Hi,
Just random thought about the discussion. Please ignore me if it didn't
sounds good.
How about "discontinued" instead of "abandoned", with some automatic
message to describe why it is discontinued.
Note that sometimes user just fail and can't find procedure to reproduce on
his own.
For
On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 12:13 PM, Joel Madero wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>>
>> Insufficient Data though can also be used for situations where a bug can
>> not be reproduced due to, well, insufficient data.. i.e. happened one
>> time crash
> * ABANDONED
> * INSUFFICIENT DATA (RedHat)
> * EXPIRED (Launchpad)
Of these I like ABANDONED as it indicates that the user abandoned
his/her own bug. Insufficient Data is really wordy to me, Expired
indicates that the user could just set the bug back to UNCONFIRMED and
say "this is still a
Hi Joel,
On Monday, 2015-11-09 09:23:20 -0800, Joel Madero wrote:
> > * ABANDONED
> > * INSUFFICIENT DATA (RedHat)
> > * EXPIRED (Launchpad)
>
> Of these I like ABANDONED as it indicates that the user abandoned
> his/her own bug. Insufficient Data is really wordy to me,
Insufficient Data
On 11/09/2015 11:15 AM, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 07:10:44PM +0100, Eike Rathke wrote:
>> Insufficient Data though can also be used for situations where a bug can
>> not be reproduced due to, well, insufficient data.. i.e. happened one
>> time crash and no stack trace,
On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 07:10:44PM +0100, Eike Rathke wrote:
> Insufficient Data though can also be used for situations where a bug can
> not be reproduced due to, well, insufficient data.. i.e. happened one
> time crash and no stack trace, no exact steps to reproduce, even if the
> reporter was
>
>
> I think we should keep labeling those as INVALID
>
> IMHO the time spent to implement this new
> ABANDONED/EXPIRED/WHATEVERstate will be almost useless...
>
> in both cases the fault of the bug closure is the reporting user
> so I really do not care at all being diplomatic with people who
Hi Bjoern,
On Monday, 2015-11-09 20:15:39 +0100, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 07:10:44PM +0100, Eike Rathke wrote:
> > Insufficient Data though can also be used for situations where a bug can
> > not be reproduced due to, well, insufficient data.. i.e. happened one
> > time
Robinson Tryon wrote:
Hi all,
As mentioned in the ESC call, it could be helpful to add a new
Bugzilla Status that encompasses bugs that have been abandoned/don't
have enough data.
=> What type of bugs would this cover?
* User isn't willing to share private document with anyone, and we
can't