Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Testing Release Notes 5.2 - Cell References keyboard shortcut ⇧ Shift+F4 was removed in favor of F4, but is still available in OpenOffice.org Legacy keybindings. tdf#97906 (Dennis

2016-04-23 Thread Raal 

On 23.4.2016 12:24, m.a.riosv wrote:

Test: Ok.

Tested:
- F4 with 'Key binding - Defaul'
- Shift+F4 'Key binding -  OpenOffice.org Legacy keybindings'

*
OS:Win10x64
Processor: IC i3 CPU M 330 @2.13GHz
Graphics:  AMD M Radeon HD 5000 v15.11

LibreOffice options:

- Memory - Graphics cache default 64 MB
- OpenGL - Enable.

Version: 5.2.0.0.alpha1
Build ID: 902b28a39528b6c92602e9b521a1d0861be1caf9
CPU Threads: 4; OS Version: Windows 6.2; UI Render: default;

Miguel Ángel.



Hello Miguel,
great work! You should also set bug to status "verified"
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97906
Regards
Raal

--
LibreOffice is powered by a team of volunteers who mostly give their 
time for free.
We invite you to join as there are many ways to get involved including 
bugs triage,
marketing, UX, documentation, and of course developing - 
https://www.libreoffice.org/get-involved/

___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [ANN] LibreOfficeDev 5.2.0 alpha1 test builds available

2016-04-23 Thread Pedro 
Hi Stuart

Thank you for the detailed information.

So this is clearly not the problem since, as I mentioned, "I tested with
both x86 and x64, installed in parallel with SI GUI and standard install."

In any case the PC where I tested the Alpha build has version 5.1.3.1
installed and running so any needed libraries are already there.

This is definitely a bug (and sadly enough you had reported this 10 days
ago...)



--
View this message in context: 
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-ANN-LibreOfficeDev-5-2-0-alpha1-test-builds-available-tp4181683p4181783.html
Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] regression keyword

2016-04-23 Thread Joel Madero 


On 04/22/2016 01:23 PM, Terrence Enger wrote:
> Hello, All,
>
> I was surprised to read in "QA/BugTriage"
>  ...
>
> Use the keyword regression if the previous minor version or
> bugfix release works correctly. Please do not mark older bugs
> as regressions.
>
> Is this restriction to *recent* regressions right?
Whoa...yeah that seems really wrong and not at all what we've been
doing. This goes to show that the wiki still needs a lot of cleanup :-/
Thanks for catching this.


Best,
Joel
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [ANN] LibreOfficeDev 5.2.0 alpha1 test builds available

2016-04-23 Thread V Stuart Foote 
Pedro wrote
> Hi Florian
> 
> Long time no see ;)
> Florian Reisinger wrote
>> Have you installed the correct MS C++ redistributable? I do not which
>> version is the baseline ATM...
> I sincerely don't know. I never had to worry about that in any software
> (including LibreOffice).
> If the correct MSVC libraries are not included in Win 10 then they need to
> be packaged with the LO installer, right?
> 
> I can manually install any MSVC version to check if that solves the
> problem. Which is the expected version?
> 
> Regards,
> Pedro

The Visual Studio baseline remains 2013 at 5.2, and Christian's TB62 and
release builds, Kendy's TB39 and Thorsten's TB42 all bundle the 2103 MS VC++
redistributable runtimes in the appropriate 32bit/64bit flavor.

But when testing and performing an "in parallel"  /a administrative
installation, e.g. using the SI GUI, does not install the VC++ runtimes. The
runtimes are packaged with the build in the System folder, but they are only
installed with a full installation.

So as FLorian notes the appropriate runtimes *must* be installed, but are
more often already present on a system.

Should you need the runtimes to work with /a administrative parallel
installs of earlier releases they are available from Microsoft at these
links:

For VS 2013 for 5.y.z
https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=40784

For later 4.y.z builds
For VS 2012
https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=30679

For builds -> 3.6
For VS 2010
https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=26999

For VS 2015 (ongoing testing)
https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=48145




--
View this message in context: 
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-ANN-LibreOfficeDev-5-2-0-alpha1-test-builds-available-tp4181683p4181774.html
Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/

[Libreoffice-qa] Testing Release Notes 5.2 - Currency drop-down list attached to currency toolbar icon makes it easy to choose and use desired currency format. tdf#82641 (Mohammed Abdul Azeem; Michael

2016-04-23 Thread m.a.riosv 
Test: Ok.

Tested:
- Different currencies and languages.
- Different sizes or ranges, rows, columns, sheets.

*
OS:Win10x64
Processor: IC i3 CPU M 330 @2.13GHz
Graphics:  AMD M Radeon HD 5000 v15.11

LibreOffice options:

- Memory - Graphics cache default 64 MB
- OpenGL - Enable. 

Version: 5.2.0.0.alpha1
Build ID: 902b28a39528b6c92602e9b521a1d0861be1caf9
CPU Threads: 4; OS Version: Windows 6.2; UI Render: default;

Miguel Ángel



--
View this message in context: 
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Testing-Release-Notes-5-2-Currency-drop-down-list-attached-to-currency-toolbar-icon-makes-it-easy-to-tp4181768.html
Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/

[Libreoffice-qa] Testing Release Notes 5.2 - Cell References keyboard shortcut ⇧ Shift+F4 was removed in favor of F4, but is still available in OpenOffice.org Legacy keybindings. tdf#97906 (Dennis Fra

2016-04-23 Thread m.a.riosv 
Test: Ok.

Tested:
- F4 with 'Key binding - Defaul'
- Shift+F4 'Key binding -  OpenOffice.org Legacy keybindings'

*
OS:Win10x64
Processor: IC i3 CPU M 330 @2.13GHz
Graphics:  AMD M Radeon HD 5000 v15.11

LibreOffice options:

- Memory - Graphics cache default 64 MB
- OpenGL - Enable. 

Version: 5.2.0.0.alpha1
Build ID: 902b28a39528b6c92602e9b521a1d0861be1caf9
CPU Threads: 4; OS Version: Windows 6.2; UI Render: default;

Miguel Ángel.



--
View this message in context: 
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Testing-Release-Notes-5-2-Cell-References-keyboard-shortcut-Shift-F4-was-removed-in-favor-of-F4-but--tp4181762.html
Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Testing Release Notes 5.2 - Support wildcards to be compatible with XLS/XLSX and with ODF 1.2

2016-04-23 Thread Pedro 
Hola Miguel Ángel


m.a.riosv wrote
> Please could someone take a look to the attached test, perhaps I'm
> misinterpreting how wildcards works.

You are right, there is definitely a bug in LibreOffice implementation of
Wildcards
One comment: the last pattern has a redundancy, a question mark before an
asterisk is the same as simply the asterisk. E.g. *c?*1 is the same as *c*1

I suggest that for the bug report in the sample file you add an extra column
with the expected results as values so that it is easier to see what is
wrong.

BTW If anyone is interested in testing this new feature (under Windows 10,
at least) the only Master builds that do run are the x86 from TB39

Best regards,
Pedro



--
View this message in context: 
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Testing-Release-Notes-5-2-Support-wildcards-to-be-compatible-with-XLS-XLSX-and-with-ODF-1-2-tp4181736p4181759.html
Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] regression keyword

2016-04-23 Thread Raal 

On 22.4.2016 22:59, Cor Nouws wrote:

Hi Terrence,

Terrence Enger wrote on 22-04-16 22:23:


Use the keyword regression if the previous minor version or
bugfix release works correctly. Please do not mark older bugs
as regressions.

Is this restriction to *recent* regressions right?


Thanks for notifying.
To be honest, I've not noticed that before. Or deleted it from my memory
directly after seeing ;)
Such a rule would seem illogic to me too.

Now the wiki says " Fresh regressions are usually pretty annoying for
affected users and easier to fix. Thus they are treated with a higher
priority by the developers. On the other hand, if it takes months or
years to report a regression, it must be in a less used functionality.
People are used to live with it, and thus it is less important. "

Which may partly be true, but not so logic.
- The importance of a bug does not solely depend on the number of people
that are affected.
- Nor is it impossible that a bug (regression) is discovered or reported
late, since not all features are used by all and some user-types tend to
start with newer versions relatively late.
- Nevertheless, it is of course expected that regressions with
wide/major impact are reported soon.
- Still I would suggest to use the keyword always and let developers
decide on when to act, or not.
Apart from that, the keyword is used for statistics and it's
questionable to influence those by debatable rules ;)

Makes sense?
Cor




+1 from me for change wiki. Regressions are pretty annoying, no matter 
how old are they.




--
LibreOffice is powered by a team of volunteers who mostly give their 
time for free.
We invite you to join as there are many ways to get involved including 
bugs triage,
marketing, UX, documentation, and of course developing - 
https://www.libreoffice.org/get-involved/

___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/