[Libreoffice-qa] Bug Closing Automation - Apology

Hi All, First off, sorry that I'm starting a new thread, I'm not sure how to "reply" to something from the digest in gmail. A couple days ago there was a very brief discussion about NEEDINFO and that it wasn't very useful to have the NEEDINFO status sit for weeks or months on end if the users wer

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla Comment Spamming

Hi all, as you saw today Florian closed lots of NEEDINFO bugs. Can some of you please use a Query Feed like

[Libreoffice-qa] [ANNOUNCE] libreoffice-3.6.1.1 tag created

Hi, there have been created the libreoffice-3.6.1.1 tag (aka rc1). The corresponding official builds will be available within next few days. See the attached list of changes against 3.6.0.3[*]. Now, you might switch your current 3-6 source tree to it using: ./g fetch --tags ./g checkout -b tag

[Libreoffice-qa] Mass-Close NEEDINFO-Bugs

Hi all, Today Florian closed lots of NEEDINFO bugs. Can some of you please use a Query Feed like

[Libreoffice-qa] Would you be so nice and forward this to some mailinglists...

Dear developers / contributors of LibreOffice! Todays cleanup of bugzilla went quite wrong. The same type of message got sent to a lot of you (either as reporter or CC) to you. I really beg your pardon. For your underatanding: I prepared to send one (1) message, but due to a browser, which

[Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla Comment Spamming

@ll I am very sorry for the comment spamming, which goes on currently. This was caused by an app close to a crash here. I am very sorry for that. Hopefully it finally helps to clean out bfo. __ Florian Reisinger Von meinem iPad gesendet Sent via iPad __

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Moztrap, some questions

Hi Yifan, On 13/08/2012 12:08, Yifan Jiang wrote: Hi Sophie, On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 11:14:34AM +0200, Sophie Gautier wrote: Hi all, Yifan, So after a long time (sorry for this long absence), I would like to come back to Moztrap and try to help to test it. Welcome back :) Please let me know

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Fwd: [tdf-announce] The Document Foundation announces LibreOffice 3.6 with a wealth of new features and improvements

Michael Meeks-2 wrote > > Of course the filters are tested; there were -zero- unit tests for the > RTF filter before we started, it is now perhaps -the- most unit tested > filter that there is - every bug fix Miklos makes has a nice unit test: > better - since the code is shared, that is un

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Fwd: [tdf-announce] The Document Foundation announces LibreOffice 3.6 with a wealth of new features and improvements

On Mon, 2012-08-13 at 19:33 +0200, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: > I can assure you they are. The best way to get a bug solved is: ... > Once you are there, it is orders of magnitude easier to go ahead with the bug. Sure - the problem is then for developers to sift out these bugs where a ton o

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Fwd: [tdf-announce] The Document Foundation announces LibreOffice 3.6 with a wealth of new features and improvements

Hi there, On Mon, 2012-08-13 at 09:38 -0700, bfo wrote: > Unfortunately those graphs are discouraging in many ways. Especially if one > thinks about upgrading LO... Sure - of course I want to get on people's case ;-) we don't show any visibility of the overall number of non-regression bug