https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49547
خالد حسني changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kha...@libreoffice.org
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49547
QA Administrators changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||bibisectRequest
--
You are r
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49547
rav...@gmx.at changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||regression
--- Comment #26 from ra
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49547
--- Comment #24 from dante19031...@gmail.com ---
The bug is in core/starmath/source/parse, on the nextToken() or the grammar.
It has to be the different interpretations of '-'.
'll take a look, but do not make promises.
--
You are receivi
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49547
--- Comment #23 from Karsten ---
A general discussion is needed:
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=122730
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49547
--- Comment #22 from Vladislav Ivanistsev ---
(In reply to Caolán McNamara from comment #18)
> Olivier or Frederic might have some ideas as the last two people that hacked
> on that font. (see extras/source/truetype/symbol/ for the source
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49547
--- Comment #21 from QA Administrators ---
** Please read this message in its entirety before responding **
To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today,
LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to rete
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49547
V Stuart Foote changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49547
--- Comment #20 from Doctor Rover ---
The bug is still present.
LibreOffice 5.2.1.2
Win7 and Ubuntu 16.04
My sincere apology, but I would like to stress once again that the bug is
critical. LO Math is useless if it cannot fulfil its main
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49547
--- Comment #19 from QA Administrators ---
** Please read this message in its entirety before responding **
To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today,
LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to rete
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49547
Michael Stahl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #112556|application/octet-stream|application/zip
mime type|
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49547
Caolán McNamara changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|caol...@redhat.com |fred.w...@free.fr,
|
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49547
--- Comment #17 from rav...@gmx.at ---
The attached font file (attachment 112556) causes problems i.e. with ldbracket,
langle, lline and ldline.
So I would prefer the older one that only causes problems with lline and
ldline.
--
You are receivin
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49547
Martin G. changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #112556|OpenSymbol font the works |OpenSymbol font file that
description
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49547
--- Comment #16 from Martin G. ---
Created attachment 112556
--> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=112556&action=edit
OpenSymbol font the works on Win 8, too
This font file is based on Version 1.7 of OpenSymbol but with updated gl
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49547
--- Comment #15 from Doctor Rover ---
I confirm the problem with lline and rline when using the
"old-font-workaround".
So, LO Math is still not able to produce publication-quality equations. It is
very sad situation, since this means that LO Math
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49547
rav...@gmx.at changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|low |medium
--- Comment #14 from rav...@gmx.at
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49547
--- Comment #13 from Owen Genat ---
Alternate workaround is to use the notation:
x {"+"} y
...instead of the usual:
x + y
More examples regarding treatment of the various "minus" sign characters:
http://ask.libreoffice.org/en/question/15177/u
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49547
--- Comment #12 from Doctor Rover ---
Dear wsutcee, thank you for your advice. Actually, I did the procedure
described above long ago. I did it under Ubuntu and under Win, and it works for
me. So many thanks to Cip for finding the workaround.
But
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49547
--- Comment #11 from wsut...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> Dear friends, I'm sorry for bothering, but this bug still exist in 4.0.1.
[...]
> So is there any chance for this bug to be fixed?
I have been using LO for generating lecture
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49547
--- Comment #10 from Doctor Rover ---
Dear friends, I'm sorry for bothering, but this bug still exist in 4.0.1.
I would like to comment a bit the situation. Obviously, LO Writer is a
promising tool for creation of scientific texts. But this bug p
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49547
bfoman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||henrik.lo.bugzi...@gmail.co
|
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49547
--- Comment #8 from rav...@gmx.at ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> You may want to try replacing the font again. It should work for you as well.
Ok, now it works. Thanks. My mistake was that I just renamed and not delete the
broken font file.
--
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49547
--- Comment #7 from Cip ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> Unfortunately it does not work for me. (LO 3.6.0.2 (Kubuntu 12.04))
I installed Kubuntu 12.04.1/32 on a virtual machine.
Opened LO 3.5.4.2 that comes default, wrote an equation (x + y - z) =>
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49547
--- Comment #6 from rav...@gmx.at ---
Unfortunately it does not work for me. (LO 3.6.0.2 (Kubuntu 12.04))
(In reply to comment #5)
> The fix I found is to replace the Opensymbol font with the version supplied
> with LO 3.3.0. The reported version
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49547
--- Comment #5 from Cip ---
The fix I found is to replace the Opensymbol font with the version supplied
with LO 3.3.0. The reported versions of the old/new ttf are the same (102.2)
but the size is different.
Tested with L.O 3.6.4.3 under Win7/64
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49547
--- Comment #4 from Roberto ---
Hi, everybody.
Just informing that Bug 51827 is probably related to this bug report. Please,
check it out.
Regards.
Roberto.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
__
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49547
leighman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|NEW
Priority|medium
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49547
--- Comment #2 from rav...@gmx.at ---
Created attachment 68023
--> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=68023&action=edit
Example file to the Picture
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49547
leighman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEEDINFO
Ever confirmed|0
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49547
Fitoschido changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|VIEWING: Some signs look|VIEWING: Some glyphs are
31 matches
Mail list logo
