Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [ANNOUNCE] Tag libreoffice-4.0.5.2 (on branch libreoffice-4-0-5) created

Pedro píše v St 14. 08. 2013 v 16:48 -0700: > Christian Lohmaier-3 wrote > > The tag libreoffice-4.0.5.2 (AKA 4.0.5 RC2) has been created. This is > > the last scheduled RC. > > This message was created on the 13th but files are already being uploaded > for RC2 and they are from the 14th, a little

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla Migration Plan

Florian Reisinger píše v Út 13. 08. 2013 v 07:57 +0200: > Hi bfoman, > > Liebe Grüße, / Yours, > Florian Reisinger > > Am 12.08.2013 um 21:58 schrieb bfoman : > > > > Robinson Tryon wrote > > [...] > > Hi! > > I think this should be all or nothing operation - LibreOffice bugs > > moved to > > n

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Non-debug Windows daily builds???

Pedro píše v St 07. 08. 2013 v 02:36 -0700: > Hi all > > Two questions: > > 1) Tinderbox 6 stopped producing non-debug Windows daily builds for Master > branch. Is this deliberate? Yes, this is on purpose. We want to have a build with debugging symbols, so people could provide backtraces. > 2)

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] LO 4.1.0.4 does not start from KDE menu?

Thomas Hackert píše v Pá 02. 08. 2013 v 13:24 +0200: > >> I am not the only one, who stumdled upon this bug ... :( Ulrich > >> reported it at https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=67388 > >> as well (with KUbuntu x86) ... :( > > > > I wonder if it might help you to run > > "chown -R root:ro

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] LO 4.1.0.4 does not start from KDE menu?

Thomas Hackert píše v So 27. 07. 2013 v 13:31 +0200: > Hello Petr, *, > On Freitag, 26. Juli 2013 16:29 Petr Mladek wrote: > > > Thomas Hackert píše v Pá 26. 07. 2013 v 16:03 +0200: > > >> On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 01:49:17PM +0200, Petr Mladek wrote: > > >>

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] MAB. 3.6 to 4.0 migration. When?

Tommy píše v St 31. 07. 2013 v 21:22 +0200: > On Tue, 30 > > This is why I suggested to clean up the MAB list and do not blindly move > > the bugs to 4.0 MAB. > > I agree with you. actually I'm doing critical review to get rid of some > bugs that became WFM, bugs that do not really represent a

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] MAB. 3.6 to 4.0 migration. When?

bfoman píše v So 27. 07. 2013 v 02:44 -0700: > Petr Mladek wrote > > About 3000 bugs were fixed for LO 4.1 [...] Only small part of them was > > fixed via the MABs process. > > Hi! > Code freeze for 4.0.x branch is set to end of October and branch will be > EOLed in N

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] QA Call Time

Mas píše v Pá 26. 07. 2013 v 18:18 -0400: > Thanks everyone for opening up a dialogue about changing the time > some. I am open for anytime after 10am. My personal work schedule > Friday by 9 is kind of rough at the moment. So if the day has to be > Friday. Can we move the time later in the day so

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] LO 4.1.0.4 does not start from KDE menu?

... :( Florian Reisinger is looking it. I hope that he would solve it. > On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 01:49:17PM +0200, Petr Mladek wrote: > > Please, make sure that you have installed the package > > libreoffice4.1-debian-menus_4.1.0-4_all.deb. > > I found out, that for some reaso

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] LO 4.1.0.4 does not start from KDE menu?

(another attempt to send this to the mailing list) Thomas Hackert píše v Čt 25. 07. 2013 v 18:38 +0200: > Hello @ll, > after I have installed LO Version: 4.1.0.4 Build ID: > 89ea49ddacd9aa532507cbf852f2bb22b1ace28 with Germanophone help- as > well as langpack, I am no longer able to start it fro

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] MAB. 3.6 to 4.0 migration. When?

(I am sorry for duplicit posting. There was a problem in the mailing list setting and my mail had been eaten.) Tommy píše v St 24. 07. 2013 v 20:39 +0200: > 3.6.7 is out and will be the last 3.6 release. > I'm just curious to know when still living 3.6 bugs will be moved to the > 4.0 list. IMH

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [ANN] LibreOffice 4.1.0 RC4 test builds available for smoketesting

(another attempt to post this to the mailing list) Dan Lewis píše v Čt 25. 07. 2013 v 11:55 -0400: > There still seems to be a problem with 4.1.0.4 for Debian x86. I > downloaded it for my Ubuntu laptop and then installed. It installs > in /opt/libreoffice4.1. However, when I click on soffice

[Libreoffice-qa] [ANNOUNCE] Branch libreoffice-4-1 created

Hi all, as promised, we have created a branch for the stabilization of the 4.1.x releases, called 'libreoffice-4-1'. It is based on master, last pull on May 21, 2013 at about 10am UTC: commit a2c9d4f8bbde97f175bae4df771273a61251f402 Author: Rodolfo Ribeiro Gomes Little cleanup in ima

[Libreoffice-qa] REMINDER: 4.1 feature freeze and 4.1.0.0.beta1 release

Hi, please note that the feature freeze and commit deadline for 4.1.0.0.beta1 is today, May 20, 2013. The plan is to create the libreoffice-4-1 branch on Tuesday. Then we will make sure that it is buildable and usable and create the beta1 tag on that branch. It will hopefully happen on Tuesday.

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] NEEDINFO Status Wiki

Joel Madero píše v Út 14. 05. 2013 v 11:04 -0700: > Hi All, > > I made a pretty basic wiki page for NEEDINFO status. This was per It is great that we are moving forward again with this problem. > Rainer's suggestion that we keep the FDO response shorter (although > it won't be one line) and expl

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Method of Phone Call Friday

Joel Madero píše v Út 14. 05. 2013 v 08:56 -0700: > Hi All, > > > So I want to clarify the plan for Friday in terms of how we are going > to communicate. My pitch unless there are objections (from someone > planning on attending ;) ) - > > > 1. Try 5 minutes prior to 1300 to use talkyoo - if ev

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [ANNOUNCE] libreoffice-4.1.0.0.alpha1 tag created

Norbert Thiebaud píše v Čt 09. 05. 2013 v 08:27 -0500: > On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 8:16 AM, Pedro wrote: > > Norbert Thiebaud wrote > >> The former is what I expect from a daily-build out of a given buildbot > >> - since there can be multiple source for them for a given platform > >> > >> The later i

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [ANNOUNCE] libreoffice-4.1.0.0.alpha1 tag created

Hi Kendy, I guess that this is your area. Could you please comment on? Pedro píše v St 08. 05. 2013 v 15:19 -0700: > Hi all > > 1) > > Under Options, LibreOffice, Personalization there is a new setting: > Background Image > > To which Background does this image apply? > > I assumed it would

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [ANNOUNCE] libreoffice-4.1.0.0.alpha1 tag created

Fridrich Strba píše v Po 06. 05. 2013 v 12:03 +0200: > When trying to build it with all languages on windows, I get: > > $ /opt/lo/bin/make.exe > /opt/lo/bin/make -j 1 -rs -f C:/master/Makefile.gbuild > /cygdrive/c/master/helpcontent2/AllLangHelp_sbasic.mk:12: *** > gb_Package__check: Package Help

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Special Meeting Needed?

Joel Madero píše v Po 06. 05. 2013 v 07:32 -0700: > Hi All, > > Just trying to see if anyone thinks a special meeting is needed to > finish the agenda from last Friday or if we should just punt until next > Friday. > > Going through the list I don't think anything is vital to get through > but

[Libreoffice-qa] [ANNOUNCE] libreoffice-4.1.0.0.alpha1 tag created

Hi, there have been created the libreoffice-4.1.0.0.alpha1 tag. The corresponding official builds will be available within next few days. PURPOSE: This release in intended only for internal testing. The main purpose is to test that we are able to create release builds from master and that they ar

[Libreoffice-qa] [ANNOUNCE] libreoffice-4.0.3.3 tag created

Hi, there was a high visible regression against 4.0.2, see https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63779 . We have decided to do rc3 to fix this problem. I have just created the tag libreoffice-4.0.3.3, aka rc3. The corresponding official builds will be hopefully available over the weekend.

[Libreoffice-qa] [ANNOUNCE] libreoffice-4.0.3.2 tag created

|62815}} SLIDESHOW: Slideshow does not open [Michael Meeks] * {{fdo|63306}} BASIC: FileDateTime Function [Eike Rathke] + common + version 4.0.3.2, tag libreoffice-4.0.3.2 [Petr Mladek] + core + EmbeddedObjectContainer: guard against embed::WrongStateException (fdo#58949) [Miklos Vajna

[Libreoffice-qa] REMINDER: Release 4.0.3.2 from libreoffice-4-0-3 branch

Hi, please note that the commit deadline for 4.0.3.2, aka rc2, is today, April 29, 2013. It will be used as LO-4.0.3 final if no blocker is reported. See also http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan#4.0_release http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Release_Criteria http://wiki.documentfoundat

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Role of the QA calls

Rainer Bielefeld píše v Čt 25. 04. 2013 v 19:40 +0200: > Hi, > > in discussions I sometimes read statements like „...formal vote next > call”. I think here some clarification is required. I agree that the wording is not ideal and we should improve it. The processes are often just suggested and

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] fdo#63680 - Windows builds of Master - Writer crashing

Pedro píše v Út 23. 04. 2013 v 06:37 -0700: > Hi Bjoern, all > > > Bjoern Michaelsen wrote > > How do you want to discuss a bug in a productive way, that neither helps > > QA or > > devs (thus the first) or the users (thus the second)? > > The question is not How but Where to discuss (which is N

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] After EOL has been reached...

Robinson Tryon píše v Pá 19. 04. 2013 v 17:21 -0400: > Per discussion at the meeting today, we generally agreed to the following: > > AGREED: For users inquiring about tech support after the EOL date of a > release, we politely indicate that the release is EOL and ask them to > upgrade to a new ve

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] New QA Site - Press Release?

Joel Madero píše v Ne 21. 04. 2013 v 09:32 -0700: > Some other content that will be on the page is a general overview of QA > work, how to's for things like our mailing list and #libreoffice-qa IRC > channel, and OS specific content such as parallel installs on different > OS' (required for tria

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [ANN] LibreOffice 4.0.3 RC1 test builds available

Hi Marc, I am not sure if anyone has responded this yet. Marc Kaulisch píše v St 17. 04. 2013 v 18:28 +0200: > With this version Symantec (Norton Internet Security) is not very happy > with LibreOffice :-( > > I get the following notice and will contact Symantec. This was the best solution. It

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Question : FILEOPEN bug vs 'filters and storage' bug

Jochen píše v Čt 18. 04. 2013 v 14:42 +0200: > Hi Rainer, > > Am 18.04.2013 14:22, schrieb Rainer Bielefeld: > > well, they will be discouraged and deterred (because the have no idea > > concerning what problem that report might be), not prevented. > > Maybe... I can not follow your reasoning. >

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Question : FILEOPEN bug vs 'filters and storage' bug

Adam Fyne píše v Po 15. 04. 2013 v 08:18 -0700: > Hi, > This is my first mail sent to the 'libreoffice-qa' mail-list. Welcome here. > I hope this is the correct method of doing things... My question is: > What is the difference between bugs posted under 'Writer' section with > the keyword 'FILE

[Libreoffice-qa] [ANNOUNCE] libreoffice-4.0.3.1 tag created

rrect for right triangle? [Regina Henschel] * {{i|78247}} Upper gluepoint of Isosceles Triangle is wrong when moving the handle. [Regina Henschel] * {{rhbz|876742}} [fix available] manipulation with larger tables in impress is very slow [David Tardon] * {{rhbz|906137}} Slide show mode inverts ou

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Enhancements - Getting User Input

Joel Madero píše v Po 15. 04. 2013 v 11:20 -0700: > > > Also we don't need a new system for the voting, we already > have the bugzilla. > > > Currently we don't use bugzilla voting, also it is a big problem if > the #1 enhancement request is some crazy request that takes

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Lifecycle of builds?

Robinson Tryon píše v Po 15. 04. 2013 v 11:21 -0400: > > BTW: ESC has had nothing against the one month after the last planned > > release. If you update the wiki pages with the dates that would be cool. > > Great! Pages are now updated. I think we're basically done with our > EOL Action Item now.

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Lifecycle of builds?

Robinson Tryon píše v Pá 12. 04. 2013 v 13:24 -0400: > On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 4:00 AM, Petr Mladek wrote: > Regarding the EOL date, I've mocked-up an example of how we could > display it on the wiki page: > https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Talk:ReleasePlan#Draft:_Adding

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] FDO#61146 - Supplied libstdc++.so.6 is older than system one - causing DSO load failure

On Sun, 2013-04-14 at 22:18 -0700, Joel Madero wrote: > Can someone check this out, confirm & prioritize it - been sitting > unconfirmed for way too longer. I checked it out but am unsure how to > confirm it without similar distro. Thanks in advance, trying to tackle > these older unconfirmed bu

[Libreoffice-qa] REMINDER: Release 4.0.3.1 from libreoffice-4-0 branch

Hi, please note that the commit deadline for 4.0.3.1, aka rc1, is on today, April 15, 2013. The tag and branch libreoffice-4-0-3 is going to be created tomorrow. Only commits with 3 reviewers will be allowed for that branch. See also http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan#4.0_release htt

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Lifecycle of builds?

Robinson Tryon píše v Čt 11. 04. 2013 v 12:26 -0400: > On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 4:08 AM, Petr Mladek wrote: > > Robinson Tryon píše v St 10. 04. 2013 v 11:29 -0400: > > I think that only the single EOL date make sense. We do not provide > > bugfix releases for bugfix releas

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Master daily builds for Windows are broken

Pedro píše v Čt 11. 04. 2013 v 08:36 -0700: > Petr Mladek wrote > > Adding the developer list into CC. It actually should have been better > > to send the notice there. > > Thanks. I avoid posting there ;) > > > Petr Mladek wrote > > It is a bootleneck

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Master daily builds for Windows are broken

Pedro píše v St 10. 04. 2013 v 02:20 -0700: > The last successful build is from April 8th at 5 AM. > > Dev support needed here :) Adding the developer list into CC. It actually should have been better to send the notice there. Is there any volunteer who could setup another Windows tinderbox? It

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Rename bug or open new one?

Pedro píše v St 20. 03. 2013 v 04:27 -0700: > Nevermind. > > User already changed the bug status to CLOSED NOTABUG. > > So I opened a new one > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62554 You did it correctly. The new bug is clear and easy to understand. The old was already a bit messed w

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] New early-testing-announce maling list

Petr Mladek píše v Čt 11. 04. 2013 v 09:33 +0200: > Hi, > > you might want to subscribe the new > early-testing-annou...@documentfoundation.org mailing list. It will be > low volume. We will send there just the announcements when the builds > are available at http://dev-builds.l

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Lifecycle of builds?

Robinson Tryon píše v St 10. 04. 2013 v 11:29 -0400: > On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 10:33 AM, Petr Mladek wrote: > > I see that you both use a bit different logic, so we need to decide how > > we count the 6 and 9 months. I understand it the following way: > > > >

[Libreoffice-qa] New early-testing-announce maling list

Hi, you might want to subscribe the new early-testing-annou...@documentfoundation.org mailing list. It will be low volume. We will send there just the announcements when the builds are available at http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/pre-releases/ Please, do not spread the information widely. There

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Consistent Time for Meetings

Joel Madero píše v St 10. 04. 2013 v 16:42 -0700: > Hi All, > > So we need to set an official, every two week (or maybe 3?) I would keep the two weeks. It we use 3 weeks and cancel one, it would mean 1.5 month without a meeting :-) An important part of the meeting should be making conclusion whe

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Lifecycle of builds?

Robinson Tryon píše v St 10. 04. 2013 v 10:12 -0400: > On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 8:02 AM, Rainer Bielefeld > Rainer wrote: > "So I believe we should mark the not-release-3.3 as inactive, what means > they will stay for the bugs where they are used, but can not be used for > new bug reports (except by

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Lifecycle of builds?

Michael Meeks píše v St 10. 04. 2013 v 10:25 +0100: > Hi Robinson, > > On Tue, 2013-04-09 at 19:52 -0400, Robinson Tryon wrote: > > As Pedro mentioned, and as far as I understand it, our next step is to > > pick an EOL date for each of our builds and then go update the wiki > > pages. I'd be happy

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] moztrap documentation feedback

Thomas Hackert píše v Út 09. 04. 2013 v 04:12 +0200: > On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 07:41:59PM +0200, Petr Mladek wrote: > I think, you misunderstood me: I was not scared about its content, but > the amount of links Yifan offered to me ... ;) I think that we should not mention all the lin

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] How to change QA processes: was: What should we do with bugs filed against Extensions/Templates?

Hi, I will comment only pieces where I could add something new. I agree with the rest :-) On Mon, 2013-04-08 at 14:38 -0400, Robinson Tryon wrote: > On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 4:22 AM, Rainer Bielefeld > wrote: > > a) We have a report without info concerning Version and OS, and a > > confirmation f

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] How to change QA processes: was: What should we do with bugs filed against Extensions/Templates?

On Fri, 2013-04-05 at 18:04 +0200, Petr Mladek wrote: > I am personally not completely happy with the proposed solution but I > will explain this in another mail. I would like to keep this one focused > on the way how we change and define QA processes. I think that Rainer's solutio

[Libreoffice-qa] moztrap documentation fedback was: Re: about moztrap attachment missing :(

Hi Thomas, first, it is great that you working on the test cases. Thomas Hackert píše v Út 26. 03. 2013 v 19:00 +0100: > On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 01:01:21PM +0800, Yifan Jiang wrote: > > https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Test_Case > > https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Tes

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] How to change QA processes: was: What should we do with bugs filed against Extensions/Templates?

Rainer Bielefeld píše v Ne 07. 04. 2013 v 10:22 +0200: > Petr Mladek schrieb: > > > Ah, this sounds pretty bossy. > > Hi, > > yes, may be. My tone reflects my exception. I see too much unqualified > discussion. Before thinking about changes everybody should have hav

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [Moztrap] Can someone explain test case #122 to me?

Yifan Jiang píše v Po 08. 04. 2013 v 15:28 +0800: > Hi Miguel, > > On Sun, Apr 07, 2013 at 09:42:38AM -0700, mariosv wrote: > > Hi Thomas, I did the test, and certain that the bad English is mine. > > Hah, actually I tried to make the scenario easier but have never done > it in a better way, sadl

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Removing LibO 3.3 from Versions dropdown in Bugzilla

Rainer Bielefeld píše v Po 08. 04. 2013 v 07:47 +0200: > Hi, > > I am thinking about a Version picker cleanup by removing most 3.3. Versions. > > Currently we have 14 different Versions in the picker. > We obviously still need 3.3.0 Beta 2, what is our Version for > "inherited" Bugs. > > Within

[Libreoffice-qa] How to change QA processes: was: What should we do with bugs filed against Extensions/Templates?

Robinson Tryon píše v So 30. 03. 2013 v 15:25 -0400: > On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 1:50 PM, Rainer Bielefeld > wrote: > > Robinson Tryon schrieb: > > > >> Bugzilla is for bugs that we're willing to address/fix as a project, > > > > Hi Robinson, > > > > I am (more or less) the the creator of the LibO B

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [Moztrap] Some questions to the test cases, particularly #130

Thomas Hackert píše v St 03. 04. 2013 v 19:26 +0200: > Hello Yifan, *, > On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 02:12:32PM +0800, Yifan Jiang wrote: > no. You have written above > > 1. The welcome window should be appeared > > and on this I have written my comment ... ;) > > > The welcome window in test case

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla administration info - Help for

Jochen píše v Čt 04. 04. 2013 v 21:45 +0200: > Hi Rainer, > > I added "links" to bugzilla from the German QA-Wiki (see [1]). Is it okay? > > [1] https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/BugReport_Details#Database Sounds good. I do not see any reason why it should not be added. I hope that the German

[Libreoffice-qa] [ANNOUNCE] libreoffice-3.6.6.2 tag created

(MSO97) as plain .txt without explicit file type selection [Caolán McNamara] * {{fdo|60462}} Small errors in the layout margins of the text boxes [Joren De Cuyper] + common + version 3.6.6.2, tag libreoffice-3.6.6.2 [Petr Mladek] + core + .dot files sometimes rejected by writer (fdo#58071

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [Moztrap] Some questions to the test cases, particularly #130

Yifan Jiang píše v Út 02. 04. 2013 v 18:04 +0800: > Hi Devs, > > Sorry to interrupt, just to confirm, were you aware of some > changes to the menu item File->Template (it seemed gone since > 4.x)? > > The background is we were talking about vp.6 in a regression test case: > >

[Libreoffice-qa] REMINDER: Release 3.6.6.2 from libreoffice-3-6-6 branch

Hi, please note that the commit deadline for 3.6.6.2, aka rc2, is today, April 2, 2013[*]. It will be used as LO-3.6.6 final if no blocker is reported. [*] This time it is really 3.6.6.2 ;-) See also http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan#3.6_release http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/R

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] talkyoo issues

Florian Effenberger píše v Pá 29. 03. 2013 v 11:55 +0100: > Hi, > > Jonathan Aquilina wrote on 2013-03-29 11:48: > > Quick Google turned up this > > http://www.voipvoip.com/virtual-phone-number/germany.html is this what we > > would want? > > no. As said on IRC: "You can receive 2 concurrent cal

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [LibreOffice-QA] Minutes - March 22nd, 2013

Joel Madero píše v Čt 28. 03. 2013 v 07:04 -0700: > On 03/28/2013 05:34 AM, Christian Lohmaier wrote: > As for Talkyoo, there were multiple problems this time around. Most of > us have used talkyoo quite a bit so I am hesitant to say it was user > error. There was one skype user who had problems

[Libreoffice-qa] [ANNOUNCE] libreoffice-4.0.2.2 tag created

e show mode inverts outputs [Caolán McNamara] * {{rhbz|918938}} Crash in Impress when right-clicking selected word [Caolán McNamara] * {{rhbz|919020}} Converting String to Double [Eike Rathke] + common + version 4.0.2.2, tag libreoffice-4.0.2.2 [Petr Mladek] + core + -Werror=shadow/-Werror

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [libreoffice-l10n] REMINDER: Release 3.6.6.2 from libreoffice-3-6-6 branch

Italo Vignoli píše v Po 25. 03. 2013 v 11:26 +0100: > On 03/25/2013 09:45 AM, Petr Mladek wrote: > > > please note that the commit deadline for 3.6.6.2, aka rc2, is today, March > > 25, > > 2013. It will be used as LO-3.6.6 final if no blocker is reported. > > Wh

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] REMINDER: 4.0.2.2 from libreoffice-4-0-2 branch; was Release 3.6.6.2 from libreoffice-3-6-6 branch

Petr Mladek píše v Po 25. 03. 2013 v 09:45 +0100: > Hi, > > please note that the commit deadline for 3.6.6.2, aka rc2, is today, March 25, > 2013. It will be used as LO-3.6.6 final if no blocker is reported. Grr, today is commit deadline for 4.0.2.2 from libreoffice-4-0-2 branch. 3.6

[Libreoffice-qa] REMINDER: Release 3.6.6.2 from libreoffice-3-6-6 branch

Hi, please note that the commit deadline for 3.6.6.2, aka rc2, is today, March 25, 2013. It will be used as LO-3.6.6 final if no blocker is reported. See also http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan#3.6_release http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Release_Criteria http://wiki.documentfoundat

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [ANN] LibreOffice 4.0.2 RC1 available

Pedro píše v Pá 22. 03. 2013 v 07:05 -0700: > Petr Mladek wrote > > I think that Pedro wanted to say that installation test should be P1. > > Indeed. But also meant that Installation should be the first item on the > table. > > Currently if the user is completing the t

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [ANN] LibreOffice 4.0.2 RC1 available

Yifan Jiang píše v Pá 22. 03. 2013 v 14:56 +0800: > Hi Pedro, > > On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 05:28:07AM -0700, Pedro wrote: > > Hi Yifan > > > > Some comments/questions > > > > > > Yifan Jiang wrote > > > 3. Select your envionment: "Archs", "Locale", "Platforms" > > > > What if my Locale does

[Libreoffice-qa] [ANNOUNCE] libreoffice-3.6.6.1 tag created

743}} thread deadlock/slow join in insert->hyperlink in impress [Stephan Bergmann] * {{rhbz|916936}} can't copy text from a read-only document in Calc [Eike Rathke] + common + version 3.6.6.1, tag libreoffice-3.6.6.1 [Petr Mladek] + core + adapt rtl::Allocator::construct to C++11

[Libreoffice-qa] [ANNOUNCE] Branch libreoffice-3-6-6 created

Hi all, there have been created the libreoffice-3-6-6 branch. It will be used for fine tuning of the 4.6.6 release. The following rules apply: + preferably just translation or blocker fixes + only cherry-picking from libreoffice-4-0 branch + 2 additional reviews needed; 2

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] QA Field in FDO - What's the Purpose (discussion)

Joel Madero píše v Po 18. 03. 2013 v 11:38 -0700: > During our last QA call we had a continuing discussion about the QA > field that Rainer began a few weeks back [1] > > > Basically the conversation is "what's the point of the QA field" > > > There are multiple opinions: > > > 1. QA Field sh

[Libreoffice-qa] REMINDER: Release 3.6.6.1 from libreoffice-3-6 branch

Hi, please note that the commit deadline for 3.6.6.1, aka rc1, is today, March 18, 2013. The tag and the branch libreoffice-3-6-6 is going to be created tomorrow. Only commits with 3 reviewers will be allowed for that branch. See also http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan#3.6_release h

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [libreoffice-l10n] [ANN] LibreOffice 4.0.1 RC2 available

Serg Bormant píše v So 02. 03. 2013 v 12:51 +0400: > Hi, > > There is no LiberationSerif-Regular.ttf in > libobasis4.0-ooofonts-4.0.1.2-2.x86_64.rpm package (only -Bold, > -Italic, and -BoldItalic). Good catch. Well, the fonts were not missing. They were included in the package libobasis4.0-core0

[Libreoffice-qa] [ANNOUNCE] libreoffice-4.0.2.1 tag created

a imported during install from /3 User Profile [Petr Mladek] fdo#57536 Wrong Chinese conversion: 著 & 着 [Andras Timar] fdo#57661 Conditional formatting gets corrupted after deleting the contents of some cells. [Markus Mohrhard] fdo#57841 FILEOPEN: Importing CSV file, data columns disappear if bi

[Libreoffice-qa] REMINDER: Release 4.0.2.1 from libreoffice-4-0 branch

Hi, please note that the commit deadline for 4.0.2.1, aka rc1, is on today, March 11, 2013. The tag and branch libreoffice-4-0-2 is going to be created tomorrow. Only commits with 3 reviewers will be allowed for that branch. See also http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan#4.0_release htt

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Should we use the "QA Contact" field?

Joel Madero píše v Pá 01. 03. 2013 v 09:03 -0800: > > I would not enforce this but I would make it optional. By > other words, I > would take inspiration from the developers side where the > "random" names > in assigned fields just created false feeling that

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Some ideas about involving people in bug triaging

Mirosław Zalewski píše v So 23. 02. 2013 v 23:57 +0100: > On 22/02/2013 at 11:44, Petr Mladek wrote: > > > + at the end of the bugzilla assistant, see > > https://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/bug/ > > By the way: It would be really useful, if bug assistant provided l

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Should we use the "QA Contact" field?

Joel Madero píše v Út 26. 02. 2013 v 12:23 -0800: > Hm I have mixed feelings about these requirements. I think that what > it says is "this person prioritized the bug and did initial testing". > Personally if you say that any person who adds their name to there has > become indefinitely responsible

[Libreoffice-qa] [ANNOUNCE] libreoffice-4.0.1.2 tag created

plugin not recognized in LibO 3.6 (regression) [Andras Timar] fdo#55931 Autofit Text breaks subscript / superscript in Impress [Jan Holesovsky] fdo#57061 Not all personal data imported during install from /3 User Profile [Petr Mladek] fdo#57956 FORMATTING: Regression: text width scaling broken in

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] REMINDER: Release 4.0.1.2 from libreoffice-4-0-1 branch

Pedro píše v Po 25. 02. 2013 v 05:58 -0800: > Petr Mladek wrote > > Let's postpone the commit deadline by one day and do the tag on > > Wednesday morning. The 4.0.1.1 build have been officially available only > > since Thursday. There is only one week between these rcs,

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] REMINDER: Release 4.0.1.2 from libreoffice-4-0-1 branch

Petr Mladek píše v Čt 21. 02. 2013 v 15:16 +0100: > Hi, > > please note that the commit deadline for 4.0.1.2, aka rc2, is > already on Monday, February 25, 2013. It will be used as LO-4.0.1 > final if no blocker is reported. Let's postpone the commit deadline by one d

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Some ideas about involving people in bug triaging

Hi Miroslav, first, thanks a lot for the many great ideas. Mirosław Zalewski píše v Po 18. 02. 2013 v 18:44 +0100: > Hi > > I am long-time LibreOffice user who tries to help others on our users mailing > list. This caught an eye of Michael Meeks some time ago. He asked me whether > I > have s

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Looking for PyUno Contributor(s)

Joel Madero píše v St 20. 02. 2013 v 07:11 -0800: > Hi All! > > I am one of the members of the Quality Assurance team with LibreOffice > and we are looking for a volunteer to work with myself designing (and > coding) the framework to start automating our stats. It's been on my > list for much t

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Fw: Regression - LO Writer 4.0

r_ouellette píše v St 20. 02. 2013 v 12:05 -0800: > I'm using LO version 4.0.1.1 (Build ID: > 2c0c17a6e4bee0ee28131ea4bdc47edc700d659) since more than 3 hours on the same > 262 pages long Writer document and the problem seems solved! LO 64 bits > linux .deb version. > > Fluidity is back (like 3.6.

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] REMINDER: Release 4.0.1.2 from libreoffice-4-0-1 branch

Hi Dan, first thanks a lot for testing LibreOffice release candidates. It is important job. Dan Lewis píše v Čt 21. 02. 2013 v 09:39 -0500: > On 02/21/2013 09:16 AM, Petr Mladek wrote: > > IMPORTANT: There are not two weeks between rc1 and rc2 this time. It is > > another side eff

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [LibreOffice-QA] Conference Call - February 22nd, 2013 - 1400 UTC

Florian Reisinger píše v Čt 21. 02. 2013 v 17:13 +0100: > Hi, > > Due to I get no connection to talkyoo via Skype can anyone help me? Have you already added talkyoo_skype to your skype contacts? It does not work immediately. They have to confirm your contact which might take several hours or eve

[Libreoffice-qa] REMINDER: Release 4.0.1.2 from libreoffice-4-0-1 branch

Hi, please note that the commit deadline for 4.0.1.2, aka rc2, is already on Monday, February 25, 2013. It will be used as LO-4.0.1 final if no blocker is reported. IMPORTANT: There are not two weeks between rc1 and rc2 this time. It is another side effect of the late schedule change when we used

[Libreoffice-qa] [ANNOUNCE] libreoffice-4.0.1.1 tag created

ot clickable in textbox area of Impress slides (Lohit Hindi font only) [Caolán McNamara] fdo#55621 FILESAVE: default row heights not exported for xlsx [Noel Power] fdo#57061 Not all personal data imported during install from /3 User Profile [Petr Mladek] fdo#57417 LDAP address book support dis

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] LO manual test site (Moztrap) update and source code.

Yi Fan Jiang píše v Ne 17. 02. 2013 v 22:30 -0700: > Hi there, > > Because of the significant update of features and bug fixes, I was > trying an update of Libreoffice Moztrap from 1.0.X to 1.3.7 in last > couple of weeks. Mostly the work was to merge our own patches and > resolve data compatible

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Stagnant NEEDINFO bugs

Florian Reisinger píše v Čt 07. 02. 2013 v 16:36 +0100: > 71,43% NO INPUT > 28,57% SHOULD BE REVIEWED I think what might be a globally acceptable solution for our problem: + 20%-30% of wrongly closed bugs is relatively high number. It is realistic. I think that it corresponds w

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Stagnant NEEDINFO bugs

Robert Großkopf píše v Čt 07. 02. 2013 v 19:52 +0100: > Hi *, > > > > + https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52571 > > + BASE VBA DELETE COLUMN OR TABLE DOESN'T CHANGE THE SURFACE > > + minimalistic report => hard to understand > > + 5 months ago asked for more details and no a

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Stagnant NEEDINFO bugs

Robert Großkopf píše v Čt 07. 02. 2013 v 20:08 +0100: > Hi Petr, > > > > Also you could pay someone to work on a certain bug. There is a growing > > list of certified developers which are capable of doing such things. > > These are well spend money because they improve the product and motivate > >

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Stagnant NEEDINFO bugs

Alex Thurgood píše v Čt 07. 02. 2013 v 14:17 +0100: > Le 07/02/2013 13:32, Petr Mladek a écrit : > > Hi Petr, > > > I am confused. Are these bugs in NEEDINFO just because nobody found time > > to confirm them? If this is true, they should be in the state > > UNCONFI

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Stagnant NEEDINFO bugs

Dan Lewis píše v St 06. 02. 2013 v 10:35 -0500: > On 02/06/2013 09:50 AM, Robert Großkopf wrote: > > Hi Alex, > >> After suffering from the last two mass closure / re-initialisations of > >> status of a fair number of bugs I had spent time in opening, but for > >> lack of a dedicated developer / in

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Stagnant NEEDINFO bugs

Alex Thurgood píše v St 06. 02. 2013 v 14:09 +0100: > Le 06/02/2013 13:19, Michael Stahl a écrit : > > > > > > how many of your bugs are in NEEDINFO state? if the problem is really > > developer attention (and i don't doubt that this is the case for many > > bugs) then they should not be in NEED

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Stagnant NEEDINFO bugs

Alex Thurgood píše v St 06. 02. 2013 v 10:40 +0100: > Le 05/02/2013 13:03, Petr Mladek a écrit : > > All, > > After suffering from the last two mass closure / re-initialisations of > status of a fair number of bugs I had spent time in opening, but for > lack of a dedicated

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Stagnant NEEDINFO bugs

Rainer Bielefeld píše v Po 04. 02. 2013 v 19:23 +0100: > Hi all, > > I had the plan to write down some thoughts concerning your plans to do > an other mass close, but I wasn't in the mood to do that. Due to my > experience with bug wrangling in general and similar actions we did in > LibO Bugz

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Stagnant NEEDINFO bugs

Hi, I am going to vote on all open questions. It might speed up the voting process :-) Joel Madero píše v Po 04. 02. 2013 v 09:11 -0800: > > On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 9:09 AM, Petr Mladek wrote: > My understanding is that we want to proceed and close the > bugs. >

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Stagnant NEEDINFO bugs

Joel Madero píše v Po 04. 02. 2013 v 08:00 -0800: > Do we have a consensus on this? I'd like to pitch our idea to ESC this > week if possible. Don't want this to die and fade away into the abyss > of thoughts that didn't pan out ;) To be honest, I am a bit confused by the different opinions. My

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Poor migration of user profiles to LO 4 (was: What are "Preferences" when moving from 3.x to 4.x?)

Stephan Bergmann píše v Po 04. 02. 2013 v 12:54 +0100: > Quoting : > > "In general, what parts of an old user profile are migrated is > controlled by configuration settings in the > /org.openoffice.Setup/Migration tree (see > officecfg/re

  1   2   3   4   5   >