https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58663
--- Comment #19 from Stephan Bergmann sberg...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to comment #18)
If there are any problems with a 64-bit LO build on Mac OS X in combination
with Oracle Java 7 (like issue 74683 describes), please take that to another
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58663
Alex Thurgood ipla...@yahoo.co.uk changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58663
Stephan Bergmann sberg...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58663
Alex Thurgood ipla...@yahoo.co.uk changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ipla...@yahoo.co.uk
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58663
--- Comment #15 from Emir Sarı emir_s...@msn.com ---
4.2.0 Alpha 1 only works on 10.8 or newer. Since 64-bit architecture is present
from 10.6, shouldn't we support 10.6 as base platform?
Or is this a bug?
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58663
--- Comment #16 from Gerry gerry.trep...@googlemail.com ---
Dear Emir, it is not a bug that the baseline for 64-bit LibreOffice on OS X is
10.8. It was decided for some technical reasons in following ESC call:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58663
Julien Nabet serval2...@yahoo.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58663
Stephan Bergmann sberg...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58663
Tor Lillqvist tlillqv...@suse.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58663
--- Comment #12 from Tor Lillqvist tlillqv...@suse.com ---
There are no 32-bit master builds because nobody has volunteered to produce
such builds. There is no central authority that decides what nightly builds to
produce and then delegates that
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58663
--- Comment #8 from Emir Sarı emir_s...@msn.com ---
Are these builds now the official 4.1 builds? I cannot see any other OS X build
than this one.
And this worries me a bit, since all the other directories are empty, and some
fixes which have
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58663
--- Comment #9 from Tor Lillqvist tlillqv...@suse.com ---
Nothing official about them. And 4.1 is not even released yet.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58663
--- Comment #10 from Tor Lillqvist tlillqv...@suse.com ---
My 64-bit builds are built from the LibreOffice sources, the master branch, so
I don't really know what fixes which have probably merged to the 32-bit
builds you are talking about. Could
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58663
--- Comment #11 from Emir Sarı emir_s...@msn.com ---
Hey - I am not spreading any rumours, I was just wondering why there are no
32-bit master builds...
Anyway, I was checking Bug 62384, which is already available in LO 4.0.2.2, and
the master
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58663
--- Comment #7 from Tor Lillqvist tlillqv...@suse.com ---
See http://tml-blog.blogspot.fi/2013/04/64-bit-libreoffice-for-os-x.html
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58663
crazyske...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.freedesktop.or
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58663
Tor Lillqvist tlillqv...@suse.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||yujis...@gmail.com
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58663
--- Comment #6 from Emir Sarı emir_s...@msn.com ---
(In reply to comment #4)
A quick status update: The CoreText code no longer gets stuck in a loop or
crashes, but it doesn't work well enough for a CoreText-using LibreOffice to
be usable.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58663
Gerry gerry.trep...@googlemail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||44123
--
You are
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58663
--- Comment #4 from Tor Lillqvist tlillqv...@suse.com ---
A quick status update: The CoreText code no longer gets stuck in a loop or
crashes, but it doesn't work well enough for a CoreText-using LibreOffice to be
usable. (Some problems with the
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58663
Stephan Bergmann sberg...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58663
--- Comment #3 from Tor Lillqvist tlillqv...@suse.com ---
Actually, it *has* been started. Try the --enable-64-bit option and build
against a current SDK. Basically what prevents it from working is the
unfinishedness of the --enable-coretext
22 matches
Mail list logo
