https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=139164
Stéphane Guillou (stragu) changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||eloque...@gmail.com
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=139164
Gabor Kelemen (allotropia) changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=139164
Stéphane Guillou (stragu) changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=139164
--- Comment #34 from khagar...@gmail.com ---
Yes, that would be an issue for completely new files, but there are templates.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=139164
--- Comment #33 from Eyal Rozenberg ---
(In reply to khagaroth from comment #32)
> so that the choice could be content/file specific
I don't think that would solve anything... The bug is about the default
behavior, not just the behavior
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=139164
--- Comment #32 from khagar...@gmail.com ---
One solution that wouldn't require new UI options would be to change the PDF
export options dialog to use/save document specific configuration, so that the
choice could be content/file specific
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=139164
Stéphane Guillou (stragu) changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=139164
Ray Holme changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|https://bugs.documentfounda |
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=139164
--- Comment #30 from Telesto ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #29)
> (In reply to Telesto from comment #24)
> > FWIW: the design meeting missed the proposals at bug 54908 comment 26...
>
> (In reply to Heiko Tietze from
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=139164
--- Comment #29 from Heiko Tietze ---
(In reply to Telesto from comment #24)
> FWIW: the design meeting missed the proposals at bug 54908 comment 26...
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #21)
> 1. Show a confirmation dialog (bug
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=139164
--- Comment #28 from Telesto ---
(In reply to Eyal Rozenberg from comment #27)
> You really can't tell how much demand there is for a change by counting the
> CC list size. There is some correlation, of course, but CC list membership
>
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=139164
--- Comment #27 from Eyal Rozenberg ---
(In reply to Telesto from comment #26)
> What extend of the issue: The duplicates in bug 54908 are about Calc, not
> Writer. If you discount those members in CC, and the QA members how much
>
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=139164
--- Comment #26 from Telesto ---
(In reply to Eyal Rozenberg from comment #25)
> Do you mean coherence, or consistency?
In should have been coherence in the given context. However I still ask myself.
How much demand is there from print
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=139164
--- Comment #25 from Eyal Rozenberg ---
(In reply to Telesto from comment #24)
> FWIW: the design meeting missed the proposals at bug 54908 comment 26 by
> Mike Kaganski as far I can tell..
We didn't miss the ideas, we missed the fact
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=139164
--- Comment #24 from Telesto ---
FWIW: the design meeting missed the proposals at bug 54908 comment 26 by Mike
Kaganski as far I can tell..
"I suggest to revert it for now, and create an alternative solution. If at all,
a dialog from
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=139164
--- Comment #23 from Eyal Rozenberg ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #21)
> 3. Add an extra command for "Export Selection to PDF"
> Easy to understand and to realize but bloats the menu.
> 3.a As an improvement it could be on
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=139164
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wilkins.pe...@gmail.com
---
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=139164
--- Comment #21 from Heiko Tietze ---
We discussed this topic in the design meeting.
Printing or exporting a selection is sometimes desired and sometimes
accidentally. The preselection is a convenience feature and at least for
printing
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=139164
Telesto changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=139164
--- Comment #20 from Telesto ---
The commit of bug 54908 got reverted in the lhm branch...
https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/139407
Is it an option to simple revert it in general...
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=139164
Telesto changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||monochro...@gmail.com
--- Comment #19
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=139164
--- Comment #18 from Michael Hendry ---
Aha!
Strictly speaking, I'm not _deleting_ selection, but _cutting_ it with Cmd-X.
My use-case involves moving the contents of a label from one position to
another, so it's usually a matter of a
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=139164
--- Comment #17 from Jan-Marek Glogowski ---
(In reply to Michael Hendry from comment #15)
> Because the selection has been deleted, there is nothing for the "Print
> Selection" feature to print, there is no visibly selected area on the
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=139164
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needsUXEval |
Summary|Selection
24 matches
Mail list logo
