Re: [Libreoffice-qa] FDO bugzilla setting for following all bug reports of certain module ?

2012-03-02 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 08:13:46AM +0100, Alex Thurgood wrote: I have been rummaging around FDO bugzilla trying to find a way to make myself automatically get CC on bugs filed fot the database module. As yet, I've not found any easier way to do this than by querying for all bugs where the

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Make use of your karma - feel free to retag/edit posts (Fwd: QA forum feedback)

2012-03-02 Thread Pedro
Christian Lohmaier-3 wrote following feedback was sent regarding the askbot platform. I can only agree - so feel free to make use of your karma to moderate questions (retag, edit, ...) and make use of your votes (so that other people get their karma, and to make it easier to distinguish

[Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla queries and NEEDINFO state

2012-03-02 Thread Petr Mladek
Hi, I have just fixed the queries at https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Release_Criteria#Blocker_Bug_Nomination to accept the new NEEDINFO status. They show a bit more bugs now. Best Regards, Petr ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Make use of your karma - feel free to retag/edit posts (Fwd: QA forum feedback)

2012-03-02 Thread Christian Lohmaier
Hi Pedro, *, On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Pedro pedl...@gmail.com wrote: Christian Lohmaier-3 wrote [...] and make use of your votes (so that other people get their karma, and to make it easier to distinguish good/interesting and waste-of-time questions :-) Unfortunately the karma

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Ubuntu/Canonical doing more manual testing for LibreOffice?

2012-03-02 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
Hi Sophie, all, On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 11:29:32AM +0100, Sophie Gautier wrote: So, I'm ready to work on this, but as underlined by Yifan, it would be interesting for us to keep also our Litmus system up to date and synchronized because it's used under several OS and languages so it has a

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Ubuntu/Canonical doing more manual testing for LibreOffice?

2012-03-02 Thread Sophie Gautier
Hi Bjoern, all, I've added Nicholas in copy of this mail On 02/03/2012 13:50, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: Hi Sophie, all, On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 11:29:32AM +0100, Sophie Gautier wrote: So, I'm ready to work on this, but as underlined by Yifan, it would be interesting for us to keep also our

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] test cases quality; was: Ubuntu/Canonical doing more manual testing for LibreOffice?

2012-03-02 Thread Petr Mladek
Sophie Gautier píše v Pá 02. 03. 2012 v 14:33 +0100: - are the tests on Litmus good enough or should I write more? Great point. We have only very few test cases in Litmus (less than 50) and the quality is debatable :-/ For example, I see test cases: + create empty Writer document

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] test cases quality; was: Ubuntu/Canonical doing more manual testing for LibreOffice?

2012-03-02 Thread Petr Mladek
Petr Mladek píše v Pá 02. 03. 2012 v 16:03 +0100: IMHO, we need to discuss what test cases make sense and create a reasonable test cases first. BTW: My (draft) thoughts about how a good test case looks like can be found at http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Test_Case#Good_Test Feel

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] test cases quality; was: Ubuntu/Canonical doing more manual testing for LibreOffice?

2012-03-02 Thread Sophie Gautier
Hi Petr, On 02/03/2012 16:03, Petr Mladek wrote: Sophie Gautier píše v Pá 02. 03. 2012 v 14:33 +0100: - are the tests on Litmus good enough or should I write more? Great point. We have only very few test cases in Litmus (less than 50) and the quality is debatable :-/ For example, I see test

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Make use of your karma - feel free to retag/edit posts (Fwd: QA forum feedback)

2012-03-02 Thread Pedro
Hi Christian, all You seem to be managing the askbot site too personally. Have it your way. So if I want to have a copy of a suggestion or bug report about askbot, I should email to the website mailing list??? (don't bother to answer, I'm done with this topic) Regards, Pedro -- View this

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] test cases quality; was: Ubuntu/Canonical doing more manual testing for LibreOffice?

2012-03-02 Thread Sophie Gautier
Petr, First, I don't take anything personal in your mail. I disagree with you but it's nothing personal :) On 02/03/2012 17:26, Petr Mladek wrote: Sophie Gautier píše v Pá 02. 03. 2012 v 16:20 +0100: Another bunch of tests sounds like: + Translation check of creating a new database

[Libreoffice-qa] Thread on QA done by l10n teams

2012-03-02 Thread Sophie Gautier
Hi all, Just to get some information about l10n and QA and also because it's a way to reach more language community members, I've done a quick poll about the tests that are run on the builds, see the thread here : http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/l10n/msg04226.html I'll send a

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Ubuntu/Canonical doing more manual testing for LibreOffice?

2012-03-02 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
Hi Sophie, On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 02:33:25PM +0100, Sophie Gautier wrote: ok, but I won't install ubuntu, setup an environment on launchpad and install bazaar (or do I have to? is it mandatory?). So a little help so that I don't spend all my week-end on this would be: - is this link the good

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] test cases quality; was: Ubuntu/Canonical doing more manual testing for LibreOffice?

2012-03-02 Thread Sophie Gautier
Hi Petr, On 02/03/2012 19:21, Petr Mladek wrote: Sophie Gautier píše v Pá 02. 03. 2012 v 18:02 +0100: Petr, First, I don't take anything personal in your mail. I disagree with you but it's nothing personal :) I hope that we could learn from each other :-) yes :) On 02/03/2012 17:26,

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Ubuntu/Canonical doing more manual testing for LibreOffice?

2012-03-02 Thread Nicholas Skaggs
Hello! If your not able use bazaar feel free to email the ubuntu-qa list. And yes the wiki page you linked is a great format to do them in. If you can take a look at this page, https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/Automation/Checkbox/Walkthrough it shows what format the tests eventually have to be

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Thread on QA done by l10n teams

2012-03-02 Thread Nino Novak
On Friday 02 March 2012, 18:26:32 Sophie Gautier wrote in libo-l10n: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/l10n/msg04226.html Hi Sophie, all, I'm not subscribed to the l10n list, so I'm trying to answer here. Also, I don't know about others, I just can tell what I'm doing myself: -

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] test cases quality; was: Ubuntu/Canonical doing more manual testing for LibreOffice?

2012-03-02 Thread Michael Meeks
On Fri, 2012-03-02 at 19:21 +0100, Petr Mladek wrote: Name: Translation check of creating a new database ... * the database wizard open: all strings in the dialog box and window are correctly localized to your own language. So - this looks pretty odd to me :-) This

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Make use of your karma - feel free to retag/edit posts (Fwd: QA forum feedback)

2012-03-02 Thread Rimas Kudelis
2012.03.02 14:09, Christian Lohmaier rašė: On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Pedropedl...@gmail.com wrote: I never received a copy of my sent email (I assume you rejected my previous suggestion of enabling the form to send a copy to the author) Yes, I regard it as pointless. If you want a copy

[Libreoffice-qa] Win7 - message: LibreOffice 3.5 does not work anymore - update

2012-03-02 Thread Luc Castermans
Hi, Related to my previous post: - I installed 3.4.5, ran as Administrator - now Libo starts, but reported JRE was missing - I installed JRE Now I re-installed 3.5 rc1 and everthing is fine now. Appears to me, the message LibreOffice 3.5 does not work anymore actually means that JRE is not

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Win7 - message: LibreOffice 3.5 does not work anymore - update

2012-03-02 Thread Michael Meeks
On Fri, 2012-03-02 at 22:42 +0100, Luc Castermans wrote: Related to my previous post: Ho hum. - I installed 3.4.5, ran as Administrator - now Libo starts, but reported JRE was missing - I installed JRE Now I re-installed 3.5 rc1 and everthing is fine now. Hmm. Appears

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Make use of your karma - feel free to retag/edit posts (Fwd: QA forum feedback)

2012-03-02 Thread Christian Lohmaier
Hi Pedro, *, On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 5:18 PM, Pedro pedl...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Christian, all You seem to be managing the askbot site too personally. Not sure what you mean with this. If it is implying that I'm the über-admin who decides on everything, then no - I'm not the one. Have it