Hi All,
Yes similar to what joel stated, i'm just posting the ones i use on the
wiki for others to use if they'd like and for those who have their own
and would like to share them, that they'd have a centralized resource to
post them to. I believe the wiki will also be a useful resource for new
QA
Hi,
Le 20/08/2014 14:35, Jay Philips a écrit :
> Hi All,
>
> Over the months of doing triaging, i've found that the best means of
> communicating with bug reporters is to have a set of pre-written
> responses to suit various common situations like confirming a bug,
> requesting a sample document,
Hey there,
Jay, *,
Not sure that codifying a bunch of "approved" QA exchanges is in the best
interest of moving the QA process along--especially if we have to dig them out of a WiKi.
It would not do much to improve the QA flow, nor improve the readability of issues over
their life span.
O
Jay, *,
Not sure that codifying a bunch of "approved" QA exchanges is in the best
interest of moving the QA process along--especially if we have to dig them out
of a WiKi. It would not do much to improve the QA flow, nor improve the
readability of issues over their life span.
Otherwise, duri
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 04:35:52PM +0400, Jay Philips wrote:
> So i'd like to propose the creation a wiki page of pre-written responses
> that we can all use. I have created the wiki page at <
> https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/BugTriage/Pre-Written_Responses >
> and will be adding entri
Hi All,
Over the months of doing triaging, i've found that the best means of
communicating with bug reporters is to have a set of pre-written
responses to suit various common situations like confirming a bug,
requesting a sample document, and asking for clear steps. These
responses are very handy
