Re: [Libreoffice-qa] LibO 3.5.0 Beta 0 First assessment

On 03/12/11 18:27, Cor Nouws wrote: Michael Meeks wrote (03-12-11 15:50) Yes ! we have not branched yet; master will branch at the feature-freeze before B1 so we have: master Beta0 ---\--- crazy stuff ... \

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Crash in Impress in slideshow mode with linked movie ?

On 15/12/11 09:24, Stephan Bergmann wrote: On 12/13/2011 09:04 AM, Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote: it seems that Impress in LO 3.5.0 crashes under *MS-Windows* in slideshow mode when you try to show a slide with a linked movie (menu Insert - Movie and Sound...). No problem for me under Ubuntu.

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [ANNOUNCE] libreoffice-3.5.1.1 tag created (3.5.1-rc1)

. + accessibleTreeNode: fix headless crash (#2, #1, #15, #4, #12, #11, #5, #10, #0, #7, #16, #8, #13, #9, #14, #6, #3) [Michael Stahl] i didn't fix that many bugs, perhaps the script to generate these should assume that 1 to 3 digits are stack frame numbers and not bug ids

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] use Build ID to find the related latest commit of a build

On 13/03/12 16:30, Cor Nouws wrote: Hello Korrawit, Korrawit Pruegsanusak wrote (13-03-12 16:02) Does not work with the Build ID from a daily build from today Build ID: 39b3448-4a2109f-e67b1bf-fb5e6f3-638d9c I still can open this:

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes for the LibreOffice QA call 2012-04-06 1400UTC

On 06/04/12 19:55, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: - Florian setup a VirtualBox image for Linux regression testing - Ubuntu precise/12.04 - has LibreOffice 3.5.x and LibreOffice 3.4.x with Rainer parallel installation script AA - provide Florian with a LibreOffice 3.3 build

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] do not update MAB without a comment - was: Re: [Bug 37361] LibreOffice 3.5 most annoying bugs

On 18/04/12 16:53, dE . wrote: On 04/18/12 13:59, Petr Mladek wrote: Petr Mladek píše v St 18. 04. 2012 v 10:21 +0200: For example I am not sure why you added the bug 35158 :-) I forgot to say that I agreed with the other nominated bugs. Great work! Thanks for help with triaging. Best

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Office XP/2003, 2007/2010 formats import/export -- most used feature.

On 25/04/12 11:33, Michael Meeks wrote: On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 17:55 +0200, Petr Mladek wrote: In this case, I prefer using whiteboard instead of metabug: Easy for me to query too. + inter-operability into Whiteboard for all these bugs Gosh that's a long string; how

[Libreoffice-qa] bugzilla git hook doesn't always work (Re: PM: [Bug 49342] CRASH EDITING TABLE when merge cells in .sxw and others)

On 09/05/12 22:21, Rainer Bielefeld wrote: Hi, I did a little check [1] and found a lot of fixed Bugs listed as 3.5 MAB where fix for 3.5 is not indicated by a target note in the Whiteboard. We should watch that and add target info where possible. yes it happens sometimes that the server

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] New Bugzilla Version Picker items – 2

On 07/06/12 12:11, Rainer Bielefeld wrote: Could we use the same scheme also in bugzilla? I mean: 3.5.98.1 (3.6.0alpha1) 3.5.98.1+ (3.6.0alpha1+daily) 3.5.99.1 (3.6.0beta1) 3.6.0.1 (3.6.0rc1) Yes, a big advantage would be if we coud rework the scheme a little so that

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Cobra - WinLDTP Automation

hi bfo, On 25/06/12 23:40, bfo wrote: I stumbled upon Cobra – WinLDTP, Windows version of Linux Desktop Testing Project open sourced by VMWare recently. Using this tool, the GUI functionality of an application can be tested in Windows XP SP3, Windows 7 SP1, Windows 8 development release.

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

On 30/06/12 00:20, Caolán McNamara wrote: On Fri, 2012-06-29 at 23:57 +0200, Michael Stahl wrote: mostly though reset attachment flags what's your route here ? changing to non-patch/plain-text the experimental/dead stuff ? so my interpretation is that the patch flag doesn't mark a mime type

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Crash screencasts

hi bfo, On 25/06/12 23:57, bfo wrote: Hi. Very interesting screencasts available at air mozilla: The Life Cycle of a Firefox Crash https://air.mozilla.org/crash-life-cycl/ Mozilla CrashKill Investigation and Analysis https://air.mozilla.org/crashkill/ that is a very interesting video, i'd

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla Resolved Noanswer

On 08/07/12 13:45, Florian Reisinger wrote: Hi! Does it make sense to have something like a Resolved NoAnswer in Bugzilla for our bug cleaning? Is it possible at all?? rhbz has a RESOLVED INSUFFICIENT_DATA for that; it seems that the best thing in fdo bugzilla to resolve non-reproducible

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

On 19/07/12 11:09, Fridrich Strba wrote: On 12/07/12 17:55, Michael Meeks wrote: and/or re-write to avoid big chunk of mozilla bundled Mozilla is also used for Outlook Express (WAB) address-book and for Outlook address-book via MAPI. For windows, there is a (deprecated) API to

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Closing bugs in bugzilla: fixed in master or fixed everywhere?

On 05/09/12 10:46, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote: I'd like to check if maybe I misunderstood our bugzilla handling standards. I thought we close the bug when the fix is committed in all branches where it should be, and that's what I was doing in the bugs I was fixing. But obviously, if our

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] odf_validation bugs

On 14/09/12 17:27, Gustavo Pacheco wrote: Hi Michael! I have two web instances of ODF validators here: - ODF Toolkit based http://odf-validator2.rhcloud.com/odf-validator2/ - Office-o-tron based http://odf-validator2.rhcloud.com/officeotron-0.7.0/ Maybe it can be useful for

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] ToDos rename 3.7 to 4.0

On 11/11/12 20:59, Robert Großkopf wrote: Hi *, when I read Version 4.0 I think there should happen a lot in a program for a complete new version. Since many years for Base was discussed, that there has to be a change in the database of OOo- and LO-Base. But this discussion, if this

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Version number for 4.0 RC2

On 24/01/13 10:00, klaus-jürgen weghorn ol wrote: Hi all, in 4.0 RC2 I get the following version number: Version 4.0.0.2 .0.2 (Build ID: 5991f37846fc3763493029c4958b57282c2597e) It seems to be wrong. I don't know if it is necessary to make a bug report. where do you see this number?

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] MySQL Native Connector for 32 bit LibreOffice on Ubuntu 12.04

On 21/02/13 04:21, Dan Lewis wrote: These were the ones that autogen.sh had to have before it stopped with an error message at line 201: libgnomevfs2-common, libgnomevfs2-bin, libgnomevfs2-0, libgnomevfs2-dev, libgnomevfs2-extra, libgnomevfs2-0-dbg. this is unrelated but possibly

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] GUI automation

On 14/03/13 02:05, Markus Mohrhard wrote: 2013/3/13 Michael Meeks michael.me...@suse.com: On Wed, 2013-03-13 at 16:17 +0100, Vladimir Benes wrote: There are several options how to approach this. The first is LDTP [1] and the other one (in my opinion far better) is Dogtail [2]. If LO uses

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] cgit query help - syntax for entering a range of commits

On 28/06/13 18:06, V Stuart Foote wrote: Need some help with our cgit repository! Feeling really dumb, I am trying to use the cgit commit logs-- http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/log/ -- and pull a range of commits against master to track a bug: 20130607

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Non-debug Windows daily builds: tb39

On 21/08/13 19:39, ape wrote: Most likely, I will be forced to move to RPM-Linux (Open_SuSE or AltLinux), because I use LibreOffice by TDF only. why RPM based Linux? it's easily possible to install the RPM packages on any Linux, the only thing that does not work is system integration (menu

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Introduction

hi Howard, great to see somebody interested in doing QA! On 04/09/13 09:33, Florian Reisinger wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Howard, We are very happy, that you are going to help us doing QA. So here some points from my side (if I am wrong, anyone please

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] The garbage into the dev-builds.libreoffice.org

On 28/10/13 17:44, Pedro wrote: (For Florian Reisinger) In addition, a parallel install will not work (under Windows XP Pro x86 SP3) because of a missing MSVCR110.dll Probably the installer doesn't go through that step when doing a parallel install? iirc the MSVC runtime DLLs are installed

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [Impress] Export to SWF does not work in 4.2.0.0beta1?

On 25/11/13 19:33, bjoern wrote: On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 07:13:35PM +0100, Sophie wrote: I confirm that the export doesn't work. And the Options window doesn't open once you gave the name. My version Version: 4.2.0.0.beta1 Build ID: f4ca7b35f580827ad2c69ea6d29f7c9b48ebbac7 (same as yours ;)

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Backtracing in Windows XP

qOn 11/02/14 20:33, Christian Lohmaier wrote: Hi Pedro, *, Am 07.02.2014 15:44 schrieb Pedro pedl...@gmail.com mailto:pedl...@gmail.com: […] After your reminder I was able to run Windbg again but I still get symbol errors... Can you paste what you geht AS output? The Debugger

[Libreoffice-qa] RPM installation (was: Re: Calc freeze issues)

On 13/02/14 18:39, Kohei Yoshida wrote: On Thu, 2014-02-13 at 11:33 +0100, M Henri Day wrote: ​Kohei, any chance of a patch for ​Linux (in my specific case, deb) users being posted in the near future, in addition to those you've already posted for Windows and Mac users, respectively ?...

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Backtracing in Windows XP

On 14/02/14 21:40, bfoman wrote: ape wrote Hi Pedro! I have good news about Windows XP: http://www.ubuntukylin.com/news/shownews.php?lang=enid=191 Microsoft announced to extend deadline of Windows XP security update Service to July 14, 2015: News from Microsoft and other majority of IT

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] 4.2.1 is a Stable version???

On 09/03/14 14:51, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: Hi Pedro, On Sat, Mar 08, 2014 at 02:00:47AM -0800, Pedro wrote: http://www.libreoffice.org/download/libreoffice-fresh/ LibreOffice is available in the following stable versions: 4.1.5 4.2.1 Since we are doing the LibreOffice

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Version field options way too fine grained

On 14/03/14 14:58, Kohei Yoshida wrote: IMO we should only have 4.0, 4.1, 4.2 etc as version. All these too fine grained version numbers only serve to make bugs discoverable. but then you can't easily tell what bugs are regressions on release branches. What do you guys think about this?

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [documentliberation-discuss] ODF compatibility tests

On 02/05/14 15:01, Charles-H. Schulz wrote: Jay, Replying in more details: there are a few ODF validators out there but they are neither autoritative nor maintained. And ODF 1,2 has evolved after they were released: http://plugfest.opendocsociety.org/doku.php?id=validators:overview at

[Libreoffice-qa] Fwd: are there any known bugs about online update not working in 4.2?

apparently a user commented (off-topic on a bug) that his LO 4.2.0.4 does not get online update notification; are we aware of any problems in that area (has anybody tested it?) or should we assume it's some local mis-configuration? Original Message Subject:[Bug 74148]

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

On 09/05/14 16:01, Italo Vignoli wrote: On 08/05/14 17:29, Michael Meeks wrote: * Should we simplify version numbering? (Kendy) + So far major.minor.micro, but due to our release plan, all our versions are continuous improvements - does it make sense to still keep 'major'?

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Whiteboard Status'

On 16/06/14 23:39, Joel Madero wrote: *Status* *Question* complextest Is this useful? If so – when should we use it? unoapitestWe have “uno” is that sufficient? these two are very similar, maybe we could combine them as junittest? dataloss For me priority means this –

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Extensions with Whiteboard status

On 16/06/14 22:26, Joel Madero wrote: We have just a few extensions that somehow got special treatment to have whiteboard status (rt, rtf_filter, pdf). I'm not sure why these got special priv. over other (probably more relevant) extensions such as docx, doc, or even odt, ods, etc . . . ah

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Whiteboard Status'

On 18/06/14 17:39, Robinson Tryon wrote: On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 10:15 AM, Joel Madero jmadero@gmail.com wrote: ConfirmedRegression Description: Is used if a bug is confirmed to be a regression. why do we need this, given that we have a regression keyword? this is a pointless alias...

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] bibisect: how to update after tarball download

On 23/07/14 12:25, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote: Hi, I downloaded bibisect-43all.tar.xz and unpacked it. Now, the wiki page https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Bibisect (and common sense) suggest that I should be able to git pull to get new builds, but the wiki page does not list any git:// (or

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

On 09.10.2014 16:59, Michael Meeks wrote: * Leaking /tmp files (Cloph) + the 'lu' files are leaked by utl::TempFile (Miklos) + tinderbox has a custom tmp (Norbert) + creating a directory in workdir for tmp + could we do it in the tinderbox script by default ? (Michael)

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] rr - lightweight recording deterministic debugging

On 14.12.2014 22:26, Robinson Tryon wrote: On Sun, Dec 14, 2014 at 3:37 PM, bfoman bfo.bugm...@spamgourmet.com wrote: Hi! From the rr 3.0 release notes - http://robert.ocallahan.org/2014/12/rr-30-released-with-x86-64-support.html: [...] - Many bug fixes to broaden the range of recordable

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [LibreOffice Bugzilla Migration] We're done! Please visit the new site to reset your password!

On 24.01.2015 21:50, Robinson Tryon wrote: If you have any questions or encounter any problems, please stop by the QA IRC channel or drop us a note on the mailing list: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/IRC https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Mailing_List if i go to Saved Searches

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [LibreOffice Bugzilla Migration] We're done! Please visit the new site to reset your password!

On 27.01.2015 08:12, Robinson Tryon wrote: On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 1:20 AM, Tommy ba...@quipo.it wrote: +1. we really need to remove a lot of those useless keywords Here's the current list of keywords: ALL: What should go? bisected (255) The bug has been successfully connected

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] NEW Bug Mass Ping Round 2

On 06.01.2015 23:58, Joel Madero wrote: Hi All, So I suppose we'll start chunking into the next set relatively quickly. I was thinking at the end of January doing anything 22 months or more, slowly decrease this to 12 months. I don't want to hit all of these at once as there are already

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] LibODev_amd64 does not run

On 18.03.2015 18:53, Pedro wrote: Michael Stahl-2 wrote other tinderboxes might use Windows SDK 7.1A. Unfortunately Tinderbox 42 is the only one building x64 binaries. Are there plans to change this? Is TDF planning to support XP x64? personally i hope not, since there are only downsides

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Try not to reopen bugs when anything more than a trivial amount of time has passed

On 24.03.2015 12:36, Caolán McNamara wrote: It generally doesn't make sense to reopen a bug after a few months has passed since it was closed. indeed doing that is very annoying. personally i've started to simply ignore bugs in state REPOENED some time ago, they are generally very confusing

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] daily dbgutil bibisect: Calc fails since 2015-06-05

On 11.06.2015 13:08, Terrence Enger wrote: On Thu, 2015-06-11 at 07:58 +, Lyubomir Yotov wrote: Hi Terry, I have the same issue with this on FreeBSD 10.1. Have you managed to find a workaround? Well, the daily builds still run Calc, so that is good. However, the 50max dbgutil

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Writer password protected section is editable

On 02.10.2015 15:40, Marina Latini wrote: > Hi all, > can someone help me to correctly triage this report? > https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94697 > > I would add the keyword "security". It's correct? i guess the most important case where a password related bug is security

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] bibisecting post 5.0 regressions

On 30.12.2015 17:47, Joel Madero wrote: > Hi All, > > How do I bibisect bugs after 5.0 max? I don't see a 5.1 max. I see the > dbgutil version but I don't see instructions on how to use that version > nor is it entirely clear what versions it covers (is it covering 5.1 -> > master?). there are

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

On 28.07.2016 18:19, Markus Mohrhard wrote: > > > On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 5:18 PM, Michael Meeks > > wrote: > > > * Crashtest update (Caolan) > + 1 import failure, 7 export failures, coverity pending > +

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Building Win-x86@62-merge-TDF and Win-x86_64@62-TDF

On 05.10.2016 12:40, Lera Goncharuk wrote: > Hi, > > The building Win-x86@62-merge-TDF and Win-x86_64@62-TDF isn't made a long > time. For the Win-x86@62-merge-TDF has not been since 26-Aug-2016, and for > the i hope i've fixed the problem afflicting the --emable-mergelibs one now, although

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Invalid ODF

On 03.04.2017 20:21, Regina Henschel wrote: > Hi all, > > does a meta issue exists for those bugs, where LibreOffice writes > invalid ODF? Or is there a way to mark such bugs in a consistent way? hi Regina, there are 2 words you can put in whiteboard: "odf" -> this is any ODF interop issue

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Invalid ODF

On 03.04.2017 21:59, Regina Henschel wrote: > Hi, > > Michael Stahl schrieb: >> On 03.04.2017 20:21, Regina Henschel wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> does a meta issue exists for those bugs, where LibreOffice writes >>> invalid ODF? Or is there a

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Invalid ODF

On 03.04.2017 22:37, Michael Stahl wrote: > On 03.04.2017 21:59, Regina Henschel wrote: >> Michael Stahl schrieb: >>> "odf" -> this is any ODF interop issue >>> >>> "odf_validation" -> this is narrowly defined as something tha

[Libreoffice-qa] Writer tracked change Show/Hide needs testing

[re-sending this since the first one fell into some black hole ...] hi QA folks, the "sw_redlinehide" reimplementation of Writer tracked change Show/Hide is now complete on master, and also in LO 6.2 RC1. this is enabled by default, so you don't need the Experimental setting enabled to

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] ESC meeting minutes: 2020-05-21

On 23.05.20 12:32, Eivind Samseth wrote: I also loaded up my Catalina SSD and tested the notarisation on bug 126409, we still miss on notarisation requirements as far as I can tell when I compare to Firefox (as this is not something I know much about). More detail in the bug, but e.g., :

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Converting a Python UI test into a cppunit test

On 17.07.20 08:53, Ilmari Lauhakangas wrote: Michael Stahl kirjoitti 16.7.2020 klo 20.43: On 16.07.20 18:55, Ilmari Lauhakangas wrote: I created execute.sh for running the Python UI test: export PYTHONPATH=/home/tonttu/libreoffice/instdir/program/ export URE_BOOTSTRAP=file:///home/tonttu

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Converting a Python UI test into a cppunit test

[oops, resending because i'm too dumb for email] On 16.07.20 18:55, Ilmari Lauhakangas wrote: I created execute.sh for running the Python UI test: export PYTHONPATH=/home/tonttu/libreoffice/instdir/program/ export URE_BOOTSTRAP=file:///home/tonttu/libreoffice/instdir/program/fundamentalrc

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [libreoffice-accessibility] Re: ESC meeting minutes: 2022-05-26 [IAccessible2 support in JAWS]

On 09.06.22 11:21, Michael Weghorn wrote: I suppose that supporting new UIA concepts/features in addition would probably require more fundamental changes than "just" adding a new wrapper/bridge for UIA around existing LO a11y interfaces (either a custom one, or using Gtk/Qt). But I'm not an

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] ESC meeting agenda: 2023-07-27 16:00 CEST

hi Patrick, On 26/07/2023 14:17, Patrick Luby wrote: Hi Thorsten, Not sure if the "1 review on libreoffice-7-6 is needed" is mine or not. no, that is just a boilerplate to remind people that pushing to the branch requires 1 CR from somebody other than the author in gerrit. But if not,