Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Question about BUG 54206 fix for v.4.0

2013-02-11 Thread Florian Effenberger
Hello, Marc Paré wrote on 2013-01-28 13:54: It's the readme file whey you unpack the package before going through the installation process. See bugzilla [https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54206] for more details. All OS installs get it, and, in all native language groups.

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Question about BUG 54206 fix for v.4.0

2013-02-11 Thread Michael Meeks
On Mon, 2013-02-11 at 19:26 +0100, Florian Effenberger wrote: Otherwise, the file is available at the URL, since we have added an alias to the web server. I see no problem with tweaking the URL in our own readme file in future at least. Patches welcome. ATB,

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Question about BUG 54206 fix for v.4.0

2013-02-11 Thread Marc Paré
Le 2013-02-11 16:06, Michael Meeks a écrit : On Mon, 2013-02-11 at 19:26 +0100, Florian Effenberger wrote: Otherwise, the file is available at the URL, since we have added an alias to the web server. I see no problem with tweaking the URL in our own readme file in future at least.

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Question about BUG 54206 fix for v.4.0

2013-01-31 Thread Marc Paré
Le 2013-01-28 07:54, Marc Paré a écrit : Sorry for the double post. Le 2013-01-28 06:58, Florian Effenberger a écrit : Hi, Rainer Bielefeld wrote on 2013-01-26 17:13: Do we really need a copy of the readme on the site? [..] I also doubt that such copy is necessary. If we need it because

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Question about BUG 54206 fix for v.4.0

2013-01-28 Thread Marc Paré
Le 2013-01-28 06:58, Florian Effenberger a écrit : Hi, Rainer Bielefeld wrote on 2013-01-26 17:13: Do we really need a copy of the readme on the site? [..] I also doubt that such copy is necessary. If we need it because of legl reasons, we need a TOC with links to readme files in all

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Question about BUG 54206 fix for v.4.0

2013-01-28 Thread Marc Paré
Sorry for the double post. Le 2013-01-28 06:58, Florian Effenberger a écrit : Hi, Rainer Bielefeld wrote on 2013-01-26 17:13: Do we really need a copy of the readme on the site? [..] I also doubt that such copy is necessary. If we need it because of legl reasons, we need a TOC with links