Hi,
On Wednesday, 2013-04-10 21:52:20 +0200, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
I was not suggesting git submodules -- keep everything in one repo, but
create some ~10 toplevel directories in which you find our current modules.
My bad, I misunderstood. I plead for coining unambiguous terms :-/
*
On Wed, 2013-04-10 at 19:00 +0200, Eike Rathke wrote:
I find submodules a nightmare to handle and the current situation with
the three we have (though justified because of their optional character)
is already bad enough, we don't want to scare away new developers..
Right. Personally I
On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 11:54:07PM +0200, Michael Stahl wrote:
On 05/04/13 17:54, Lubos Lunak wrote:
- makes the separation between a 'public' header and a module-private one
more explicit
Now only if this separation currently wasn't rather confused on its own.
E.g.
Writer has a
Hi Bjoern,
On Wednesday, 2013-04-10 12:59:02 +0200, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
Writer has zero public headers, no code in a different module includes
anything from sw/. there is however a distinction between headers in
sw/inc used in all 3 parts of Writer (sw/source/*) vs. just one of
Hi Eike,
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 03:05:50PM +0200, Eike Rathke wrote:
It's not only Writer, Calc and Draw do the same with some headers, and
it serves a purpose, for example core or filters are not supposed to
access anything UI or view specific.
That is right ... and wrong. The separation
If swui is a proper lib on top of sw, it should either:
- be a toplevel module on its own
As somebody who ~never touches sw, I find this a good, clean, idea;)
The sw, sd and sc modules are so large anyway, that if they in fact
can be split up into logical sub-parts, those could well be
On 10/04/13 15:40, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
Hi Eike,
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 03:05:50PM +0200, Eike Rathke wrote:
It's not only Writer, Calc and Draw do the same with some headers, and
it serves a purpose, for example core or filters are not supposed to
access anything UI or view specific.
On 04/10/2013 03:40 PM, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 03:05:50PM +0200, Eike Rathke wrote:
It's not only Writer, Calc and Draw do the same with some headers, and
it serves a purpose, for example core or filters are not supposed to
access anything UI or view specific.
That
Hi Bjoern,
On Wednesday, 2013-04-10 15:40:29 +0200, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
- our we should introduce submodules properly
I find submodules a nightmare to handle and the current situation with
the three we have (though justified because of their optional character)
is already bad enough, we
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 04:37:51PM +0200, Michael Stahl wrote:
On 10/04/13 15:40, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
the problem is that the splitting of sw into 3 libraries is essentially
a hack to get better startup performance; there is not really a clean
separation there; for starters there are
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 07:00:57PM +0200, Eike Rathke wrote:
Hi Bjoern,
On Wednesday, 2013-04-10 15:40:29 +0200, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
- our we should introduce submodules properly
I find submodules a nightmare to handle and the current situation with
the three we have (though
Hi Stephan,
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 06:44:19PM +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
What is the half-complete new concept there, and what is wrong
with having a module build three libraries?
Well the sw/ madness is special in its own way (see msts post and my reply).
Building multiple targets in one
On 05/04/13 17:54, Lubos Lunak wrote:
- makes the separation between a 'public' header and a module-private one
more explicit
Now only if this separation currently wasn't rather confused on its own.
E.g.
Writer has a number of public and module-private headers, yet I doubt there's
On Thu, 2013-04-04 at 17:51 +0200, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
This is the first option:
Move the headers from $(SRCDIR)/$(MODULE)/inc/$(MODULE) to
$(SRCDIR)/include/$(MODULE).
I believe we agreed on this one in the ESC vs. the option two :-)
As you might guess, if we go for this I
On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 11:38:35AM +0100, Michael Meeks wrote:
+ write up for the mailing list (Bjoern)
+ find out how other big projects:
Mozilla, linux, etc. do this
We have it for Linux (see post), I had a quick view an Mozilla and couldnt
figure
On Thursday 04 of April 2013, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
Hi,
ignited by:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=61627
It would be nice if you could sum up the reason for all this, because the
bugreport is rather unclear on it. As far as I understand it, the reason for
this change
Hi,
Just to clarify upfront: Getting rid of copying the header is a topic as old as
gbuild itself, fdo#61627 just did bring it up again because Michael Meeks asked
about it.
On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 05:54:20PM +0200, Lubos Lunak wrote:
On Thursday 04 of April 2013, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
You
Hi,
ignited by:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=61627
There was a discussion on moving the global headers to one central location.
I am writing this mail mainly to work out the pros and cons of such a move, so
we can carefully evaluate and prepare for impact should we go for
18 matches
Mail list logo
