https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138645
--- Comment #1 from Tom ---
Created attachment 167805
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=167805=edit
Sample odp file
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138645
Bug ID: 138645
Summary: Impress: Flipped image not shown in presentation mode
Product: LibreOffice
Version: 7.0.3.1 release
Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64)
OS: Linux (All)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=137997
mulla.tasa...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard| QA:needsComment|
CC|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46579
--- Comment #24 from Commit Notification
---
Julien Nabet committed a patch related to this issue.
It has been pushed to "libreoffice-7-1":
https://git.libreoffice.org/core/commit/6b5ca41c5d78e6a45f7a39d99c5a7ae283d243de
tdf#46579: fix
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46579
Commit Notification changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard|target:7.2.0|target:7.2.0
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138643
Jimit Shukla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138286
mulla.tasa...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|1 |0
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=135759
NISZ LibreOffice Team changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||libreoff...@nisz.hu
---
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138542
--- Comment #6 from Telesto ---
(In reply to Michael Weghorn from comment #5)
> (In reply to Michael Weghorn from comment #3)
> > What happens at least on Linux is basically:
> > [...]
>
> Just to emphasize that: My comment 3 was
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138571
mulla.tasa...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mulla.tasa...@gmail.com
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109195
Bug 109195 depends on bug 135883, which changed state.
Bug 135883 Summary: Opening a DOCX with footnotes with Character used instead
of automatic numbering duplicates this character before footnote text
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=135883
NISZ LibreOffice Team changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109382
NISZ LibreOffice Team changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikekagan...@hotmail.com
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104468
Bug 104468 depends on bug 134381, which changed state.
Bug 134381 Summary: FILEOPEN DOCX: Images overlay and rotate
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134381
What|Removed |Added
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134381
NISZ LibreOffice Team changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138542
--- Comment #5 from Michael Weghorn ---
(In reply to Michael Weghorn from comment #3)
> What happens at least on Linux is basically:
> [...]
Just to emphasize that: My comment 3 was actually for Linux. Windows (and it's
printing system)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131947
--- Comment #25 from John ---
Thank you for indicating that this was a deliberate design change, not a
regression or other bug. It looks like I will be left using 6.4 for the time
being.
While I note the discussion, it never appeared to
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=135732
--- Comment #7 from Xisco Faulí ---
(In reply to Telesto from comment #6)
> @Xisco
> Is a separate unit test required for this case or is this covered by the
> unit test for bug 135149.
noup, see the commit
// Without the
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131947
--- Comment #24 from andis.lazd...@gmail.com ---
Created attachment 167803
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=167803=edit
Page sidedar - much wider than the contents
In attached picture you can see that page tab
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131947
--- Comment #23 from Christian Lehmann ---
Two considerations may be added to this design decision:
1) The same reasoning obviously has not applied to the Navigation bar, whose
width can be shrunk such that some controls get hidden.
2)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138313
--- Comment #13 from guy.roy...@laposte.net ---
Assistant de la fonction NB.MOIS indique pour le troisième argument :
Mode (requis) :
type de calcul : Mode=0 pour le nombre de mois dans l'intervalle
Mode=1 pour le mois du calendrier
pour
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131947
V Stuart Foote changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Writer sidebar minimum |Writer sidebar minimum
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=135732
Telesto changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xiscofa...@libreoffice.org
---
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131947
V Stuart Foote changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Writer sidebar minimum |Writer sidebar minimum
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138542
--- Comment #4 from Telesto ---
(In reply to Michael Weghorn from comment #3)
> (In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #2)
> > But I wonder how much processing is done on our side. Isn't the print job
> > forwarded to the OS specific
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104461
Bug 104461 depends on bug 135732, which changed state.
Bug 135732 Summary: Cutting image in frame in table saved as DOCX doesn't work
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=135732
What|Removed
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=135732
NISZ LibreOffice Team changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109329
Bug 109329 depends on bug 87973, which changed state.
Bug 87973 Summary: XLSX:vlookup formula changed in path to external csv file
after saved and re-opened
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=87973
What
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138470
Olivier Hallot changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138629
Noah Li changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|UNCONFIRMED
Ever confirmed|1
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138542
Michael Weghorn changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m.wegh...@posteo.de
---
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138472
--- Comment #8 from Heiko Tietze ---
(In reply to V Stuart Foote from comment #7)
> No this would not be a columnar filtering. Here we are seeking to avoid
> parsing entire _rows_ ...
Ack, my mistake. But still, filtering 1..10, 25, 735
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138644
Joseph Ervin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||joseph.er...@oracle.com
---
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=83419
NISZ LibreOffice Team changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|VERIFIED
--- Comment #14
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138644
Bug ID: 138644
Summary: large spreadsheet severe performance bug while
creating pivot table - changing data field function is
very slow
Product: LibreOffice
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=73845
Sebastian Goetze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|6.3.3.2 release |3.5 all versions
--
You are
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138637
--- Comment #3 from Xisco Faulí ---
(In reply to m.a.riosv from comment #2)
> Sorry Xisco, I can't find the option to get vertical text, in character
> format position as it is with writer.
it's a fileopen issue, should be vertical at
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=135732
--- Comment #4 from NISZ LibreOffice Team ---
Created attachment 167801
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=167801=edit
The docx versions of the original file in 7.0 and 7.2alpha after cutting the
frame
Seems to
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138629
m.a.riosv changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEEDINFO
CC|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=73845
--- Comment #15 from Sebastian Goetze ---
Still there in 7.0.3
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138637
m.a.riosv changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||miguelangelrv@libreoffice.o
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=137166
--- Comment #10 from Regina Henschel ---
The intention is to have a predefined style as conditional style, even if the
condition is empty. So you can define an own conditional style, which fits in
nicely into the "Text Body" hierarchy.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107656
Bug 107656 depends on bug 135714, which changed state.
Bug 135714 Summary: There are no image boundary's; image frame can be moved
outside of page (especially DOCX, but also with ODT)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=135714
NISZ LibreOffice Team changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138472
--- Comment #7 from V Stuart Foote ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #6)
> ... since we have a dropdown "Column Type" where
> "Hide" is an option, we could easily add "Delete" to the list. This wouldn't
> affect the usability of
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=135714
--- Comment #2 from NISZ LibreOffice Team ---
Created attachment 167800
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=167800=edit
The example file and its docx-version in 7.2alpha
Frame in ODT does not leave the page area,
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138643
m.a.riosv changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEEDINFO
Ever confirmed|0
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=135707
NISZ LibreOffice Team changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96579
NISZ LibreOffice Team changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=120466
NISZ LibreOffice Team changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||135707
Referenced
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=135707
NISZ LibreOffice Team changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Blocks|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138626
--- Comment #2 from V Stuart Foote ---
OP replied via PM
Javier Lapaz
Wed 2020-12-02 7:37 PM
After reading it, I think it is not supported. You can take data from Base with
the Data Source tool and use it in Calc, but in order for the
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=135707
NISZ LibreOffice Team changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||libreoff...@nisz.hu
---
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138643
--- Comment #1 from Jimit Shukla ---
Here's Some Information I found in about section while not in safe mode
Version: 7.0.3.1 (x64)
Build ID: d7547858d014d4cf69878db179d326fc3483e082
CPU threads: 8; OS: Windows 10.0 Build 19042; UI
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138643
Jimit Shukla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||topicUI
CC|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138643
Bug ID: 138643
Summary: Libre office showing wrong background colour which
makes things unreadable until I hover over them
Product: LibreOffice
Version: 7.0.3.1 release
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=122835
NISZ LibreOffice Team changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118711
NISZ LibreOffice Team changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=135692
NISZ LibreOffice Team changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||10
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10
NISZ LibreOffice Team changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||135692
Referenced
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=135692
--- Comment #2 from NISZ LibreOffice Team ---
Created attachment 167798
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=167798=edit
The example file and its docx-version in 7.2alpha
Repro in:
Version: 7.2.0.0.alpha0+ (x64)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138122
--- Comment #101 from Mark Byrn ---
(In reply to Telesto from comment #100)
> Not sure if relevant at all, but this might influence they font quality
> https://www.macrumors.com/how-to/disable-font-smoothing-in-macos-big-sur/
Tried that
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=135621
NISZ LibreOffice Team changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=135621
--- Comment #5 from NISZ LibreOffice Team ---
Created attachment 167797
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=167797=edit
The original document and its docx version in LO 7.2alpha
Also still good in 7.0, and
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=135621
--- Comment #4 from NISZ LibreOffice Team ---
Created attachment 167796
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=167796=edit
The original document and its docx version in LO 6.4.4
This looked okay in 6.4.
Both the
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138642
Telesto changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||libreoffice-ux-advise@lists
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138642
Bug ID: 138642
Summary: Manual break dialog says (next) page style set to
none. Appears to incorrect, the page layout is always
based on a page style
Product:
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92456
--- Comment #8 from Attila Szűcs ---
It is probably a performance issue.
This copy (23000+ rows) finished in 13 minutes on a i7-4790.
Version: 7.2.0.0.alpha0+ (x64)
Build ID: 498c6b9f4ee53677381d10d41df0abc9782689c4
CPU threads: 8; OS:
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138641
Telesto changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needsUXEval
CC|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138641
Bug ID: 138641
Summary: Page style should be next page style in the insert
page dialog
Product: LibreOffice
Version: 7.2.0.0.alpha0+ Master
Hardware: All
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138640
Telesto changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needsUXEval
CC|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134381
--- Comment #4 from NISZ LibreOffice Team ---
Created attachment 167795
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=167795=edit
The original document and its docx version in LO 7.0.3
Looks like not only the overlapping
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134381
--- Comment #3 from NISZ LibreOffice Team ---
Created attachment 167794
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=167794=edit
The original document and its docx version in LO 6.4.0
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134381
--- Comment #2 from NISZ LibreOffice Team ---
Created attachment 167793
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=167793=edit
Very simple reproducer document
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138640
Bug ID: 138640
Summary: Page break before/after terminology kind of confusing
Product: LibreOffice
Version: 7.2.0.0.alpha0+ Master
Hardware: All
OS: All
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134128
--- Comment #8 from Regina Henschel ---
The error is in /vcl/win/gdi/gdiimpl.cxx#2351
aPen.SetDashCap(Gdiplus::DashCapFlat);
There unconditionally "Flat" is set.
Dash caps use the same setting as the line cap (line caps are in
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=122886
Bug 122886 depends on bug 135044, which changed state.
Bug 135044 Summary: EDITING Shape with textbox copied with Ctrl+dragging
creates incorrectly placed textbox
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=135044
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=124176
Shravan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||shravan.a...@gmail.com
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=122736
--- Comment #21 from Telesto ---
(In reply to Xisco Faulí from comment #20)
> Just for the record, this bug is becoming a mess
I'm happy to create a fresh one if desired
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82802
--- Comment #19 from Justin L ---
Here is a code sample for disabling that pointless checkbox. It still needs a
glade-person to fully remove it from the UI.
http://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/107162 tdf#82802 sw page-style UI:
remove
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109266
NISZ LibreOffice Team changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|VERIFIED
--- Comment #7
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=137166
--- Comment #9 from Justin L ---
(In reply to Regina Henschel from comment #8)
> Therefore, any styles you derive from it can be used as conditional styles.
That sounds like meaningless drivel to me. If I create a new style "derived"
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138362
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131947
--- Comment #21 from John ---
Just to confirm that I see the same problem in all windows versions of 7.x up
to and including 7.1.0 beta 1. The waste of space is considerable on small
screens. When using styles, which I know well, I only
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=123569
NISZ LibreOffice Team changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=135619
NISZ LibreOffice Team changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=135619
NISZ LibreOffice Team changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||libreoff...@nisz.hu
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104468
NISZ LibreOffice Team changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||135619
Referenced
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138472
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|libreoffice-ux-advise@lists |heiko.tietze@documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=135614
--- Comment #4 from NISZ LibreOffice Team ---
Created attachment 167791
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=167791=edit
The example file in 7.2 master and 6.4.0 after pressing right arrow a few time
--
You are
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=80958
--- Comment #9 from Sachin Raul ---
Why am I not abbe to use these so called Isometric connectors? Any sights
please...
https://www.asphaltsealcoatingdirect.com/directory/california/pro-oxnard-concrete
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138639
--- Comment #1 from ak...@volny.cz ---
Created attachment 167790
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=167790=edit
The documment with the error, use it as private. The information is not public.
The documment is in
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=137894
--- Comment #8 from Buovjaga ---
I verify the fix
Arch Linux 64-bit
Version: 7.2.0.0.alpha0+
Build ID: 79ec66700266a22966d9e308a716be56c9c3a4a7
CPU threads: 8; OS: Linux 5.9; UI render: default; VCL: kf5
Locale: fi-FI (fi_FI.UTF-8); UI:
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103152
NISZ LibreOffice Team changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||135614
Referenced
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=135614
NISZ LibreOffice Team changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||103152
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138639
Bug ID: 138639
Summary: Wrong style update
Product: LibreOffice
Version: 7.0.3.1 release
Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64)
OS: Windows (All)
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134736
Buovjaga changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|6.4.4.2 release |6.3.0.4 release
Keywords|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138502
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136764
--- Comment #5 from John ---
(In reply to Ming Hua from comment #4)
> Hi John,
>
> (In reply to John from comment #2)
> > My issue may be the same as this, or at least a subset of it. I routinely
> > have the sidebar open to show styles
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82802
--- Comment #18 from Regina Henschel ---
The built-in style "Text Body" is supposed to be a conditional style, even if
currently no condition is set.
See
101 - 200 of 290 matches
Mail list logo