[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 101837] EDITING: Calculation error for CHIINV function
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101837 --- Comment #25 from QA Administrators --- Dear Alex Kempshall, To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo'; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: https://web.libera.chat/?settings=#libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 101837] EDITING: Calculation error for CHIINV function
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101837 --- Comment #24 from bugzil...@cb-computerservice.at --- Just to let you know: I can easily reproduce the "osl::Thread::create failed" error now. I could send a memory dump or a guide on how to reproduce it, if its of interest to someone of you. Not sure about that though, because it has nothing to do with "Calculation error for CHIINV function". Java-Heapspace is a big mystery and problem in LibO as it seems, I'm still doing tests in this regard and will file a separate bugreport on that soon (hopefully). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 101837] EDITING: Calculation error for CHIINV function
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101837 --- Comment #23 from bugzil...@cb-computerservice.at --- I already was about to file a report on the heap space issue, but the way that I thought I could reproduce it didn't really work :/ I don't think its useful to open a bug report on that, when I can't offer a way to demonstrate it. If I find a way to make it reproducible I'll file the report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 101837] EDITING: Calculation error for CHIINV function
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101837 --- Comment #22 from Aron Budea --- (In reply to bugzilla2 from comment #21) > Since this is the only bug found which mentions "osl::Thread::create > failed", I'll add my comment to this one, even though it happened in writer > for me, not calc. Mentioning that error was just a side comment, please open a new bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 101837] EDITING: Calculation error for CHIINV function
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101837 --- Comment #21 from bugzil...@cb-computerservice.at --- Since this is the only bug found which mentions "osl::Thread::create failed", I'll add my comment to this one, even though it happened in writer for me, not calc. I just had this Error: "LibreOffice 7.0 - Fatal Error", "osl::Thread::create failed". I use 32Bit LibO on 64Bit Windows. All I did was to open a writer-document with a table in it and wanted to add one line, when the message came up. One important note is, that I use LangTool-Extension which uses Java. And I have read above, that heap space somehow is involved in this. As for my tests with langtool the last weeks (a lot of bugs were fixed there) it seems to me, that 32Bit LibO has an issue with allocating heap space. Because sometimes LibO itself sets the heap space so big, that LibO cant handle it. If I set the heap space manually to more than 755M, LibO shows a message on start that JRE is not working, so 755MB is the limit as it seems. But LibO itself seems to allocate more heaps space in some conditions and then fails. I wanted to create a separate bug on the heaps space issue, but it fits in here now :) Tell me if I shall open a separate bug for that. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 101837] EDITING: Calculation error for CHIINV function
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101837 Aron Budea changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||126862 Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126862 [Bug 126862] [META] Issues with unusual builds / unit tests -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 101837] EDITING: Calculation error for CHIINV function
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101837 --- Comment #20 from sudhanshu arora --- Thank you to share your thoughs. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 101837] EDITING: Calculation error for CHIINV function
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101837 Roman Kuznetsov <79045_79...@mail.ru> changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||108827 Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108827 [Bug 108827] [META] Calc functions bugs and enhancements -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 101837] EDITING: Calculation error for CHIINV function
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101837 Roman Kuznetsov <79045_79...@mail.ru> changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||109324 Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109324 [Bug 109324] [META] Calculate bugs and enhancements -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 101837] EDITING: Calculation error for CHIINV function
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101837 Aron Budea changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW Assignee|ba...@caesar.elte.hu|libreoffice-b...@lists.free ||desktop.org --- Comment #19 from Aron Budea --- Let me unassign myself to avoid any confusion. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 101837] EDITING: Calculation error for CHIINV function
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101837 Xisco Faulí changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|libreoffice-b...@lists.free |ba...@caesar.elte.hu |desktop.org | --- Comment #16 from Xisco Faulí --- Assigning it to Aron for the time being... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 101837] EDITING: Calculation error for CHIINV function
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101837 --- Comment #15 from Aron Budea --- Very peculiar, in both cases the first 13 iterations of the while loop in lcl_IterateInverse(...) ("inverse quadric interpolation with additional brackets") are the exact same. Then in the 14th iteration, this diverges: fRy = rFunction.GetValue(fSx);<= rfunction is ScChiDistFunction fRy becomes: - in the good case: 0 - in the bad case: -4.6945954068622342e-17 However, in both cases the result of ScChiDistFunction::GetValue(...) is supposed to be: 0.99911 - 0.99911 (return fp - rInt.GetChiDist(x, fDF);) Surely the displayed value doesn't reflect the actual double value. In the good case, the while loop exits afterwards, because this part of the condition is false: fabs(fRy) > fYEps In the bad case the while loop does an extra 3 iterations, which results in the final discrepancy. For the record, in the bad case the equality check only passes with 1 digit of rounding, ie. ROUNDSIG(A8;1) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 101837] EDITING: Calculation error for CHIINV function
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101837 Winfried Donkers changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW Assignee|winfrieddonkers@libreoffice |libreoffice-b...@lists.free |.org|desktop.org --- Comment #14 from Winfried Donkers --- Unassigning myself, as a quick fix proved not to fix anything at all and I find it hard to find time to work on it in the very near future. @Aaron: Should you have question, please feel free to ask. No guarantee that I can answer within hours, nor that I will know the answer ;-) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 101837] EDITING: Calculation error for CHIINV function
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101837 Xisco Faulí changed: What|Removed |Added CC||xiscofa...@libreoffice.org Assignee|libreoffice-b...@lists.free |winfrieddonkers@libreoffice |desktop.org |.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 101837] EDITING: Calculation error for CHIINV function
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101837 --- Comment #11 from Aron Budea --- (In reply to Winfried Donkers from comment #10) > Updated unittest document for CHIINV to be tested on 32bit platforms. > Open document and recalculate entire document, all result in column B of tab > 1 should be green (TRUE). If not, please inform me which rows in tab 2 are > red (FALSE) in column C. Thanks for taking a stab at this! Unfortunately the issue is the same with the ROUNDSIG equality check, C8 is false when the other 15 unit test spreadsheets are also open together with the new one. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 101837] EDITING: Calculation error for CHIINV function
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101837 --- Comment #10 from Winfried Donkers --- Created attachment 141374 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=141374&action=edit updated unittest document for CHIINV Updated unittest document for CHIINV to be tested on 32bit platforms. Open document and recalculate entire document, all result in column B of tab 1 should be green (TRUE). If not, please inform me which rows in tab 2 are red (FALSE) in column C. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 101837] EDITING: Calculation error for CHIINV function
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101837 Winfried Donkers changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #9 from Winfried Donkers --- In 2017 a function ROUNDSIG has been introduced to cope with rounding problems like these. I will update the unittest document for CHIINV, but cannot test it on 32 bit systems. @Alex, @Aaron: if I upload an updated unittest document as attachment to this bug report, can you test if this updated document no longer has the reported problems? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 101837] EDITING: Calculation error for CHIINV function
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101837 Aron Budea changed: What|Removed |Added Hardware|All |x86 (IA32) OS|Linux (All) |All -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 101837] EDITING: Calculation error for CHIINV function
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101837 Aron Budea changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0 |1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 101837] EDITING: Calculation error for CHIINV function
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101837 Aron Budea changed: What|Removed |Added Status|CLOSED |UNCONFIRMED CC||ba...@caesar.elte.hu Resolution|WORKSFORME |--- Ever confirmed|1 |0 --- Comment #8 from Aron Budea --- I was going to open a new bug report, when stumbled upon this. It's reproducible with a 32-bit master (0fe5d61ad2c9e21f393bdad4b706e398728a70d8) Windows debug build for me. - Open test files from 'sc\qa\unit\data\functions\statistical\fods', the ones from 'avedev.fods' to 'chiinv.fods' (16 files altogether, in alphabetical order). - Do a full recalc of 'chiinv.fods'. => Sheet2's C8 becomes false. CHIINV(0.999; 10) is evaluated to 0.005090405273006 instead of the expected 0.005035400390625. After further opening/closing files, sometimes I get errors on failed thread creation ("osl::Thread::create failed", in the logs: "_beginthreadex undocumented errno ENOMEM - this means not enough VM for stack"). This might be a red herring, I'd assume the unit tests are executed one by one, and don't run out of resources. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 101837] EDITING: Calculation error for CHIINV function
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101837 --- Comment #7 from Alex Kempshall --- On 16/09/16 11:05, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > > Turns out, the relevant GCC switches are > > -mfpmath=sse -msse2 > On this basis I ran make clean && make ENVCFLAGS="-mfpmath=sse -msse2" ENVCFLAGSCXX="-mfpmath=sse -msse2" && make sc.check The compile and tests all completed successfully on an up to date 32-bit Lubuntu 14.04 and 32-bit Slackware-Current from November 2015. I haven't pulled any new code since 1st September so haven't inadvertently picked up the work around about disabling the tests. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 101837] EDITING: Calculation error for CHIINV function
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101837 Eike Rathke changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 101837] EDITING: Calculation error for CHIINV function
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101837 Eike Rathke changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME --- Comment #6 from Eike Rathke --- (In reply to Luke from comment #4) > Alex are you sure 5.1.4.2 is passing? Are you pressing Shift+Ctrl+F9? For me > the 32-bit Version: 5.1.4.2 Build ID: 1:5.1.4-0ubuntu1 and Excel both fail. Note that the function tests in question are not part of 5.1, this is specifically about current master 32-bit builds failing. Anyway, we now disabled the tests for 32-bit builds until a more detailed solution is available as not only one or two tests are affected. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 101837] EDITING: Calculation error for CHIINV function
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101837 Luke changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda ||tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10 ||1838 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 101837] EDITING: Calculation error for CHIINV function
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101837 Luke changed: What|Removed |Added URL||http://nabble.documentfound ||ation.org/Test-File-sc-qa-u ||nit-data-functions-fods-chi ||inv-fods-fails-with-Asserti ||on-tp4192267.html -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 101837] EDITING: Calculation error for CHIINV function
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101837 --- Comment #5 from Alex Kempshall --- Luke LO Version 5.3.0.0.alpha 0+ compiled from source on 32bit Lubuntu 14.04LTS, the chiinv calculation results in 0.005090405273006 LO Version 5.3.0.0.alpha 0+ compiled from source on 32bit Slackware 14.2 ( a few months out of date), the chiinv calculation results in 0.005090405273006 LO Version 5.0.2.2 downloaded from Fresh some time ago on 32bit Slackware 14.2 ( a few months out of date), the chiinv calculation results in 0.0050904053 LO Version 5.0.0.5 installed using apt-get on 32bit Lubuntu 14.04LTS, the chiinv calculation results in 0.0050904053 LO Version 5.1.4.2 downloaded from Still on an up to date 32bit Slackware 14.1, the chiinv calculation results in 0.0050354004 LO Version 5.1.4.2 downloaded from Still on 32bit Slackware 14.2 ( a few months out of date), the chiinv calculation results in 0.0050904053 The number of places after the decimal point is something I may have changed under options or some such place. Can't find where that option was now! Anyway I seem to remember that I reduced it from something like 15 to 12, don't rely on my memory it could have been 15 to 10. As I say I can't remember where I changed it or on what version. Probably not important as the results diverge after the 5th decimal place. So at the moment it looks like that LO version 5.1.4.2 calculates - 0.0050904053 on 32bit Slackware 14.2 ( a few months out of date) 0.0050354004 on an up to date 32bit Slackware 14.1 In other words it looks to me that the same binaries give different results on different platforms. Everything above other than the up to date 32bit Slackware 14.1 (my production platform) is running in VirtualBox Alex -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 101837] EDITING: Calculation error for CHIINV function
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101837 Luke changed: What|Removed |Added CC||zdenek.crho...@seznam.cz --- Comment #4 from Luke --- Alex are you sure 5.1.4.2 is passing? Are you pressing Shift+Ctrl+F9? For me the 32-bit Version: 5.1.4.2 Build ID: 1:5.1.4-0ubuntu1 and Excel both fail. 5.1.4.2 Ubuntu Calc A8=0.0050904053 Excel 2013 A8=0.0050903836 Gnumeric A8=0.0050903836 Expected/Win32/Win64/Linx64 A8=0.0050354004 It seems that our 32-bit Linux floating point math is closer to Excel than our 64-bit. Should 32 and 64-bit builds get the same results? Or should we drop the accuracy of the test? C8=ROUND(A8,3)=ROUND(B8,3) Will pass all versions. CHIINV Was added with: commit 1fe44f6e9763203689c6d98aef82b5141d95410e Author: Zdeněk Crhonek Date: Thu Aug 18 22:56:35 2016 +0200 Is this when the 32-bit tinderboxes started failing? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 101837] EDITING: Calculation error for CHIINV function
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101837 Eike Rathke changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #3 from Eike Rathke --- See also recent tinderbox Linux-rpm_deb-x86_71-TDF and Linux-rpm_deb-x86_71-TDF-dbg builds. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 101837] EDITING: Calculation error for CHIINV function
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101837 --- Comment #2 from Alex Kempshall --- Had another look at this one and it suspiciously looks looks a rounding error. Pushed the numbers through the medcalc website and compared it with Calc. The precision on medcalc is 9 digits after the decimal point whereas for calc it's 15 digits after the decimal point. I've increased the precision each time from 0.9 to 0.999. Everything seems in order until we get to the last iteration. CalcMedCalc 4.865182051925334.865182052 FALSE =CHIINV(F25,G25)1 0.9 10 2.558212160187212.55821216 FALSE =CHIINV(F26,G26)2 0.9910 1.478743463835671.478743464 FALSE =CHIINV(F27,G27)3 0.999 10 0.888920357912875 0.888920358 FALSE =CHIINV(F28,G28)4 0. 10 0.545169540878432 0.545169541 FALSE =CHIINV(F29,G29)5 0.9 10 0.338126003244954 0.338126003 FALSE =CHIINV(F30,G30)6 0.9910 0.211104115873973 0.211104116 FALSE =CHIINV(F31,G31)7 0.999 10 0.132327944421752 0.132327944 FALSE =CHIINV(F32,G32)8 0. 10 0.083152274011688 0.083152274 FALSE =CHIINV(F33,G33)9 0.9 10 0.052331066501630.052331067 FALSE =CHIINV(F34,G34)10 0.9910 0.032965528624475 0.032965455 FALSE =CHIINV(F35,G35)11 0.999 10 0.020778597606181 0.020778598 FALSE =CHIINV(F36,G36)12 0. 10 0.013099986480001 0.0131029 FALSE =CHIINV(F37,G37)13 0.9 10 0.008262202343253 0.008262202 FALSE =CHIINV(F38,G38)14 0.9910 0.005090405273006 0.005211772 FALSE =CHIINV(F39,G39)15 0.999 10 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 101837] EDITING: Calculation error for CHIINV function
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101837 Eike Rathke changed: What|Removed |Added CC||er...@redhat.com, ||markus.mohrhard@googlemail. ||com, r...@post.cz, ||winfrieddonkers@libreoffice ||.org --- Comment #1 from Eike Rathke --- So this seems to point out the weird build failures we had with the function test documents that weren't reproducible on other systems. Adding interests to Cc ... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs