https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69254
--- Comment #61 from Tor Lillqvist ---
(But it is weird that in the Mozilla bug discussion they talk about the "appkit
weight" or "apple weight" being a small integer between 2 and 9 (a bit like
LO's FontWeight), not a floating-point numbe
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69254
--- Comment #60 from Tor Lillqvist ---
Some discussion in
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jan/0076.html , and (linked
from that) https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=931426
--
You are receiving this mail becaus
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69254
--- Comment #59 from Tor Lillqvist ---
> the Extra Light weight is missing from the LO UI
But is that with the patch above or not?
And yes, it does seem likely that CoreText is just making things up;) It's just
software, presumably with
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69254
--- Comment #58 from ikjt ---
> (Compared to how the Thin vs ExraLight styles actually look, I think it's an
> exaggeration from the font creators to give the Thin style the width value
> -0.7, as it is not really that much condensed, if a
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69254
--- Comment #57 from Commit Notification
---
Tor Lillqvist committed a patch related to this issue.
It has been pushed to "master":
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=407546e7c3f8c732ccf60e5fb3844f6efb86f932
tdf#692
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69254
Commit Notification changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard|BSA |BSA target:6.1.0
--
You ar
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69254
--- Comment #56 from Tor Lillqvist ---
To comment #47:
Yes, seems so. If a typeface has more than 9 weights, those could not even in
theory be distinguished by LO's FontWeight. (And in practice, it is likely that
the mapping from the floa
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69254
Thomas Linard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ian...@gmail.com
--- Comment #54
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69254
Thomas Linard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||supp...@komedth.ch
--- Comment #5
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69254
--- Comment #55 from Tor Lillqvist ---
One difference between Overpass ExtraLight and Overpass Thin that is visible in
CoreText is the width, kCTFontWidthTrait:
debug:34633:25641404: ==> Overpass: ExtraLight width=0 -> 5
debug:34633:25641
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69254
--- Comment #53 from Thomas Linard ---
*** Bug 101905 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bu
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69254
Thomas Linard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kingre...@gmx.at
--- Comment #52
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69254
--- Comment #50 from Thomas Linard ---
*** Bug 89242 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bug
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69254
--- Comment #49 from Thomas Linard ---
*** Bug 79726 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bug
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69254
--- Comment #48 from Thomas Linard ---
*** Bug 68889 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bug
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69254
Thomas Linard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||35538
Referenced Bugs:
https://
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69254
--- Comment #47 from ikjt ---
Okay, I'm inclined to file a bug with Apple about CoreText returning the same
weight value for two clearly distinct weights.
But... Even if CoreText returned unique weights, would this thing still work?
Looki
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69254
Aron Budea changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|NEW
Resolution|DUPLICATE
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69254
--- Comment #42 from Tor Lillqvist ---
Created attachment 139292
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=139292&action=edit
With https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/#/c/48409/
As can be seen, with this patch Light is differ
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69254
--- Comment #33 from Tor Lillqvist ---
Also, interoperability of those additional styles in .odt documents is broken
with Word 2013, at least.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug._
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69254
--- Comment #45 from Tor Lillqvist ---
Sure, but the weights of the Overpass styles do not correspond to the AppKit
weights with the corresponding names:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/32570968/what-are-the-canonical-font-weights-in-
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69254
--- Comment #38 from Tor Lillqvist ---
To ikjt in comment #35:
Ah yes, now I see what you mean. This is presumably caused by the fact that all
three of Overpass:Thin, Overpass:Light, and Overpass:ExtraLight have the same
weight, and proba
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69254
--- Comment #41 from ikjt ---
(In reply to Tor Lillqvist from comment #40)
> > debug:33677:25401597: ===> Overpass: Light: w=-0.4
> > debug:33677:25401597: ===> Overpass: ExtraLight: w=-0.5
> > debug:33677:25401597: ===> Overpass: Thin: w=
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69254
--- Comment #36 from Thomas Linard ---
(In reply to Tor Lillqvist from comment #32)
> It also saves that to .odt, and reloads it correctly.
Yes, but open it in LibreOffice Windows (with the same typeface installed, of
course).
Or, on Win
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69254
--- Comment #29 from ikjt ---
(In reply to Tor Lillqvist from comment #28)
> Re: comment #26, but where would different styles of a typeface show up in
> LibreOffice? Doesn't LibreOffice only have a selector for typeface
> "family", and t
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69254
--- Comment #37 from Thomas Linard ---
(In reply to Tor Lillqvist from comment #33)
> Also, interoperability of those additional styles in .odt documents is
> broken with Word 2013, at least.
According to https://glyphsapp.com/tutorials/n
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69254
--- Comment #44 from ikjt ---
(In reply to Tor Lillqvist from comment #43)
> To comment #41:
>
> Sure, there are lots of things that could be done. This particular fix above
> was very small and easy. (But still took almost one work-day t
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69254
--- Comment #32 from Tor Lillqvist ---
Anyway, for me all the styles of the Overpass typeface do show up in the
Character:Font dialog? And I am able to choose for instance the Thin Italic
style.
It also saves that to .odt, and reloads it
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69254
--- Comment #34 from Tor Lillqvist ---
But in general, my advice would naturally be that if one wants as good
roundtrippability, interoperability, and cross-platformness as possible, one
should stick to the traditional four styles of well-
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69254
--- Comment #35 from ikjt ---
> Anyway, for me all the styles of the Overpass typeface do show up in the
> Character:Font dialog? And I am able to choose for instance the Thin Italic
> style.
Right, they show up in the list, but go ahead
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69254
--- Comment #39 from ikjt ---
(In reply to Tor Lillqvist from comment #38)
> Ah yes, now I see what you mean. This is presumably caused by the fact that
> all three of Overpass:Thin, Overpass:Light, and Overpass:ExtraLight have the
> same
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69254
--- Comment #43 from Tor Lillqvist ---
To comment #41:
Sure, there are lots of things that could be done. This particular fix above
was very small and easy. (But still took almost one work-day to investigate and
figure out.) There are not
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69254
--- Comment #30 from Tor Lillqvist ---
Ooh, I didn't know/remember that, interesting. IMHO the style selector should
ideally be visible in the toolbar, too, if (as it seems) it is more and more
common that typefaces have more styles than j
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69254
--- Comment #31 from Tor Lillqvist ---
(Side remark: I only now notice that LO on the Mac indeed calls a style of a
typeface a "typeface" (and not "style") in that Character dialog. How odd. But
indeed that terminology seems to what is nor
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69254
--- Comment #40 from Tor Lillqvist ---
To ikjt in comment #39:
It seems that what CoreText actually gives us is a floating point number
between -1.0 and 1.0, with 0 being the "normal" weight. See
https://developer.apple.com/documentation/
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69254
--- Comment #28 from Tor Lillqvist ---
Re: comment #26, but where would different styles of a typeface show up in
LibreOffice? Doesn't LibreOffice only have a selector for typeface "family",
and then one can only modulate that using the B
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69254
Thomas Linard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on|35538 |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugs.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69254
Thomas Linard changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|https://bugs.freedesktop.or |
|g/show_bug.cg
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69254
Thomas Linard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69254
Thomas Linard changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69254
Yannick.D changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69254
Yannick.D changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69254
--- Comment #26 from ikjt ---
The freely available Overpass typeface from Red Hat has enough weights (8 plus
italics) to clearly demonstrate the problem.
http://overpassfont.org/
What happens with typefaces like this is that some of the
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69254
--- Comment #25 from Thomas Linard ---
Duplicate of Bug 35538.
Still valid for 5.3.4.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69254
--- Comment #24 from Alex Thurgood ---
With the move to harfbuzz and the recent coretext changes made in 5.3,
shouldn't we be asking people to retest with current production release and
reporting back ?
--
You are receiving this mail bec
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69254
Yousuf Philips (jay) changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
46 matches
Mail list logo
