Hi,
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 06:01:33PM +, Noel Grandin wrote:
Wasn't someone going to look at speeding that up? Make check is not
currently making very good use of multiple cores and it has a long tail
where only one or two cores are busy.
I cant fully confirm that -- at least not
Hi,
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 10:40:40PM +0200, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
And with this I see a lot of processes running parallel till the end. This
suggests to me that the stuff is quite parallelized -- however none of the
testing threads seem to be CPU-bound rather the Java-stuff seems to be IO
On 05/27/2015 07:25 AM, Caolán McNamara wrote:
There are ~190 bugs with the word crash in the summary in the states
new/assigned/reopened/unconfirmed.
As with the coverity, import-testing, export-testing stuff I think it
would be helpful to start chewing into crashers in some systematic way
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 7:37 PM, Bjoern Michaelsen
bjoern.michael...@canonical.com wrote:
there is no excuse to not run 'make check' anymore at least before
pushing -- if there ever was one.
you mean beside the fact that make check fails on Windows _and_ Mac ?
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 11:16 AM, Michael Meeks
michael.me...@collabora.com wrote:
+ Windows 64 status (David O)
+ all fine, poking some Base test with Stephan
+ an OLE test, failing on some machines not others;
environment dependent. Thorsten's
* Present:
+ Andras, Caolan, Kendy, Sophie, Michael M, David T, Bjoern, David O,
Robinson, Miklos, Muthu, Thorsten, Lionel
* Completed Action Items:
+ add ooenv bits for cppunittests (Michael)
+ take pretty Cambridge Hackfest pictures (Thorsten)
[ pending permission
