https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=86915
raal r...@post.cz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||r...@post.cz
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69644
Timur gti...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gti...@gmail.com
--- Comment #5
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=86920
Cor Nouws c...@nouenoff.nl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
CC|
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=75025
--- Comment #88 from deligeo deli...@physics.uoc.gr ---
Migrating from 4.2 which reached EOL:
https://www.libreoffice.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42346
Cross reference handling broken when exporting to doc / docx
Same bug still exists in 4.3 (
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42346
deligeo deli...@physics.uoc.gr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||75025
--
You are
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=75025
deligeo deli...@physics.uoc.gr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||42346
--
You are
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65675
tommy27 ba...@quipo.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on|75209 |
--
You are receiving this
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=75025
tommy27 ba...@quipo.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||75209
--
You are receiving
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=75209
tommy27 ba...@quipo.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|65675 |75025
--- Comment #16 from
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=81475
--- Comment #33 from Commit Notification
libreoffice-comm...@lists.freedesktop.org ---
Maxim Monastirsky committed a patch related to this issue.
It has been pushed to master:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69644
Timur gti...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|4.2.0.0.alpha0+ Master |Inherited From OOo
--
You are
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=81475
--- Comment #34 from Commit Notification
libreoffice-comm...@lists.freedesktop.org ---
Maxim Monastirsky committed a patch related to this issue.
It has been pushed to libreoffice-4-4:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=86926
Bug ID: 86926
Summary: page format not saved in docx
Product: LibreOffice
Version: 4.3.4.1 release
Hardware: All
OS: Linux (All)
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=86927
Bug ID: 86927
Summary: Error writing content.xml
Product: LibreOffice
Version: 4.4.0.0.beta1
Hardware: Other
OS: Windows (All)
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=86829
--- Comment #2 from Darius Daniel Grigoras daniel.grigo...@movidius.com ---
Well, I just encountered another problem related to the Spell Checker, a case
in which Ignore Once does not work.
I have the followning phrase: issues an RX DMA request.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=86928
Bug ID: 86928
Summary: Calc warns of macros, but there are no macros in the
XLS
Product: LibreOffice
Version: 4.3.2.2 release
Hardware: Other
OS: All
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=86928
Roman Polach r0pol...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #110352|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=86928
--- Comment #2 from Roman Polach r0pol...@gmail.com ---
Comment on attachment 110352
-- https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=110352
XLS causing the problem when open
...
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=86928
Roman Polach r0pol...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #110352|1 |0
is obsolete|
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=86902
raal r...@post.cz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||r...@post.cz
--- Comment #1 from
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=86829
Darius Daniel Grigoras daniel.grigo...@movidius.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Hardware|Other
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=86929
Bug ID: 86929
Summary: Kill FOREACHPAM_START for good
Product: LibreOffice
Version: unspecified
Hardware: Other
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=74385
--- Comment #21 from bugzil...@cb-computerservice.at ---
(In reply to Julien Nabet from comment #20)
bugzilla2:
- did you rename your LO directory profile (see
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/UserProfile#Windows) to have a clean env?
- do
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=86829
Darius Daniel Grigoras daniel.grigo...@movidius.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|Writer
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=86929
Björn Michaelsen bjoern.michael...@canonical.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|medium |low
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=86928
Eike Rathke er...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #110352|text/plain |application/vnd.ms-excel
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42788
--- Comment #18 from Björn Michaelsen bjoern.michael...@canonical.com ---
adding LibreOffice developer list as CC to unresolved Writer EasyHacks for
better visibility.
see e.g.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=83546
Björn Michaelsen bjoern.michael...@canonical.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=86929
Björn Michaelsen bjoern.michael...@canonical.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=75019
Björn Michaelsen bjoern.michael...@canonical.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33831
--- Comment #6 from Björn Michaelsen bjoern.michael...@canonical.com ---
adding LibreOffice developer list as CC to unresolved Writer EasyHacks for
better visibility.
see e.g.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32531
--- Comment #15 from Björn Michaelsen bjoern.michael...@canonical.com ---
adding LibreOffice developer list as CC to unresolved Writer EasyHacks for
better visibility.
see e.g.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63436
--- Comment #2 from Björn Michaelsen bjoern.michael...@canonical.com ---
adding LibreOffice developer list as CC to unresolved Writer EasyHacks for
better visibility.
see e.g.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=67208
--- Comment #3 from Björn Michaelsen bjoern.michael...@canonical.com ---
adding LibreOffice developer list as CC to unresolved Writer EasyHacks for
better visibility.
see e.g.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60739
--- Comment #9 from Björn Michaelsen bjoern.michael...@canonical.com ---
adding LibreOffice developer list as CC to unresolved Writer EasyHacks for
better visibility.
see e.g.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50050
--- Comment #4 from Björn Michaelsen bjoern.michael...@canonical.com ---
adding LibreOffice developer list as CC to unresolved Writer EasyHacks for
better visibility.
see e.g.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32364
--- Comment #7 from Björn Michaelsen bjoern.michael...@canonical.com ---
adding LibreOffice developer list as CC to unresolved Writer EasyHacks for
better visibility.
see e.g.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=83958
Björn Michaelsen bjoern.michael...@canonical.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53236
Björn Michaelsen bjoern.michael...@canonical.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=80798
Björn Michaelsen bjoern.michael...@canonical.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=79167
--- Comment #7 from Björn Michaelsen bjoern.michael...@canonical.com ---
adding LibreOffice developer list as CC to unresolved Writer EasyHacks for
better visibility.
see e.g.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=80907
Björn Michaelsen bjoern.michael...@canonical.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=86929
--- Comment #2 from Miklos Vajna vmik...@collabora.co.uk ---
FWIW, C++11 range-based for-loops are OK on libreoffice-4-4 and master, best to
not use BOOST_FOREACH in new code, I guess.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68684
Commit Notification libreoffice-comm...@lists.freedesktop.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard|
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68684
--- Comment #8 from Commit Notification
libreoffice-comm...@lists.freedesktop.org ---
Andras Timar committed a patch related to this issue.
It has been pushed to master:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=86928
--- Comment #4 from Roman Polach r0pol...@gmail.com ---
Please ignore previous 3 comments.
They was posted by a mistake
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=86922
Cor Nouws c...@nouenoff.nl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEEDINFO
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68684
--- Comment #9 from Commit Notification
libreoffice-comm...@lists.freedesktop.org ---
Andras Timar committed a patch related to this issue.
It has been pushed to libreoffice-4-4:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68684
Commit Notification libreoffice-comm...@lists.freedesktop.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard| target:4.5.0
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68684
Andras Timar tima...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=74385
--- Comment #22 from Maxim Monastirsky momonas...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Julien Nabet from comment #20)
Tor: I'm not accustomed at all for retrieving a bt on Windows env, it seems
the
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=86905
--- Comment #4 from Yury yury.tarasiev...@gmail.com ---
Unfortunately, that TAB trick works weirdly for me in a document instantiated
from template (in which the numbering style resides). This may or may not be
connected with the original issue.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=86905
--- Comment #5 from Yury yury.tarasiev...@gmail.com ---
...forgot to add the numbering still looks as if being at level 1 !
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=74385
--- Comment #23 from bugzil...@cb-computerservice.at ---
(In reply to Maxim Monastirsky from comment #22)
Could it be that a release build, even with debug symbols, doesn't allow
breaking to the debugger from this error message, and just quits?
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=80939
--- Comment #38 from Robinson Tryon (qubit) qu...@runcibility.com ---
(In reply to Dan from comment #37)
The 64-bit detection on the website
does *NOT* work properly for the OS X platform and the 32-bit version is
selected by default.
...
I
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=86929
--- Comment #3 from Björn Michaelsen bjoern.michael...@canonical.com ---
We cant for now have sw::Ring implement STL-like begin()/end() functions,
see:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=86117
--- Comment #15 from Commit Notification
libreoffice-comm...@lists.freedesktop.org ---
Maxim Monastirsky committed a patch related to this issue.
It has been pushed to libreoffice-4-4:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=86117
Commit Notification libreoffice-comm...@lists.freedesktop.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard|
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=86117
Maxim Monastirsky momonas...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50421
--- Comment #34 from Robinson Tryon (qubit) qu...@runcibility.com ---
(In reply to Christian Schroeder from comment #33)
The bug reappears reliably in my VM, as does the crash.
If LO is crashing, then we can get a backtrace from that and help
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36514
Urmas davian...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Error message Error in |Empty style name in a Word
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42897
--- Comment #7 from Renato Ferreira renato.w...@gmail.com ---
Created attachment 110355
-- https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=110355action=edit
Patch for equal to value vs. equal to formula
I have prepared a patch that creates this
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=86931
Bug ID: 86931
Summary: Doing Chinese conversion causes the Impress and
Spreadsheet to crash.
Product: LibreOffice
Version: 4.3.4.1 release
Hardware: x86 (IA32)
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=86636
--- Comment #6 from rob...@familiegrosskopf.de ---
(In reply to Joel Madero from comment #5)
Please read this message in its entirety and do not revert change.
This is simply an update to the priority/severity of the bug. Blockers are
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=75280
Michael Stahl mst...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=79063
--- Comment #6 from Raphael raphael.biol...@ac-grenoble.fr ---
I made new tests with the 4.4 beta : I still have the spacement problem, but
the disapearing top lines seem to have been resolved somwhere with the 4.4.0
beta version.
--
You are
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66701
--- Comment #37 from Tor Lillqvist t...@iki.fi ---
By the way, Adobe Reader XI (11.0.09) says that also the allegedly correct
digital_signature_correct.pdf document attached in Comment #1 has problems:
Signature validity is unknown:
Document
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=86932
Bug ID: 86932
Summary: Error in pivottable
Product: LibreOffice
Version: 4.3.4.1 release
Hardware: Other
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=86932
Juan Luis Gallego julug...@yahoo.es changed:
What|Removed |Added
Hardware|Other |All
--
You are
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66701
--- Comment #38 from Markus Wernig pub...@wernig.net ---
Can you give the entire error message?
It looks like Acrobat can read the signature, but has a problem with it.
Make sure that the CA that has issued the signing certificate is imported in
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39878
--- Comment #5 from Urmas davian...@gmail.com ---
What editor do you use? Every text in Clipboard is stored in Unicode, so it
should be pasted as Unicode.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76239
Urmas davian...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fox_yad...@objectmail.com
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=86918
Urmas davian...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68684
Commit Notification libreoffice-comm...@lists.freedesktop.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard| target:4.5.0
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68684
--- Comment #10 from Commit Notification
libreoffice-comm...@lists.freedesktop.org ---
Andras Timar committed a patch related to this issue.
It has been pushed to libreoffice-4-3:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=81475
--- Comment #35 from Commit Notification
libreoffice-comm...@lists.freedesktop.org ---
Yousuf Philips committed a patch related to this issue.
It has been pushed to master:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66701
--- Comment #39 from Tamas Domjan domj...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Tor Lillqvist from comment #37)
By the way, Adobe Reader XI (11.0.09) says that also the allegedly correct
digital_signature_correct.pdf document attached in Comment #1 has
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66701
--- Comment #40 from Tor Lillqvist t...@iki.fi ---
Well, it can be a matter of taste what is correctly signed and what is not.
Presumably many normal users use the latest version of Adobe Reader, and it
claims the signature is invalid. (Even if
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66701
--- Comment #41 from Tor Lillqvist t...@iki.fi ---
(But sure, the certificate was not expired at the time of signing, so by
default, if I understand correctly, Adobe Reader should not mind that it is
expired now.)
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39878
--- Comment #6 from Robert spamt...@prino.net ---
The editor is RE and it's a rewrite of an old DOS editor. I don't have access
to the source and the original author has long disappeared.
Pasting it as Unicode (UTF-16) gives exactly the same
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=86934
Bug ID: 86934
Summary: Writer crashes on opening large file doc or docx
Product: LibreOffice
Version: 4.3.3.2 release
Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64)
OS: Windows (All)
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=81605
Eric Christensen spa...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66701
--- Comment #42 from Tamas Domjan domj...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Tor Lillqvist from comment #41)
(But sure, the certificate was not expired at the time of signing, so by
default, if I understand correctly, Adobe Reader should not mind that
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70157
Commit Notification libreoffice-comm...@lists.freedesktop.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard|BSA
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70157
--- Comment #7 from Commit Notification
libreoffice-comm...@lists.freedesktop.org ---
Caolán McNamara committed a patch related to this issue.
It has been pushed to master:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70157
--- Comment #8 from Commit Notification
libreoffice-comm...@lists.freedesktop.org ---
Caolán McNamara committed a patch related to this issue.
It has been pushed to libreoffice-4-4:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70157
Commit Notification libreoffice-comm...@lists.freedesktop.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard|BSA
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70157
Caolán McNamara caol...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=86927
Jacques Guilleron guillero...@aol.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66701
--- Comment #43 from Markus Wernig pub...@wernig.net ---
(In reply to Tor Lillqvist from comment #41)
(But sure, the certificate was not expired at the time of signing, so by
default, if I understand correctly, Adobe Reader should not mind that
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=86902
--- Comment #2 from Lutz Wittber l.witt...@puls10.de ---
Created attachment 110358
-- https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=110358action=edit
Operating expenses for House
This complex file has now been adjusted with oO (I hope so).
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66701
--- Comment #44 from Markus Wernig pub...@wernig.net ---
(In reply to Tor Lillqvist from comment #40)
Well, it can be a matter of taste what is correctly signed and what is
not. Presumably many normal users use the latest version of Adobe
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=86931
Eudien eud...@hotmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=86931
--- Comment #1 from Eudien eud...@hotmail.com ---
Before step 3 select all characters, sorry about that
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=86900
--- Comment #7 from jonasla...@gmx.de ---
Do I need to uninstall Java 7 to get Java 6? I tried this* and it installed
without problems but Java SysPrefs still say 1.7 and LO is still crashing (I
deleted the LO office in Library after installing
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=86906
sophie gautier.sop...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=86904
sophie gautier.sop...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=86904
Jacques Guilleron guillero...@aol.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45313
--- Comment #3 from Clément Lassieur clem...@lassieur.org ---
Hi,
Confirmed on:
/daily/master/Linux-rpm_deb-x86_64@46-TDF/2014-11-28_00.50.11
/daily/master/Win-x86@51-TDF/2014-11-28_08.54.54
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=86636
--- Comment #7 from Joel Madero jmadero@gmail.com ---
So it definitely isn't based on this prevents ME from using the software.
Blockers must be discussed thoroughly within QA, then presented to the ESC to
determine if it is indeed a
1 - 100 of 231 matches
Mail list logo
