Hello!
I am new to LibreOffice.
I think I have tried my best to ask using the LibreOffice user support mailing
list .
No one replied.
Hopefully, I will get the information.
Recently, I downloaded the daily build for testing. However, I cannot find the
_sha1sum_ or _sha512sum_ values for c
I don't know if my email has been sent. I try again.
Regards,
C. H. D.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
__
Your mail to 'Libreoffice-qa' with the subject
Testing LibreOffice Daily Builds
Is being held until the list moderator can review it for approval.
The reason it
Sorry, please ignore my previous emails with these subjects.
Sha1Sum of File
and
Testing LibreOffice Daily Builds
I think my emails hit the anti-spam engine or the like.
C. H. D.
My question is below:
Hello!
I am new to LibreOffice.
I think I have tried my best to ask u
Hi,
It was somehow too difficult to get only one mail through the filter.
Anyway I had a look, but was unable to find any hash... Maybe someone
else can help...
Yours,
Florian
Am 22.03.2013 02:19, schrieb C. H. D. for LibreOffice QA:
Sorry, please ignore my previous emails with these subje
C. H. D. for LibreOffice QA wrote
> Recently, I downloaded the daily build for testing. However, I cannot find
> the _sha1sum_ or _sha512sum_ values for checking the file.
To my knowledge this project does not include any MD5 or SHA keys in any
folder.
Not even for the stable builds. If there are
Hi,
there have been created the tag libreoffice-4.0.2.2, aka rc2. The
corresponding official builds will be available within next few days.
It will be used as final if no blocker is found.
See the attached list of changes against 4.0.2.1.
Now, you might switch your current 4-0 source tree to it
On 26/03/13 11:40, Pedro wrote:
> C. H. D. for LibreOffice QA wrote
>> Recently, I downloaded the daily build for testing. However, I cannot find
>> the _sha1sum_ or _sha512sum_ values for checking the file.
>
> To my knowledge this project does not include any MD5 or SHA keys in any
> folder.
>
Michael Stahl-2 wrote
> there are GPG signatures on release builds, for example:
I believe signatures only certify the reliability of the source of the file.
They do not allow to check the file integrity.
I could be mistaken, though.
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfo
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 6:40 AM, Pedro wrote:
> C. H. D. for LibreOffice QA wrote
>> Recently, I downloaded the daily build for testing. However, I cannot find
>> the _sha1sum_ or _sha512sum_ values for checking the file.
>
> To my knowledge this project does not include any MD5 or SHA keys in any
Hi qubit :)
Robinson Tryon wrote
> Information for both stable (and some testing) builds is available for
> files distributed through MirrorBrain:
> http://download.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/
Good catch! That must be the only place where that info is available for all
files.
You also h
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 11:21 AM, Pedro wrote:
> Hi qubit :)
>
Hiya :-)
> I always get my builds from the nearest mirror and I can assure you that
> NONE of these have such information
> http://download.documentfoundation.org/mirrors/all.html
Hmm...too bad.
> BTW you forgot to mention that the
Hello Yifan, *,
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 01:01:21PM +0800, Yifan Jiang wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 07:38:39PM +0100, Thomas Hackert wrote:
> > > Of course, I saw your previous discussion as well.
> >
> > which one? The one on the Germanophone discuss ML?
>
> hehe, I meant I saw your active di
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 07:36:13AM -0700, Pedro wrote:
> Michael Stahl-2 wrote
> > there are GPG signatures on release builds, for example:
>
> I believe signatures only certify the reliability of the source of the file.
> They do not allow to check the file integrity.
They do the latter -- mayb
13 matches
Mail list logo
