Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

2016-09-20 Thread Jan Iversen
> Curiously, this keyword’s first name was “proposedEasyHack”, which at some > point was found “confusing” by someone. I just find it a bit funny that a > similar name is being proposed now… ;-) > I too found needsEasyhackEvaluation a bit curious. But I have to admit that the current use:

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

2016-09-20 Thread Xisco Fauli
Hello Jan, El 20/09/16 a les 10:30, Jan Iversen ha escrit: Curiously, this keyword’s first name was “proposedEasyHack”, which at some point was found “confusing” by someone. I just find it a bit funny that a similar name is being proposed now… ;-) I too found needsEasyhackEvaluation a bi

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

2016-09-20 Thread Jan Iversen
> The point of changing the word to 'needsEasyHackValidation' is to limit its > use to only easyhacks. 'needsDevEval' is too general and could be use in > order cases where we don't want contributors to use it. Well you reach out to the same group of people, to do the same thing….provide advice