https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62846
V Stuart Foote changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62846
Khaled Hosny changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62846
--- Comment #56 from martin_hos...@sil.org ---
(In reply to shreeshrii from comment #54)
> The problem of copying text from pdfs created with unicode fonts for complex
> scripts has been solved by Jonathan Kew by use of actualtext in
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62846
--- Comment #55 from shreesh...@gmail.com ---
Please also see https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66597#c20
Comment # 20 on bug 66597 from Khaled Hosny
LibreOfice has limited support for actual text already and I think it
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62846
--- Comment #54 from shreesh...@gmail.com ---
The problem of copying text from pdfs created with unicode fonts for complex
scripts has been solved by Jonathan Kew by use of actualtext in xelatex.
It uses the new \XeTeXgenerateactualtext
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62846
--- Comment #53 from Jonathan ---
Thanks for the update martin_hos...@sil.org. Personally I concur with the
previous comment in that I don't have a strong preference. Neither space nor
time is a constraint, but having
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62846
--- Comment #52 from Volga ---
(In reply to martin_hosken from comment #51)
> One of the difficulties with attaching text to a PDF text run is that the
> text has to be output before the glyphs that give
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62846
--- Comment #51 from martin_hos...@sil.org ---
Sorry to be somewhat brutal. But until we get the PDF writer to produce the
necessary PDF to allow for data extraction, using tagged PDF, it doesn't matter
what magic we do with our fonts, it
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62846
--- Comment #50 from Volga ---
Created attachment 136058
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=136058=edit
Problem with Cyrillic
The problem still appearing with Cyrillic. I installed
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62846
--- Comment #49 from Volga ---
Created attachment 136057
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=136057=edit
Awami Nastaliq Type Sample generated by LibreOffice 5.4
I have already got
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62846
--- Comment #48 from martin_hos...@sil.org ---
I lied. It's not producing good text, even if it is somewhat Arabic like. For a
start the text seems to be backwards.
Here's what is going on. Inside the PDF there is a 1:n mapping between
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62846
--- Comment #47 from martin_hos...@sil.org ---
Looks like this is fixed in 5.4. I ran a test and for the 3 fonts:
NotoNastaliqUrdu, Awami Nastaliq and Scheherazade, the PDF copied arabic text
(even with correct characters with nuqtas).
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62846
--- Comment #46 from Volga ---
This bug still affect LO 5.3. SIL Awami Nastaliq website has a font type sample
, this sample produced with LibreOffice 5.3.1.2, when I open the file, copy
Urdu text from page
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62846
--- Comment #45 from Vera ---
I can confirm that the bug is present in LibreOffice 5.2.2.2 in Ubuntu 16.04.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62846
--- Comment #44 from Jonathan ---
I can confirm that the bug is present and the behaviour unchanged in version
5.2.0.4 (Debian build ID 1:5.2.0-2) which is the version installed on my work
notebook. I am away from my
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62846
--- Comment #43 from QA Administrators ---
** Please read this message in its entirety before responding **
To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today,
LibreOffice QA is asking bug
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62846
Gerry gerry.trep...@googlemail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Incorrect glyph to Unicode |Incorrect
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62846
--- Comment #37 from martin_hos...@sil.org ---
I'm sorry. Yes, this is about extracting text from a PDF.
tldr; The basic way to fix this font is to get the associations correct. But
this requires both a compiler change and a serious fixup
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62846
--- Comment #38 from martin_hos...@sil.org ---
I would like to point out that this same bug exists in OpenType fonts as well.
If an OT font creates a ligature it will do the wrong associations with the
glyphs. There is no reliable way to
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62846
--- Comment #39 from László Németh nem...@numbertext.org ---
(In reply to martin_hosken from comment #38)
If you want a workaround for this particular case in Linux Libertine G, then
I would use kerning to introduce the space rather then
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62846
--- Comment #40 from martin_hos...@sil.org ---
@Laslzo in that case may I beg you to try to get the warnings count as close to
0 as you can. If there are any that you find particularly difficulty, please
feel free to contact me.
In
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62846
--- Comment #41 from László Németh nem...@numbertext.org ---
@Martin: Many thanks for your great help! I will try to avoid the warning
messages, also simplify the rules. Graide seems to be a very useful tool for
these goals. Thanks for the
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62846
--- Comment #36 from Gerry gerry.trep...@googlemail.com ---
(In reply to martin_hosken from comment #34)
Created attachment 115108 [details]
test result on master
@Martin: Thanks for testing the document, but the bug is unfortunately
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62846
--- Comment #33 from Gerry gerry.trep...@googlemail.com ---
(In reply to martin_hosken from comment #32)
That is, the PDF generated correctly reflects the document. It looks the bug
is fixed in master.
@Martin: I tested the problem as
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62846
--- Comment #35 from martin_hos...@sil.org ---
I also tried 11 11 111 all which rendered find in pdf complete with
appropriate spacings.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62846
--- Comment #34 from martin_hos...@sil.org ---
Created attachment 115108
-- https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=115108action=edit
test result on master
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62846
--- Comment #28 from Jonathan jonat...@imatix.com ---
As far as I can tell the patch was never quite right, as it didn't work with
the cursive gy. I just tried with the version I currently have running - Debian
build Version 4.3.3.2 Build
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62846
--- Comment #29 from Gerry gerry.trep...@googlemail.com ---
I did some further tests in LO 4.4.2.2 (Windows 7) and most of the problems are
solved. However, there is a wrong mapping of glyphs to unicode in PDF export in
all Graphite fonts
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62846
--- Comment #30 from Gerry gerry.trep...@googlemail.com ---
Created attachment 115088
-- https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=115088action=edit
test file for comment 29, wrong number export to PDF
--
You are receiving
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62846
--- Comment #31 from martin_hos...@sil.org ---
Works for me against master, based on the patch for bug #52540.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62846
--- Comment #32 from martin_hos...@sil.org ---
That is, the PDF generated correctly reflects the document. It looks the bug is
fixed in master.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62846
Gerry gerry.trep...@googlemail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62846
Michael Stahl mst...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #77575|application/octet-stream
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62846
Michael Stahl mst...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #77997|application/octet-stream
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62846
Michael Stahl mst...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #77996|application/octet-stream|application/pdf
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62846
Khaled Hosny khaledho...@eglug.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||66597
--
You are
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62846
Commit Notification libreoffice-comm...@lists.freedesktop.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard|BSA
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62846
--- Comment #25 from Commit Notification
libreoffice-comm...@lists.freedesktop.org ---
Tor Lillqvist committed a patch related to this issue.
It has been pushed to master:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62846
--- Comment #26 from László Németh nem...@numbertext.org ---
(In reply to comment #18)
I tried to commit the patch, but you were right, the patch for Windows
UniScribe has had a bug yet:
Breaks the build for Windows:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62846
--- Comment #23 from László Németh nem...@numbertext.org ---
(In reply to comment #22)
Interesting. When you run the unpatched Libreoffice, the cursive gy is
handled properly.
Sometimes it is handled well by the patched version, too.
How
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62846
--- Comment #19 from László Németh nem...@numbertext.org ---
Created attachment 77996
-- https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=77996action=edit
problem with the cursive gy
Original text:
Magyar maffia is paffan.
A final version.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62846
--- Comment #20 from László Németh nem...@numbertext.org ---
Created attachment 77997
-- https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=77997action=edit
problem with the cursive gy (source document)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62846
--- Comment #21 from László Németh nem...@numbertext.org ---
The recent patch is quite good (I have checked only under Linux), many thanks
for it! I have found only the attached problem.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62846
--- Comment #22 from Jonathan jonat...@imatix.com ---
Interesting. When you run the unpatched Libreoffice, the cursive gy is handled
properly.
How do you even generate that cursive gy? When I tried to create the same file
I got g and y as
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62846
--- Comment #17 from Jonathan jonat...@imatix.com ---
Created attachment 77964
-- https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=77964action=edit
Send attempt at a patch. Supercedes previous patches.
- All instances of GetNextGlyphs modified
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62846
--- Comment #13 from Jonathan jonat...@imatix.com ---
Looking at the configuration files, it seems to me that the internal/external
PDF configuration is for PDF importing, not exporting. Can anyone confirm?
So, since this really is a killer bug
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62846
--- Comment #14 from László Németh nem...@numbertext.org ---
(In reply to comment #13)
Anyway, it all seems harmless enough to me. But then a little knowledge is a
dangerous thing.
I strongly support the fix, it is one of the annoying problems
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62846
--- Comment #15 from Jonathan jonat...@imatix.com ---
I strongly support the fix, it is one of the annoying problems of Graphite
(the other ones are the following regressions: character duplication at the
hyphenation between ligatures, and the
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62846
--- Comment #16 from László Németh nem...@numbertext.org ---
(In reply to comment #15)
I strongly support the fix, it is one of the annoying problems of Graphite
(the other ones are the following regressions: character duplication at the
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62846
--- Comment #12 from László Németh nem...@numbertext.org ---
@Jonathan. You are right, I had a problem with the second patch. Your patch
works well for the first paragraph of a newly filled document.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62846
--- Comment #8 from László Németh nem...@numbertext.org ---
Created attachment 77575
-- https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=77575action=edit
Test document
Test document with the text “This stiff the official version.”
--
You are
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62846
--- Comment #9 from Jonathan jonat...@imatix.com ---
I got something much more strange from that attached file:
Thisstifftheofficialversion.stifftheofficial
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62846
--- Comment #10 from László Németh nem...@numbertext.org ---
(In reply to comment #9)
I have got problems with the new empty file, too:
This sthif the offichial vershion.
(Likely it is indifferent, but my build uses the internal PDF backend:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62846
--- Comment #11 from Jonathan jonat...@imatix.com ---
1. I get the same result so my build is also using the internal PDF backend.
The only explanation I can find is that you have somehow not incorporated the
patches. That is, the behaviour you
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62846
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan jonat...@imatix.com ---
I tried to replicate that with my patches and it worked for me. Perhaps you
could attach an .odt file that causes the problem?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62846
--- Comment #6 from László Németh nem...@numbertext.org ---
I have tested the patches, but I have got a similar bad result:
“This sthiff the official version. the offichial vershion.”
Maybe this documentation will help to fix the problem:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62846
Michael Stahl mst...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
57 matches
Mail list logo