On 09/29/2011 06:01 PM, Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
Hi,
I was noticed that there is package called npapi-sdk [1] that can be
used as firefox/mozilla headers instead of requiring whole beast to
build the plugins.
Do you think it would be possible to use this in libreoffice, or is it
impossible?
I don't
On 04/21/2011 07:17 PM, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
Hi all,
I just want to bring up an idea of which I am not really sure if it is
a good one. Currently we have new contributors writing patches to the
dev-ML and grant them direct repository access later. Commiting
directly on the master might be qu
On 03/09/2011 06:01 PM, Caolán McNamara wrote:
On Wed, 2011-03-09 at 10:46 +0200, Jani Monoses wrote:
On 01/29/2011 03:04 PM, Caolán McNamara wrote:
On Thu, 2011-01-27 at 20:13 +0200, Jani Monoses wrote:
What about using GCC atomic builtins like in the attached patch?
Excellent, the pthread
On 01/29/2011 03:04 PM, Caolán McNamara wrote:
On Thu, 2011-01-27 at 20:13 +0200, Jani Monoses wrote:
What about using GCC atomic builtins like in the attached patch?
Excellent, the pthread fallback always niggled me.
Sorry for not thinking about this earlier, can this be cherry-picked
On 01/27/2011 05:31 PM, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-01-27 at 15:42 +0200, Jani Monoses wrote:
>> armel
>
> sal/osl/unx/interlck.c probably should have a specific impl for arm btw,
> probably a low hanging fruit for someone who knows a little bit of arm
> assembly.
Hi Michael,
thanks for pushing to 3.3
When there's a relase with the patch included, it should close this
issue I opened a few days ago
https://bugs.freedesktop.org//show_bug.cgi?id=33402
>
> Having said that, it is already fixed in master, so I just merged your
> patch to libreoffice-3-
hain issue at
play as well.
Jani
>From 7305b53aad89f4c0362e6126edc8f1930eed22f4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jani Monoses
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 15:33:06 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Remove unused declaration
---
sc/source/core/tool/token.cxx |3 ---
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 3 delet
On 01/25/2011 11:13 AM, Alexander Thurgood wrote:
> Le 25/01/11 08:24, Jonathan Aquilina a écrit :
>
> Hi Jonathan,
>
>> Correct me if I am wrong but wont LO be a little screwed since LO only
>> supports X from what I have seen codewise?
>
> That was precisely my point : applications have to be
The OPs mail simply shows Ubuntus attitude and cluelessless, both reasons for
why they have to die.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zrzMhU_4m-g#t=1m20s
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailm
On 11/27/2010 05:36 PM, Rene Engelhard wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 04:22:06PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 04:08:37PM +0100, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
hey guys what is being done to get LO into debian so that downstream
It already for almost a month.
to ma
On 11/08/2010 10:37 AM, Sebastian Spaeth wrote:
I think, I'll add a "how to prepare and send patches" section to the
wiki, as that causes lots of confusion. Is there consensus by committers
whether we want to have patches attached to a mail or sent inline with
"git send-email"? Depending on the o
On 11/03/2010 04:06 PM, Caolán McNamara wrote:
On Tue, 2010-11-02 at 14:30 +0100, Cedric Bosdonnat wrote:
On Tue, 2010-11-02 at 12:47 +, Michael Meeks wrote:
Quite; cf. such uncertainty - it probably makes considerable sense to
look into a migration strategy from Java to (insert any
Is there a list of which compilers are supported and what versions
recommeneded for building LO?
I was thinking of the feasibility of using gcc's __builtin_constant_p in
a macro to differentiate fast and not so fast paths for createFromAscii
cases to keep the code uniform but still get the opt
rom 753c0a3ff6704045d3837581a2299f4c20b76452 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jani Monoses
Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2010 01:55:47 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Include header file instead of redefining a macro.
---
starmath/source/accessibility.cxx |3 +--
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/starmath/sou
Hello,
This changes the only occurrence in writer/starmath.
The wiki entry does not mention it, but should
UNOOUSTRING::createFromAscii (not OUString) be replaced as well?
There are two of that in starmath
Jani
>From da30daf2c9cf9d1f19da7b674a8896fc5fa6e453 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: J
This page describes building in the topmost dir
http://www.documentfoundation.org/develop/
whereas the wiki-page example changes to rawbuild before.
Which one is recommended? I have been building from topmost dir so far.
thanks
Jani
___
LibreOffice ma
On 10/12/2010 04:43 AM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
Ok so I don't have a blog... but We have a brand new wiki...
So I started a page, intended to help prospective developper to get
acquainted with the build and with git...
This is quite fresh in my mind... since I've learn that in the past
few days
17 matches
Mail list logo
