On 21/10/11 16:04, Michael Meeks wrote:
Hi August,
Well - of course, it'd be nice to have some more complex tests of
StarBasic (and VBA) macros, potentially loaded from .bas files inside a
unit test.
Noel - do you have any really nasty syntax / built-in basic
functionality
On 10/21/2011 10:17 PM, Michael Meeks wrote:
On Fri, 2011-10-21 at 18:16 +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
Unfortunately, this breaks the build, as basic now has a (missing)
dependency on sfx2, which already depends on basic.
Fair enough, my mistake. I dropped sfx from the link line,
Hi August,
On Thu, 2011-10-20 at 15:01 -0400, August Sodora wrote:
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 3:01 PM, August Sodora aug...@gmail.com wrote:
I've attached a new patch that includes some tests for the BASIC
scanner. Most of the test cases are just to get an idea of how the
scanner handles
Thanks to all for being so patient with me! Would it be worthwhile to
continue working on the mess that is scanner/tokenizer/parser (why do
they inherit from eachother?!) in basic? I'm also curious about VBA
support and whether there exists a grammar or similar documentation
for the StarBASIC
Hi August,
On Fri, 2011-10-21 at 08:50 -0400, August Sodora wrote:
Thanks to all for being so patient with me! Would it be worthwhile to
continue working on the mess that is scanner/tokenizer/parser (why do
they inherit from eachother?!) in basic? I'm also curious about VBA
support and
Hello Michael, August,
2011/10/21 Michael Meeks michael.me...@suse.com:
Hi August,
On Fri, 2011-10-21 at 08:50 -0400, August Sodora wrote:
Thanks to all for being so patient with me! Would it be worthwhile to
continue working on the mess that is scanner/tokenizer/parser (why do
they inherit
On 10/21/2011 11:13 AM, Michael Meeks wrote:
Hi August,
On Thu, 2011-10-20 at 15:01 -0400, August Sodora wrote:
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 3:01 PM, August Sodoraaug...@gmail.com wrote:
I've attached a new patch that includes some tests for the BASIC
scanner. Most of the test cases are just to
Hi August, Michael,
Michael Meeks píše v Pá 21. 10. 2011 v 10:13 +0100:
Ooh ! :-) this is really nice. I was previously fooled by the subject
into not noticing that this was some sexy code cleanup + unit testing
patch.
Michael - thank you a lot for pushing this, and sorry, August, that
On Fri, 2011-10-21 at 18:16 +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
Unfortunately, this breaks the build, as basic now has a (missing)
dependency on sfx2, which already depends on basic.
Fair enough, my mistake. I dropped sfx from the link line, it's not
actually required, leaving the link