https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68791
QA Administrators changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED
Resolution|-
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68791
--- Comment #25 from QA Administrators ---
Dear Bug Submitter,
This bug has been in NEEDINFO status with no change for at least 6 months.
Please provide the requested information as soon as possible and mark the bug
as UNCONFIRMED. Due to
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68791
--- Comment #24 from Alex Thurgood ---
Adding self to CC if not already on
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68791
Robinson Tryon (qubit) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEEDINFO
Ever confirmed|0
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68791
--- Comment #22 from Robinson Tryon (qubit) ---
(In reply to david.vantyghem from comment #0)
> ...It would be great to add it to LibreOffice, so
> LibreOffice would become a 100 % free software.
> OpenJDK binaries : https://github.com/alexkasko/
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68791
Joel Madero changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|UNCONFIRMED
Ever confirmed|1
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68791
Joel Madero changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
--- Comment #21 from Joel Madero
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68791
--- Comment #20 from david.vantyg...@free.fr ---
You mean that if some people stop to work on a piece of LibreOffice, you will
always find more than one other people for continue their work ?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the a
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68791
--- Comment #19 from Joel Madero ---
You are missing the point entirely - while we TRY to encourage open source our
obligation is to ensure a stable product to our users. If there is one
developer working on OpenJDK there is no way we're going to
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68791
--- Comment #18 from david.vantyg...@free.fr ---
If LibreOffice says that the work of Alex KASKO is the official LibreOffice
JAVA version, others people will join the project. And Libre Office is not the
only software that begin to work with OpenJ
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68791
--- Comment #17 from Joel Madero ---
Hm how about you write to him and report back instead of asking others to do
the work for something that you want (no offense)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
__
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68791
--- Comment #16 from Robinson Tryon (qubit) ---
(In reply to david.vantyghem from comment #15)
> (In reply to Robinson Tryon (qubit) from comment #13)
> > ...but I
> > would prefer for us to point to a project's download site, rather than a
> > p
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68791
--- Comment #15 from david.vantyg...@free.fr ---
(In reply to Robinson Tryon (qubit) from comment #13)
> (In reply to Jean-Baptiste Faure from comment #11)
> > I think that we can't take the responsibility to recommend to install a non
> > officia
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68791
--- Comment #14 from Joel Madero ---
That comparison is a bit . . . non sensical. I agree with JBF here.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68791
--- Comment #13 from Robinson Tryon (qubit) ---
(In reply to Jean-Baptiste Faure from comment #11)
> I think that we can't take the responsibility to recommend to install a non
> official build of OpenJDK.
I think it's fine for us to recommend s
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68791
--- Comment #12 from david.vantyg...@free.fr ---
Is it a bigger responsability than recommending to install non-free software
Oracle JAVA ?
And it's possible to make a compilation of OpenJDK, like KASKO explain it.
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68791
--- Comment #11 from Jean-Baptiste Faure ---
I think that we can't take the responsibility to recommend to install a non
official build of OpenJDK.
Best regards. JBF
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68791
Joel Madero changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|NEW
CC|
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68791
david.vantyg...@free.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|WON
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68791
Jean-Baptiste Faure changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68791
--- Comment #7 from Qubit ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> It's not necessary to add OpenJDK in the LibreOffice package. Simply replace
> the link "visitez http://java.com/fr/ (site officiel de Java)" on the page
> http://fr.libreoffice.org/telecha
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68791
--- Comment #6 from david.vantyg...@free.fr ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> How much bigger would this make our downloads/installs?
It's not necessary to add OpenJDK in the LibreOffice package. Simply replace
the link "visitez http://java.com/fr/
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68791
Maxim changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS|All |Windows (All)
CC|
23 matches
Mail list logo
