https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94437
--- Comment #22 from Bernard Moreton ---
I note that there *has* been a change - possibly before my comment last year -
in that concordance files seem now to be *.sdi rather than *.txt.
On my local system I copied the concordance file to
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94437
--- Comment #21 from QA Administrators ---
Dear Bernard Moreton,
To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today,
LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed
bugs which have not
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94437
--- Comment #20 from Bernard Moreton ---
There has been no change since my comment 18, two years ago.
Where FILE is called for, the display does not list the *.txt files (possible
concordance files) in the chosen directory, so none can be
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94437
--- Comment #19 from QA Administrators ---
Dear Bernard Moreton,
To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today,
LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed
bugs which have not
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94437
Roman Kuznetsov <79045_79...@mail.ru> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||89606
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94437
--- Comment #18 from Bernard Moreton ---
There has been change, but the situation is now more muddled than before.
Using the same ODT and concordance file as before,
Insert / Table of Contents and Index
now gives 3 options (Index entry,
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94437
--- Comment #17 from QA Administrators ---
** Please read this message in its entirety before responding **
To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today,
LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94437
--- Comment #16 from Bernard Moreton ---
Those "small grey squares" appear when Field Shading is turned on.
The field shading for the earlier indexing (? no definition for whole words ?)
appears before the
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94437
--- Comment #15 from Bernard Moreton ---
The problem still exists in LO 5.4.4.2 on Ubuntu 16.04 LTS, at least when using
the test documents suppplied.
As before, the first attempt to insert the index inserted
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94437
--- Comment #14 from QA Administrators ---
** Please read this message in its entirety before responding **
To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today,
LibreOffice QA is asking bug
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94437
--- Comment #13 from Bernard Moreton ---
The bug is still present in LO 5.2.3.2 on Ubuntu 16.04 LTS
If anything, it is now slightly worse, because although the test document opens
at its end, the first attempt
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94437
--- Comment #12 from QA Administrators ---
** Please read this message in its entirety before responding **
To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today,
LibreOffice QA is asking bug
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94437
--- Comment #11 from Bernard Moreton ---
Tuppence worth again, mostly to show I'm listening to the experts. The
original indexing was done with an earlier form of the concordance file, with
too many keys (a
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94437
--- Comment #10 from Oliver Specht ---
(In reply to Svante Schubert from comment #8)
> What I see as an issue is that for each of the existing index entries always
> TWO lines are being added even if the entry only
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94437
--- Comment #7 from Svante Schubert ---
To rephrase the issue:
The attached ODT already contains existing index fields, like:
Justin,
and someone adds a new index file (as the second attached) the
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94437
--- Comment #8 from Svante Schubert ---
Note the new index file is being merged, only "miles" will be added.
What I see as an issue is that for each of the existing index entries always
TWO lines are being
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94437
--- Comment #9 from Oliver Specht ---
(In reply to Svante Schubert from comment #7)
>
> Olivers assumption was that the existing index is an automated generated
> one, which should be marked as auto generated so can
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94437
Oliver Specht changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94437
Beluga changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94437
--- Comment #4 from Bernard Moreton ---
Nothing to do with ToC, I'm afraid.
Sample ODT file for indexing has had an index created, then deleted, then Saved
- possibly more than once.
To reproduce:
Check the
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94437
--- Comment #2 from Bernard Moreton ---
Created attachment 118943
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=118943=edit
chapter (ODT) awaiting fresh indexing
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94437
--- Comment #3 from Bernard Moreton ---
Created attachment 118944
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=118944=edit
Concrdance file for test alphabetic indexing
--
You are receiving this
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94437
Beluga changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
23 matches
Mail list logo