Hi Roman and Rainer,
Le 2012-08-19 04:29, Rainer Bielefeld a écrit :
Roman Eisele schrieb:
Am 18.08.12 03:57, schrieb Marc Paré:
Would it make sense to add Accessibility as another component to the
Bug Assistant? Maybe this would encourage people to submit more
accessibility bugs? Not to
Hi,
I still miss instructions how to set severity, priority, and component
during the bug triage process. I think that we really should do it.
Joel has a great proposal for severity handling at
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/images/0/06/Prioritizing_Bugs_Flowchart.jpg
The components are
Hi everyone!
__
Florian Reisinger
Von meinem iPad gesendet
Sent via iPad
Am 20.08.2012 um 13:45 schrieb Michael Meeks michael.me...@suse.com:
Hi Alex,
On Sun, 2012-08-19 at 22:14 +0200, Alex Thurgood wrote:
My own personal take on this is that if you guys want to regularly
schmeiss out
Petr Mladek schrieb:
I think that we really should set severity and priority.
Hi Petr,
a while ago we decided that we should not invest too much time into this
because of numerous abuse of these flags. But indeed, I use Priority for
my workflow (without trusting selected prio too much),
Rainer Bielefeld píše v Po 20. 08. 2012 v 13:21 +0200:
Petr Mladek schrieb:
I think that we really should set severity and priority.
Hi Petr,
a while ago we decided that we should not invest too much time into this
because of numerous abuse of these flags.
It was during times when
Florian Reisinger píše v Po 20. 08. 2012 v 14:03 +0300:
hmm, does that really make sense? I am working through, lets say, 20
LT NEEDINFO bugs.
Let's say 10% answer (more than this time...): 2 bugs are saved...
AND I wasted my time...
It was not waste of time, definitely. You tried to
I think that we should spread the news by linking your post in the
announce mailing list and in a TDF blog post. I will do it later today,
as I am currently answering some media questions on the subject.
On 08/20/2012 02:40 AM, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
Hi,
as already hinted at in the ESC
I will have to address the full thread in a few hours when I can sit
down and think a bit about this but a couple points:
a) I feel strongly that we should be actively aiming at making the
triaging a more important aspect of development and agree with Petr
that we should use priority and
Joel Madero schrieb:
Ultimately I think the whole QA wiki needs redone but we can maybe start
with the triaging section.
Hi Joel,
I think so, too. That has been growing with the project with lots of ad
hoc kludge (most created by me) has been added. That all is very muddled.
Writing
Hi All,
Progress is still going for the unconfirmed bugs but we still needs people
to actively and aggressively help. If you have some time in the coming
weeks take a look at the following document:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0ApS-XtOUGGH5dDIwaXN1YnNsM0h4RXFKdVhvb2RRb0E
If you
10 matches
Mail list logo
