Can someone double check this. UNO Runtime Environment URE/jvmfwk looks
to have Java vendor dependencies for each OS distribution.
In libreoffice-ure-3.4.4.2\jvmfwk\distributions\OpenOfficeorg\
The appropriate javavendors_[freebsd|linux|macosx|os2|unx|wnt].xml
template gets copied from
Same experience following installation of 3.6.0.4 where on first launch
per-user see the splash screen with configuring extensions scrolling across
its bottom, then nothing. Comes up fine for each user on subsequent
launches.
LO 3.6.0.2 was fully uninstalled and Windows registry cleared of all
Devs,
ref: Bug 46114 ( https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46114 )
So understand the effort to reduce the Java UNO dependencies and desire to
move to more robust solutions. But it would appear that current releases of
Oracle's Java Access Bridge is no longer functioning, so the
Happy to cobble together a couple of clean Win7sp1 systems (32bit, 64bit)
with JRE 1.7.4, Java Access Bridge 2.0.2, NVDA 2012.1 and LibreOffice
3.5.4rc2 to capture the faults.
But for posting stack- trace what would folks prefer (be able to use) to
efficiently pin down the issue under Windows,
Apologies for a misread on my part.
Seems I'd screwed up the JAB 2.0.2 installation, so unlikely to be be able
to recreate the original crash for stack dump. There are some issues with
structure of the jfw::isAccessibilitySupportDesired() calls but otherwise
won't do anything further with this
Multiple sends aside, was this flush of old/obsolete bugs as an a
clean-up of LibreOffice Bugzilla really all that productive?
Over on the user side--where a lot of these issues get picked up--the
reception was decidedly unappreciative...
.
From: David Goldfield [mailto:dgold...@asb.org]
Sent: Tue 10/9/2012 7:44 AM
To: V Stuart Foote
Subject: RE: [libreoffice-accessibility] Latest Libo Won't Play Nice with myJRE
Hello.
I uninstalled the components in the order in which you suggested. Using
another installed screen reader
We have a group of LibreOffice Bugs in the OS X builds related to keyboard
accelerators (cmd-A, cmd-C, cmd-V):
fdo#49853 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49853
fdo#55914 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55914
fdo#60790 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60790
The autocorrect handling of fractional text 1/4, 1/2 3/4 disrupts data
entry in calc where slash is used for entry of dates.
fdo#33899 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33899 and several
multiple later bugs (37353, 44952, 46969, 53098, 53858 and 61903) all
suggest that unexpected
From: Markus Mohrhard [markus.mohrh...@googlemail.com]
Sent: Friday, March 08, 2013 3:13 AM
Thanks a lot for your effort rising awareness of these problems. If
you think it is a general problem that we are not paying enough
attention on accessibility support in new dialogs it would be nice if
you
Bug fdo#62303 ( https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62303 ) has been
submitted as an enhancement request to adjust the installation folder on
Windows to a non-versioned folder e.g. C:\Program Files\LibreOffice\
Brief discussion on Discuss (
1.7 and a more current HSQLDB build.
Stuart
From: Tom Davies [tomdavie...@yahoo.co.uk]
Sent: Saturday, December 29, 2012 10:45 AM
To: us...@global.libreoffice.org
Cc: V Stuart Foote
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-accessibility] where's the accessibility?
Hi :)
Should
Submitted fdo#58995 -- https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58995 –
Apparent changes in Java SE JRE 1.7 are impacting fidelity of Java Access
Bridge (JAB) v2.0.3 delivered UNO Accessibility API roles for AT users on
Windows OS.
The JREs 1.7 u6 are activating the JAB, and do provide AT
On Windows 7 SP1 64-bit
JRE 1.6.45
JAB 2.0.2
Bumped into a an issue with Java Access Bridge and LibreOffice today's Master
daily build.
When running the NVDA 2012.3.1 AT screen reader, a long stable test document is
crashing LibreOffice 4.1 alpha from Master when accessed with NVDA AT in use.
So having a bit of a chore when grabbing a stack trace in Windows.
Application to use seems to be the Sysinternals (Microsoft TechNet)
Russinovich Cogswell developed Process Monitor utility. It will
completely capture to log ALL system activity on a Windows OS.
The problem then becomes
@bfo,
Thanks. Familiar with the reference. Unfortunately completely dependent on a
WNT build done with MSVC debug symbols--not the case for our TinderBox
builds. Process Monitor and its stack trace is a workable alternative, but
it is tedious and gets one only to the ball park--especially if
Great topic. Please take a hard look at impact of this.
From 3.6.0 onward, handling of Windows Jump lists has been an annoyance on
that platform. BTW thank you Jesús for revisiting that issue and correcting
fdo#35785 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35785 for the
time being.
Jesús,
Rather than default SHAddtoRecentDocs calls, would it make any sense to
implement the launchers as a custom list using ICustomDestinationList
methods?
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd378402%28VS.85%29.aspx
You could then implement any custom actions to the lists that would make
LibreOffice versions 3.6.0 and later have not correctly implemented the Java
Access Bridge (JAB) modules used to expose the Java Accessibility API roles for
Windows users.
It took me a little while to work out the testing methods, but the Oracle test
utilities JavaFerret-32 and JavaMonkey-32
Hope the fix is a simple as that!
Since I reopened the FDO#53474
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53474 bug, I am happy to
re-test, but I'm not set up to build.
Assume I would grab the below 3.6 build on next cycle. It doesn't look as
if the Master for Windows Tinderbox is
V Stuart Foote wrote
It doesn't look as if the Master for Windows Tinderbox is being routinely
built.
That should have read ... is building to completion without errors.
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/RE-libreoffice-accessibility-Latest-Libo-Won-t
David,
Nominated the fdo#53474 as a most annoying for 3.6. It is a regression from
3.5 and has been with us now for four build/QA reviews.
Not sure of the etiquette but are you willing to take assignment of the bug?
The Java Accessibility testers (JavaMonkey and JavaFerret) are pretty
David,
Grabbed the build, and unfortunately it still has the MSI installer Error
1935 ( fdo#55290 ) https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55290
affecting it.
But, in reading the build info and the Tinderbox Wiki
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Tinderbox the number 16
Would ask to have 3.6.3 final release held, and proceed with a 3.6.3. rc3 build.
Stephan Bergmann's Patch for fdo#53474 requires some testing, but if fully
functional will return Java Accessibility based Assistive Technology support to
the Windows users that otherwise can not use LibreOffice.
Looking at http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Tinderbox and the
http://tinderbox.libreoffice.org/index.html
I know every body's busy, but any chance that one of the three TinderBox's
for Windows master/3-7 can be brought back on line?
TB 16 doesn't build the full Windows bundle.
: d.ostrov...@idaia.de [mailto:d.ostrov...@idaia.de]
Sent: Wed 10/31/2012 8:03 AM
To: V Stuart Foote
Cc: libreoffice@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: no functional TinderBox for master/3-7 full Windows builds
Zitat von V Stuart Foote vstuart.fo...@utsa.edu:
I know every body's busy, but any
builds
Date:
Thu, 01 Nov 2012 00:18:16 +0100
From:
David Ostrovsky david.ostrov...@gmx.de mailto:david.ostrov...@gmx.de
To:
libreoffice@lists.freedesktop.org
On 31.10.2012 16:26, V Stuart Foote wrote:
Thanks David!
So, I gave the Win2008 VC10 0build a go
Hold on! I knew this seemed familiar, happened the last time I had occasion
to load a LOdev build.
See fdo#39833 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39833#c11
comment 11 from Andras. When I get a moment I'll load the LOdev with
WRITE_REGISTRY=1 and see if that fixes the current build
Rats, working with David O's VC 2010 build of LOdev master, no improvement
using the WRITE_REGISTRY=1 during installtion, nor with manually setting a
SAL_ACCESSIBILITY_ENABLED environment variable.
The Use Assistive Tools checkbox still won't hold its state.
Stuart
--
View this message in
With a working MSVC 2010 build of master /3-7 for Windows now able to
finally get into the a11y support for Java Accessibility in Windows with
Java Access Bridge.
Two open BUGs fdo#39833
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39833 and fdo#56704
registry value, hope you are OK with that.
Stuart
-Original Message-
From: David Ostrovsky [mailto:david.ostrov...@gmx.de]
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2012 3:23 PM
To: V Stuart Foote
Cc: Libreoffice-dev
Subject: Re: no functional TinderBox for master/3-7 full Windows builds
On 01.11.2012
Tor, of course you are correct that indiscriminant use of untrusted DLL is
a sure vector to introduce malware and compromise system stability. But I
knew to not install the download DLL, and only extract and copy into the
LOdev program folder to bring up David's build of master that has been
I'll throw this out for the Dev community to mull over.
The apparent ESC decision to accelerate adoption of LibO 4.0 and not release
LibO 3.7 would seem to eliminate a potential logical break point for
implementation of several outstanding /a11y/ accessibility changes. Notably
getting the Windows
Seems like something didn't go quite right with recent refactoring of
UIConfiguration. From 7 Dec builds of master we've had a directory UIConfig
in the root of the install directory and we seem to be missing .UI
configuration details needed on launch--with Fatal Error resulting.
Have fdo#72451
Matúš K. fixed the regression. Useable TB builds again as of 10 Dec.
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/is-the-UIConfig-folder-in-root-of-install-direcotry-correct-fdo-72451-tp4087443p4087498.html
Sent from the Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Michael Meeks-5 wrote
+ decide on whether to remove legacy Java Access Bridge from 4.2
(Michael S)
[ decided not to for now, historically good to have old RTF + new
RTF
filters, so it's easy to try out if new bugs are causd by new
code ]
While probably sound, this is
OK, so with a bit of git magic, looks like the Apache OpenOffice work on their
Sidebar implementation of the Symphony contribution has been merged into
LibreOffice master. And, unless I am really misreading the git logs, has been
included in the libreoffice-4-1 branch (at commit
I've posted up stack trace for the the IAccessible2 related hang of the
Windows 4.2.0.2 RC2 builds to BZ.
fdo#73464 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=73464
It looks to be an OLE32 issue, but I'm not clear (or I could be too late in
the crash to have the correct point of failure).
I've added additional Windows WinDbg based stack traces (soffice.bin attached
to WinDbg, and of a ProcDump generated dump file).
Posted to the BZ issue:
fdo#73464 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=73464
--
View this message in context:
Tamás,
As you look at adjusting the UI grouping of the 'Help' and 'Extension'
buttons, a currently annoying aspect of the Nested GtkBox's used is that
each level of the box gets picked up and announced by screen reader AT.
Although not set to focus, each GtkBox seems to get picked up as empty
With the pending 4.2.0 RC3 spin, I can't say I'm comfortable with current
state of resolving fdo#73464
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=73464 .
Hey, I'd even be happy if someone else can report reproducing the crash on
the 4.2.0.2 RC2 build, ;-)
I've posted up a set of the
If no one has noticed, the four TB Windows builds of master went bad late on
the 21st.
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Windows-TB-builds-of-master-have-all-sputtered-tp4093494.html
Sent from the Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Unfortunately looks like the same IA2 crashing issue continues with the RC3
build. Not fit for release.
fdo#73464 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=73464
--
View this message in context:
Here is an interesting technical puzzler from a non-developer...
So, with the 4.1.0.1 build got to looking at fdo#58995
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58995 JRE 1.7u25's Java
Access Bridge v2.0.3 not interfacing with UNO Accessibility API for Windows
builds.
The current 4.1.0.1
David,
Thanks! The zip'd packaging is fine for testing, have grabbed a copy.
Will run with it and a JRE 1.7u25 and JAB 2.0.3, but noticed for starters
that the build target for the Java bytecode is still set to major/minor
49.0, or J2SE 5. Is that a javac compatibility mode setting of some
David,
Yes! I will happily work with your JDK 7 based build with Java 7 bytecode to
see if that restores the JAB function Oracle clobbered when they moved Java
Access Bridge into the base JRE at 1.7u6.
Thanks for the history...
Can't fault Tor's work on fixing the compiler java_target_version
David,
David Ostrovsky-3 wrote
But anyway i can conduct a new and shiny 51 byte code version of LO if
you would like to try it and see if we have any improvements with JAB
with it?
I would still very much like to explore this further if you are able to
generate viable Java 1.7 bytecode of
Noel,
You have continued to say that simply changing the byte code does nothing.
Even if we accept that, the issue remains that there are functional
differences between the current feature set represented by J2SE 5.0 targeted
bytecode and the current feature set that JDK SE 7 is configured to
Steve Yin's ia2 branch has been successfully merged into trunk as rev
1542312, nightly Windows buildbot build for 16 Nov #837 is functional with
a native Windows bridge provided by IAccessible2.
Please report any issues against AOO bugzilla issues i107914
And of course this is on the upstream AOO project side, implementing and
IAccessible2 based native bridge for Windows.
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/ia2-branch-sucessfully-integrated-with-trunk-as-rev-1542312-tp4083537p4083539.html
Sent from the Dev
@Kendy,
Any chance of putting up Windows debug symbols to go with the
--enable-debug configured debug build of master you're spinning on TB-39?
Have a crash fdo#72185 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=72185
with limited log details when running on Windows XP with the IAccessible2
@Kendy,
Thanks! The symbols are up and I'm able to parse for a debug review with
Process Monitor v3.05 on XP with addition of current Win7 SDK dbghelp.dll
and .NET 4 framework.
Now I just need to figure out where the thing goes south on XP... been
through it twice already and nothing is jumping
So, not to pester but figured I'd give Pedro a break.
Any prognosis for the Windows builds?
The two active Windows TB (39 42) have been failing builds for several
days now.
Stuart
--
View this message in context:
So noticed that the TB 27 builds of the 4.1 branch has .dmg installers that
are being named as 4.0.6 builds.
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/file/n4078336/lodev_OSX.png
I sent Thorsten a note about it, and he had not been aware but was just
running the build scripts.
So anyone know what
Stephan Bergmann-2 wrote
I cannot reproduce any problem with a current master build, at least on
Windows 7 with MS Narrator (Control Panel - Ease of Access Center -
Start Narrator) enabled. Expert Config comes up relatively quickly even
and appears fully functional.
Not sure you'd have
Markus,
Great! Unfortunately build logs for Kendy's TB 39 of master show that is
not yet configured to build with that flag.
I guess adjusting it to do so should resolve fdo#69517
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69517 . Kendy?
Stuart
--
View this message in context:
Jan Holesovsky-4 wrote
...@39 updated now, the next build should be usable on XP.
Yep, confirmed working on 32-bit Windows XP sp3 with today's
2013-10-04_08.16.05 TB 39 build of master.
Thanks!
--
View this message in context:
Believe they get recorded into a panel specific .xcu file, or the generic
GenericCommands.xcu
http://opengrok.libreoffice.org/xref/core/officecfg/registry/data/org/openoffice/Office/UI/GenericCommands.xcu
Entries to receive a shortcut (aka. accelerator) are tagged with a tilde ~
Also, seems
Cloph, *,
So Code Review on gerrit.libreoffice.org is churning along nicely, but the
cgit.freedesktop.org repo stopped showing commits 24 hours ago.
Intentional?
Stuart
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/cgit-repo-offline-tp4122436.html
Sent from the
Confirmed, looks to be Stephan B. and Tor L.'s recent work implementing an
louno.
I think the damage was done here:
https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/gitweb?p=core.git;a=commitdiff;h=d1a734cef0ed5d655774c2f8ac7a2203f8c0a385
sberg wrote
Is there a uno.ini file somewhere else in C:\Program Files
Only a pythonloader.uno.ini -- no uno.ini present in the installed build.
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Windows-daily-build-broken-on-Windows-8-1-tp4122701p4122726.html
Sent from
All good now with todays build on TB39, have a uno.ini again located in the
URE/bin directory contents match prior builds.
Version: 4.4.0.0.alpha0+
Build ID: be775a1ab40ccedfbc9659120b82867d6c128e6a
TinderBox: Win-x86@39, Branch:master, Time: 2014-09-19_18:16:31
--
View this message in
Cloph, *,
Windows only RC3 issue fdo#81511
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=81511has corrupted
spelling check--every word is marked wrong; looks to be patched already per
fdo#80363 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=80363 ) but that
needs to be confirmed.
Anyway,
Christian, *,
Not sure I would characterize EPS as simply a niche use.
EPS, still much more so than SVG, is the preferred format for preparation of
vector based technical images, graphs and charts for academic and scientific
publication. When you consider that Windows continues to hold the
Kendy, *,
Thanks, but that give a little love was from the last TB's off-line cycle in
February =)
Anyhow, here are the range of commits since the last solid build 30 April and
the first crashed TB-39 build still showing in TB logs:
Cloph, Kendy, *,
Hate to pester, but your Windows TB's for Master--and Symbols--dropped off
line ~12-14 Aug.
Thorsten's TB 42 has continued to grind out builds of master, so the missing
builds have not been too big a deal.
However, with Samuel M.'s refactoring of the SideBar done today
Looking at issue fdo#62051
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62051 , why no versions of
LibreOffice seem to handle insertion of EPS.
Looking in OpenGrok at ieps.cxx
http://opengrok.libreoffice.org/xref/core/filter/source/graphicfilter/ieps/ieps.cxx
Linux seems to use the
So, poking around on this in Bugzilla and OpenGrok, seems there is no
native handling of EPS in LibreOffice, and the filters (input output)
are a mess.
There has been a call for built-in EPS rendering as fdo#67464
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=67464 as an enhancement.
@Kendy, @Zolnai
Thanks for the work on the backingwindow.cxx and thumbnailview.cxx keyboard
navigation to resolve fdo#71763 and fdo#71764. Will test the F6 navigation
as the next TB builds of master roll around.
Since you've already gotten so far into the key board navigation might I be
able to
Have a nasty regression in Apple OS X accessibility fdo#74121
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=74121
Looks to have been caused by an AOO contributed refactoring attempting to
isolate VCL Window type naming from NS Window and NS View type naming.
Something was not quite correct
@Marcus, @Kendy, @Christian
Other than Thorsten's TB 42, the Windows TinderBoxes of master (TBs 38, 39
and 47) have been missing in action...
Could you each give them a little love as time permits.
Thanks!
Stuart
--
View this message in context:
Here is a mixed UX and Dev question...
As submitted by a vigilant user, OfficeUser (Norbert N.), a
href=https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=75489;fdo#74589 /a raises
an interesting UI question, introduced for 4.2, what is intended purpose for
the non visible buttons that now show
Thorsten, Kendy, *
TB42 dumped core and the
libo-master~2014-10-10_23.17.23_LibreOfficeDev_4.4.0.0.alpha0_Win_x86.msi is
only a partial installer package at 93MB. Not much in the build log--guess
it got truncated. Nor has Kendy's TB39 spun a build since Monday the
6th--and of course
Just discovered we have a pesky regression we picked up on the 4.1 - 4.2
transition with the Spelling dialog F7 not resetting underline of the
misspelled words when corrected. All seems correct if the spelling is
corrected with context menu.
So, suspect it to be mishandling of the bPaintWrong
ESC, TDF Board, *,
LibreOffice's support for the Chinese national standard for XML documents
was added to the OOo CWS mid-2006 and seems to comply with just a portion of
the UOF V1.0 standard--it is a flat XML implementation.
Technical comparison between UOF v1.0 and ODF packaged XML is in a
Tor Lillqvist-2 wrote
Should filters be removed from
core and repackaged as an extension to externally provide document
conversion?
If they are broken anyway, what would be the point with that?
Well, I would expect that if someone were to take the time to implement as
an appropriately
Robinson Tryon wrote
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 12:37 PM, V Stuart Foote lt;
VStuart.Foote@
gt; wrote:
Since then, the Chinese Office suite development by the likes of RedFlag
2000 (defunct), KingSoft, YozoSoft and CS2C with state sponsorship and
academic research have refined the UOF
@Kohei,
Kohei Yoshida-7 wrote
It seems to me that you probably know more about UOF than the rest of
us. I'd like to hear your opinion of what should be done. And if your
answer is we should take this further to support Chinese users, then
who do you think should provide the development
jonathon-4 wrote
What happened to the Chinese language team?
zh.libreoffice.org is in English, even though that is not on the
There is a pretty vibrant Chinese user community here:
http://www.libreofficechina.org/forum.php
And the truth is, it is not that difficult to gist most document and
Top posting reply to Joel's note...
Actually, it makes a lot of sense in that release notes really need a more
descriptive narrative for substantive enhancements and bug fixes. As is we
often simply list the fixes against prior releases.
Envision this whiteboard tagging would support two
extras/source/palettes/standard.soc |2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
New commits:
commit e95ae3278b71fc56fa6cdab9ecff4c5bdbdda583
Author: V Stuart Foote vstuart.fo...@utsa.edu
Date: Thu Dec 4 17:08:53 2014 +0100
fdo#86511: Fix the RGB value of 'Sky blue 1' color
extras/source/palettes/standard.soc |2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
New commits:
commit fa2ac4cf5fc268b07dab42c2f610fb62f214a69c
Author: V Stuart Foote vstuart.fo...@utsa.edu
Date: Thu Dec 4 17:08:53 2014 +0100
fdo#86511: Fix the RGB value of 'Sky blue 1' color
to my past future Artwork and Design
contributions to the LibreOffice project, and similarly to The Document
Foundation, placing such contributions under CC0:
http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0
V Stuart Foote
San Antonio, Texas
sw/source/core/doc/DocumentStylePoolManager.cxx |4
1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
New commits:
commit 889f4705b90147d5653b08491579c51a7aca12be
Author: V Stuart Foote vstuart.fo...@utsa.edu
Date: Wed Dec 24 20:10:23 2014 +0400
fdo#82041 restore heading 3 and 4 color to automatic
Request for late review for 4.4.1
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=c7e907f58f8d0791ee304b42de769f43102522e9
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=ad14ed0bbf80dd95dca6e0dea6edbe5fb68f9f26
The first corrects 4.4 MAB tdf#88935 and has been picked up in
@Miklos, *,
Of course that is how it would work if all participants of the project were
able and currently building from source.
I don't. No excuses, I just don't. I should, and freely acknowledge that I
need to.
So, that said and out of the way--opportunity here to fix a nasty 4.4 MAB
Zolnai, *
Did not realize there were actually two OOXML/MSO attributes that had to be
manipulated to handle highlighting in MS Office formats. And that we'd been
fudging it with just one--your patch with just one
attribute--RES_CHRATR_HIGHLIGHT manipulated as background fill in LO.
This
@Tamás,
Getting the first in to correct the MAB for 4.4.1 is probably enough. Thank
you.
As to even bringing the second down to 4.4, I'll have to do some bench
marking comparing t a 4.4.2 nightly and a 4.5.0 master with the sw: avoid
temporary object creation to build GraphicPrimitive2D patch.
sw/source/core/doc/DocumentStylePoolManager.cxx |4
1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
New commits:
commit aa474a538315c20128d0853bac97bfa3e66a2c12
Author: V Stuart Foote vstuart.fo...@utsa.edu
Date: Wed Dec 24 20:10:23 2014 +0400
fdo#82041 restore heading 3 and 4 color to automatic
Ashod Nakashian-2 wrote
So, unless Gerrit has decided not to, or is unable to, migrate to OpenID
Connect by the deadline, migrating to OpenID Connect should be seamless
and
uneventful.
Do we know whether or not Gerrit will have migrated by the deadline?
(Granted, warning people to avoid a
Trying to accomplish the Link Another Identity process for my LO gerrit
account.
Username
vsfoote
Full Name V Stuart Foote
Email Address vstuart.foote AT utsa.edu
Registered Oct 2, 2014 2:18 PM
Account ID 1000805
But the WebIdentities ?link an account page is a little thin
V Stuart Foote wrote
Hmm, so looks like there is an issue with gerrit project's implementation
of openid4java and StackExchanges OpenID (also using openid4java).
s/(also using openid4java)/(using DotNetOpenAuth)/
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org
Hmm, so looks like there is an issue with gerrit project's implementation of
openid4java and StackExchanges OpenID (also using openid4java).
Looks like StackExchange is serving OpenID AX attribute type/value pair
exchanges to a namespace alias alias3 rather than the OpenID prototypical
alias ax
So with release of 4.4.0 we appear to still have issues with OS X 10.9 and
10.10 Gatekeeper fussing over the package signing.
An easy work around to by-pass Gatekeeper, but it seems like we have a
correct Apple v2 signature and should not have to be asking folks to. Is
that not the case?
Jonathan Aquilina wrote
There is a way around that all one has to do to open libreoffice is go to
system preferences and go to securty and you can do one of two things
1) change gatekeeper settings
2) open libreoffice. After that it doesnt prompt you again.
Of course-- there are work
@madrosh,
The major bug I have is applying a register-true to an entire document
at a time. I use OL to put together a periodical, with columned text and
many images (which are put in frames and anchored to specific pages).
It is LO not OL, or better LibreOffice.
Believe the best practice
This is easily done from within Draw.
1. Open a new draw document
2. Use the page dialog to set orientation, and page size, also I prefer to
remove margins--setting the page allows you to work with the whole drawing
and pass it for export rendering.
3. Use the Insert -> Image, or the Drawing
@Wol,*
Wols Lists wrote
> I know developers love to add bells and whistles, and aiui when you
> "save as pdf" from LO it can now embed the original document in the pdf
> to make it easy to get the document back into editable form, but the
> attached email below makes me think "is this wise?".
@Jan,
Regina H. and Fred W. were some of the last to poke at the math formula
editor. Unfortunately, the StarMath syntax while comfortable has stagnated
as W3C MathML evolved, and LaTex remained mainstream--we don't natively
enter either and have to filter or extend to work with them. Regina
Markus Mohrhard wrote
>> + Most Pressing Bugs:
>> http://tdf.io/mostressingbugs
>> + tdf#100295 - LibODev-5.2.0.0.b2 does not run in Windows_XP (32
>> or 64 bit)
>> + Interest in fixing ? (or is this a 'feature' ?)
>> + Tor - thinks a feature.
>>
1 - 100 of 296 matches
Mail list logo
