Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bug sur Nouveau dans le BSA français!

Hi All, Florian and I where able to fix the problems with the mailing in the BSA. So the French BSA can be tested now. Please let me know if something needs to be changed. The URL is https://bugassistant.libreoffice.org/libreoffice/bug/bug_fr.html. Please remember that each test sends a mail

[Libreoffice-qa] [ANN] LibreOffice 4.0.4 RC2 available

Dear Community, The Document Foundation is pleased to announce the second release candidate of our upcoming LibreOffice 4.0.4. This will be the fourth in a series of frequent updates to our feature-packed 4.0 branch. Please be aware that LibreOffice 4.0.4 RC2 is not ready for production use, you s

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bug Report Incorrectly Marked as NEW

Hi Florian, *, On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 6:34 AM, Florian Reisinger wrote: > > Pedro is it true, that this has changed? IMHO we had this nasty > problem once, but IMO all new bugs should be UNCONFIRMED. Bugs reported via the BugAssistant should be UNCONFIRMED, but the default when creating bugs on

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bug Report Incorrectly Marked as NEW

Hi, Liebe Grüße, / Yours, Florian Reisinger Am 15.06.2013 um 14:50 schrieb Christian Lohmaier : > Hi Florian, *, > > On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 6:34 AM, Florian Reisinger wrote: >> >> Pedro is it true, that this has changed? IMHO we had this nasty >> problem once, but IMO all new bugs should be UN

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bug Report Incorrectly Marked as NEW

On 06/15/2013 02:52 PM, Florian Reisinger wrote: Am 15.06.2013 um 14:50 schrieb Christian Lohmaier : On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 6:34 AM, Florian Reisinger wrote: Pedro is it true, that this has changed? IMHO we had this nasty problem once, but IMO all new bugs should be UNCONFIRMED. Bugs report

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bug Report Incorrectly Marked as NEW

Hi Am 15.06.2013 15:18, schrieb Stephan Bergmann: On 06/15/2013 02:52 PM, Florian Reisinger wrote: Am 15.06.2013 um 14:50 schrieb Christian Lohmaier : On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 6:34 AM, Florian Reisinger wrote: Pedro is it true, that this has changed? IMHO we had this nasty problem once, but I

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bibisect Whiteboard Status

On Mon, 2013-06-10 at 09:49 -0700, Joel Madero wrote: > Hey Terrence, > > On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 9:06 AM, Terrence Enger > wrote: > > > On Sat, 2013-05-25 at 10:44 -0700, Joel Madero wrote: > > > I finally got around to updating the wiki: > > > > > https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzill

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bug Report Incorrectly Marked as NEW

Hi Florian, *, On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 2:52 PM, Florian Reisinger wrote: > Am 15.06.2013 um 14:50 schrieb Christian Lohmaier > : >> On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 6:34 AM, Florian Reisinger >> wrote: >>> >>> Pedro is it true, that this has changed? IMHO we had this nasty >>> problem once, but IMO all

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bug Report Incorrectly Marked as NEW

On Sat, 2013-06-15 at 15:41 +0200, Florian Reisinger wrote: > > It should be unconfirmed as long as someone from the QA team (so > everyone triaging) can reproduce it on his machine, preferably on a > different OS Well, I usually do not file a bug until I am pretty sure that I am seeing wha

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bug Fixed in 4.2 branch, broken in 4.1 daily, status thoughts?

I think we need to be more stricter, if the bug is in a published version in LibreOffice download page, like is the case, and if it is not fixed at least for the last published version, it can not be considered as fixed. Miguel Ángel. -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoun

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Food for thought...

Hi Pedro, I think it is not needed any special justification in this case, even I don't like some linked people. Really I do not understand the concerns. Food for thought usually is good. IMMHO there are concerns that should be, as it is so few work to look for in the QA email. Or how the main j

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bug Report Incorrectly Marked as NEW

You are right, and this is the root of some misunderstandings reviewing bugs, because one can think this status was established by the reporter, what it is not true. Please can some admin restore the default to UNCONFIRMED. Miguel Ángel -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentf

[Libreoffice-qa] wiki page oddities: How To Bibisect

I have recently been paying some attention to wiki page "How To Bibisect" , and I see a few funny things. Comments and guidance welcome. (*) In the list of bugs needing bibisect displayed in the page, each bug number is preceded by the wor