Re: [Libreoffice-qa] credits for people doing QA

> We the also could ask on e.g. the users list if there are people that we definitely/maybe should add to the list/gallery. As for me they are Rainer Bielefeld Jean-Baptiste Faure sasha.libreoff...@gmail.com tester8 (it is me, little bit immodestly) There is a new QA page: http://wiki.documentfo

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] credits for people doing QA

Cor Nouws wrote (04-02-12 23:39) Suggestions remarks? Thanks to all for the remarks, ideas. My summary for now: - we could do statistics for submitted bugs and (I hope) for added comments. And then maybe stop at the minimum of 10 ? Another idea that I've got: we can make it an community issu

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] credits for people doing QA

Hi Nino, all Having "false-positives" ist bad, of course. > > But IMO false-negatives are worse :-/ > Couldn't agree more :) There were at least 3 guys that were particularly helpful on the second Bug Hunting Session while I was online (probably there were many more). I thanked them publicly on

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] credits for people doing QA

Am Montag, 6. Februar 2012, 08:43:30 schrieb klaus-jürgen weghorn ol: > Hi Rainer, > > Am 05.02.2012 13:47, schrieb Rainer Bielefeld: > > Hi, > > > > we have some rather reliable Bugzilla statistics for Reporters on > > , Cor knows > > th

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] credits for people doing QA

On Sat, 2012-02-04 at 15:53 -0800, Pedro wrote: > TDF doesn't give any credit. They do appreciate the work and have mentioned > it several times. Sure - but we need to fix that; for a start it is only polite, you guys do great work, and we should recognise that. > QA people don't write c

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] credits for people doing QA

Hi klaus-jürgen, all They get their own credit points as you can see on the credit list. It > won't be a direct QA point but it is a counting one. Well, then that list needs to be updated more frequently so that people actually see their name on it after a new release (I find it a little absurd

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] credits for people doing QA

Hi Rainer, Am 05.02.2012 13:47, schrieb Rainer Bielefeld: Hi, we have some rather reliable Bugzilla statistics for Reporters on , Cor knows them. I do no know any way to get numbers of Comments from current Bugzilla version, and not ever

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] credits for people doing QA

Hi all, Am 06.02.2012 03:44, schrieb Yifan Jiang: Hi there, Nice topic, 2 cents from me as follows. What I could think about roles to be considered: 1. bugzilla reporters This is pretty intuitive to count, as mentioned by Rainer, +1 when one reporting happens. 2. b

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] credits for people doing QA

Hi there, Nice topic, 2 cents from me as follows. What I could think about roles to be considered: 1. bugzilla reporters This is pretty intuitive to count, as mentioned by Rainer, +1 when one reporting happens. 2. bugzilla information provider (confirming, following up)

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] credits for people doing QA

Cor Nouws schrieb: What about adding something here: http://www.libreoffice.org/about-us/credits/ ? We need to have some rule of course, based on which people get mentioned. Suggestions remarks? Hi, we have some rather reliable Bugzilla statistics for Reporters on

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] credits for people doing QA

consisted of. I have no idea what to count for QA. -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-credits-for-people-doing-QA-tp3716290p3716356.html Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ List Name: Libreoffic

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] credits for people doing QA

Hi Cor, Am Samstag, 4. Februar 2012, 23:39:02 schrieb Cor Nouws: > Today with my little QA presentation at FOSDEM, one person asked about > how we give credits to people doing this work. > Well, not structural/in a visible place, as far as I know. > > What about adding something here: >http:

[Libreoffice-qa] credits for people doing QA

Hi, Today with my little QA presentation at FOSDEM, one person asked about how we give credits to people doing this work. Well, not structural/in a visible place, as far as I know. What about adding something here: http://www.libreoffice.org/about-us/credits/ ? We need to have some rule of