempted to remove soffice.exe rename
> > soffice.bin -> soffice.exe and debug that way.
>
> I found it.
> dev
On Wed, 2011-07-27 at 13:27 +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> Apparently, crash-be-gone anyway, nm -D gives me what I expect now on
> the final .so. I'd like to propose that fix
> 1022b20da6e234349b9c8d094670297a8e523c86 in libs-extern for 3-4.
Wonderful - cherry picked it to -3-4 just now.
Hi Kevin,
On Wed, 2011-07-27 at 06:56 -0400, Kevin Hunter wrote:
> At 6:07am -0400 Wed, 27 Jul 2011, Michael Meeks wrote:
> > but IMHO -the- fundamental design problem with calc, is something
> > quite banal - the concept that a spreadsheet is built from cells:
> > withou
Hi Peter,
On Wed, 2011-07-27 at 13:21 +0200, Péter Rabi wrote:
> The bug (fdo#32895), which we are talking about affects 'dlgass' (the
> welcoming wizard of impress) and dialogue 'doctempl' (Impress -> File ->
> Templates -> Save).
Okay ! :-)
> While 'doctempl' uses the template handling
Hi Kevin,
On Thu, 2011-07-28 at 01:07 -0400, Kevin Hunter wrote:
> Actually, as text it is convincing.
Hah ;-) there is a lot more, around dependencies. You'd be surprised at
how much time + space is spent in a spreadsheet making sure we only
re-calculate the right pieces.
> So my origi
On Thu, 2011-07-28 at 12:29 +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> proposing for 3-4
Looks golden, pushed :-)
Michael.
--
michael.me...@novell.com <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lis
On Fri, 2011-07-29 at 12:39 +0200, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
> > Sorry for bothering, but does anyone have the idea what went wrong
> > while making the build?
Which reminds me; why are we not checking in configure for make 2.82 ?
IIRC there was some to/fro on that - but I forget the resul
Hi Parag,
Great to meet you.
On Fri, 2011-07-29 at 13:53 +0530, Parag Agrawal wrote:
> I am an avid Ubuntu user ...
> So, I was wondering is there a way users can suggest features and
> changes that they would like to see in the future versions of
> libreoffice.
Yes - it is a ve
Hi Peter,
On Thu, 2011-07-28 at 16:58 +0200, Péter Rabi wrote:
> I attached the patches that fix bug fdo#32895. I eliminated the baroque
> castings and reused the duplicated function as you suggested.
Great - I've pushed to -3-4, and I'll cherry-pick to master on top of
the previously pus
On Sat, 2011-07-30 at 13:57 +0200, Francois Tigeot wrote:
> "These problems were detected only 5 days before the official Java 7
> release,
> so Oracle had no time to fix those bugs"
>
> They knew before the release date their product was broken and they still
> shipped it. Unbelievable.
On Fri, 2011-07-29 at 20:12 +0200, Eike Rathke wrote:
> * In locale data replaceTo must not be empty if replaceFrom isn't.
> + Also added check to locale data compiler to prevent this in future.
> * Fixed a currency format's group separator.
> * Marked LANGUAGE_USER_KABYLE (0x0659) obsolete as LAN
Hi Ryan,
On Sat, 2011-07-30 at 12:04 +0100, Ryan Jendoubi wrote:
> That was from content.xml. Interestingly, their definition is different
> when I save the document out as .fodt:
Hmm; that seems quite odd :-) fodt should intercept the same ODF export
filter at a very low level, certainl
On Mon, 2011-08-01 at 10:54 +0200, Petr Mladek wrote:
> BTW: The crash happens when people close the document. It usually
> happens when people close the whole application => It is ugly,
We've seen a number of similar bugs in recent times, some of which have
been quite long standing; ther
Hi Olivier,
On Mon, 2011-08-01 at 06:51 -0300, Olivier Hallot wrote:
> Any git command i isssue does not gives me a response anymore.
Ok - that is bad,
> e.g. git clone git://anongit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/bootstrap libo
Do you have access via the git:// protocol ? or is th
Hi there,
On Thu, 2011-07-28 at 01:09 +0700, Ta Duc Tung wrote:
> I've tried to make with debug=t but no change. GDB log still the same :(
> Any one please help!
You need to 'make clean' in sw and then 'make debug=true' - and -then-
you need to ensure that your install is linked to the d
Hi Jenei,
On Wed, 2011-07-27 at 20:49 +0200, Jenei Gábor wrote:
> Could you tell me if the first easyHack mentioned in the subject is
> still alive? Because for me it seems to be already resolved in version
> 3.5(However in 3.4 it can be seen). And as for the second hack, could
> someone tell me i
On Mon, 2011-08-01 at 13:54 +0200, Eike Rathke wrote:
> > Looks nice :-) it makes me wonder if we want this as a low-risk bug-fix
> > in 3.4.3 (?).
>
> No risk, and the sooner LANGUAGE_USER_KABYLE and its language listbox
> entry are removed the less chance is that documents written in MS
> f
Hi Knut,
On Mon, 2011-08-01 at 13:26 +0200, Knut Olav Bøhmer wrote:
> Now that I have my DDEInitiate-bug-workaround tested (and it works) I
> have some more time to do this.
ooh nice :-) It'd help to have the real number though:
> I have updated the bug-report at
> https://bugs.freedeskt
56991b23947d7d2307cc4bc039b8b0a2a0cd8da1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Michael Meeks
Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2011 17:36:56 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] remove name-to-ver-control map contents from
RSC_VERSIONCONTROL record
Based on a patch from Andras, this removes a set of un-used
debugging type strings from a
Hi Norbert,
On Wed, 2010-10-06 at 03:03 -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
> The patches are attached to Bug 30642
> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30642
>
> These patches remove FASTBOOL everywhere but in binfilter (bilfiler
> has more FASTBOOL use than the rest of the project combined
Hi Tor,
I believe kendy did something cunning replacing tabs with spaces during
the mercurial -> git import , so we should be all spaces not tabs now.
I suggest we discuss/decide (and I'm pro) on doing the monster sed to
add the helper comments for editors to the source at the nex
On Wed, 2010-10-06 at 19:37 +0200, Jan Holesovsky wrote:
> Done and pushed :-) Only very few conflicts, so all is good.
Great.
> Please note that you might experience a build breakage in sdext - please
> rm unxlng*.pro in sdext (or the appropriate windows version of that),
> clean build
On Thu, 2010-10-07 at 09:00 +0200, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
> Michael Meeks wrote:
> > I wonder - should we have a '$(STAMP)/download.$(SERIAL)' file - that
> > the Makefile will bail-out if it is not there with a "run download
> > first" type thing; th
Hi John,
On Tue, 2010-10-05 at 19:35 -0500, John Wohn wrote:
> Michael and whoever else might be kind enough to be looking at this
> for me: don't bother.
Oh - shame :-) it looked like you had found some really interesting
bug.
> My laptop has suddenly started showing signs of impending
Hi Werner,
On Tue, 2010-10-05 at 11:56 -0400, werner wrote:
> I'm making the SYS distro
> ftp://ftp5.gwdg.de/pub/linux/install/sys
Great :-)
> I always made own .tgz packages of OO.The basical
> package always was without the english language parts,
> and additionally I made languag
On Thu, 2010-10-07 at 01:18 +0200, Miklos Vajna wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 07, 2010 at 12:00:35AM +0200, Cédric Bosdonnat
> wrote:
> > I just pushed another patch:
> > * Calc, Writer and Impress tables now can have dotted and dashed
> > borders.
>
> Are you sure about the RTF part? Looks like you're
On Thu, 2010-10-07 at 14:22 +0200, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
> Michael Meeks wrote:
> > Urk - not an ideal solution IMHO ;-) I would prefer a clean exit,
> > rather than having the build need a network connection to download
> > things personally.
>
> Hm - but
On Tue, 2010-10-05 at 22:04 -0600, calla...@xmission.com wrote:
> Thanks for checking that last batch in. Here is the next pattern to
> run through fixguard.py which picks up all of the guarded includes
> that are commented out.
>
> exp = '//.*#ifndef.*_(?:H|HXX|HRC|HPP)_*[
> \t]*\/*.*\n(/
Hi Camille,
On Thu, 2010-10-07 at 16:54 +0200, camille.mou...@free.fr wrote:
> I completely agree with you here. That's why I was happy but when Caolán
> McNamara implemented yesterday a change I had been wainting for (no auto
> conversion of numbers in Writer's tables by default) but also worried
On Thu, 2010-10-07 at 21:28 +0530, krishnan parthasarathi wrote:
> Attaching a patch that removes commented out code from
> sd/source/ui/func/bulmaper.cxx.
Pushed; thanks ! :-)
Michael.
--
michael.me...@novell.com <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
_
On Thu, 2010-10-07 at 20:53 +0200, Andreas Mantke wrote:
> translation into English
Committed, with thanks ! :-)
Michael.
--
michael.me...@novell.com <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
___
LibreOffice mailing list
Libre
Hi Julien,
On Thu, 2010-10-07 at 21:41 +0200, julien wrote:
> I've just done these steps :
> git pull -r
> ./autogen.sh --with-git --disable-kde --disable-kde4
> ./download
You prolly want a:
$ bin/g pull -r
here - which will update the repositories in clone/
> make
Fasc
Hi Eric,
On Fri, 2010-10-08 at 07:35 +0200, Eric Hoch wrote:
> Looking at this list now it reminds me of the building the X11 OOo
> on the mac :-)
Wow - we don't want to be that bad - obviously.
> Is this because of a new build process that LibO uses compared to
> the one OOo uses?
Hi Joseph,
On Thu, 2010-10-07 at 20:56 -0700, Joseph Powers wrote:
> Ok, it looks like someone changed the way text strings are handled...
Right - this file is no longer compiled it seems, it is not there in
master (bin/g pull -r) - I suspect the problem is related to a stale
build direct
Hi Norbert,
On Wed, 2010-10-06 at 03:03 -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
> The patches are attached to Bug 30642
> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30642
Soo - I did some more spot review of the patches, and I liked what I
saw :-) things like this:
-sal_uInt16 nColor = 0, n
Present:Thorsten, Caolan, Rene, Michael
Invited:Petr, Fridrich, David, Kendy
* previous actions
+ all completed
* adding emacs/vi formatting comments to files
+ agreed; at top of header
AA: + add to easy-hacks list & do in a week if not done (Thorsten)
* enabl
Hi Prashant,
On Sun, 2010-10-10 at 22:36 +0530, Prashant Shah wrote:
> These are patches to "writer" tree
This is some great work :-) the code starts to look much less
cluttered, thanks for that !
As Norbert says - making the mailing-list look less cluttered by
merging many patch
Hi there,
On Sun, 2010-10-10 at 20:48 +0200, Giuseppe Castagno wrote:
> register component 'vnd.openoffice.pymodule:mailmerge' in registry
> '/tmp/ooopackaging/i_310291286735874/unxlngx6.pro/LibreOffice//gid_Starregistry_Services_Rdb_servicesrdb/en-US_it_fr_pt-BR_inprogress_1/services.rdb'
>
>
Hi Julien,
So - again this might go well in a bug; this is the 2nd time I've seen
this, and I can't recall the resolution previously.
On Sun, 2010-10-10 at 22:31 +0200, julien wrote:
> > do i need to add the option with-distro or can i keep on to build like
> > this, without with-distro
On Mon, 2010-10-11 at 10:08 +0100, Michael Meeks wrote:
> /home/serval/libreoffice-source/build/build/libreoffice-3.2.99.2/solenv/bin/checkdll.sh
I added valgrind instead of gdb, and on openSUSE it is (surprisingly)
completely valgrind clean as well, which is odd.
Look
Hi there,
On Sat, 2010-10-09 at 20:41 -0700, LeMoyne wrote:
> I just got started with OpenOffice this week and struggled with their install
> (it hung twice -2d time at end so OO worked). Did a lot of learning with
> MRI and got a little OO Basic code to ~work. Found LibreOffice and easily
> cho
Hi Pat,
On Mon, 2010-10-11 at 10:20 -0500, Pat Hawks wrote:
> I've applied some lossless compression to the PNGs in the package to
> reduce the size of the files a bit, some by as much as 50%
Worth doing :-)
> In the grand scheme of things I know it's not life or death, but every
> litt
On Tue, 2010-10-12 at 08:26 +0200, David Tardon wrote:
> There is the problem: this line should be
>
> gdb --args $checkdll "$@"
Urk - my problem; you almost got there manually with:
On Mon, 2010-10-11 at 23:08 +0200, julien wrote:
(gdb) run -s ../unxlngi6.pro/lib/check_libvclplug_kdeli
On Tue, 2010-10-12 at 03:33 -0600, Noel Power wrote:
> > - problem is, the OOo code we inherit here has several bugs.
Ah - fun :-)
> I was about to add an Openoffice3 supported version but I see your
> comments that you are removing 'Basic' anyway from the MigrationSteps,
> did I get tha
Pushed - thanks ! :-)
Michael.
--
michael.me...@novell.com <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Hi there,
On Tue, 2010-10-12 at 22:16 +0300, Aurimas Fišeras wrote:
> Fixes more typos in documentation.
Lovely :-) pushed it [ makes you wonder how long that lot have been
there - un-cared for - thank you for caring ! ]
All the best,
Michael.
--
michael.me...
Hi Prashant,
On Tue, 2010-10-12 at 23:09 +0530, Prashant Shah wrote:
> This patch removes bogus comments found in the shells directory
> including empty Beschreibung (translation: description) statements
Again - thanks :-) I like your style too, normalising to a single line
of whitespace
On Tue, 2010-10-12 at 22:33 +0530, Prashant Shah wrote:
> This patch removes bogus comments found in the frmdlg directory
> including empty Beschreibung (translation: description) statements
Again, lovely - pushed :-)
Thanks,
Michael.
--
michael.me...@novell.c
801 - 900 of 7124 matches
Mail list logo
