[Libreoffice-qa] QA Meeting Minutes 2014-05-05

2014-05-06 Thread Robinson Tryon
Hi all, We had a great QA Meeting today; it was great to hear from both new and long-term contributors on the call! Meeting agenda and minutes are available on the meeting page: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Meetings/2014/May_05 Our next meeting is (tentatively) scheduled for May 19th,

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Running LO 4.3 alpha in Windows XP...

2014-05-06 Thread Pedro
Hi Stuart, all Just downloaded Version: 4.3.0.0.alpha1+ Build ID: a3c00ee3c7b3b0fbcde32baeb7023c7e8526b908 TinderBox: Win-x86@47-TDF, Branch:MASTER, Time: 2014-04-28_07:22:55 and installed in parallel on another XP machine. It does seem to be fixed. I can confirm it later when I install it on

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Running LO 4.3 alpha in Windows XP...

2014-05-06 Thread Florian Reisinger
Hi Pedro, Was it only the alpha 1? If so, CC cloph, as this (IMHO) buggy build is the release config.. Buggy? It worked with the master (alpha 1 is just a snapshot of the master) the day before, and the day after. At least all the bugs I found on Windows Liebe Grüße, / Yours, Florian

[Libreoffice-qa] fdo#77479

2014-05-06 Thread Kohei Yoshida
This bug https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=77479 fell through the crack and became confirmed but it really isn't. It went from UNCONFIRMED - WORKSFORME - REOPENED and REOPENED is handled as if it's been confirmed, hence the problem. Could anyone give this a quick look? Thanks,

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] FDO Versions

2014-05-06 Thread Tommy
On Sun, 04 May 2014 18:45:23 +0200, Joel Madero jmadero@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, I've gone ahead and hidden most 3.6 pre release versions on FDO (kept 3.6.0.beta0 because this is the equivalent of before bibisect). I see no 3.6 all release it was added for 3.4 and 3.5 Two

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] FDO Versions

2014-05-06 Thread Tommy
On Sun, 04 May 2014 18:45:23 +0200, Joel Madero jmadero@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, I've gone ahead and hidden most 3.6 pre release versions on FDO (kept 3.6.0.beta0 because this is the equivalent of before bibisect). Two questions: 1. Can I do the same for 4.0 or should I wait longer ?

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] fdo#77479

2014-05-06 Thread Gérard Fargeot
Kohei Yoshida-6 wrote This bug https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=77479 fell through the crack and became confirmed but it really isn't. It went from UNCONFIRMED - WORKSFORME - REOPENED and REOPENED is handled as if it's been confirmed, hence the problem. Could anyone

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Running LO 4.3 alpha in Windows XP...

2014-05-06 Thread Pedro
Hi Florian, all Florian Reisinger wrote Was it only the alpha 1? If so, CC cloph, as this (IMHO) buggy build is the release config.. Buggy? It worked with the master (alpha 1 is just a snapshot of the master) the day before, and the day after. At least all the bugs I found on Windows

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] fdo#77479

2014-05-06 Thread V Stuart Foote
Kohei, So confirmed at least as far back as 3.5.x, but probably some of the work you and Markus did Nov 2011 in lead up to 3.4.0 Issue is confirmed--and have set the bug to NEW. The issue is that when the AutoFilter buttons are cleared during a Sort--if there were any filters applied those

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Running LO 4.3 alpha in Windows XP...

2014-05-06 Thread Florian Reisinger
Hi Pedro, What I can see, and that's why cloph should know it: With the very same source it does not work quite well. So it has to be the setup IMHO Liebe Grüße, / Yours, Florian Reisinger Am 07.05.2014 um 00:27 schrieb Pedro pedl...@gmail.com: Hi Florian, all Florian Reisinger