On 22/05/12 15:56, Lubos Lunak wrote:
On Friday 18 of May 2012, Michael Stahl wrote:
On 16/05/12 15:09, Lubos Lunak wrote:
(i wonder if -ggdb1 exists and would be sufficient for symbols but don't
care enough to try).
It does, from gcc manpage: Level 1 produces minimal information, enough
On Monday 21 of May 2012, Michael Meeks wrote:
On Mon, 2012-05-21 at 18:06 +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
I rarely use a debugger to step through code, so I prefer to avoid the
Egad - is this thread still going on :-) Could we create a set of the
pros / cons a concrete proposal for
On Tuesday 22 of May 2012, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
On 05/22/2012 04:02 PM, Lubos Lunak wrote:
On Tuesday 22 of May 2012, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
On 05/22/2012 03:19 PM, Lubos Lunak wrote:
But --enable-debug also enables asserts, logging and similar
functionality that should be rather
On Monday 21 of May 2012, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
On 05/21/2012 05:10 PM, Lubos Lunak wrote:
On Friday 18 of May 2012, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
Ah, you wanted --enable-dbgutil to disable -O2, the same way that
--enable-debug does. Had missed that point. Hm, as I said, I prefer my
On 05/22/2012 03:19 PM, Lubos Lunak wrote:
On Monday 21 of May 2012, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
On 05/21/2012 05:10 PM, Lubos Lunak wrote:
On Friday 18 of May 2012, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
Ah, you wanted --enable-dbgutil to disable -O2, the same way that
--enable-debug does. Had missed that
On Friday 18 of May 2012, Michael Stahl wrote:
On 16/05/12 15:09, Lubos Lunak wrote:
these switches are actually supposed to do. As far as I can
tell, --enable-symbols enables -g, --enable-debug does --enable-symbols
and turns on logging+assertions and disables optimizations, and
On Tuesday 22 of May 2012, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
On 05/22/2012 03:19 PM, Lubos Lunak wrote:
On Monday 21 of May 2012, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
On 05/21/2012 05:10 PM, Lubos Lunak wrote:
On Friday 18 of May 2012, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
Ah, you wanted --enable-dbgutil to disable -O2, the
On 05/22/2012 04:02 PM, Lubos Lunak wrote:
On Tuesday 22 of May 2012, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
On 05/22/2012 03:19 PM, Lubos Lunak wrote:
On Monday 21 of May 2012, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
On 05/21/2012 05:10 PM, Lubos Lunak wrote:
On Friday 18 of May 2012, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
Ah, you
On Friday 18 of May 2012, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
On 05/18/2012 04:05 PM, Lubos Lunak wrote:
On Friday 18 of May 2012, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
On 05/16/2012 05:01 PM, Lubos Lunak wrote:
- non-debug/dbgutils (i.e. also the default) - -O2
- symbols - -g (probably even -g1, if this is
On 05/21/2012 05:10 PM, Lubos Lunak wrote:
On Friday 18 of May 2012, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
Ah, you wanted --enable-dbgutil to disable -O2, the same way that
--enable-debug does. Had missed that point. Hm, as I said, I prefer my
--enable-dbgutil --disable-debug builds to be -O2.
What is
Hello,
On 05/20/2012 11:24 PM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 11:30 PM, Pierre-André Jacquod
pjacq...@alumni.ethz.ch wrote:
expecting to get symbols without optimization, not wanting all asserts
outputs.
If you are intending to debug why wouldn't you want the misnamed
On Mon, 2012-05-21 at 18:06 +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
I rarely use a debugger to step through code, so I prefer to avoid the
Egad - is this thread still going on :-) Could we create a set of the
pros / cons a concrete proposal for the ESC call on Thursday ?
Thanks,
hello,
On 05/16/2012 04:07 PM, Lubos Lunak wrote:
If somebody does
a developer build, there are not many good reasons why -O2 should be used -
it takes noticably more time and it makes debugging miserable. I can't think
of anything else than final builds and profiling as a good
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 11:30 PM, Pierre-André Jacquod
pjacq...@alumni.ethz.ch wrote:
At least I understand why I always got debug builds with optimization, which
does not ease the use of debugger... and why it takes so long to build.
As occasional developer, I do not want to dig to deep in
On 05/16/2012 05:01 PM, Lubos Lunak wrote:
- non-debug/dbgutils (i.e. also the default) - -O2
- symbols - -g (probably even -g1, if this is actually meant for release
builds with debug info sufficient mainly for backtraces)
- debug/dbgutils - -g, making sure it overrides -g1 from symbols
-
On Friday 18 of May 2012, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
On 05/16/2012 05:01 PM, Lubos Lunak wrote:
- non-debug/dbgutils (i.e. also the default) - -O2
- symbols - -g (probably even -g1, if this is actually meant for
release builds with debug info sufficient mainly for backtraces)
-
On 05/18/2012 04:05 PM, Lubos Lunak wrote:
On Friday 18 of May 2012, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
On 05/16/2012 05:01 PM, Lubos Lunak wrote:
- non-debug/dbgutils (i.e. also the default) - -O2
- symbols - -g (probably even -g1, if this is actually meant for
release builds with debug info
On 16/05/12 15:09, Lubos Lunak wrote:
On Tuesday 08 of May 2012, Michael Stahl wrote:
sorry for the late reply
Hmm, ok, I don't want to just revert once more, but since it looks to me
like
you've broken this in several ways, it is possible we don't agree on what
i'm biased but i bet i
On Tuesday 08 of May 2012, Michael Stahl wrote:
config_host.mk.in|2
configure.in | 48 ++-
filter/source/pdf/impdialog.cxx | 29 +++
oox/source/dump/dumperbase.cxx |
On 05/16/2012 03:09 PM, Lubos Lunak wrote:
Now --enable-debug=-sc/ means that sc/ is built without -g and with -O2. In
other words, the compiler spends extra time working on code I don't care
about at all. There was a reason why OPT flags was empty in --enable-debug
build - as soon as I do a
On Wednesday 16 of May 2012, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
On 05/16/2012 03:09 PM, Lubos Lunak wrote:
Now --enable-debug=-sc/ means that sc/ is built without -g and with
-O2. In other words, the compiler spends extra time working on code I
don't care about at all. There was a reason why OPT
On 05/16/2012 04:07 PM, Lubos Lunak wrote:
On Wednesday 16 of May 2012, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
On 05/16/2012 03:09 PM, Lubos Lunak wrote:
Now --enable-debug=-sc/ means that sc/ is built without -g and with
-O2. In other words, the compiler spends extra time working on code I
don't care
On Wednesday 16 of May 2012, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
On 05/16/2012 04:07 PM, Lubos Lunak wrote:
Given that those differences you mention should be either irrelevant in
practice or compiler bugs, even I, having rather fast build system, do
not see -O2 worth using.
...yes, I mainly
23 matches
Mail list logo
