https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102862
Timur changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|https://bugs.documentfounda |https://bugs.documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102862
--- Comment #23 from Gabor Kelemen ---
*** Bug 83832 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bu
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102862
--- Comment #22 from QA Administrators ---
** Please read this message in its entirety before responding **
To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today,
LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to ret
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102862
Xisco Faulí changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||filter:pdf
Blocks|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102862
Yousuf Philips (jay) changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.documentfound
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102862
--- Comment #20 from Cor Nouws ---
(In reply to Yousuf Philips (jay) from comment #19)
>
> Related but not a duplicate. :D
Might well be - I'm rather lost in 'false output', 'affecting' and similar
descriptions, leaving too much room fo
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102862
Yousuf Philips (jay) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|NEW
See Also|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102862
Cor Nouws changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102862
--- Comment #17 from Ophir LOJKINE ---
Here it is, I reported the two other bugs
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libr
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102862
Ophir LOJKINE changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||103376
Referenced Bugs:
https:
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102862
Ophir LOJKINE changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||103374
Referenced Bugs:
https:
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102862
--- Comment #16 from Yousuf Philips (jay) ---
(In reply to Ophir LOJKINE from comment #15)
> Why ? Not allowing to export comment in margins for PDFs would be a
> regression, wouldn't it ?
I personally dont think its needed, but as you d
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102862
--- Comment #15 from Ophir LOJKINE ---
> i dont think this option is needed for pdf.
Why ? Not allowing to export comment in margins for PDFs would be a regression,
wouldn't it ?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assi
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102862
--- Comment #14 from Yousuf Philips (jay) ---
(In reply to Ophir LOJKINE from comment #12)
> The problem is also that this print option affects documents that don't have
> comments.
>
> Steps to reproduce:
>
> 1) Open a document with co
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102862
--- Comment #13 from Ophir LOJKINE ---
I gave a look at the code.
I see that in core/view/vprint.cxx, in SwViewShell::PrintOrPDFExport, the
condition to rescale the document is rPrintData.GetPrintPostIts() ==
SwPostItMode::InMargins. I th
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102862
--- Comment #12 from Ophir LOJKINE ---
I think the problem isn't only that "Print dialog comments value affects PDF
export".
The problem is also that this print option affects documents that don't have
comments.
Steps to reproduce:
1)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102862
Yousuf Philips (jay) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|NEW
Version|5.
17 matches
Mail list logo
