[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 89657] The lang-pack installation mechanism on OS X unacceptable -- needs refactoring for better installation UX

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657 Sierk Bornemann changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 89657] The lang-pack installation mechanism on OS X unacceptable -- needs refactoring for better installation UX

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657 Xisco Faulí changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|REOPENED

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 89657] The lang-pack installation mechanism on OS X unacceptable -- needs refactoring for better installation UX

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657 --- Comment #79 from Martin Srebotnjak --- @ Emir Sarı (away) I disagree, Slovenian is not supported by Apple on macOS (as probably the only official EU language, and noone knows why) yet LO is fully localized into Slovenian since

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 89657] The lang-pack installation mechanism on OS X unacceptable -- needs refactoring for better installation UX

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657 --- Comment #78 from Emir Sarı (away) --- IMHO, there is only one single and unifying Mac-like solution to this problem, bundling all the language packs that macOS has a localisation for. If the user speaks a language outside of

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 89657] The lang-pack installation mechanism on OS X unacceptable -- needs refactoring for better installation UX

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657 Paul Oranje changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |--- Status|RESOLVED

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 89657] The lang-pack installation mechanism on OS X unacceptable -- needs refactoring for better installation UX

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657 --- Comment #76 from Alex Thurgood --- FWIW, 6.3 is supposed to be notarized, cf. bug 126409 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 89657] The lang-pack installation mechanism on OS X unacceptable -- needs refactoring for better installation UX

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657 --- Comment #75 from Buovjaga --- (In reply to Frank Fuchs from comment #72) > I am happy to open a new bug report on this but I think it directly involves > the language installation process (because the LO package is changed by it) >

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 89657] The lang-pack installation mechanism on OS X unacceptable -- needs refactoring for better installation UX

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657 --- Comment #74 from Sierk Bornemann --- (In reply to barefootguru from comment #73) > Some people on this thread don’t think this is an issue. Other people on > this thread, and in related duplicate bugs, do consider it an issue. > >

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 89657] The lang-pack installation mechanism on OS X unacceptable -- needs refactoring for better installation UX

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657 --- Comment #73 from barefootguru --- The fact is installing LO with a language pack is markedly more difficult than most Mac apps. Even with Read Me webpages and helper AppleScripts. Some people on this thread don’t think this is an

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 89657] The lang-pack installation mechanism on OS X unacceptable -- needs refactoring for better installation UX

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657 --- Comment #72 from Frank Fuchs --- @Uwe: There is no maybe involved regarding app notarization on macOS 10.15 (Catalina). Quote: Mac apps, installer packages, and kernel extensions that are signed with Developer ID must also be

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 89657] The lang-pack installation mechanism on OS X unacceptable -- needs refactoring for better installation UX

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657 Uwe Altmann changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|REOPENED

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 89657] The lang-pack installation mechanism on OS X unacceptable -- needs refactoring for better installation UX

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657 Sierk Bornemann changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 89657] The lang-pack installation mechanism on OS X unacceptable -- needs refactoring for better installation UX

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657 --- Comment #70 from Frank Fuchs --- Dear All, we may also run into the problem that with macOS 10.15 Apple wants all Mac apps to be "notarized" by Apple. One of the std requirements is that no code in the notarized app is changed or

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 89657] The lang-pack installation mechanism on OS X unacceptable -- needs refactoring for better installation UX

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657 --- Comment #69 from Fred --- There is a further issue with the install process. As the script does not shut down LO afterwards, a user who opens LO immediately post langpack install will not see the newly installed language in their

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 89657] The lang-pack installation mechanism on OS X unacceptable -- needs refactoring for better installation UX

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657 Uwe Altmann changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 89657] The lang-pack installation mechanism on OS X unacceptable -- needs refactoring for better installation UX

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657 Alex Thurgood changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gna...@gmail.com --- Comment #67

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 89657] The lang-pack installation mechanism on OS X unacceptable -- needs refactoring for better installation UX

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657 Adolfo Jayme changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 89657] The lang-pack installation mechanism on OS X unacceptable -- needs refactoring for better installation UX

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657 --- Comment #66 from Uwe Altmann --- (In reply to Fred from comment #65) > … > Installing 5.4.1, then langpack: > > I get the usual "it's not from the App Store" warning, and the followup > installer window is hiding

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 89657] The lang-pack installation mechanism on OS X unacceptable -- needs refactoring for better installation UX

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657 --- Comment #65 from Fred --- (In reply to Uwe Altmann from comment #64) > > not really user upgradeable as it doesn't speak the user's installed or > > desired language. > This is not quite right. Installation process by

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 89657] The lang-pack installation mechanism on OS X unacceptable -- needs refactoring for better installation UX

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657 Sierk Bornemann changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 89657] The lang-pack installation mechanism on OS X unacceptable -- needs refactoring for better installation UX

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657 Uwe Altmann changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 89657] The lang-pack installation mechanism on OS X unacceptable -- needs refactoring for better installation UX

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657 --- Comment #63 from Fred --- OK, so the "start LO once before updating" issue is now solved and automated (cool), but the key problem is left unaddressed: the process to install a non-US variant (i.e. core + langpack) is

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 89657] The lang-pack installation mechanism on OS X unacceptable -- needs refactoring for better installation UX

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657 --- Comment #62 from Christian Lohmaier --- there is no additional user interaction, the starting of LO is done automatically. and there is no agreement to "bundle the 5 most important languages" - after all

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 89657] The lang-pack installation mechanism on OS X unacceptable -- needs refactoring for better installation UX

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657 --- Comment #61 from Fred --- I'm not sure if the answer is bundling the 5 most prevalent languages as it increases the volume of the application (I was already surprised by finding dictionaries for every language on the

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 89657] The lang-pack installation mechanism on OS X unacceptable -- needs refactoring for better installation UX

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657 Xisco Faulí changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 89657] The lang-pack installation mechanism on OS X unacceptable -- needs refactoring for better installation UX

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657 Uwe Altmann changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|libreoffice-b...@lists.free |l...@altsys.de

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 89657] The lang-pack installation mechanism on OS X unacceptable -- needs refactoring for better installation UX

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657 --- Comment #34 from Christian Lohmaier --- @Uwe: If you attach your patch to the bug, there's a chance that it might make it in time for 5.1.3 and even 5.0.6… -- You are receiving this mail because: You

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 89657] The lang-pack installation mechanism on OS X unacceptable -- needs refactoring for better installation UX

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657 jan iversen changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard|ToBeReviewed| --

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 89657] The lang-pack installation mechanism on OS X unacceptable -- needs refactoring for better installation UX

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657 V Stuart Foote changed: What|Removed |Added See Also|

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 89657] The lang-pack installation mechanism on OS X unacceptable -- needs refactoring for better installation UX

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657 --- Comment #33 from William Gallafent --- I note that the GB language pack (for v5.1), at least, is not “signed by a recognised developer”, so there is yet another hoop to jump through (alt-click -> “open” -> “yes”)

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 89657] The lang-pack installation mechanism on OS X unacceptable -- needs refactoring for better installation UX

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657 --- Comment #32 from Sierk Bornemann --- (In reply to Emir Sarı (away) from comment #31) > This bug should be regarded as a "high" importance bug, since it greatly > distrupts user experience and creates a "this is sh*t" or

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 89657] The lang-pack installation mechanism on OS X unacceptable -- needs refactoring for better installation UX

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657 --- Comment #31 from Emir Sarı (away) --- This bug should be regarded as a "high" importance bug, since it greatly distrupts user experience and creates a "this is sh*t" or "this does not work" (which I belive

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 89657] The lang-pack installation mechanism on OS X unacceptable -- needs refactoring for better installation UX

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657 Tor Lillqvist changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|The lang-pack installation |The lang-pack