[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 106529] LibO 5.3.1.x breaks extensions for changes in BASIC parser (error message: "Basic Syntax error. Expected: ).")

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106529 --- Comment #60 from Pierre C --- (In reply to Mike Kaganski from comment #59) > > Why? Which problems do you expect to prevent by that? Have you read and > understood the part with "installed extensions and document with macros with >

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 106529] LibO 5.3.1.x breaks extensions for changes in BASIC parser (error message: "Basic Syntax error. Expected: ).")

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106529 --- Comment #59 from Mike Kaganski --- (In reply to Pierre C from comment #58) > Shouldn't this commit be activated in the master branch and reversed in all > the sub branches. Why? Which problems do you expect to prevent by that? Have

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 106529] LibO 5.3.1.x breaks extensions for changes in BASIC parser (error message: "Basic Syntax error. Expected: ).")

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106529 --- Comment #58 from Pierre C --- Shouldn't this commit be activated in the master branch and reversed in all the sub branches. In this way devs will updated their extensions, and maybe find errors It could also be activated in all

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 106529] LibO 5.3.1.x breaks extensions for changes in BASIC parser (error message: "Basic Syntax error. Expected: ).")

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106529 --- Comment #57 from Mike Kaganski --- https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/81616 aims to reinstate the fix reverted here in comment 50, so that the error would only be thrown when using IDE (so that installed extensions and document with

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 106529] LibO 5.3.1.x breaks extensions for changes in BASIC parser ( error message: "Basic Syntax error. Expected: ).")

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106529 Xisco Faulí changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 106529] LibO 5.3.1.x breaks extensions for changes in BASIC parser ( error message: "Basic Syntax error. Expected: ).")

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106529 --- Comment #55 from Timur --- Looks to me this one may be closed because Bug 80731 is open. Only thing missing is an explanation why this is reverted in then-master: (In reply to Commit Notification from comment #53)

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 106529] LibO 5.3.1.x breaks extensions for changes in BASIC parser ( error message: "Basic Syntax error. Expected: ).")

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106529 Xisco Faulí changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 106529] LibO 5.3.1.x breaks extensions for changes in BASIC parser ( error message: "Basic Syntax error. Expected: ).")

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106529 --- Comment #53 from Commit Notification --- Katarina Behrens committed a patch related to this issue. It has been pushed to "master":

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 106529] LibO 5.3.1.x breaks extensions for changes in BASIC parser ( error message: "Basic Syntax error. Expected: ).")

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106529 --- Comment #52 from Volga --- This bug also affect Writer2ePub (https://extensions.libreoffice.org/extensions/writer2epub/1-1-2.8) Version: 5.3.2.1 (x64) Build ID:

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 106529] LibO 5.3.1.x breaks extensions for changes in BASIC parser ( error message: "Basic Syntax error. Expected: ).")

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106529 Xisco Faulí changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 106529] LibO 5.3.1.x breaks extensions for changes in BASIC parser ( error message: "Basic Syntax error. Expected: ).")

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106529 --- Comment #50 from Commit Notification --- Katarina Behrens committed a patch related to this issue. It has been pushed to "libreoffice-5-3-2":

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 106529] LibO 5.3.1.x breaks extensions for changes in BASIC parser ( error message: "Basic Syntax error. Expected: ).")

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106529 Commit Notification changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard|target:5.3.3

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 106529] LibO 5.3.1.x breaks extensions for changes in BASIC parser ( error message: "Basic Syntax error. Expected: ).")

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106529 --- Comment #49 from Julien Nabet --- *** Bug 106549 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 106529] LibO 5.3.1.x breaks extensions for changes in BASIC parser ( error message: "Basic Syntax error. Expected: ).")

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106529 --- Comment #48 from Commit Notification --- Andreas Säger committed a patch related to this issue. It has been pushed to "libreoffice-5-3":

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 106529] LibO 5.3.1.x breaks extensions for changes in BASIC parser ( error message: "Basic Syntax error. Expected: ).")

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106529 --- Comment #47 from Commit Notification --- Andreas Säger committed a patch related to this issue. It has been pushed to "master":

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 106529] LibO 5.3.1.x breaks extensions for changes in BASIC parser ( error message: "Basic Syntax error. Expected: ).")

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106529 Commit Notification changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard|target:5.3.3

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 106529] LibO 5.3.1.x breaks extensions for changes in BASIC parser ( error message: "Basic Syntax error. Expected: ).")

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106529 --- Comment #46 from Andreas Säger --- (In reply to Mike Kaganski from comment #45) > (In reply to Andreas Säger from comment #43) > > access2base is fixed in bug 106710. Gimmicks fixed by commit >

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 106529] LibO 5.3.1.x breaks extensions for changes in BASIC parser ( error message: "Basic Syntax error. Expected: ).")

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106529 --- Comment #45 from Mike Kaganski --- (In reply to Andreas Säger from comment #43) access2base is fixed in bug 106710. Gimmicks fixed by commit 6bb6ca1fb30f786385c2357e5435077066a49f82. The other fixes are

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 106529] LibO 5.3.1.x breaks extensions for changes in BASIC parser ( error message: "Basic Syntax error. Expected: ).")

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106529 --- Comment #44 from Andreas Säger --- Sorry, the correct base dir is ${INSTALLDIR}/share/basic/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 106529] LibO 5.3.1.x breaks extensions for changes in BASIC parser ( error message: "Basic Syntax error. Expected: ).")

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106529 --- Comment #43 from Andreas Säger --- I'll attach a zip with all fixed Basic modules in ${INSTALLDIR}/basic/. I appended a closing brace to all lines where the new Basic compiler complained since this is what the

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 106529] LibO 5.3.1.x breaks extensions for changes in BASIC parser ( error message: "Basic Syntax error. Expected: ).")

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106529 --- Comment #42 from Andreas Säger --- Created attachment 132144 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=132144=edit Fixed Basic modules -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 106529] LibO 5.3.1.x breaks extensions for changes in BASIC parser ( error message: "Basic Syntax error. Expected: ).")

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106529 Buovjaga changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 106529] LibO 5.3.1.x breaks extensions for changes in BASIC parser ( error message: "Basic Syntax error. Expected: ).")

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106529 --- Comment #40 from Mike Kaganski --- (In reply to Andreas Säger from comment #39) I assume that you took the effort and found some places with modules shipped with LO? So why not to tell exactly where did you

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 106529] LibO 5.3.1.x breaks extensions for changes in BASIC parser ( error message: "Basic Syntax error. Expected: ).")

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106529 --- Comment #39 from Andreas Säger --- Almost every Library shipped with LibreOffice shows the same problem as you can prove by brwosing module by module and click the compile button. -- You are receiving this

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 106529] LibO 5.3.1.x breaks extensions for changes in BASIC parser ( error message: "Basic Syntax error. Expected: ).")

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106529 --- Comment #38 from Gerhard Weydt --- Concerning extension DCM: I supplied the missing parentheses and tested with rel. 5.3.1.2: the error no longer occurred after the changes. I added a new release to my

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 106529] LibO 5.3.1.x breaks extensions for changes in BASIC parser ( error message: "Basic Syntax error. Expected: ).")

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106529 --- Comment #37 from Dorange-Pattoret Didier --- Hello, I corrected the code in two extensions Gdmath and Dmaths. I added the missing ). It works fine. Yhanks for your job. -- You are receiving this mail because:

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 106529] LibO 5.3.1.x breaks extensions for changes in BASIC parser ( error message: "Basic Syntax error. Expected: ).")

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106529 --- Comment #36 from Mike Kaganski --- To conclude the problematic extensions known at this moment: - access2base - the author (Jean-Pierre Ledure) is subscribed to tdf#106710. - decroise' author is informed

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 106529] LibO 5.3.1.x breaks extensions for changes in BASIC parser ( error message: "Basic Syntax error. Expected: ).")

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106529 --- Comment #35 from Mike Kaganski --- Read Text extension: a new issue filed https://github.com/jimholgate/readtextextension/issues/9 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 106529] LibO 5.3.1.x breaks extensions for changes in BASIC parser ( error message: "Basic Syntax error. Expected: ).")

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106529 --- Comment #34 from Mike Kaganski --- ... as well as author of DCM Direct Colour Management - Gerhard Weydt. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 106529] LibO 5.3.1.x breaks extensions for changes in BASIC parser ( error message: "Basic Syntax error. Expected: ).")

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106529 --- Comment #33 from Mike Kaganski --- AltSearch author (Tomáš Bílek) has been sent an email. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 106529] LibO 5.3.1.x breaks extensions for changes in BASIC parser ( error message: "Basic Syntax error. Expected: ).")

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106529 --- Comment #32 from Mike Kaganski --- (In reply to Katarina Behrens (CIB) from comment #26) > So I wonder if we can coordinate the activity somewhere, which extensions > are fixed or at the least their

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 106529] LibO 5.3.1.x breaks extensions for changes in BASIC parser ( error message: "Basic Syntax error. Expected: ).")

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106529 Aron Budea changed: What|Removed |Added See Also|

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 106529] LibO 5.3.1.x breaks extensions for changes in BASIC parser ( error message: "Basic Syntax error. Expected: ).")

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106529 Xisco Faulí changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 106529] LibO 5.3.1.x breaks extensions for changes in BASIC parser ( error message: "Basic Syntax error. Expected: ).")

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106529 --- Comment #30 from Katarina Behrens (CIB) --- > Conclusion 2: it is a problem that the Macro editor silently refuses to > edit, rather than giving some positive indication that editing is not > permitted. It

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 106529] LibO 5.3.1.x breaks extensions for changes in BASIC parser ( error message: "Basic Syntax error. Expected: ).")

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106529 --- Comment #29 from Jim DeLaHunt --- OK, I've done a careful check. I think JBF may have been correct. However, I think this may be a different Extensions Manager bug. Procedure 1: Install Typography

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 106529] LibO 5.3.1.x breaks extensions for changes in BASIC parser ( error message: "Basic Syntax error. Expected: ).")

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106529 --- Comment #28 from Jim DeLaHunt --- (In reply to Jean-Baptiste Faure from comment #24) > (In reply to Jim DeLaHunt from comment #23) > > By the way, after bug 106687 occurred I noticed that I was not

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 106529] LibO 5.3.1.x breaks extensions for changes in BASIC parser ( error message: "Basic Syntax error. Expected: ).")

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106529 --- Comment #27 from sergio.calleg...@gmail.com --- I confirm that TeXMaths is affected and has a fixed version that is ready (but not yet officially announced and released) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 106529] LibO 5.3.1.x breaks extensions for changes in BASIC parser ( error message: "Basic Syntax error. Expected: ).")

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106529 --- Comment #26 from Katarina Behrens (CIB) --- So I wonder if we can coordinate the activity somewhere, which extensions are fixed or at the least their author(s) are notified and which are still missing As in

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 106529] LibO 5.3.1.x breaks extensions for changes in BASIC parser ( error message: "Basic Syntax error. Expected: ).")

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106529 Xisco Faulí changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 106529] LibO 5.3.1.x breaks extensions for changes in BASIC parser ( error message: "Basic Syntax error. Expected: ).")

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106529 --- Comment #24 from Jean-Baptiste Faure --- (In reply to Jim DeLaHunt from comment #23) > By the way, after bug 106687 occurred I noticed that I was not able to edit > the failing macro in my macro editor. I'm

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 106529] LibO 5.3.1.x breaks extensions for changes in BASIC parser ( error message: "Basic Syntax error. Expected: ).")

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106529 --- Comment #23 from Jim DeLaHunt --- By the way, after bug 106687 occurred I noticed that I was not able to edit the failing macro in my macro editor. I'm not sure this is part of this bug or not. If

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 106529] LibO 5.3.1.x breaks extensions for changes in BASIC parser ( error message: "Basic Syntax error. Expected: ).")

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106529 --- Comment #22 from Jim DeLaHunt --- Is there anything in the BASIC parser which _warns_ about syntax errors, like missing parentheses, short of throwing an error and making the Extension fail? It

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 106529] LibO 5.3.1.x breaks extensions for changes in BASIC parser ( error message: "Basic Syntax error. Expected: ).")

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106529 Mike Kaganski changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|LibO 5.3.1.x breaks |LibO

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 106529] LibO 5.3.1.x breaks extensions for changes in BASIC parser

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106529 Mike Kaganski changed: What|Removed |Added See Also|

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 106529] LibO 5.3.1.x breaks extensions for changes in BASIC parser

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106529 Mike Kaganski changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 106529] LibO 5.3.1.x breaks extensions for changes in BASIC parser

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106529 Commit Notification changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard|

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 106529] LibO 5.3.1.x breaks extensions for changes in BASIC parser

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106529 --- Comment #20 from Commit Notification --- Katarina Behrens committed a patch related to this issue. It has been pushed to "libreoffice-5-3":

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 106529] LibO 5.3.1.x breaks extensions for changes in BASIC parser

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106529 --- Comment #19 from Johnny_M --- > ok, does this mean that it's FIXED with target 5.3.2.x? It's pending review: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/35340 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 106529] LibO 5.3.1.x breaks extensions for changes in BASIC parser

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106529 --- Comment #18 from tommy27 --- (In reply to Katarina Behrens (CIB) from comment #17) > > it sounds horrible... > > let's consider a patch revert and an extra 5.3.1 rc3 then... > > So I've reverted. For 5.3.1 we're

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 106529] LibO 5.3.1.x breaks extensions for changes in BASIC parser

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106529 Mike Kaganski changed: What|Removed |Added See Also|

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 106529] LibO 5.3.1.x breaks extensions for changes in BASIC parser

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106529 --- Comment #17 from Katarina Behrens (CIB) --- > it sounds horrible... > let's consider a patch revert and an extra 5.3.1 rc3 then... So I've reverted. For 5.3.1 we're sadly too late to a party (released

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 106529] LibO 5.3.1.x breaks extensions for changes in BASIC parser

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106529 tommy27 changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|medium |high -- You are

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 106529] LibO 5.3.1.x breaks extensions for changes in BASIC parser

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106529 --- Comment #16 from tommy27 --- (In reply to Katarina Behrens (CIB) from comment #15) > ... > > And not only extensions, I guess there's now thousands of macros that don't > work anymore it sounds horrible... let's

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 106529] LibO 5.3.1.x breaks extensions for changes in BASIC parser

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106529 --- Comment #15 from Katarina Behrens (CIB) --- > But I do not know if the patch was pushed to 5.3.x as an effective bugfix > for something (because not doing so immediately would have left broken some > core

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 106529] LibO 5.3.1.x breaks extensions for changes in BASIC parser

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106529 --- Comment #14 from tommy27 --- maybe too late to revert the patch in 5.3.1 that should be probably done in 5.3.2 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 106529] LibO 5.3.1.x breaks extensions for changes in BASIC parser

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106529 --- Comment #13 from Caolán McNamara --- re https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/#/c/33341 I don't remember any specific reason for backporting it to 5.3, maybe the author asked how to get it into 5.3 or something like

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 106529] LibO 5.3.1.x breaks extensions for changes in BASIC parser

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106529 --- Comment #12 from sergio.calleg...@gmail.com --- > You mean if this can be reverted for 5.3.x? If the patch breaks extensions, having a "deprecation period" before the "quirk" the extensions relied upon is removed would seem good

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 106529] LibO 5.3.1.x breaks extensions for changes in BASIC parser

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106529 --- Comment #11 from tommy27 --- (In reply to Katarina Behrens (CIB) from comment #10) > ... > > > Can this be pushed back for 5.4, having the 5.3.x point releases from now on > > carry a clear deprecation statement in

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 106529] LibO 5.3.1.x breaks extensions for changes in BASIC parser

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106529 Katarina Behrens (CIB) changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 106529] LibO 5.3.1.x breaks extensions for changes in BASIC parser

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106529 --- Comment #9 from tommy27 --- I agree with Sergio. this fix, though correct from a technical point of view, will probably create more negative effects from a user point of view. It would be probably better to

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 106529] LibO 5.3.1.x breaks extensions for changes in BASIC parser

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106529 --- Comment #8 from sergio.calleg...@gmail.com --- > missing closing parenthesis in Basic expressions is now considered to be an > error (which it really is) Hard not to agree, yet: Is there any good reason why a change with the

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 106529] LibO 5.3.1.x breaks extensions for changes in BASIC parser

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106529 Katarina Behrens (CIB) changed: What|Removed |Added Component|BASIC

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 106529] LibO 5.3.1.x breaks extensions for changes in BASIC parser

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106529 tommy27 changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||regression