[Libreoffice] question about cppcheck for libreoffice.boldandbusted.com
Hello, libreoffice.boldandbusted.com is a great idea, but what's the version cppcheck used for libreoffice.boldandbusted.com ? I ask this because cppcheck has sometimes false positives. For example, lately i had opened a tracker (#2235: false Resource leak) and today it's corrected. It could be useful to know the date of the last update at the beginning of the report. Julien. ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [Libreoffice] question about cppcheck for libreoffice.boldandbusted.com
Hi Julien, It is the git version of cppchcek, which I checkout every few days via Portage. If you find false positives, you should let the cppcheck folks know, and they'll remove it or otherwise correct it (or tell you that it isn't a false positive ;) ). Which tracker are you referencing? cppcheck's bugtracker or LO's? I'll bump cppcheck today. Cheers, Jesse Adelman Bold and Busted LLC http://www.boldandbusted.com/ On Sat, 27 Nov 2010 22:44 +0100, Julien Nabet serval2...@yahoo.fr wrote: Hello, libreoffice.boldandbusted.com is a great idea, but what's the version cppcheck used for libreoffice.boldandbusted.com ? I ask this because cppcheck has sometimes false positives. For example, lately i had opened a tracker (#2235: false Resource leak) and today it's corrected. It could be useful to know the date of the last update at the beginning of the report. Julien. ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [Libreoffice] question about cppcheck for libreoffice.boldandbusted.com
I've added some code to my report generation scripts to insert the cppcheck git sha1 hash in the title of the report. I had to do a bit of shell trickery to get Gentoo's Portage to give me the hash of the installed cppcheck. It is in the middle of a report run now, so probably in 4-6 hours from this writing will the git sha1 hash show up. I'd love it if the cppcheck-htmlreport was made more flexible (the title/header is getting mighty ugly and ungainly, and I just *love* the HTML in the TITLE tag...), but when/if I have time I'll see if I can hack that to work better and add options. Cheers, Jesse Adelman Bold and Busted LLC http://www.boldandbusted.com/ On Sat, 27 Nov 2010 14:02 -0800, some...@boldandbusted.com wrote: Hi Julien, It is the git version of cppchcek, which I checkout every few days via Portage. If you find false positives, you should let the cppcheck folks know, and they'll remove it or otherwise correct it (or tell you that it isn't a false positive ;) ). Which tracker are you referencing? cppcheck's bugtracker or LO's? I'll bump cppcheck today. Cheers, Jesse Adelman Bold and Busted LLC http://www.boldandbusted.com/ On Sat, 27 Nov 2010 22:44 +0100, Julien Nabet serval2...@yahoo.fr wrote: Hello, libreoffice.boldandbusted.com is a great idea, but what's the version cppcheck used for libreoffice.boldandbusted.com ? I ask this because cppcheck has sometimes false positives. For example, lately i had opened a tracker (#2235: false Resource leak) and today it's corrected. It could be useful to know the date of the last update at the beginning of the report. Julien. ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: [Libreoffice] question about cppcheck for libreoffice.boldandbusted.com
Hi Jesse I was talking about cppcheck bugtracker. There has been a fix for the tracker #2235, this one has been corrected yesterday. About false positives, i've created 3 trackers on cppcheck for the moment. 2 have been fixed : #2235 i talked about and #2210 which has been corrected by the cppcheck guys the 18/11. It seems like the other one (#2217) has been corrected with other fixes since they didn't reproduce it. Julien. Le 27/11/2010 23:02, some...@boldandbusted.com a écrit : Hi Julien, It is the git version of cppchcek, which I checkout every few days via Portage. If you find false positives, you should let the cppcheck folks know, and they'll remove it or otherwise correct it (or tell you that it isn't a false positive ;) ). Which tracker are you referencing? cppcheck's bugtracker or LO's? I'll bump cppcheck today. Cheers, Jesse Adelman Bold and Busted LLC http://www.boldandbusted.com/ On Sat, 27 Nov 2010 22:44 +0100, Julien Nabetserval2...@yahoo.fr wrote: Hello, libreoffice.boldandbusted.com is a great idea, but what's the version cppcheck used for libreoffice.boldandbusted.com ? I ask this because cppcheck has sometimes false positives. For example, lately i had opened a tracker (#2235: false Resource leak) and today it's corrected. It could be useful to know the date of the last update at the beginning of the report. Julien. ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
