Hi,
I don't think it is reasonable to tag all bugs in the HSQLDB to
Firebird migration as regressions. These are bugs in a new feature, so
by definition cannot be regressions.
In the context of a mandatory migration, there is some argument to say
that they are regressions, but in case you didn't
Hi,
The automated "please retest" bug comment says:
Test to see if the bug is still present on a currently supported
version of LibreOffice (5.0.0.5 or later)
This suggests that LibreOffice Still is not supported anymore. What
about:
Test to see if the bug is still present on a currently
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 05:00:19PM +, Michael Meeks wrote:
* Pending Action Items:
+ please file an Easy-Hack this week: just a bug with whiteboard: (All)
EasyHack DifficultyBeginner SkillCpp TopicCleanup
+ thanks to:
+ Stephan, Michael, Lionel, Ashdod
Hi,
I downloaded bibisect-43all.tar.xz and unpacked it. Now, the wiki page
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Bibisect (and common sense)
suggest that I should be able to git pull to get new builds, but the
wiki page does not list any git:// (or ssh:// or whatever) URLs I
could use to fetch/pull
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 08:24:29PM +, Michael Meeks wrote:
* Crashtest update (Markus)
+ cf. http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/crashtest/
new crash testing result is available (cf. the date git hash)
All files tested, and the results are complete for the 1st time.
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 04:16:18PM +0100, Michael Meeks wrote:
+ noticed a couple of people CC'ing developers on bugs (Joel)
+ been an issue in the past - what's the story now
Except for running into the bug myself, it is the _only_ way for me to
know about a bug.
--
Lionel
On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 04:33:45PM -0400, Robinson Tryon wrote:
[cc'ing QA, as they might have some suggestions here...]
On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 12:16 PM, Kracked_P_P---webmaster
webmas...@krackedpress.com wrote:
I do not know that 4.1.0 would be the best to start a user on,
personallythat
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 12:49:03PM +0200, Eike Rathke wrote:
On Thursday, 2013-05-16 16:25:40 +0100, Michael Meeks wrote:
+ double check Lionel's list-box / API change (Eike)
Done. The two properties added to
com.sun.star.form.component.DataBaseListBox are marked optional which
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 03:54:19PM +0100, Michael Meeks wrote:
* Scripting interface for form elements broken (?) (Lionel)
+ I've just sent a message to the dev ML with subject
Value of a ListBox, FMC paradigm for Form elements (controls)
+ C++ module / forms / frm::
On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 11:17:20AM -0500, Terrence Enger wrote:
On Fri, 2013-01-18 at 08:04 -0800, Joel Madero wrote:
Can someone triage this one? Thanks in advance!
And there has been quit a bit of subsequent discussion.
I wonder just what Lionel was proposing [1] after the announcement
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 11:43:17PM +0100, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
I write:
The Document Foundation is happy to announce the second release
candidate of LibreOffice 3.6.5.
In case you wonder if you missed RC1 - that version was tagged, but
no binaries built and released because of a
Hi,
What is our policy about MS Word import? Should it give the same
result as in MS Word, or where MS Word is buggy it should give a
correct result?
I ask this in context of the attached bug.
--
Lionel
---BeginMessage---
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49306
ydutri...@gmail.com
, but I don't have the MS Word format
skills to understand what is going on: some graphical object is in the
file, is invisible in MS Word, but visible in LibreOffice.
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 2:51 PM, Lionel Elie Mamane lio...@mamane.lu wrote:
What is our policy about MS Word import? Should
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 04:07:40PM +, Michael Meeks wrote:
* CUPS - switching back to PDF output by default ? (Caolan)
+ need ability to toggle it, have a universal default ? etc.
+ needs some input to have a PDF / PS toggle for generation
AI: + look into adding a UI setting
On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 04:39:22PM +, Michael Meeks wrote:
* 4.0 pending tasks
+ should we drop Rhino, Beanshell javascript in 4.0 ? (Michael)
+ could be turned into an extension
+ was in the past was turned off (Stephan)
AA: + disable Rhino /
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 12:14:18PM +0100, Michael Meeks wrote:
* Meeting organisation / minuting
+ weekly calls ok ?
+ better than async mail.
I'm a much more written word person than an oral person. In a
meeting where people *speak* (and not write), I often have
On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 09:24:41PM +0200, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 06:30:30PM +0200, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
So if you go to https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37361 (LO
3.5 MAB), you have to click through on *each* resolved bug to read the
bug log and try
On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 04:42:11PM +0100, Michael Meeks wrote:
* QA update (Rainer)
+ HardHacks:
ID OS Component - Summary
32948 Linux Libreoffice/Database(?) - Address Book Data
On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 12:44:58PM +0200, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 11:39:04AM +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
On 09/05/2012 10:46 AM, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
I thought we close the bug when the fix is committed in all branches
where it should be, and that's what I
On Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 08:31:37AM +0200, Rainer Bielefeld wrote:
After it has been running a little bumpy all morning it seems
Bugzilla is down now?
Got the same, seems back up now.
--
Lionel
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 10:56:39PM +0200, Jochen wrote:
On the German discuss-ML we are currently discussing following questions:
If a database-file (odb-file) is opened must this database be
registered in LibreOffice?
No.
We have observed that some people can´t use a odb-file without
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 04:55:50PM +0100, Michael Meeks wrote:
* gerrit update (David / Bjoern)
+ can we have the patch in the 'new change' mail (Lionel)
+ would be nice !
+ two ways to do mailing - better to move to using stream object
and generate our own
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 09:52:20AM +0200, Petr Mladek wrote:
On Fri, 2012-06-01 at 13:00 +0200, David wrote:
I have a Base database that is about 22mb in size with
approximately 40,000 entries and climbing. I recently upgraded from
LibO 3.4.3 to LibO3.5.4 and suddenly my database is really,
On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 03:08:55PM +0200, Michael Stahl wrote:
On 01/06/12 15:01, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 5:24 AM, Michael Meeks michael.me...@suse.com wrote:
* Quality of round-robin patch review (Markus)
+ often generalists review specific patches for master
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 04:16:33PM +0100, Jan Holesovsky wrote:
whenever you are committing / pushing to git, and you
reference the bugs.freedesktop.org bug in the commit message, it will
automatically appear as a comment in the bug :-)
It seems not to happen this morning. In general, after
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 07:49:04PM +0100, Jan Holesovsky wrote:
Ivan Timofeev píše v Út 14. 02. 2012 v 20:33 +0400:
Is it possible somehow include the information about a target version?
Oh - great idea :-) Added that to the script; it does some best-effort
guess, (...)
Please test that
On Fri, Dec 09, 2011 at 02:13:12PM -0600, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 1:55 PM, Pedro Lino pedl...@gmail.com wrote:
I know, I did it... but you don't have a 'push time'
:) Thank you, then :)
Why do I need to know the push time? Any commits that were pushed into
Central
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 12:04:36AM +0100, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
On Fri, Dec 09, 2011 at 11:36:47PM +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
So, really, rather than time at which the tinderbox pulled, I argue
that recorded commit time of the HEAD node is a better identifier to
put in tarball names
On Sat, Dec 03, 2011 at 01:06:18PM +0100, Andras Timar wrote:
2011/12/3 Pedro Lino pedl...@gmail.com:
Another situation: I download a master build from a tinderbox. How do
I know the build included? How do I know if the source it was
generated from is newer or older than the one I already
On Sat, Dec 03, 2011 at 11:40:01PM +, Pedro Lino wrote:
Git commit IDs as identifiers have the huge problem that they are not
comparable (one cannot say which one is greater) without referring
to the repository. How about we also put the *commit* (not author)
timestamp (in UTC) of the top
30 matches
Mail list logo
