Hi Urmas,
I saw activity from you in bugzilla today, so i thought it was time to
make amends. Firstly, i'd like to say that i didnt snitch on you to the
moderator, a moderator saw our discussion and decided to do that
himself. I've been instructed that the best means of settling
differences
other bug reports in Bugzilla, so don't come here to
complain, crybaby. Instead try to be more polite and maybe (yes, maybe)
people be polite towards you.
Best regards.
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-Bacchanaly-around-Bug-81041-tp4117248p4117376
Interesting things happen in LO QA community.
Instead of reading 4.3 release notes, as an adequate person would, Jay
Philips in comment 15 starts being rude (and authoritative) to me, which I
—knowing about the dreck open source generally attracts— can look over; but
than he snitches me over
I suggest everyone ignore this
On 07/30/2014 10:38 AM, Urmas wrote:
Interesting things happen in LO QA community.
Instead of reading 4.3 release notes, as an adequate person would, Jay
Philips in comment 15 starts being rude (and authoritative) to me, which I
—knowing about the dreck open
Hi Urmas,
I'm not going to discuss the content of the bug itself. I'd like to
discuss some other things:
First of all: thanks for just bringing this to the list, instead of play
cat and mouse in Bugzilla which result in a huge spam.
Secondly, I'm not sure how you even can ask for an
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 7:58 PM, Sophie gautier.sop...@gmail.com wrote:
I would like to receive some
explanations about faggots and snitches in its public-faced parts
being the QA community.
What sort of answer do you expect? You want us to escalate on non sense?
OK sophie, I'm convinced...
