Hi Tommy, all
Tommy wrote
>>> 1- I still think that the 6 months EOL embargo before cleanup is too
>>> much... It would be better to do the cleanup earlier, let's say 4 or 3
>>> months after the EOL
>>
>> I still disagree :) I don't see that many benefits and I see potential
>> issues that cause
HI *,
On Sunday, November 29, 2015, Tommy wrote:
> Joel Madero wrote:
>
>> Hi Tommy,
>>
>> 1- I still think that the 6 months EOL embargo before cleanup is too
>>> much... It would be better to do the cleanup earlier, let's say 4 or 3
>>> months after the EOL
>>>
>>
>> I still disagree :) I don
Hi All,
>
> As long as the comment moving all to the maj.min version includes the
> original version (or even adds it as a whiteboard item, I don't see
> need for having the versions available.
Well the comment doesn't always have the version - more often than not
it doesn't. I'm definitely not in
Hi All,
> I agree with Tommy. Bugzilla is unfriendly enough. Shortening the list is a
> good idea.
>
> How many people report bugs which are specific to a given RC? Are there more
> than 10 people in the world doing this?
> In fact at the pace the RCs are released it is nearly impossible for some
Joel Madero wrote:
Hi All,
As long as the comment moving all to the maj.min version includes the
original version (or even adds it as a whiteboard item, I don't see
need for having the versions available.
Well the comment doesn't always have the version - more often than not
it doesn't. I'm d
Pedro wrote:
Hi Tommy, all
Tommy wrote
1- I still think that the 6 months EOL embargo before cleanup is too
much... It would be better to do the cleanup earlier, let's say 4 or 3
months after the EOL
so leaving all those RCs in the list for such a long time still seems to
me just a waste of
Hi Joel, all
jmadero wrote
> The problem really is that at least *I* do often time request users to
> go back and install older versions to help narrow down where a
> regression was introduced. This is particularly useful when a user is
> complaining about their regression not getting love - at t
> Hi Joel, all
>
>
> jmadero wrote
>> The problem really is that at least *I* do often time request users to
>> go back and install older versions to help narrow down where a
>> regression was introduced. This is particularly useful when a user is
>> complaining about their regression not getting
Pedro wrote:
I don't see any incompatibility in asking people to use several versions
(actually I do that using Portable versions of LibreOffice from WinPenPack)
and reducing the number of versions in the drop list.
>
..
>
Regards,
Pedro
I use too winPenPack versions to identify regressi
There is an application to do parallel installations with any version
including RCs and master.
"si-gui" a nice development, by Florian Reisinger, for windows:
http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/si-gui/
In their blog there is pre-release Java version for Linux.
https://flosmind.wordpress.com/
10 matches
Mail list logo
