[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 56015] Insane use of _PC_NAME_MAX

2013-08-22 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56015 --- Comment #8 from Cesar Eduardo Barros ces...@cesarb.eti.br --- The plot thickens: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14699 This means that, with recent enough glibc, NAME_MAX+1 will be enough, even if a fuse filesystem decides to

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 56015] Insane use of _PC_NAME_MAX

2013-04-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56015 --- Comment #5 from Eike Rathke er...@redhat.com --- Thanks, looks possible. Actually the union attempt in plugins does something plausible without the need for an assertion. Well, but, there is no guarantee that NAME_MAX is actually sufficient

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 56015] Insane use of _PC_NAME_MAX

2013-04-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56015 --- Comment #6 from Cesar Eduardo Barros ces...@cesarb.net --- (In reply to comment #5) Thanks, looks possible. Actually the union attempt in plugins does something plausible without the need for an assertion. Well, but, there is no guarantee

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 56015] Insane use of _PC_NAME_MAX

2013-04-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56015 Cesar Eduardo Barros ces...@cesarb.net changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #77345|0 |1 is

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 56015] Insane use of _PC_NAME_MAX

2013-04-02 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56015 --- Comment #2 from Eike Rathke er...@redhat.com --- Heh, I wasn't aware we even had a bug for this :-) Just to mention that in the mean time apparently all (relevant for LibreOffice) systems use a sufficiently large dirent d_name size, e.g. of

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 56015] Insane use of _PC_NAME_MAX

2013-04-02 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56015 --- Comment #3 from Cesar Eduardo Barros ces...@cesarb.net --- (In reply to comment #2) Heh, I wasn't aware we even had a bug for this :-) Just to mention that in the mean time apparently all (relevant for LibreOffice) systems use a

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 56015] Insane use of _PC_NAME_MAX

2013-04-02 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56015 --- Comment #4 from Cesar Eduardo Barros ces...@cesarb.net --- Created attachment 77345 -- https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=77345action=edit Use struct dirent directly Draft patch, not even compile tested. -- You are receiving

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 56015] Insane use of _PC_NAME_MAX

2013-03-30 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56015 Cesar Eduardo Barros ces...@cesarb.net changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED