Hi Michael,
> The "just run the console and do chmod +x " that
> I see on their front-page is (I suspect) rather a bit of a usability
> nightmare ;-) at least initially vs. say an app-store. Some 'technical'
> people I know are impressed by command-line use ;-)
As you can set the executabl
Hi All,
Sorry i wasnt able to attend today, so i guess i'll leave my comments by email.
> + unclear what the future holds here: Snap, FlatPack, AppImage (Michael)
If its Libreoffice future, i believe AppImage will be it, as it provides
similar functionality as the portable version found on
> Hi Jay, *,
Hi Cloph,
>> 1) not having to install it on your system to run it (aka portable)
> No need to install for TDF builds either.
You would have to extract, which isnt simple for a regular user.
>> 2) copying it on a usb and run it on any linux distro (atleast the minimum
>> system tha
Hi All,
For all those interested in the organization efforts that have been going on
with meta bugs, i've created a meta bugs telegram group for us to coordinate
our efforts. Everyone is welcome to join using the link below[1], either with
the telegram app[2] on your desktop or phone or throug
egram account ), plus it may
encourage others to start using the metabugs too.
Just my two cents.
Regards
[1] https://t.me/LibreOffice_QA
El 18/07/17 a les 23:53, Jay Philips ha escrit:
Hi All,
For all those interested in the organization efforts that have been going on
with meta bugs,
Hi Guys,
It has been alot of fun these last 4 years working with the many
libreoffice teams, but like all things in life, things come to an end, so
i'd like to thank you all for the pleasure of working with you and wish you
all the best in the continuous success of LO.
Just as a note, all of the
nd the results were
bad mainly due to incorrect font sizes for bullet list items
test3: opened @calligrasuite odf in @libreoffice and it has 24 pages as
tables are crushed flat and first page document heading is missing
[first part mentioned above]
I look forward working with you and the QA team
Hi Joel,
Thanks for the welcome and i look forward to being on the next call as i
got the notice to late today to be on the today's. I live in Dubai,
United Arab Emirates and wondered what was the best way to get on the call.
Jay Philips
On 04/22/2014 08:13 AM, Joel Madero wrote:
Incre
On 04/22/2014 08:28 AM, Robinson Tryon wrote:
On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 8:51 PM, Jay Philips wrote:
Hi Robinson,
Thanks for cc'ing me as i wasnt part of the list but have sent in a request
to be part of it.
:-)
If you run into any problems, just ping me, and we'll do our best
d. Is there
any means of knowing what was the software used to create the .docx?
Yes i testing what comes from various word processors into LibreOffice
writer and out. If you see my last message in the mailing list, i
explain my basic routine.
Jay Philips
On 04/22/2014 11:16 AM, Roopesh Kohad
Hi Robinson,
Thanks for cc'ing me as i wasnt part of the list but have sent in a
request to be part of it.
Jay Philips
On 04/21/2014 03:07 AM, Robinson Tryon wrote:
Aaand I should probably cc Jay here, as I'm not sure he's on the list :-)
--R
On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 4:
st_id=415544&emailtype1=substring&query_format=advanced&email1=philipz85%40hotmail.com&product=LibreOffice
>
Jay Philips
On 04/22/2014 12:52 PM, Jay Philips wrote:
On 04/22/2014 08:28 AM, Robinson Tryon wrote:
On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 8:51 PM, Jay Philips
wrote:
Hi Robinson,
this helps.
regards,Roopesh
Original Message
Subject:
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Extensive docx conversion tests...
Date:
Tue, 22 Apr 2014 13:12:55 +0400
Everytime i upload a jpg or png on bugzilla, i have to go back into the
file and change it mime type. Is this supposed to be like this?
--
Jay Philips
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Hi Joren,
Thanks for looking into my reports. I am testing it also on the master
build, as you can see i do mention things like "Tested in 4.0 - 4.3."
and "Regression starting in 4.2. Tested on 4.3 as well.", stated that
4.3 alpha was also tested. :)
Jay Philips
On
that regressions are constantly popping up into the code and I
was wondering why isnt the development of the import libraries done
separate from the UI.
Jay Philips
On 04/26/2014 04:57 PM, Joren DC wrote:
Hi Jay,
Jay Philips schreef op 26/04/2014 14:56:
Hi Joren,
Thanks for looking into my
Hi All,
Is there no means of getting smaller updates to development builds, as i
find it wasteful to redownload 200mb on every update.
--
Jay Philips
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Hi Roopesh,
Just did some testing of my own and you had the version numbering wrong
as MS Office 2013 is 15.0, MS Office 2010 is 14.0 and MS Office 2007 is
12.0. I checked the output of files from office.com and they had 00.0001.
Jay Philips
On 04/24/2014 08:51 AM, Roopesh Kohad wrote:
Hi
Hi All,
As i'm currently doing a test of .docx compatibility, i was wondering if
there was an archive of standard compliant odf files in 1.0/1.1 and 1.2
formats that can be tested against LibO.
--
Jay Philips
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa ma
Well i was browsing through the website a noticed a few issues i wanted
to put to the website team and wondered how to contact them.
--
Jay Philips
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change
Thanks Florian.
Jay Philips
On 05/02/2014 11:27 AM, Florian Reisinger wrote:
I guess a note on the WWW list would be nice
(website<>global.libreoffice.org <http://global.libreoffice.org>)
subscribe/Unsubscribe of all the ML:
http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-li
bO and ms
word, i report these bugs, but if there are load differences for .odt
files its difficult to know if its a LibO or ms word problem.
--
Jay Philips
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
5-02 at 16:21 +0400, Jay Philips wrote:
Alternatively, is there an ODF test to validate if a ODF file
outputted by an ODF compatible software complies to the ODF standard and
can output the file as a pdf to show how it should be rendered, somewhat
similar to the Acid test for CSS.
O
i would have the time to manage test runs myself.
Jay Philips
On 05/02/2014 07:20 PM, Sophie wrote:
Hi Jay,
Le 02/05/2014 14:21, Jay Philips a écrit :
Hi All,
I was curious what compatibility tests are being run to ensure that LibO
displays ODF accurately. I had asked a similar question a few
On 05/02/2014 07:50 PM, Sophie wrote:
Hi Jay,,
Le 02/05/2014 17:40, Jay Philips a écrit :
Hi Sophie,
If you are not already aware, you can create office documents at
office.com as it is free. I have created a few tests there myself, but
prefer to use ms word myself.
Yes, thanks, but it'
and line spacing is off
* word 2013/2010 odt export - table type lines appeared on the page
which are not visible in calligra words [reported]
Rating: B as opening/saving rtf/doc had font and image problems, as well
as problems with opening ms word odt file
--
Jay Phi
bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&bug_status=RESOLVED&bug_status=VERIFIED&bug_status=CLOSED&bug_status=NEEDINFO&bug_status=PLEASETEST&email1=philipz85%40hotmail.com&v1=regression&product=LibreOffice
>
Jay Ph
Hi,
No i haven't bibisected before, but can give it a try.
Jay Philips
On 05/04/2014 06:51 AM, Joel Madero wrote:
have you bibisected before? if not, are you willing to try? it helps
tremendously for regressions.
Best,
Joel
On 05/03/2014 11:30 AM, Jay Philips wrote:
Hi Joel,
I'
Hi Joel,
I think i hit my first snag as i dont run 64-bit linux. :(
Jay Philips
On 05/04/2014 08:48 PM, Joel Madero wrote:
Nice! Thanks for offering to try. First thing is to download the very
large package (8.4 gigs) -
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/HowToBibisect#Versions
You&#x
Hi Joel,
Its been done. :)
Jay Philips
On 05/05/2014 02:48 AM, Joel Madero wrote:
Ah - okay new plan. CC me on every regression and put
"bibisectrequest" in whiteboard. I'll do the bibisecting :)
Best,
Joel
On 05/04/2014 02:02 PM, Jay Philips wrote:
Hi Joel,
I think
inue to support office 2007 for another
3 years and office 2010 for another 7 <
http://www.allyncs.com/docs/lifecyclesupport.html >.
--
Jay Philips
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Chan
Hi Michael,
On 05/05/2014 02:37 PM, Michael Meeks wrote:
Hi Jay,
I think you're confused by the naming. Currently we have these
releases:
4.3 (master) - Beta
4.2 - Fresh
4.1 - Stable
As/when we release 4.3.0 those will rotate I imagine:
master
Hello,
On 05/05/2014 05:36 PM, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, May 05, 2014 at 04:59:37PM +0400, Jay Philips wrote:
Yes initially i was confused as i was used to seeing chrome's
labelling there releases as development, beta and stable.I think it
would be great if the website
Hi Joel,
Yes someone else suggested that as well which i will be doing. Any
particular specs your looking for?
Jay Philips
On 05/05/2014 08:56 PM, Joel Madero wrote:
On future reports will you try to include your computer specs (most
importantly your OS) :)
Best,
Joel
On 05/05/2014 01
Hi Joel,
Yes i agree stable should be default, but with some indication that
users can get fresh if they are interested in more 'fresh' code. :)
Jay Philips
On 05/06/2014 01:16 AM, Joel Madero wrote:
Hi All,
Per our discussion, here is a single thread where I think we shou
ong location [reported 78510]
word 2011 odt - links show up in dark blue and numeric & bullet lists
are indented more (ms office problem)
Rating: C- for good display of original file, small problems with tables
in .docx files, and significant problems with impor
Hi All,
Not sure if this is the best place to mention this, but i wanted to
suggest that similar to having a pre-release and fresh ppa for ubuntu
and derivatives, that we have a stable ppa that users who wish to stay
on stable dont have to modify when a new stables comes out.
--
Jay Philips
a
disabled LibO repo/ppa added by default to the repo list?
Jay Philips
On 05/23/2014 08:04 PM, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
> On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 07:58:28PM +0400, Jay Philips wrote:
>> Not sure if this is the best place to mention this, but i wanted to
>> suggest that similar to
Hi All,
I visited < http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/libreoffice-4-3/ >
and noticed that only deb x86 and mac x86 are being built and the deb
x86 hasnt been built since the 22nd, while the mac x86 has a build for
today.
--
Jay Philips
__
thers
didnt (avi, mkv). As i dont know how its being played on windows, i dont
know how to remedy the issue.
Regards,
Jay Philips
On 05/31/2014 10:17 PM, Joel Madero wrote:
> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56847
>
> We've had an extensive discussion on the QA channel about
not a reference media player on windows which i can say if it
plays there than it should play in LibO.
Regards,
Jay Philips
On 05/31/2014 11:34 PM, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
> On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 10:46:11PM +0400, Jay Philips wrote:
>> Yes i've had success in Xubuntu 14.04 and Linux
On 06/03/2014 03:24 PM, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> For Linux, we're using gstreamer under Linux to play back video, so I
> suggest if there's an issue playing back video under Linux that the
> reporter checks if it works in totem which typically defaults to having
> gstreamer as its backend. So as a
of time is
wasted trying to pull them from online, and wondered how would i do the
same, especially with master updating daily. I have attached the full
'!analyze -v' output that i got when trying to debug a crash, which i
hope someone can look at and tell me what
#x27;
doesn't indicate that it wont also happen on other OSes - fdo#79460
LanguageSpecific:jp - a means of filtering reports that can only be
properly tested by an individuals who know a particular language and i
think it would be useful when we expand the bug submission beyond just
englis
Hi Joren,
Looking over keywords, you are correct that it has 'have-backtrace', it
even has 'want-backtrace', and it also has keywords that arent that
useful in the keyword field like bibisected (used in WhiteBoard),
NEEDINFO (used in status), and notourbug (used in status).
breoffice4.2/program/soffice.bin...(no debugging symbols
found)...done." which makes me think i'm missing something. So are all
linux installations from the .tar.gz files found on the website and in
the daily builds, debug enabled?
--
Regards,
Jay Philips
___
Hi All,
The bug reporter of 79599 has done all the ground work and would like to
submit some code, so if someone from the devs could nudge him in the
right direction.
--
Regards,
Jay Philips
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address
Hi All,
I went through the same issue last week and noticed that installing in
parallel outputted a folder called '\Win\System\'
which contained the MSVC runtime files in it, so i simply copied them
into the C:\Windows\System32\ folder and all went well. :)
Regards,
Jay Philips
On 06/
Hi Rob,
Yes i installed a TDF build to /opt/.
Regards,
Jay Philips
On 06/06/2014 07:49 AM, Robinson Tryon wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 6:36 PM, Jay Philips wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I submitted my first windows and linux backtraces today to fdo#79569,
>> and wou
tps://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/BugReport/Debug_Information#GNU.2FLinux:_How_to_get_a_backtrace
>
Regards,
Jay Philips
On 06/06/2014 03:14 PM, Christian Lohmaier wrote:
> Hi Jay, *,
>
> On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 12:36 AM, Jay Philips wrote:
>> So are all
>> linux installations from
Hi All,
Came across a bug report <
https://www.libreoffice.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79483 > which i
cant triage as i dont have a scanner. :) User claiming that he's unable
to exit the scan dialog after finishing the scan.
--
Regards,
sist,
that would be great.
< https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76636 >
--
Regards,
Jay Philips
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/
Hi All,
Have a bug report that i cant confirm on Linux Mint and the user says
they are running Fedora 20 KDE, so i'm assuming it maybe KDE related, so
if you anyone has KDE, can you check it out.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76347
--
Regards,
Jay Ph
Hi Robert,
Thanks. :)
Regards,
Jay Philips
On 06/11/2014 08:46 AM, Robert Großkopf wrote:
> Hi Jay,
>> Have a bug report that i cant confirm on Linux Mint and the user says
>> they are running Fedora 20 KDE, so i'm assuming it maybe KDE related, so
>> if you anyone has
Hi Joel and everyone,
Just to let you all know, i had completed all the writer entries since
last week, so the 4 current entries under 'WriterCrasher' arent crash
related, and a few of them that i did in the list weren't crashers.
Regards,
Jay Philips
On 06/15/2014 10:02 PM, Jo
in english. If anyone from the spanish team can look into
this, it would be great.
< https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=80042 >
--
Regards,
Jay Philips
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoff
tting this
same bug as time goes by, as its a major dataloss interoperability
issue, as i've just encountered two such duplicates today.
--
Regards,
Jay Philips
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop
Hi Tommy,
I assume 4.2 cant become stable until 4.3 becomes fresh. :)
Regards,
Jay Philips
On 06/21/2014 11:32 AM, Tommy wrote:
> On Sat, 14 Jun 2014 23:12:51 +0200, Christian Lohmaier
> wrote:
>
>> Dear Community,
>>
>> The Document Foundation is pleased to
writer since the 1st of may.
--
Regards,
Jay Philips
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http
Hi All,
I have already triaged this bug that seems to only effect Windows Vista,
so if anyones has it, please have a look. Its a simple test of whether
local help will open when running from a standard user account.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60181
--
Regards,
Jay Philips
Hi All,
Just noticed that 4.2 and 4.3 havent gotten new builds since the 23rd.
--
Regards,
Jay Philips
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman
Yes its the linux 45, as thats the main one i test on.
Regards,
Jay Philips
On 06/29/2014 09:11 AM, Tommy wrote:
> On Sun, 29 Jun 2014 05:20:52 +0200, Jay Philips
> wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> Just noticed that 4.2 and 4.3 havent gotten new builds since the 23rd.
>
do let me know. Your comments
are also welcome. :)
--
Regards,
Jay Philips
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Pr
of reading, and the point of the wiki page is to provide summaries and
possible solutions.
Regards,
Jay Philips
On 06/30/2014 12:08 AM, bfoman wrote:
> jphilipz wrote
>> Hi All,
>> After commenting on over 300 bugs in the last month, i have noticed a
>> number of duplicate
77241
- below one i tried and would like someone to make sure i'm correct -
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=78611
--
Regards,
Jay Philips
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Chang
Hi Joel, All,
I dont see anything from the 4.3 mabs that stands out to me on why it
should be released, except for maybe the high contrast icons in the
control center. :)
Regards,
Jay Philips
On 07/01/2014 06:57 PM, Joel Madero wrote:
> On 07/01/2014 06:27 AM, Sophie wrote:
>> Hi Joel,
sting our users to go through the same process. :)
< https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/How_to_get_a_backtrace_with_WinDbg >
--
Regards,
Jay Philips
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Chan
Hi Sophie,
You should also take a look at #77650, as the PDF export dialog needs a
rework for including comments in PDFs.
Regards,
Jay Philips
On 07/02/2014 06:48 PM, Sophie wrote:
> Le 02/07/2014 16:41, Marina Latini a écrit :
>>
>> - Messaggio originale -
>>
of this one to
someone who actually compiles it.
Regards,
Jay Philips
On 07/02/2014 08:37 PM, Robinson Tryon wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 10:39 AM, Jay Philips wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> After going through many pains to understand how to get backtracing done
>> through WinDb
separately, but guess
i didnt notice the checkbox in the file open dialog. :) I havent really
found a need to run it this way, unless libreoffice was crashing itself
when starting up without the loading of a file.
Look forward to your additions when ever you do get the time.
Regards,
Jay Philips
- screen reader -
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=77132
--
Regards,
Jay Philips
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoff
nd the bug reporter
believes libreoffice should do something different than whats its doing
and i cant judge if i agree with him or not, so i've wanted a mentors
second opinion.
Maybe we need another whiteboard called NeedQASecondOpinion. :)
Regards,
Jay Philips
On 07/09/2014 10:46 PM, Joe
merge -
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=80810
- index -
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=73573
I'm happy to report that there are less than 50 unconfirmed writer bugs
from jan 1st that have less than 6 comments and are not enhancement
requests.
--
Regards,
J
, docx, and rtf.
--
Regards,
Jay Philips
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/maili
plication.
Regards,
Jay Philips
On 07/13/2014 09:09 PM, Joel Madero wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Including dev list on this because I know developers are using the
> whiteboard status' to do queries so I wanted to give you all the chance
> to voice opinions.
>
> Currently we are no
hancement 132 ( 13.88% )
-
Total 951
--
Regards,
Jay Philips
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libr
Hi Miklos,
I mis-wrote in my last email, as i only do writer bug triaging, so
luckily ww8 hasnt been used to mislead anyone. :)
Regards,
Jay Philips
On 07/14/2014 12:44 PM, Miklos Vajna wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 01:58:56AM +0400, Jay Philips
> wrote:
>> I have been using
Hi Marc,
Thanks for looking into it, but unfortunately you need to check the
print dialog to confirm it. :)
Regards,
Jay Philips
On 07/14/2014 05:51 PM, Marc Paré wrote:
> Hi Jay,
>
> Le 2014-07-13 23:08, Jay Philips a écrit :
>> Hi All,
>>
>> Users trying to
faster we
can confirm/close it and move on to the next one.
Just my two cents. ;)
Regards,
Jay Philips
On 07/15/2014 01:48 AM, bfoman wrote:
> Hi!
> From my experience asking for an example file is the best way to triage for
> following reasons:
> - saves time - you can download the a
Hi All,
I normally update my daily builds of 4.2, 4.3 and master once a week,
but unfortunately they havent been updated since the 8th or 9th for
Linux-rpm_deb-x86@45-TDF. Any help would be appreciated.
--
Regards,
Jay Philips
___
List Name
Hi Christian, *,
With bug 77277, the user has stated that it prints fine with AOO but not
with LO, so i'm assuming its not the driver. :)
Regards,
Jay Philips
On 07/16/2014 12:32 PM, Christian Lohmaier wrote:
> Hi Jay, *,
>
> Am 14.07.2014 05:08 schrieb "Jay Phili
Hi Florian, All,
A user has submitted these issues for Logo in Writer related to german
localization.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=81372
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=81352
--
Regards,
Jay Philips
___
List Name
e autosave time, it should autosave anyway.
Just another 2 cents.
Regards,
Jay Philips
On 07/22/2014 08:19 AM, Joel Madero wrote:
> I have closed this bug twice as NOTABUG but the user does not agree so
> requesting second opinion:
> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=81627
>
Hi All,
I stumbled on 2 bugs i confirmed quite a while back and wanted someone
to check them to see if they are MAB suitable.
https://www.libreoffice.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80715
https://www.libreoffice.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79422
--
Regards,
Jay Philips
zilla/attachment.cgi?id=103484
It is now in the hands of the UX team to comment on. For those that
would like to read more about it, check bug 81475. Hopefully you guys
can benefit from these findings by customizing your toolbars for QA work. :)
--
Regards,
Jay Ph
ont mind sharing them. :)
Regards,
Jay Philips
On 07/26/2014 08:26 PM, V Stuart Foote wrote:
> Jay forgot to add it, but his work up on this is an active BZ issue--
> fdo#81475 <https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=81475> . More on
> the proposal is detailed there.
>
Hi Jochen,
Tried to get access to the file but all i get is stupid ads. If you
could upload it to imgur.com, that would be great.
Regards,
Jay Philips
On 07/27/2014 02:45 AM, Jochen Schiffers wrote:
> Hi Jay,
>
> Am 27.07.2014 00:22, schrieb Jay Philips:
>> Would love to
On 07/27/2014 12:06 PM, Tommy wrote:
> On Sun, 27 Jul 2014 00:22:18 +0200, Jay Philips
> wrote:
>
> experienced UI users would not take any benefit from a change since they
> will keep using their custom preset
The advantage would be that they would have less buttons to add/
LO's look from OOo/AOO. But I was mainly just sharing my
work with the QA team, as it was a happy occasion for me that i was able
to complete it, as this is the team i'm with and welcomed their
constructive criticism of it. :D
Regards,
Jay Philips
On 07/30/2014 12:36 AM, Joel Madero wrot
On 07/31/2014 02:28 PM, Gerry T. wrote:
> Hi Jay, hi all,
>
Hi Gerry,
> First, I like the grouping of icons. I think it is a good idea that
> everything is accessible and the interface clean. However, I understand
> the criticism that some people may not find their buttons anymore.
> Hence, it w
ake more than a minute or two to
confirm and presently there are 11 bugs. Here is a quick link to them
for those with spare time to kill. :) < http://bit.ly/jay4_3bugs >
--
Regards,
Jay Philips
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail ad
hat reasons had they to change?
Have users been asked whether they approve of it? Or is there a small
group of people who like to change things on a whim?
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82041
--
Regards,
Jay Philips
___
List Name: Libreoffice-
Hi Marina,
I have added all my recent non-fixed RTF bugs to the meta bug and will
add my older list as well shortly. Thanks for confirming the bugs. :)
Regards,
Jay Philips
On 08/04/2014 01:18 PM, Marina Latini wrote:
>
>
> - Messaggio originale -
>> Da: &quo
Hi All,
Stumbled on this Kubuntu UI bug in calc and wondered if someone can have
a look at it. It may also effect other KDE desktops.
https://www.libreoffice.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82036
--
Regards,
Jay Philips
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa
s uses rtf
files for their workflow, is it just opening rtfs to convert them to odf
or saving them also in rtf?
Regards,
Jay Philips
On 08/05/2014 11:03 AM, Marina Latini wrote:
>
>
> - Messaggio originale -
>> Da: "Jay Philips"
>> A: libreoffice-qa@li
Thanks.
Regards,
Jay Philips
On 08/05/2014 01:07 PM, Luc Castermans wrote:
> I am running Debian/KDE I can check later today. OK?
>
> 2014-08-05 10:17 GMT+02:00 Jay Philips :
>> Hi All,
>>
>> Stumbled on this Kubuntu UI bug in calc and wondered if someone can have
&
Thanks for the workflow info. Regarding the second case, are there more
problems opening or saving the RTF documents. Can you send me some
sample second and third case files for me to do some testing on?
Regards,
Jay Philips
On 08/05/2014 02:41 PM, Marina Latini wrote:
>
>
> -
ed against me in the email, as sometimes we say things in anger
that shouldnt be said. And if you dont wish to apologize for it, that is
fine. I'm here volunteering to help improve LibO and hope we can be nice
to each other, as i like being part of the QA team, and hope they feel
likewise.
Regar
gh i have very little knowledge of
how best to format the page :D. Please add in your own collection of
responses if you have.
--
Regards,
Jay Philips
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change
a
few of them listed there.
Regards,
Jay Philips
On 08/20/2014 06:38 PM, Joel Madero wrote:
>
> Hey there,
>
>> Jay, *,
>>
>> Not sure that codifying a bunch of "approved" QA exchanges is in the
>> best interest of moving the QA process along--especially
1 - 100 of 160 matches
Mail list logo
