Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Try not to reopen bugs when anything more than a trivial amount of time has passed

2015-03-24 Thread Michael Stahl
On 24.03.2015 12:36, Caolán McNamara wrote: It generally doesn't make sense to reopen a bug after a few months has passed since it was closed. indeed doing that is very annoying. personally i've started to simply ignore bugs in state REPOENED some time ago, they are generally very confusing

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Try not to reopen bugs when anything more than a trivial amount of time has passed

2015-03-24 Thread Pedro
Michael Stahl-2 wrote actually, would it be possible in our bugzilla to disallow a transition from RESOLVED - REOPENED except if the user is a well-known QA or developer with a special bugzilla privilege? I think this should be done ASAP. If new Bugzilla users are advised to search for

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Try not to reopen bugs when anything more than a trivial amount of time has passed

2015-03-24 Thread Joel Madero
Hi Caolan - On 03/24/2015 04:36 AM, Caolán McNamara wrote: It generally doesn't make sense to reopen a bug after a few months has passed since it was closed. I wonder if removing REOPENED all together is appropriate then - it seems like it has no place outside of a very very narrow 30 day

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Try not to reopen bugs when anything more than a trivial amount of time has passed

2015-03-24 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Tue, 2015-03-24 at 08:29 -0700, Joel Madero wrote: On 03/24/2015 08:23 AM, Pedro wrote: Michael Stahl-2 wrote actually, would it be possible in our bugzilla to disallow a transition from RESOLVED - REOPENED except if the user is a well-known QA or developer with a special bugzilla

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Try not to reopen bugs when anything more than a trivial amount of time has passed

2015-03-24 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 07:33:03PM +0100, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: all bugs(*). One could have a bot setting bugs from RESOLVED to VERIFIED though, if there is not objection (verified by silent approval) ... after the suggested a month timeframe, that is obviously. Best, Bjoern