https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103405
Bug 103405 depends on bug 133589, which changed state.
Bug 133589 Summary: add transliteration support for Old Hungarian
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=133589
What|Removed |Added
---
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103405
V Stuart Foote changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||133589
Referenced Bugs:
https
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103405
V Stuart Foote changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||127722
Referenced Bugs:
https
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103405
Bug 103405 depends on bug 123219, which changed state.
Bug 123219 Summary: Provide font support of Unicode "Old Hungarian" block
(10c80-10cff) and required punctuation and quotation marks.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103405
V Stuart Foote changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||123219
Referenced Bugs:
https
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103405
--- Comment #34 from Kovács Viktor ---
(In reply to Óvári from comment #33)
> (In reply to Kovács Viktor from comment #32)
> > cc:Óvári
> > What is Your opinion about file a bug for a font acceptation method?
>
> Can a developer who can
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103405
--- Comment #33 from Óvári ---
(In reply to Kovács Viktor from comment #32)
> cc:Óvári
> What is Your opinion about file a bug for a font acceptation method?
Can a developer who can accept changes please advise whether this will be
accep
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103405
--- Comment #32 from Kovács Viktor ---
cc:Óvári
What is Your opinion about file a bug for a font acceptation method?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.__
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103405
--- Comment #31 from Kovács Viktor ---
cc:V Stuart Foote
So, may I file a bug for a font-acceptation method kende-fonts or any other
well-done fonts, or we must to wait for a long period until DejaVu patch is
accepted?
--
You are receiv
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103405
--- Comment #30 from Tamas Rumi ---
(In reply to Óvári from comment #0)
> Description:
> In LibreOffice installation, section ‘Additional user interface languages’
> (see attachment: Installation Additional user interface languages.png),
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103405
--- Comment #29 from Tamas Rumi ---
We have been waiting to give assistance to LO community and developers:
font, spellchecker, UI.
1. We can provide full character set (vector graphics) for the rovas script,
however, there are missing (
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103405
--- Comment #28 from Tamas Rumi ---
It is crucial to mention, that the Unicode standard is incomplete, there are no
punctuation marks, and there are no codepoints for several letters. However if
we want the LO a perfect platform for the r
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103405
--- Comment #27 from Kovács Viktor ---
cc:V Stuart Foote
> (In reply to V Stuart Foote from comment #23)
> > When Hungarian (Szekely-Hungarian Rovas) is assigned as the default CTL
> > script (with suitable font support) use of glyphs in
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103405
--- Comment #26 from Kovács Viktor ---
(In reply to Kovács Viktor from comment #25)
> cc:László Németh
> Spellchecker of "Székely-magyar rovás" will not work without changing the
> binary of hunspell.
>
> First main problem is that, cli
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103405
--- Comment #25 from Kovács Viktor ---
cc:László Németh
Spellchecker of "Székely-magyar rovás" will not work without changing the
binary of hunspell.
First main problem is that, client or "user-program" asks whether the character
is let
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103405
--- Comment #24 from Kovács Viktor ---
(In reply to V Stuart Foote from comment #23)
> When Hungarian (Szekely-Hungarian Rovas) is assigned as the default CTL
> script (with suitable font support) use of glyphs in the Old Hungarian
> (10c
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103405
--- Comment #23 from V Stuart Foote ---
(In reply to Kovács Viktor from comment #22)
> cc:V Stuart Foote
> Please read Comment #20 and Comment #21.
> May I file a new bug?
IMHO I don't see a new issue as necessary (and which you'd done a
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103405
--- Comment #22 from Kovács Viktor ---
cc:V Stuart Foote
Please read Comment #20 and Comment #21.
May I file a new bug?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103405
--- Comment #21 from Kovács Viktor ---
I am sorry, Writer has Rtl capability for that codepage since version 6.0, the
others since version 6.1.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103405
--- Comment #20 from Kovács Viktor ---
(In reply to Eike Rathke from comment #19)
> Thanks. I take it that the current 'hu-Hung' actually is what is wanted,
> "modern Hungarian written in the Old Hungarian script".
I asked op Doug Ewell
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103405
--- Comment #19 from Eike Rathke ---
Thanks. I take it that the current 'hu-Hung' actually is what is wanted,
"modern Hungarian written in the Old Hungarian script".
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the b
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103405
--- Comment #18 from Kovács Viktor ---
(In reply to Eike Rathke from comment #17)
> Are 'hu-Hung' and 'ohu' synonyms, and 'ohu' (Old Hungarian) has implicit
> 'Hung' (Hungarian Runic) script? Or wouldn't it rather have to be an
> explicit
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103405
--- Comment #17 from Eike Rathke ---
Are 'hu-Hung' and 'ohu' synonyms, and 'ohu' (Old Hungarian) has implicit 'Hung'
(Hungarian Runic) script? Or wouldn't it rather have to be an explicit
'ohu-Hung'? The IANA language tag registration doe
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103405
--- Comment #16 from V Stuart Foote ---
*** Bug 120205 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103405
--- Comment #15 from Kovács Viktor ---
cc:Khaled,
I remember, you were, who coded the "Old Hungarian" part of UNICODE range RTL
capability, with language name as "none". I didn't know, that it has
identifier, ISO639 ID is ohu, and has alr
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103405
--- Comment #14 from Kovács Viktor ---
There is a language ID: hu-Hung-HU. There is an UNICODE code page called "Old
Hungarian". The LibreOffice can use this page as RTL script, named "none".
Could any programmer to link this two things?
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103405
--- Comment #13 from Kovács Viktor ---
László, could we communicate about hunspell for rovás in private e-mail's?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
L
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103405
--- Comment #12 from Kovács Viktor ---
(In reply to V Stuart Foote from comment #11)
> Hunspell is of course László's baby...
I need to discuss about László in private mailing. It's not an easy way to
create spelling dictionary for Hungar
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103405
V Stuart Foote changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||107204
See Also|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103405
V Stuart Foote changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|https://bugs.documentfounda |
|tion.org/sh
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103405
--- Comment #10 from Kovács Viktor ---
(In reply to Andras Timar from comment #8)
Ok. I develop hunspell for Hungarian Rovás, but there are several problem: I
developed Old Hungarian script for DejaVu. (See
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/sh
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103405
Kovács Viktor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kovacs.viktor@gmail.com
---
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103405
--- Comment #8 from Andras Timar ---
(In reply to Kovács Viktor from comment #7)
First you need to make transliteration existing Hungarian translation to Rovas
script for UI and help. I can imagine that proofreading of this would be a lot
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103405
--- Comment #7 from Kovács Viktor ---
(In reply to Joel Madero from comment #5)
> The real issue isn't adding the option to the list but doing all the behind
> the scenes work that comes with it (such as currency, spell check, etc)
>
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103405
V Stuart Foote changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||119767
See Also|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103405
Bug 103405 depends on bug 113017, which changed state.
Bug 113017 Summary: Old Hungarian fonts missing. Can I grant one?
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113017
What|Removed |Added
---
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103405
Bug 103405 depends on bug 113017, which changed state.
Bug 113017 Summary: Old Hungarian fonts missing. Can I grant one?
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113017
What|Removed |Added
---
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103405
Bug 103405 depends on bug 113017, which changed state.
Bug 113017 Summary: Old Hungarian fonts missing. Can I grant one?
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113017
What|Removed |Added
---
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103405
V Stuart Foote changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||113017
Referenced Bugs:
https
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103405
V Stuart Foote changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
CC|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103405
Aron Budea changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ba...@caesar.elte.hu
Seve
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103405
Joel Madero changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jmadero@gmail.com
--- Comment
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103405
--- Comment #4 from RovasFoundation ---
Dear All,
I support the idea of the language option separation with a slight
modification.
As there are Latin and multiple! Rovas scripts for the Hungarian language (even
Cyrillic was created), my
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103405
Óvári changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||102854
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugs.d
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103405
--- Comment #2 from Óvári ---
Created attachment 128149
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=128149&action=edit
Installation Additional user interface Serbian.png
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are th
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103405
--- Comment #3 from Óvári ---
Created attachment 128150
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=128150&action=edit
Installation Additional user interface Hungarian.png
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103405
--- Comment #1 from Óvári ---
Created attachment 128148
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=128148&action=edit
Installation Additional user interface languages.png
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
47 matches
Mail list logo
